Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 299 references

Hybrid Quantum Neural Networks: Theory, Implementations, and Applications

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review argues that hybrid quantum neural networks earn their keep only when the problem's structure — symmetry, spectral bias, or quantum-native data — matches the quantum layer, and that generic circuits do not yet beat classical base

desk verdict A broad, balanced HQNN review whose central map is credible but whose applications table is a self-cited grab bag that needs re-collection before the empirical claims can be taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.01194 v1 pith:ACYSIXV3 submitted 2026-08-02 quant-ph cs.ETcs.LG

Léo Monbroussou , Maniraman Periyasamy , Viacheslav Kuzmin , Pavel Sekatski , Viktoria Patapovich , Asel Sagingalieva , Alexey Melnikov This is my paper
classification quant-phcs.ETcs.LG
keywords hybridquantumneuralnetworksmachinelearningvariationalcircuitsbarrenplateausdequantizationFouriermodelsreservoircomputingbenchmarking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review maps where hybrid quantum–classical neural networks (HQNNs) help and where they do not. It argues that the value of a quantum layer cannot be read off the size of the Hilbert space it acts on: expressivity, trainability, and classical simulability interact so tightly that ansatzes which are provably trainable tend to admit efficient classical surrogates. The informed regimes, it concludes, are data-scarce tasks with exploitable symmetries, problems whose structure matches a quantum layer's inductive bias, and settings where parameter efficiency or model size is the binding constraint. Generic variational circuits on ordinary classical data, by contrast, are consistently matched or beaten by well-tuned classical baselines.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the Quantum Fourier Model identity: a broad class of data-encoding variational circuits computes truncated Fourier series $f(x,\theta)=\sum_{\omega\in\Omega} c_\omega(\theta)e^{i\omega^T x}$, with the accessible spectrum $\Omega$ fixed by the encoding gates and the coefficients $c_\omega(\theta)$ fixed by the trainable unitaries. This identity ties inductive bias to a concrete spectral structure, and it drives the review's three-way analysis of expressivity (spectrum size), trainability (barren plateaus), and dequantization (classical surrogates on polynomial sub-spectra). The complementary mechanism is the trainability–simulability trade-off: proofs of barren-p

What would settle it

An independent large-scale benchmark (hundreds of datasets, matched compute budgets) in which unstructured variational quantum layers consistently beat well-tuned classical baselines on generic classical data lacking symmetry or data scarcity would overturn the review's central conclusion; the claim would also be weakened if a re-analysis of Table III showed the favorable entries vanish once classical baselines are equally resourced.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the field now has a reliable map rather than a collection of anecdotes. Concretely: variational quantum circuits with angle encoding realize truncated Fourier series (Quantum Fourier Models); their spectrum, set by the encoding gates, controls what they can represent, while barren-plateau results constrain what can be trained, and classical surrogates (random-feature, tensor-network, Pauli-propagation) can mimic what is trainable. The interaction of these three facts yields the review's synthesis: 'the value of an HQNN cannot be read off the size of its Hilbert space,' and the regimes where a quantum layer is the informed choice are structured, small-scale,

Load-bearing premise

The whole map depends on the surveyed evidence being representative: Table III's favorable parameter-reduction and accuracy results were collected without stated inclusion criteria, and the review itself cites benchmarks finding classical baselines match or beat quantum classifiers.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Generic variational quantum layers are unlikely to beat well-tuned classical baselines on ordinary classical datasets; entanglement by itself is often neutral or harmful at small scales.
  • A quantum layer earns its place when the problem exhibits symmetry, periodicity, or other structure matching the layer's inductive bias, or when the data are quantum-native.
  • Data scarcity is a friend of quantum layers: parameter efficiency at fixed accuracy is where the reported gains are most consistent.
  • Provable quantum advantages in learning are real but require hidden algebraic structure (e.g., cryptographic functions) or quantum data access; they are properties of the problem, not of the model family.
  • On fault-tolerant hardware, the binding cost shifts from noise to deterministic T-gate synthesis and magic-state budgets, so structured ansatzes that cap non-Clifford content become the credible candidates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the trainability–simulability trade-off is as tight as the review suggests, then the practical route to quantum advantage may be through data access (preparing and measuring quantum states) rather than through the trainable circuit itself.
  • The review's regime map implies a testable scaling law: as dataset size grows and structure weakens, the performance gap between structured HQNNs and classical baselines should narrow; benchmarks that sweep these two axes could locate the boundary precisely.
  • The same Fourier-spectrum analysis that explains quantum inductive bias also connects to classical architectures like Fourier feature networks; the paper's synthesis suggests that the quantum-versus-classical question is less about capacity than about which physical resource (qubits vs parameters) is cheaper for a given spectral structure.
  • Energy and parameter counts, not just accuracy, may be where hybrid models eventually differentiate themselves; the review's discussion of photonic and room-temperature platforms points to a testable claim that energy-per-gradient-step could favor certain quantum modalities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review surveys hybrid quantum neural networks (HQNNs), covering the theoretical foundations (Fourier-series models, trainability and barren plateaus, controllability, dequantization and classical surrogates), the main architectural paradigms (subspace-preserving ansatzes, quantum reservoir computing, linear combinations of unitaries, quantum generative models, and fault-tolerant primitives), the classical/quantum software stack and hardware platforms, and an empirical survey across time-series forecasting, image classification, computational fluid dynamics, and planning/logistics. The paper's central synthesis, stated most explicitly in Section VII, is that an HQNN's value cannot be read from its Hilbert-space dimension: generic variational circuits are often either untrainable or classically simulable, while quantum layers help in specific regimes—data-scarce tasks with exploitable symmetries, problems whose structure matches a quantum layer's inductive bias, and settings where parameter efficiency is the binding constraint. The review explicitly acknowledges the mixed empirical evidence, including large-scale benchmarks where classical models match or outperform quantum classifiers, and identifies open challenges in trainability at scale, benchmarking practice, hardware paths, and integration with classical ML stacks.

Significance. If the synthesis is accepted with appropriate caveats, this review provides a genuinely useful map of a fragmented field. Its main strengths are its balanced treatment of negative evidence—especially the classical-surrogate results of [51], the 160-dataset benchmark of [64], and the time-series benchmark of [65]—and its clear articulation of the trainability/simulability trade-off. The paper also gives a broad, mostly accurate taxonomy of architectures and of the current software/hardware stack, and it states its conclusions in a falsifiable form that can guide future benchmark design. The review does not present new proofs or code, but its value lies in consolidation and in framing the open questions. The principal risk to the paper's contribution is that the positive empirical record, consolidated in Table III, is presented without the methodological transparency needed to support the 'informed regimes' conclusion.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section VI.A and Table III] The central empirical support for the 'informed regimes' claim rests on Table III, but the table has no stated inclusion criteria, search strategy, or baseline-quality threshold. Several rows come from the authors' own group (e.g., [80], [315], [317], [321], [349], [352], [353], [356]), and the metric 'Param. Red.' is not defined: entries range from 0.07% (Medical MNIST) to 87.9% (MNIST) with no specification of whether these are remaining-parameter fractions or reduction ratios. Simulator and QPU results are pooled without error bars, and classical baselines are not characterized as tuned or out-of-the-box. Since Section VI.B itself reports independent benchmarks [64,65] in which generic quantum classifiers do not beat classical baselines, the claim in Section VII that 'the empirical record ... is consistent with this theoretical picture' is not established unless Table III is either sy
  2. [Section VII vs. Section III.B2] The synthesis states that 'ansatzes that are provably trainable seem to admit classical simulation methods.' This is too strong in view of the paper's own Section III.B2, which reports that barren plateaus can be avoided heuristically using IQP circuits [162] and quantum graph neural networks [163] with no known classical simulation method. The word 'seem' provides some hedge, but the blanket formulation misses the explicit exceptions already discussed in the manuscript. Since this trade-off is load-bearing for the paper's proposed research directions, the statement should be qualified to acknowledge these counterexamples, or the counterexamples should be argued away.
  3. [Section VI.C.2 and Table III] The figure-of-merit discussion is welcome, but it is not connected to the empirical table. The energy-consumption analysis cites preliminary estimates that current QPUs do not generally offer energy advantages over GPUs for ML workloads, while Table III reports only accuracy and parameter-reduction numbers. If energy or other non-accuracy metrics are to be part of the assessment, the review should state which entries in Table III would survive a comparison on those metrics, or clearly separate accuracy claims from resource-usage claims.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section VI.A.a] There is a broken sentence beginning 'instances[65]benchmarked...' that is missing a subject and spacing; it should be rewritten, e.g., 'The authors of [65] benchmarked...'.
  2. [Throughout] Several typos should be corrected: 'strugle' (Sec. VI.A.a), 'algoritm' (Sec. VI.C.1), 'measuremtn' (Sec. II.B.4), 'andand' (Sec. V.D), and 'recent recent' (Sec. VI.B).
  3. [Table III] The table would benefit from a footnote defining 'Param. Red.' and specifying how classical baselines were tuned, the number of runs, and whether results are on simulated or QPU backends with associated uncertainties.
  4. [Figure 12] The shaded regions in the figure are described in the text but not labeled in the figure itself; a legend would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a review whose central synthesis is supported by external theory and independent benchmarks, not by a derivation from fitted inputs.

