Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the Nonlinearity of Layer Normalization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.01255 v1 pith:ABXLKEAX submitted 2024-06-03 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords nonlinearitylayerln-netcapacityexperimentsnormalizationrepresentationsupported
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Layer normalization (LN) is a ubiquitous technique in deep learning but our theoretical understanding to it remains elusive. This paper investigates a new theoretical direction for LN, regarding to its nonlinearity and representation capacity. We investigate the representation capacity of a network with layerwise composition of linear and LN transformations, referred to as LN-Net. We theoretically show that, given $m$ samples with any label assignment, an LN-Net with only 3 neurons in each layer and $O(m)$ LN layers can correctly classify them. We further show the lower bound of the VC dimension of an LN-Net. The nonlinearity of LN can be amplified by group partition, which is also theoretically demonstrated with mild assumption and empirically supported by our experiments. Based on our analyses, we consider to design neural architecture by exploiting and amplifying the nonlinearity of LN, and the effectiveness is supported by our experiments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Mathematical Impossibility of Safe Universal Approximators

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    This preprint argues that useful universal approximators must have dense catastrophic failures, but the proof rests on unproven measure convergence and circular use of adversarial examples.

Pith tools