Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Attack of the Genes: Finding Keys and Parameters of Locked Analog ICs Using Genetic Algorithm

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.13904 v1 pith:A6RYT2CA submitted 2020-03-31 cs.CR cs.NE

Attack of the Genes: Finding Keys and Parameters of Locked Analog ICs Using Genetic Algorithm

classification cs.CR cs.NE
keywords analogattacklockingcircuitslockedobfuscationtechniquesalgorithm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Hardware intellectual property (IP) theft is a major issue in today's globalized supply chain. To address it, numerous logic locking and obfuscation techniques have been proposed. While locking initially focused on digital integrated circuits (ICs), there have been recent attempts to extend it to analog ICs, which are easier to reverse engineer and to copy than digital ICs. In this paper, we use algorithms based on evolutionary strategies to investigate the security of analog obfuscation/locking techniques. We present a genetic algorithm (GA) approach which is capable of completely breaking a locked analog circuit by finding either its obfuscation key or its obfuscated parameters. We implement both the GA attack as well as a more naive satisfiability modulo theory (SMT)-based attack on common analog benchmark circuits obfuscated by combinational locking and parameter biasing. We find that GA attack can unlock all the circuits using only the locked netlist and an unlocked chip in minutes. On the other hand, while the SMT attack converges faster, it requires circuit specification to execute and it also returns multiple keys that need to be brute-forced by a post-processing step. We also discuss how the GA attack can generalize to other recent analog locking techniques not tested in the paper

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.