full rationale

This is a review paper, not an original derivation; it contains no chain of equations in which an output is fed back as an input or in which a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The central claim in Section VII—that HQNN value depends on problem structure rather than Hilbert-space dimension and that generically trainable ansatzes tend to be classically simulable—is anchored in external theoretical results: the Fourier-series characterization of variational models [54], barren-plateau and concentration results [137,138], and classical-surrogation/dequantization results [51,121,122,161]. None of these are the authors' own results, and the review does not derive them from its own fitted data. Table III does include several rows from the authors' own group (e.g., [80], [321], [349], [352], [353]), and the table lacks stated inclusion criteria, but this is an evidence-selection and representativeness concern, not a circularity. The review itself repeatedly invokes the independent negative benchmarks [64,65] and explicitly states that generic architectures do not yet carry gains to scale, so the positive rows are presented as small-scale promising results rather than as the proof of the central theoretical map. No passage exhibits a reduction of a claimed result to its own inputs, and no load-bearing premise is justified only by a self-citation. The honest finding is therefore no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review, so the ledger contains no fitted parameters and no invented entities. Its epistemic weight is carried entirely by the accuracy and representativeness of the cited literature plus standard background. The only number-bearing assertions are cited values (hardware figures in Table II, parameter reductions in Table III) whose provenance is the primary literature.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The cited primary literature is accurately summarized and exists as described.
    Every factual claim in Sections III, V, and VI, including Tables I-III, inherits the correctness of the cited works; verifying all 376 references is beyond a single reading.
  • domain assumption The literature selected for the survey is representative of the HQNN field.
    Section VI and Table III present positive results without stated inclusion criteria, while the authors acknowledge independent benchmarks with negative results in Section VI.B.
  • standard math Standard quantum-information background: unitary evolution, tensor-product Hilbert spaces, parameter-shift rules, Lie-algebraic controllability, and Fourier representation of angle-encoded circuits.
    Sections II and III restate these as background; no new proofs are offered.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hybrid Quantum Neural Networks: Theory, Implementations, and Applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ACYSIXV3

@misc{pith2026260801194,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hybrid Quantum Neural Networks: Theory, Implementations, and Applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ACYSIXV3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.01194}
}
read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence has been transformed by deep neural networks, yet the search for new learning architectures continues. Quantum machine learning offers one such direction, and hybrid quantum neural networks, which combine classical neural-network components with quantum information processing units, have emerged as a practical framework for near-term quantum technologies. However, the rapid development of the field across diverse architectures, benchmarks and hardware assumptions makes it difficult to assess the utility of various proposals, identify where genuine advantages may arise, and determine how practitioners can use these models. While recent benchmarks caution that such gains have not yet been demonstrated at scale, theoretical work has identified tasks on which quantum models hold provable advantages, and hybrid approaches have delivered promising results on practical problems using deliberately compact quantum components and substantially fewer trainable parameters. Here, we review hybrid quantum neural networks for the machine-learning and quantum-machine-learning communities. We summarize their main theoretical and methodological foundations, survey some of the most promising architectures developed so far, and examine their implementation challenges and reported performance. By consolidating these perspectives, this review provides a structured view of the state of the field and helps identify promising paths for future research and application-driven development.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.01194 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Architecture example of a hybrid quantum neural network. A classical computer handles data pre- and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Exponential growth trends in quantum hardware and Quantum Machine Learning (QML) research. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The trade-off between the two main data-encoding strategies, illustrated on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: QNN as a truncated Fourier series, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Illustration of Random Feature Surrogate. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Hybrid Quantum Neural Network consists of different types of layers: quantum (orange boxes), classical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Linear Optical Circuit (a) and equivalent unitary given by the photonic homomorphism (b), see the text. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Principles of quantum reservoir computing. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Quantum circuit implementing a linear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Layered architecture of the HQNN software [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Placement of representative QPUs in the plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_12.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [51]

    L.MauronandG.Carleo,arXivpreprintarXiv:2503.08247 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  2. [64]

    Auffèves, PRX Quantum3, 020101 (2022)

    A. Auffèves, PRX Quantum3, 020101 (2022)

    2022

  3. [65]

    Jaschke and S

    D. Jaschke and S. Montangero, Quantum Science and Technology8, 025001 (2023)

    2023

  4. [80]

    Schuld and F

    M. Schuld and F. Petruccione,Machine Learning with Quantum Computers(Springer, Cham, 2021)

    2021

  5. [162]

    K. Shen, S. Pielawa, V. Dunjko, and H. Wang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.11042 10.48550/arXiv.2602.11042 (2026), arXiv:2602.11042 [quant-ph]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.11042 2026

  6. [163]

    Lerch, R

    S. Lerch, R. Puig, M. S. Rudolph, A. Angrisani, T. Jones, M. Cerezo, S. Thanasilp, and Z. Holmes, PRX Quantum 7, 020359 (2026), arXiv:2411.19896 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  7. [1]

    quantum- ness

    Hardware-modality dependence Superconductingprocessors are the main target for surface-code architectures. Their fast gate clock par- tially absorbs the inflated logical-circuit depth, but the 𝑂(𝑑 2)overhead is felt directly, since cryogenic wiring and control electronics already constrain physical-qubit growth, and routing on a nearest-neighbor lattice f...

  8. [2]

    Several sampling-based quantum mod- els are believed to be classically intractable

    Running time and complexity The computational complexity of HQNNs is inti- mately tied to the hardness of simulating quantum cir- cuits classically. Several sampling-based quantum mod- els are believed to be classically intractable. For exam- ple,BosonSampling[212]andIQPcircuits[366]arecon- jectured to be classically hard. More broadly, large ran- dom qua...

Show all 299 references
  1. [3]

    Param. Red

    Energy Consumption The energy footprint of training and inference is an increasingly important metric, particularly as classical deeplearningmodelsgrowtobillionsofparameterswith associated carbon costs [368, 369]. Comparative energy analysis between quantum and classical compu...

