Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Self-attention in Vision Transformers Performs Perceptual Grouping, Not Attention

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.01542 v1 pith:A2A7QA5M submitted 2023-03-02 cs.CV

Self-attention in Vision Transformers Performs Perceptual Grouping, Not Attention

classification cs.CV
keywords attentionvisiontransformersmechanismsmodelsvisualeffectsgrouping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, a considerable number of studies in computer vision involves deep neural architectures called vision transformers. Visual processing in these models incorporates computational models that are claimed to implement attention mechanisms. Despite an increasing body of work that attempts to understand the role of attention mechanisms in vision transformers, their effect is largely unknown. Here, we asked if the attention mechanisms in vision transformers exhibit similar effects as those known in human visual attention. To answer this question, we revisited the attention formulation in these models and found that despite the name, computationally, these models perform a special class of relaxation labeling with similarity grouping effects. Additionally, whereas modern experimental findings reveal that human visual attention involves both feed-forward and feedback mechanisms, the purely feed-forward architecture of vision transformers suggests that attention in these models will not have the same effects as those known in humans. To quantify these observations, we evaluated grouping performance in a family of vision transformers. Our results suggest that self-attention modules group figures in the stimuli based on similarity in visual features such as color. Also, in a singleton detection experiment as an instance of saliency detection, we studied if these models exhibit similar effects as those of feed-forward visual salience mechanisms utilized in human visual attention. We found that generally, the transformer-based attention modules assign more salience either to distractors or the ground. Together, our study suggests that the attention mechanisms in vision transformers perform similarity grouping and not attention.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Human-like Object Grouping in Self-supervised Vision Transformers

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.5

    DINO self-supervised transformers best predict human same/different object RTs; object-centric patch affinity and Gram-matrix distillation explain and transfer the alignment.