REVIEW 1 cited by
Metallicity Bias in the Kinematics of the Milky Way Stellar Halo
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Metallicity Bias in the Kinematics of the Milky Way Stellar Halo
read the original abstract
Here we study the metallicity bias in the velocity dispersions, the derived quantity called anisotropy and the mean azimuthal velocity profiles of the Milky Way stellar halo using Blue Horizontal Branch (BHB) stars taken from SDSS/SEGUE survey. The comparatively metal-rich sample ([Fe/H]>-2) has prograde motion and is found to have an offset of 40 km/s in the mean azimuthal velocity with respect to a metal-poor sample ([Fe/H]<=-2) which has retrograde motion. The difference in rotation between the most metal-poor and most metal-rich population was found to be around 65 km/s. For galactocentric distances r<16 kpc, an offset in velocity dispersion profiles and anisotropy can also be seen. In the inner regions, the metal-poor population is in average tangential orbit; however, anisotropy is found to decrease monotonically with radius independent of metallicity. Beyond r = 16 kpc, both the metal-rich and the metal-poor samples are found to have tangential motion. The metallicity bias in the kinematics of the halo stars qualitatively supports the co-existence of at least two-components in the halo having different formation history e.g. in-situ formation and formation by accretion.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
From metallicity distributions to mutual information: A new perspective on stellar halo assembly
Mutual information between angular position and binary metallicity increases with radius in all five Aquarius stellar halos, and after satellite removal the residual signal is confined to the inner ~30-50 kpc.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.