  2. [4]

    com/blog/quantum-volume-record-2025-september (2025), quantum Volume2 25 =33,554,432on System Model H2

    Quantinuum, Quantinuum achieves highest-ever 33.5 million quantum volume,https://www.quantinuum. com/blog/quantum-volume-record-2025-september (2025), quantum Volume2 25 =33,554,432on System Model H2

    2025

  3. [5]

    A.Ransford,M.S.Allman,J.Arkinstall,etal.,Nature655, 81 (2026), 98 qubits,137Ba+ hyperfine qubits, two-qubit gate fidelity 99.921%

    2026

  4. [6]

    ibm.com/quantum/hardware(2025), 120 qubits, square lattice, 218 tunable couplers, 5000 two-qubit gates

    IBM,IBMquantumNighthawkprocessor,https://www. ibm.com/quantum/hardware(2025), 120 qubits, square lattice, 218 tunable couplers, 5000 two-qubit gates

    2025

  5. [7]

    ibm.com/roadmaps/quantum/2025/(2025), nighthawk (2025), Kookaburra 4158-qubit system (2026), Starling FTQC (2029), Blue Jay (2033)

    IBM, IBM quantum roadmap 2025–2033,https://www. ibm.com/roadmaps/quantum/2025/(2025), nighthawk (2025), Kookaburra 4158-qubit system (2026), Starling FTQC (2029), Blue Jay (2033)

    2025

  6. [8]

    AbuGhanem, The Journal of Supercomputing81, 687 (2025)

    M. AbuGhanem, The Journal of Supercomputing81, 687 (2025)

    2025

  7. [9]

    Priem, H

    J. Priem, H. Piwowar, and R. Orr, arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01833 (2022),dataretrievedFebruary2026via https://api.openalex.org

    2022 arXiv

  8. [10]

    J. W. Ayers, A. Poliak, M. Dredze,et al., JAMA Internal Medicine183, 589 (2023)

    2023

  9. [11]

    N. Guha, J. Nyarko, D. E. Ho,et al., inProceedings of the 37thInternationalConferenceonNeuralInformationProcess- ing Systems, NIPS ’23 (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 2023)

    2023

  10. [12]

    J. P. Carvallo and L. Erazo-Garzón, inProceedings of the 18th Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO2023)(Springer-Verlag,Berlin,Heidelberg,2023) pp. 328–342

    2023

  11. [13]

    B. Cao, S. Wang, X. Lin, X. Wu, H. Zhang, L. M. Ni, and J. Guo, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21422 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  12. [14]

    P.Covington,J.Adams,andE.Sargin,inProceedingsofthe 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys ’16 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2016) pp. 191–198

    2016

  13. [15]

    J. M. Jumper, R. Evans, A. Pritzel,et al., Nature596, 583 (2021)

    2021

  14. [16]

    Yamada, R

    Y. Yamada, R. T. Lange, C. Lu, S. Hu, C. Lu, J. Foer- ster,J.Clune,andD.Ha,arXivpreprintarXiv:2504.08066 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  15. [17]

    A.Ramesh,P.Dhariwal,A.Nichol,C.Chu,andM.Chen, arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  16. [18]

    OpenAI, Video generation models as world simulators,https://openai.com/research/ video-generation-models-as-world-simulators (2024), accessed: 2026-06-15

    2024

  17. [19]

    Badue, R

    C. Badue, R. Guidolini, R. V. Carneiro,et al., Expert Sys- tems with Applications165, 113816 (2021)

    2021

  18. [20]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition(Cam- bridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  19. [21]

    P. W. Shor, SIAM Journal on Computing26, 1484 (1997)

    1997

  20. [22]

    L. K. Grover, inProceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Sym- posiumonTheoryofComputing(STOC’96)(1996)pp.212– 219. 28

    1996

  21. [23]

    Aaronson, Nature Physics11, 291 (2015)

    S. Aaronson, Nature Physics11, 291 (2015)

    2015

  22. [24]

    Preskill, Quantum2, 79 (2018)

    J. Preskill, Quantum2, 79 (2018)

    2018

  23. [25]

    Arute, K

    F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R.Barends,R.Biswas,S.Boixo,F.G.Brandao,D.A.Buell, et al., Nature574, 505 (2019)

    2019

  24. [26]

    Biamonte, P

    J. Biamonte, P. Wittek, N. Pancotti, P. Rebentrost, N. Wiebe, and S. Lloyd, Nature549, 195 (2017)

    2017

  25. [27]

    Kaplan, S

    J. Kaplan, S. McCandlish, T. Henighan,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361 (2020)

    2001 arXiv

  26. [28]

    Nakkiran, G

    P. Nakkiran, G. Kaplun, Y. Bansal, T. Yang, B. Barak, and I.Sutskever,JournalofStatisticalMechanics: Theoryand Experiment2021, 124003 (2021)

    2021

  27. [29]

    A.Radford,K.Narasimhan,T.Salimans,andI.Sutskever, Improving language understanding by generative pre- training, OpenAI Technical Report (2018)

    2018

  28. [30]

    Radford, J

    A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, and I. Sutskever, Language models are unsupervised multi- task learners, OpenAI Technical Report (2019)

    2019

  29. [31]

    T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Ka- plan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell,et al., inAdvances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems, Vol. 33 (2020) pp. 1877–1901

    2020

  30. [32]

    Achiam, S

    OpenAI, J. Achiam, S. Adler,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  31. [33]

    OpenAI, GPT-5 system card,https://openai.com/ index/gpt-5-system-card/(2025), accessed: 2026-06- 15

    2025

  32. [34]

    Cheng, M

    H. Cheng, M. Zhang, and J. Q. Shi, IEEE Transac- tions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence46, 10.1109/tpami.2024.3447085 (2024)

    2024

  33. [35]

    Keutzer, inLow-Power Computer Vision(Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2022) pp

    A.Gholami,S.Kim,Z.Dong,Z.Yao,M.W.Mahoney,and K. Keutzer, inLow-Power Computer Vision(Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2022) pp. 291–326

    2022

  34. [36]

    Hinton, O

    G. Hinton, O. Vinyals, and J. Dean, arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531 (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  35. [37]

    W. Cai, J. Jiang, F. Wang, J. Tang, S. Kim, and J. Huang, IEEETransactionsonKnowledgeandDataEngineering, 1 (2025), early access

    2025

  36. [38]

    Hernandez and T

    D. Hernandez and T. B. Brown, arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.04305 (2020)

    2005 arXiv

  37. [39]

    Y. Liu, S. Arunachalam, and K. Temme, Nature Physics 17, 1013 (2021)

    2021

  38. [40]

    Huang, M

    H.-Y. Huang, M. Broughton, J. Cotler,et al., Science376, 1182 (2022)

    2022

  39. [41]

    I.Cong,S.Choi,andM.D.Lukin,NaturePhysics15,1273 (2019)

    2019

  40. [42]

    Hartnett, Does Neven’s law describe quantum com- puting’s rise?, Quanta Magazine (2019), based on obser- vations by Hartmut Neven, Google Quantum AI

    K. Hartnett, Does Neven’s law describe quantum com- puting’s rise?, Quanta Magazine (2019), based on obser- vations by Hartmut Neven, Google Quantum AI

    2019

  41. [43]

    Cho, C.-Y

    C.-H. Cho, C.-Y. Chen, K.-C. Chen, T.-W. Huang, M.-C. Hsu, N.-P. Cao, B. Zeng, S.-Y. Kuo, and D. Reitzner, Chi- nese Journal of Physics72, 248 (2021)

    2021

  42. [44]

    Google Quantum AI, Meet Willow, our state-of-the- art quantum chip,https://blog.google/technology/ research/google-willow-quantum-chip/(2024), 105 qubits, below-threshold error correction, 100𝜇s coher- ence

    2024

  43. [45]

    Y. Kim, A. Eddins, S. Anand, K. X. Wei, E. Van Den Berg, S. Rosenblatt, H. Nayfeh, Y. Wu, M. Zaletel, K. Temme, et al., Nature618, 500 (2023)

    2023

  44. [46]

    A. D. Kinget al., Science387(2025)

    2025

  45. [47]

    Google Quantum AI and Collaborators, Nature646, 825 (2025)

    2025

  46. [48]

    Huang, F

    C. Huang, F. Zhang, M. Newman, J. Cai, X. Gao, Z. Tian, J. Wu, H. Xu, H. Yu, B. Yuan,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.06787 (2020)

    2005 arXiv

  47. [49]

    Tindall, M

    J. Tindall, M. Fishman, E. M. Stoudenmire, and D. Sels, PRX Quantum5, 010308 (2024)

    2024

  48. [50]

    Begusic and G

    T. Begusic and G. K.-L. Chan, Science Advances10, 10.1126/sciadv.adk4321 (2024)

    2024 doi

  49. [52]

