Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Tests and estimation strategies associated to some loss functions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.12544 v4 pith:A5BT3LIQ submitted 2020-03-27 math.ST stat.TH

Tests and estimation strategies associated to some loss functions

classification math.ST stat.TH
keywords distributionlossmodelestimationtruefunctionprobabilitiesapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the problem of estimating the joint distribution of $n$ independent random variables. Our approach is based on a family of candidate probabilities that we shall call a model and which is chosen to either contain the true distribution of the data or at least to provide a good approximation of it with respect to some loss function. The aim of the present paper is to describe a general estimation strategy that allows to adapt to both the specific features of the model and the choice of the loss function in view of designing an estimator with good estimation properties. The losses we have in mind are based on the total variation, Hellinger, Wasserstein and $\mathbb{L}_p$-distances to name a few. We show that the risk of the resulting estimator with respect to the loss function can be bounded by the sum of an approximation term accounting for the loss between the true distribution and the model and a complexity term that corresponds to the bound we would get if this distribution did belong to the model. Our results hold under mild assumptions on the true distribution of the data and are based on exponential deviation inequalities that are non-asymptotic and involve explicit constants. When the model reduces to two distinct probabilities, we show how our estimation strategy leads to a robust test whose errors of first and second kinds only depend on the losses between the true distribution and the two tested probabilities.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bathtubs, Boundaries, and Sandboxes: AI Regulatory Learning under Legal Uncertainty

    cs.CY 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0

    AI technical sandboxes, standardized and machine-readable, are framed as the essential micro-level evidence generator for adaptive regulatory learning under the EU AI Act.