Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Benchmarking LLM powered Chatbots: Methods and Metrics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.04624 v1 pith:A5VPEZSI submitted 2023-08-08 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords benchmarkchatbotsmetricspoweredbenchmarkingchatbotcosineespecially
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Autonomous conversational agents, i.e. chatbots, are becoming an increasingly common mechanism for enterprises to provide support to customers and partners. In order to rate chatbots, especially ones powered by Generative AI tools like Large Language Models (LLMs) we need to be able to accurately assess their performance. This is where chatbot benchmarking becomes important. In this paper, we propose the use of a novel benchmark that we call the E2E (End to End) benchmark, and show how the E2E benchmark can be used to evaluate accuracy and usefulness of the answers provided by chatbots, especially ones powered by LLMs. We evaluate an example chatbot at different levels of sophistication based on both our E2E benchmark, as well as other available metrics commonly used in the state of art, and observe that the proposed benchmark show better results compared to others. In addition, while some metrics proved to be unpredictable, the metric associated with the E2E benchmark, which uses cosine similarity performed well in evaluating chatbots. The performance of our best models shows that there are several benefits of using the cosine similarity score as a metric in the E2E benchmark.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Inference performance evaluation for LLMs on edge devices with a novel benchmarking framework and metric

    cs.PF 2025-08 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A benchmarking study of LLM inference on three edge devices with a proposed MBU metric that reduces to a standard throughput normalization.

Pith tools