    IBM,Whatisquantumutility? (2024),accessed: 2024-06- 23

    2024

  50. [53]

    A. Mari, T. R. Bromley, J. Izaac, M. Schuld, and N. Killo- ran, Quantum4, 340 (2020)

    2020

  51. [54]

    Bermejo, P

    P. Bermejo, P. Braccia, M. S. Rudolph, Z. Holmes, L. Cin- cio, and M. Cerezo, PRX Quantum7, 020304 (2026)

    2026

  52. [55]

    Aaronson, inProceedings of the 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2018 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2018) pp

    S. Aaronson, inProceedings of the 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2018 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2018) pp. 325–338

    2018

  53. [56]

    Huang, M

    H.-Y. Huang, M. Broughton, M. Mohseni, R. Babbush, S. Boixo, H. Neven, and J. R. McClean, Nature Commu- nications12, 2631 (2021)

    2021

  54. [57]

    Schuld, R

    M. Schuld, R. Sweke, and J. J. Meyer, Physical Review A 103, 10.1103/physreva.103.032430 (2021)

    2021 doi

  55. [58]

    Sitzmann, J

    V. Sitzmann, J. N. Martel, A. W. Bergman, D. B. Lindell, and G. Wetzstein, inAdvances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, Vol. 33 (2020)

    2020

  56. [59]

    Tancik, P

    M. Tancik, P. P. Srinivasan, B. Mildenhall, S. Fridovich- Keil,N.Raghavan,U.Singhal,R.Ramamoorthi,J.T.Bar- ron, and R. Ng, inAdvances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems, Vol. 33 (2020)

    2020

  57. [60]

    Z. Li, N. Kovachki, K. Azizzadenesheli, B. Liu, K. Bhatt, A.Stuart,andA.Anandkumar,inInternationalConference on Learning Representations(2021)

    2021

  58. [61]

    Kordzanganeh, P

    M. Kordzanganeh, P. Sekatski, L. Fedichkin, and A. Mel- nikov, Machine Learning: Science and Technology4, 035036 (2023)

    2023

  59. [62]

    Latorre, Quantum4, 226 (2020)

    A.Pérez-Salinas,A.Cervera-Lierta,E.Gil-Fuster,andJ.I. Latorre, Quantum4, 226 (2020)

    2020

  60. [63]

    1 (IEEE, 2025) pp

    M.Wiedmann,M.Periyasamy,andD.D.Scherer,in2025 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), Vol. 1 (IEEE, 2025) pp. 1785–1795

    2025

  61. [66]

    Fellous-Asiani, J

    M. Fellous-Asiani, J. H. Chai, R. S. Whitney, A. Auffèves, and H. K. Ng, PRX Quantum2, 040335 (2021)

    2021

  62. [67]

    Bowles, S

    J. Bowles, S. Ahmed, and M. Schuld, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07059 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  63. [68]

    Fellner, D

    T. Fellner, D. A. Kreplin, S. Tovey, and C. Holm, Machine Learning: Science and Technology7, 010501 (2026)

    2026

  64. [69]

    M.C.Caro,H.-Y.Huang,M.Cerezo,K.Sharma,A.Sorn- borger,L.Cincio,andP.J.Coles,NatureCommunications 13, 10.1038/s41467-022-32550-3 (2022)

    2022 doi

  65. [70]

    Goodfellow, Y

    I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville,Deep learning (MIT press, 2016)

    2016

  66. [71]

    Hornik, M

    K. Hornik, M. Stinchcombe, and H. White, Neural Net- works2, 359 (1989)

    1989

  67. [72]

    LeCun, L

    Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner, Proceed- ings of the IEEE86, 2278 (1998)

    1998

  68. [73]

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, inProc. IEEE CVPR 29 (2016) pp. 770–778

    2016

  69. [74]

    Hochreiter and J

    S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, Neural Computation 9, 1735 (1997)

    1997

  70. [75]

    Benedetti, E

    M. Benedetti, E. Lloyd, S. Sack, and M. Fiorentini, Quan- tum Science and Technology4, 043001 (2019)

    2019

  71. [76]

    Cerezo, A

    M. Cerezo, A. Arrasmith, R. Babbush,et al., Nature Re- views Physics3, 625 (2021)

    2021

  72. [77]

    de Wolf, arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.09415 (2019)

    R. de Wolf, arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.09415 (2019)

    1907 arXiv

  73. [78]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Reviews of modern physics81, 865 (2009)

    2009

  74. [79]

    Bluvstein, A

    D. Bluvstein, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li,et al., Nature649, 39 (2026)

    2026

  75. [81]

    Sagingalieva, M

    A. Sagingalieva, M. Kordzanganeh, N. Kenbayev, D. Kosichkina, T. Tomashuk, and A. Melnikov, Cancers 15, 2705 (2023)

    2023

  76. [82]

    Lusnig, A

    L. Lusnig, A. Sagingalieva, M. Surmach, T. Protase- vich, O. Michiu, J. McLoughlin, C. Mansell, G. de’Petris, D.Bonazza,F.Zanconati,etal.,Diagnostics14,558(2024)

    2024

  77. [83]

    Sagingalieva, S

    A. Sagingalieva, S. Komornyik, A. Senokosov, A. Joshi, C.Mansell,O.Tsurkan,K.Pinto,M.Pflitsch,andA.Mel- nikov, Solar Energy302, 114016 (2025)

    2025

  78. [84]

    Periyasamy, N

    M. Periyasamy, N. Meyer, C. Ufrecht, D. D. Scherer, A. Plinge, and C. Mutschler, in2022 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) (IEEE, 2022) pp. 31–37

    2022

  79. [85]

    Periyasamy, M

    M. Periyasamy, M. Hölle, M. Wiedmann, D. D. Scherer, A. Plinge, and C. Mutschler, in2024 International Joint ConferenceonNeuralNetworks(IJCNN)(IEEE,2024)pp.1– 9

    2024

  80. [86]

    Long and Y

    G.-L. Long and Y. Sun, Physical Review A64, 014303 (2001)

    2001

  81. [87]

    Plesch and Č

    M. Plesch and Č. Brukner, Physical Review A83, 032302 (2011)

    2011

  82. [88]

    A. W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, and S. Lloyd, Physical Re- view Letters103, 150502 (2009), publisher: American Physical Society

    2009

  83. [89]

    M. E. S. Morales, L. Pira, P. Schleich,et al., Reviews of Modern Physics98, 025005 (2026), arXiv:2411.02522 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  84. [90]

    R. M. Farias, T. O. Maciel, G. Camilo, R. Lin, S. Ramos- Calderer, and L. Aolita, Physical Review Applied23, 044014 (2025)

    2025

  85. [91]

    Johri, S

    S. Johri, S. Debnath, A. Mocherla, A. Singk, A. Prakash, J.Kim,andI.Kerenidis,npjQuantumInformation7,122 (2021)

    2021

  86. [92]

    E. A. Cherrat, I. Kerenidis, N. Mathur, J. Landman, M. Strahm, and Y. Y. Li, Quantum8, 1265 (2024)

    2024

  87. [93]

    Monbroussou, E

    L. Monbroussou, E. Z. Mamon, J. Landman, A. B. Grilo, R. Kukla, and E. Kashefi, Quantum9, 1745 (2025)

    2025

  88. [94]

    R.Dilip,Y.-J.Liu,A.Smith,andF.Pollmann,PhysicalRe- view Research4, 043007 (2022)

    2022

  89. [95]

    Iaconis and S

    J. Iaconis and S. Johri, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05897 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  90. [96]

    T.AlbashandD.A.Lidar,ReviewsofModernPhysics90, 015002 (2018)

    2018

  91. [97]

    Reymond, and C

    L.Henriet,L.Beguin,A.Signoles,T.Lahaye,A.Browaeys, G.-O. Reymond, and C. Jurczak, Quantum4, 327 (2020)

    2020

  92. [98]

    H.-Y.Huang,R.Kueng,andJ.Preskill,NaturePhysics16, 1050 (2020)

    2020

  93. [99]

    Thomas, U

    H. Thomas, U. Chabaud, and P.-E. Emeriau, Shedding light on classical shadows: learning photonic quantum states (2025), arXiv:2510.07240 [quant-ph]

    2025

  94. [100]

    K.Mitarai,M.Negoro,M.Kitagawa,andK.Fujii,Physical Review A98, 10.1103/physreva.98.032309 (2018)

    2018 doi

  95. [101]

    Schuld, V

    M. Schuld, V. Bergholm, C. Gogolin, J. Izaac, and N. Kil- loran,PhysicalReviewA99,10.1103/physreva.99.032331 (2019)

    2019 doi

  96. [102]

    D.Wierichs,J.Izaac,C.Wang,andC.Y.-Y.Lin,Quantum 6, 677 (2022)

    2022

  97. [103]

    F. Hoch, G. Rodari, T. Giordani,et al., Physical Review Research7, 023227 (2025)

    2025

  98. [104]

    Facelli, D

    G. Facelli, D. D. Roberts, H. Wallner, A. Makarovskiy, Z. Holmes, and W. R. Clements, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16369 10.48550/arXiv.2409.16369 (2024), arXiv:2409.16369 [quant-ph]

    2024 doi arXiv

  99. [105]

    J. C. Spall, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control37, 332 (1992)

    1992

  100. [106]

    J.C.Spall,IEEETransactionsonAerospaceandElectronic Systems34, 817 (1998)

    1998

  101. [107]

    Kandala, A

    A. Kandala, A. Mezzacapo, K. Temme, M. Takita, M. Brink, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, Nature549, 242 (2017)

    2017

  102. [108]

    Bonet-Monroig, H

    X. Bonet-Monroig, H. Wang, D. Vermetten, B. Senjean, C.Moussa,T.Bäck,V.Dunjko,andT.E.O’Brien,Physical Review A107, 032407 (2023)

    2023

  103. [109]

    Wiedmann, M

    M. Wiedmann, M. Hölle, M. Periyasamy, N. Meyer, C. Ufrecht, D. D. Scherer, A. Plinge, and C. Mutschler, in 2023IEEEInternationalConferenceonQuantumComputing and Engineering (QCE), Vol. 01 (IEEE, 2023) pp. 450–456

    2023

  104. [110]

    Liang, W

    Y. Liang, W. Peng, Z.-J. Zheng, O. Silvén, and G. Zhao, Neural Networks143, 133 (2021)

    2021

  105. [111]

    Meyer, C

    N. Meyer, C. Ufrecht, M. Periyasamy, A. Plinge, C. Mutschler, D. D. Scherer, and A. Maier, in2024 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engi- neering (QCE), Vol. 1 (IEEE, 2024) pp. 817–823

    2024

  106. [112]

    K.Sharma,S.Khatri,M.Cerezo,andP.J.Coles,NewJour- nal of Physics22, 043006 (2020)

    2020

  107. [113]

    1504–1515

    M.Periyasamy,A.Plinge,C.Mutschler,D.D.Scherer,and W.Mauerer,in2024IEEEInternationalConferenceonQuan- tumComputingandEngineering(QCE),Vol.1(IEEE,2024) pp. 1504–1515

    2024

  108. [114]

    thesis, Sorbonne Université (2025), arXiv:2606.14822 [quant-ph]

    L.Monbroussou,QuantumMachineLearningforIndustrial Applications, Ph.D. thesis, Sorbonne Université (2025), arXiv:2606.14822 [quant-ph]

    2025

  109. [115]

    Aclassicalpreprocessingofthedatastillleadtotruncated series expansion in another basis as explained in [129]

  110. [116]

    H.Mhiri,L.Monbroussou,M.Herrero-Gonzalez,S.Tha- bet,E.Kashefi,andJ.Landman,Quantum9,1847(2025)

    2025

  111. [117]

    Peters and M

    E. Peters and M. Schuld, Quantum7, 1210 (2023)

    2023

  112. [118]

    S. Shin, Y. S. Teo, and H. Jeong, Physical Review A107, 012422 (2023)

    2023

  113. [120]

    Strobl, M

    M. Strobl, M. E. Sahin, L. v. d. Horst, E. Kuehn, A. Streit, and B. Jaderberg, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.20868 10.48550/arXiv.2508.20868 (2025), arXiv:2508.20868 [quant-ph]

    2025 doi arXiv

  114. [121]

    K. J. S. Campbell, L. D. Debbio, and P. Wallden, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.04292 10.48550/arXiv.2604.04292 (2026), arXiv:2604.04292 [quant-ph]. 30

    2026 doi arXiv

  115. [122]

    Xiong, G

    W. Xiong, G. Facelli, M. Sahebi, O. Agnel, T. Chotibut, S. Thanasilp, and Z. Holmes, Quantum Machine Intelli- gence7, 20 (2025)

    2025

  116. [123]

    T.Hofmann,B.Schölkopf,andA.J.Smola,TheAnnalsof Statistics36, 1171 (2008)

    2008

  117. [124]

    Landman, S

    J. Landman, S. Thabet, C. Dalyac, H. Mhiri, and E. Kashefi, inThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)(2023)

    2023

  118. [125]

    Sweke, E

    R. Sweke, E. Recio-Armengol, S. Jerbi, E. Gil-Fuster, B.Fuller,J.Eisert,andJ.J.Meyer,Quantum9,1640(2025)

    2025

  119. [126]

    Sahebi, A

    M. Sahebi, A. Barthe, Y. Suzuki, Z. Holmes, and M. Grossi, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15902 10.48550/arXiv.2505.15902 (2025), arXiv:2505.15902 [quant-ph]

    2025 doi

  120. [127]

    A.RahimiandB.Recht,in200846thAnnualAllertonCon- ference on Communication, Control, and Computing(2008) pp. 555–561

    2008

  121. [128]

    C.GyurikandV.Dunjko,arXivpreprintarXiv:2306.16028 10.48550/arXiv.2306.16028 (2024), arXiv:2306.16028 [quant-ph]

    2024 doi arXiv

  122. [129]

    Molteni, C

    R. Molteni, C. Gyurik, and V. Dunjko, npj Quantum In- formation12, 19 (2026)

    2026

  123. [130]

    S.Jerbi,C.Gyurik,S.C.Marshall,R.Molteni,andV.Dun- jko, Nature Communications15, 5676 (2024)

    2024

  124. [131]

    Jerbi, L

    S. Jerbi, L. J. Fiderer, H. Poulsen Nautrup, J. M. Kübler, H.J.Briegel,andV.Dunjko,NatureCommunications14, 517 (2023)

    2023

  125. [132]

    Thabet, L

    S. Thabet, L. Monbroussou, E. Z. Mamon, and J. Land- man, npj Quantum Information12, 81 (2026)

    2026

  126. [133]

    Gil-Fuster, J

    E. Gil-Fuster, J. Eisert, and C. Bravo-Prieto, Nature Com- munications15, 2277 (2024)

    2024

  127. [134]

    M. C. Caro and I. Datta, Quantum Machine Intelligence 2, 14 (2020)

    2020

  128. [135]

    M. C. Caro, E. Gil-Fuster, J. J. Meyer, J. Eisert, and R. Sweke, Quantum5, 582 (2021)

    2021

  129. [136]

    Banchi, J

    L. Banchi, J. Pereira, and S. Pirandola, PRX Quantum2, 040321 (2021)

    2021

  130. [137]

    Abbas, D

    A. Abbas, D. Sutter, C. Zoufal, A. Lucchi, A. Figalli, and S. Woerner, Nature Computational Science1, 403 (2021)

    2021

  131. [138]

    Schuld and N

    M. Schuld and N. Killoran, Physical Review Letters122, 040504 (2019)

    2019

  132. [139]

    Holmes, K

    Z. Holmes, K. Sharma, M. Cerezo, and P. J. Coles, PRX Quantum3, 010313 (2022)

    2022

  133. [140]

    J. R. McClean, S. Boixo, V. N. Smelyanskiy, R. Bab- bush, and H. Neven, Nature Communications9, 10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4 (2018)

    2018 doi

  134. [141]

    Larocca, S

    M. Larocca, S. Thanasilp, S. Wang,et al., Nature Reviews Physics7, 174 (2025)

    2025

  135. [142]

    S. Wang, E. Fontana, M. Cerezo, K. Sharma, A. Sone, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, Nature Communications12, 6961 (2021)

    2021

  136. [143]

    J. M. Kübler, A. Arrasmith, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, Quantum4, 263 (2020)

    2020

  137. [144]

    Larocca, N

    M. Larocca, N. Ju, D. García-Martín, P. J. Coles, and M. Cerezo, Nature Computational Science3, 542 (2023)

    2023

  138. [145]

    Arrasmith, M

    A. Arrasmith, M. Cerezo, P. Czarnik, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, Quantum5, 558 (2021)

    2021

  139. [146]

    M.CerezoandP.J.Coles,QuantumScienceandTechnol- ogy6, 035006 (2021)

    2021

  140. [147]

    Dankert, R

    C. Dankert, R. Cleve, J. Emerson, and E. Livine, Physical Review A80, 012304 (2009)

    2009

  141. [148]

    A. A. Mele, Quantum8, 1340 (2024)

    2024

  142. [149]

    Larocca, P

    M. Larocca, P. Czarnik, K. Sharma, G. Muraleedharan, P. J. Coles, and M. Cerezo, Quantum6, 824 (2022)

    2022

  143. [150]

    Fontana, D

    E. Fontana, D. Herman, S. Chakrabarti, N. Kumar, R. Yalovetzky, J. Heredge, S. H. Sureshbabu, and M. Pis- toia, Nature Communications15, 7171 (2024)

    2024

  144. [151]

    M.Ragone,B.N.Bakalov,F.Sauvage,A.F.Kemper,C.Or- tizMarrero,M.Larocca,andM.Cerezo,NatureCommu- nications15, 7172 (2024)

    2024

  145. [152]

    C.OrtizMarrero,M.Kieferová,andN.Wiebe,PRXQuan- tum2, 040316 (2021)

    2021

  146. [153]

    Mhiri, H

    H. Mhiri, H. Thomas, L. Monbroussou, U. Chabaud, Z. Holmes, and E. Kashefi, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.14323 10.48550/arXiv.2604.14323 (2026), arXiv:2604.14323 [quant-ph]

    2026 doi arXiv

  147. [154]

    Monbroussou, H

    L. Monbroussou, H. Thomas, H. Mhiri, Z. Holmes, and E.Kashefi,Classicalsimulationandmodelconcentration in passive linear optics (2026)

    2026

  148. [155]

    Cerezo, A

    M. Cerezo, A. Sone, T. Volkoff, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, Nature Communications12, 10.1038/s41467-021-21728- w (2021)

    2021 doi

  149. [156]

    A. V. Uvarov and J. D. Biamonte, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical54, 245301 (2021)

    2021

  150. [157]

    A.Pesah,M.Cerezo,S.Wang,T.Volkoff,A.T.Sornborger, and P. J. Coles, Physical Review X11, 041011 (2021)

    2021

  151. [158]

    Liu, L.-W

    Z. Liu, L.-W. Yu, L.-M. Duan, and D.-L. Deng, Physical Review Letters129, 270501 (2022)

    2022

  152. [159]

    Letcher, S

    A. Letcher, S. Woerner, and C. Zoufal, Quantum8, 1484 (2024)

    2024

  153. [160]

    R. Puig, M. Drudis, S. Thanasilp, and Z. Holmes, PRX Quantum6, 010317 (2025)

    2025

  154. [161]

    Mhiri, R

    H. Mhiri, R. Puig, S. Lerch, M. S. Rudolph, T. Chotibut, S. Thanasilp, and Z. Holmes, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.07889 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  155. [164]

    Cerezo, M

    M. Cerezo, M. Larocca, D. García-Martín,et al., Nature Communications16, 7907 (2025)

    2025

  156. [165]

    Recio-Armengol, S

    E. Recio-Armengol, S. Ahmed, and J. Bowles, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.02934 10.48550/arXiv.2503.02934 (2025), arXiv:2503.02934 [quant-ph]

    2025 doi

  157. [166]

    S. Raj, B. Coyle, L. Monbroussou, A. J. Ferreira- Martins, R. M. S. Farias, and E. Kashefi, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.26873 10.48550/arXiv.2606.26873 (2026), arXiv:2606.26873 [quant-ph]

    2026 doi arXiv

  158. [167]

    (Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, 2021)

    D.D’Alessandro,IntroductiontoQuantumControlandDy- namics, 2nd ed. (Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, 2021)

    2021

  159. [168]

    E. Z. Mamon, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.07995 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  160. [169]

    J.Liu,H.Yuan,X.-M.Lu,andX.Wang,JournalofPhysics A: Mathematical and Theoretical53, 023001 (2019)

    2019

  161. [170]

    Bengtsson and K

    I. Bengtsson and K. Życzkowski,Geometry of quantum states: anintroductiontoquantumentanglement(Cambridge university press, 2017)

    2017

  162. [171]

    T.HaugandM.Kim,PhysicalReviewLetters133,050603 (2024)

    2024

  163. [172]

    V.Giovannetti,S.Lloyd,andL.Maccone,NaturePhoton- ics5, 222 (2011)

    2011

  164. [173]

    J.Stokes,J.Izaac,N.Killoran,andG.Carleo,Quantum4, 31 269 (2020)

    2020

  165. [174]

    McArdle, T

    S. McArdle, T. Jones, S. Endo, Y. Li, S. C. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, npj Quantum Information5, 75 (2019)

    2019

  166. [175]

    J.Gacon,C.Zoufal, G.Carleo,andS.Woerner,Quantum 5, 567 (2021)

    2021

  167. [176]

    S.M.Kay,FundamentalsofStatisticalSignalProcessing,Vol- ume I: Estimation Theory(Prentice-Hall, 1993)

    1993

  168. [177]

    Masot-Llima, E

    S. Masot-Llima, E. Gil-Fuster, C. Bravo-Prieto, J. Eis- ert, and T. Guaita, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.15661 10.48550/arXiv.2512.15661 (2025), arXiv:2512.15661 [quant-ph]

    2025 doi

  169. [178]

    De Raedt, F

    H. De Raedt, F. Jin, D. Willsch, M. Willsch, N. Yoshioka, N. Ito, S. Yuan, and K. Michielsen, Computer Physics Communications237, 47 (2019)

    2019

  170. [179]

    Häner and D

    T. Häner and D. S. Steiger, inProceedings of the Interna- tionalConferenceforHighPerformanceComputing,Network- ing,StorageandAnalysis(2017)pp.1–10,arXiv:1704.01127 [quant-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  171. [180]

    Aaronson and D

    S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Phys. Rev. A70, 052328 (2004)

    2004

  172. [181]

    Bravyi, Physical Review Letters116, 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.116.250501 (2016)

    S. Bravyi, Physical Review Letters116, 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.116.250501 (2016)

    2016 doi

  173. [182]

    A.Berezutskii,M.Liu,A.Acharya,etal.,NatureReviews Physics7, 581 (2025)

    2025

  174. [183]

    M. L. Goh, M. Larocca, L. Cincio, M. Cerezo, and F. Sauvage, Physical Review Research7, 033266 (2025)

    2025

  175. [184]

    Bärligea, M

    A. Bärligea, M. L. Sims-Goh, and J. S. Kottmann, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.16701 10.48550/arXiv.2604.16701 (2026), arXiv:2604.16701 [quant-ph]

    2026 doi arXiv

  176. [185]

    R.JozsaandA.Miyake,ProceedingsoftheRoyalSociety A:Mathematical,PhysicalandEngineeringSciences464, 3089 (2008)

    2008

  177. [186]

    B.M.TerhalandD.P.DiVincenzo,PhysicalReviewA65, 032325 (2002)

    2002

  178. [187]

    S. D. Bartlett, B. C. Sanders, S. L. Braunstein, and K. Nemoto, Physical Review Letters88, 097904 (2002)

    2002

  179. [188]

    Clifford and R

    P. Clifford and R. Clifford, inProceedings of the Twenty- Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algo- rithms, SODA ’18 (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, USA, 2018) pp. 146–155

    2018

  180. [189]

    N.QuesadaandJ.M.Arrazola,PhysicalReviewResearch 2, 023005 (2020)

    2020

  181. [190]

    Quesada, L

    N. Quesada, L. G. Helt, J. Izaac, J. M. Arrazola, R. Shahrokhshahi, C. R. Myers, and K. K. Sabapathy, Physical Review A100, 022341 (2019)

    2019

  182. [191]

    Chabaud, G

    U. Chabaud, G. Ferrini, F. Grosshans, and D. Markham, Physical Review Research3, 033018 (2021)

    2021

  183. [192]

    Izaac, K

    J.E.Bourassa,N.Quesada,I.Tzitrin,A.Száva,T.Isacsson, J. Izaac, K. K. Sabapathy, G. Dauphinais, and I. Dhand, PRX Quantum2, 040315 (2021)

    2021

  184. [193]

    Y.LimandC.Oh,Classicalalgorithmsforestimatingex- pectation values in linear-optical circuits (2025)

    2025

  185. [194]

    Seron, L

    B. Seron, L. Novo, A. Arkhipov, and N. J. Cerf, Quantum 8, 1479 (2024)

    2024

  186. [195]

    M. S. Rudolph, E. Fontana, Z. Holmes, and L. Cincio, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.09109 10.48550/arXiv.2308.09109 (2023), arXiv:2308.09109 [quant-ph]

    2023 doi arXiv

  187. [196]

    M. S. Rudolph, T. Jones, Y. Teng, A. Angrisani, and Z. Holmes, PRX Quantum 10.1103/6vd7-l9bn (2026), in press

    2026 doi

  188. [197]

    Y. Shao, F. Wei, S. Cheng, and Z. Liu, Physical Review Letters133, 120603 (2024)

    2024

  189. [198]

    A.Angrisani,A.Schmidhuber,M.S.Rudolph,M.Cerezo, Z.Holmes,andH.-Y.Huang,PhysicalReviewLetters135, 170602 (2025)

    2025

  190. [199]

    C.-J. Lin, H. Gharibyan, and V. P. Su, Quantum10, 2014 (2026)

    2014

  191. [200]

    S.Shin,Y.S.Teo,andH.Jeong,PhysicalReviewResearch 6, 023218 (2024)

    2024

  192. [201]

    M.Kordzanganeh,D.Kosichkina,andA.Melnikov,Intel- ligent Computing2, 0028 (2023)

    2023

  193. [202]

    J.Lee,A.B.Magann,H.A.Rabitz,andC.Arenz,Physical Review A104, 032401 (2021)

    2021

  194. [203]

    Cerezo, PRX Quantum3, 030341 (2022)

    M.Larocca,F.Sauvage,F.M.Sbahi,G.Verdon,P.J.Coles, and M. Cerezo, PRX Quantum3, 030341 (2022)

    2022

  195. [204]

    J. J. Meyer, M. Mularski, E. Gil-Fuster, A. A. Mele, F.Arzani,A.Wilms,andJ.Eisert,PRXQuantum4,010328 (2023)

    2023

  196. [205]

    Zheng, Z

    H. Zheng, Z. Li, J. Liu, S. Strelchuk, and R. Kondor, PRX Quantum4, 020327 (2023)

    2023

  197. [206]

    M. T. West, J. Heredge, M. Sevior, and M. Usman, PRX Quantum5, 030320 (2024)

    2024

  198. [207]

    Prakash, and I

    J.Landman,N.Mathur,Y.Y.Li,M.Strahm,S.Kazdaghli, A. Prakash, and I. Kerenidis, Quantum6, 881 (2022)

    2022

  199. [208]

    Raj and B

    S. Raj and B. Coyle, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.06916 10.48550/arXiv.2502.06916 (2025), arXiv:2502.06916 [cs]

    2025 doi

  200. [209]

    Monbroussou, J

    L. Monbroussou, J. Landman, L. Wang, A. B. Grilo, and E. Kashefi, Quantum Science and Technology10, 025050 (2025)

    2025

  201. [210]

    N. Jain, J. Landman, N. Mathur, and I. Kerenidis, Quan- tum Science and Technology9, 035026 (2024)

    2024

  202. [211]

    Kerenidis and A

    I. Kerenidis and A. Prakash, arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00054 10.48550/arXiv.2202.00054 (2022), arXiv:2202.00054 [quant-ph]

    2022 doi arXiv

  203. [212]

    Knill, R

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, Nature409, 46 (2001)

    2001

  204. [213]

    Bartolucci, P

    S. Bartolucci, P. Birchall, H. Bombín,et al., Nature Com- munications14, 912 (2023)

    2023

  205. [214]

    H.AghaeeRad,T.Ainsworth,R.N.Alexander,etal.,Na- ture638, 912 (2025)

    2025

  206. [215]

    Aaronson and A

    S. Aaronson and A. Arkhipov, inProceedings of the forty- thirdannualACMsymposiumonTheoryofcomputing,STOC ’11 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2011) pp. 333–342

    2011

  207. [216]

    Shastri, npj Unconventional Computing2, 29 (2025)

    T.Austin,S.Bilodeau,A.Hayman,N.Rotenberg,andB.J. Shastri, npj Unconventional Computing2, 29 (2025)

    2025

  208. [217]

    Killoran, T

    N. Killoran, T. R. Bromley, J. M. Arrazola, M. Schuld, N. Quesada, and S. Lloyd, Physical Review Research1, 033063 (2019)

    2019

  209. [218]

    Z.Yin, I.Agresti, G.deFelice,etal.,NaturePhotonics19, 1020 (2025)

    2025

  210. [219]

    B.Y.Gan,D.Leykam,andD.G.Angelakis,EPJQuantum Technology9, 16 (2022)

    2022

  211. [220]

    U.Chabaud,D.Markham,andA.Sohbi,Quantum5,496 (2021)

    2021

  212. [221]

    Monbroussou, E

    L. Monbroussou, E. Z. Mamon, H. Thomas, V. Yacoub, U.Chabaud,andE.Kashefi,PhysicalReviewResearch7, 033051 (2025)

    2025

  213. [222]

    Monbroussou, B

    L. Monbroussou, B. Polacchi, V. Yacoub,et al., Advanced Photonics7, 066012 (2025)

    2025

  214. [223]

    F. Hoch, E. Caruccio, G. Rodari,et al., Nature Communi- cations16, 902 (2025)

    2025

  215. [224]

    Kolarovszki, B

    Z. Kolarovszki, B. Bakó, M. Oszmaniec, C. Oh, 32 and Z. Zimborás, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.11195 10.48550/arXiv.2603.11195 (2026), arXiv:2603.11195 [quant-ph]

    2026 doi

  216. [225]

    Gottlieb, R

    F. Gottlieb, R. Mezher, B. Ventura, S. Mansfield, and A. Salavrakos, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.08793 10.48550/arXiv.2603.08793 (2026), arXiv:2603.08793 [quant-ph]

    2026 doi arXiv

  217. [226]

    A. P. Lund, M. J. Bremner, and T. C. Ralph, npj Quantum Information3, 15 (2017)

    2017

  218. [227]

    Deshpande, A

    A. Deshpande, A. Mehta, T. Vincent,et al., Science Ad- vances8, eabi7894 (2022)

    2022

  219. [228]

    D. J. Brod, Physical Review A91, 042316 (2015)

    2015

  220. [229]

    Soret, N

    A. Soret, N. Dridi, S. C. Wein, V. Giesz, S. Mansfield, and P.-E. Emeriau, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.08068 10.48550/arXiv.2601.08068 (2026), arXiv:2601.08068 [quant-ph]

    2026 doi

  221. [230]

    Tanaka, T

    G. Tanaka, T. Yamane, J. B. Héroux, R. Nakane, N. Kanazawa, S. Takeda, H. Numata, D. Nakano, and A. Hirose, Neural Networks115, 100 (2019)

    2019

  222. [231]

    N. M. Chmielewski,Quantum Machine Learning for Time Series, Theses, Université Paris-Saclay (2026), issue: 2026UPAST028

    2026

  223. [232]

    Jaeger and H

    H. Jaeger and H. Haas, Science304, 78 (2004)

    2004

  224. [233]

    W.Maass,T.Natschläger,andH.Markram,NeuralCom- putation14, 2531 (2002)

    2002

  225. [234]

    Fujii and K

    K. Fujii and K. Nakajima, Physical Review Applied8, 024030 (2017)

    2017

  226. [235]

    K.Nakajima,K.Fujii,M.Negoro,K.Mitarai,andM.Kita- gawa, Physical Review Applied11, 034021 (2019)

    2019

  227. [236]

    Kutvonen, K

    A. Kutvonen, K. Fujii, and T. Sagawa, Scientific Reports 10, 14687 (2020)

    2020

  228. [237]

    Martínez-Peña, J

    R. Martínez-Peña, J. Nokkala, G. L. Giorgi, R. Zambrini, andM.C.Soriano,CognitiveComputation15,1440–1451 (2020)

    2020

  229. [238]

    Suzuki, Q

    Y. Suzuki, Q. Gao, K. C. Pradel, K. Yasuoka, and N. Ya- mamoto, Scientific Reports12, 1353 (2022)

    2022

  230. [239]

    Dudas, B

    J. Dudas, B. Carles, E. Plouet, F. A. Mizrahi, J. Grollier, and D. Marković, npj Quantum Information9, 64 (2023)

    2023

  231. [240]

    L. C. G. Govia, G. J. Ribeill, G. E. Rowlands, H. K. Krovi,andT.A.Ohki,PhysicalReviewResearch3,013077 (2021)

    2021

  232. [241]

    R. A. Bravo, K. Najafi, X. Gao, and S. F. Yelin, PRX Quan- tum3, 030325 (2022)

    2022

  233. [242]

    A. M. Childs and N. Wiebe, Quantum Information & Computation12, 901 (2012)

    2012

  234. [243]

    D. W. Berry, A. M. Childs, R. Cleve, R. Kothari, and R. D. Somma, Physical Review Letters114, 090502 (2015)

    2015

  235. [244]

    Gilyén, Y

    A. Gilyén, Y. Su, G. H. Low, and N. Wiebe, inProceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)(ACM, 2019) pp. 193–204

    2019

  236. [245]

    G. H. Low and I. L. Chuang, Quantum3, 163 (2019)

    2019

  237. [246]

    J. Tian, X. Sun, Y. Du,et al., IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence45, 12321 (2023)

    2023

  238. [247]

    M. H. Amin, E. Andriyash, J. Rolfe, B. Kulchytskyy, and R. Melko, Physical Review X8, 021050 (2018)

    2018

  239. [248]

    Cheng, J

    S. Cheng, J. Chen, and L. Wang, Entropy20, 583 (2018)

    2018

  240. [249]

    Benedetti, J

    M. Benedetti, J. Realpe-Gómez, R. Biswas, and A. Perdomo-Ortiz, Physical Review X7, 041052 (2017)

    2017

  241. [250]

    Benedetti, J

    M. Benedetti, J. Realpe-Gómez, R. Biswas, and A. Perdomo-Ortiz, Physical Review A94, 022308 (2016)

    2016

  242. [251]

    M. H. Amin, Physical Review A92, 052323 (2015)

    2015

  243. [252]

    Liu and L

    J.-G. Liu and L. Wang, Physical Review A98, 062324 (2018)

    2018

  244. [253]

    B.Coyle,D.Mills,V.Danos,andE.Kashefi,npjQuantum Information6, 60 (2020)

    2020

  245. [254]

    Benedetti, D

    M. Benedetti, D. Garcia-Pintos, O. Perdomo, V. Leyton- Ortega,Y.Nam,andA.Perdomo-Ortiz,npjQuantumIn- formation5, 45 (2019)

    2019

  246. [255]

    B.Bakó,Z.Kolarovszki,andZ.Zimborás,arXivpreprint arXiv:2511.13844 10.48550/arXiv.2511.13844 (2025), arXiv:2511.13844 [quant-ph]

    2025 doi

  247. [256]

    Kerenidis, Scalable Quantum Machine Learn- ing: Trainability, Expressivity and Efficiency (2026), arXiv:2607.24014 [quant-ph]

    I. Kerenidis, Scalable Quantum Machine Learn- ing: Trainability, Expressivity and Efficiency (2026), arXiv:2607.24014 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  248. [257]

    Kasture, O

    S. Kasture, O. Kyriienko, and V. E. Elfving, Physical Re- view A108, 042406 (2023)

    2023

  249. [258]

    Goodfellow, J

    I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 27 (2014)

    2014

  250. [259]

    Creswell, T

    A. Creswell, T. White, V. Dumoulin, K. Arulkumaran, B. Sengupta, and A. A. Bharath, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine35, 53 (2018)

    2018

  251. [260]

    S.LloydandC.Weedbrook,PhysicalReviewLetters121, 040502 (2018)

    2018

  252. [261]

    P.-L.Dallaire-DemersandN.Killoran,PhysicalReviewA 98, 012324 (2018)

    2018

  253. [262]

    C.Zoufal,A.Lucchi,andS.Woerner,npjQuantumInfor- mation5, 103 (2019)

    2019

  254. [263]

    Lloyd, M

    S. Lloyd, M. Mohseni, and P. Rebentrost, Nature Physics 10, 631 (2014)

    2014

  255. [264]

    P.Rebentrost,M.Mohseni,andS.Lloyd,PhysicalReview Letters113, 10.1103/physrevlett.113.130503 (2014)

    2014 doi

  256. [265]

    Kerenidis and A

    I. Kerenidis and A. Prakash, in8th Innovations in The- oretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2017), Leib- niz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Vol. 67, edited by C. H. Papadimitriou (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany,

    2017

  257. [266]

    Brassard, P

    G. Brassard, P. Høyer, M. Mosca, and A. Tapp, inQuan- tum Computation and Information, Contemporary Mathe- matics, Vol. 305 (American Mathematical Society, 2002) pp. 53–74

    2002

  258. [267]

    V.Giovannetti,S.Lloyd,andL.Maccone,PhysicalReview Letters100, 10.1103/physrevlett.100.160501 (2008)

    2008 doi

  259. [268]

    Tang, Physical Review Letters127, 060503 (2021)

    E. Tang, Physical Review Letters127, 060503 (2021)

    2021

  260. [269]

    N.-H. Chia, A. Gilyén, T. Li, H.-H. Lin, E. Tang, and C. Wang, inProceedings of the 52nd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2020 (Associ- ation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA,

    2020

  261. [270]

    Bergholm, J

    V. Bergholm, J. Izaac, M. Schuld, C. Gogolin, S. Ahmed, V. Ajith, M. S. Alam, G. Alonso-Linaje, B. AkashNarayanan, A. Asadi,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.04968 (2018), arXiv:1811.04968

    2018 arXiv

  262. [271]

    Zhang, J

    S.-X. Zhang, J. Allcock, Z.-Q. Wan,et al., Quantum7, 912 (2023)

    2023

  263. [272]

    H. Wang, Y. Ding, J. Gu, Z. Li, Y. Lin, F. T. Chong, D. Z. Pan, and S. Han, in2022 IEEE International Symposium on High-PerformanceComputerArchitecture(HPCA)(2022)pp. 692–708, TorchQuantum library;https://github.com/ mit-han-lab/torchquantum

    2022

  264. [273]

    Broughton, G

    M. Broughton, G. Verdon, T. McCourt, A. J. Martinez, 33 J. H. Yoo, S. V. Isakov, P. Massey, R. Halavati, M. Y. Niu, A. Zlokapa, E. Peters, O. Lockwood, A. Skolik, S. Jerbi, V. Dunjko, M. Leib, M. Streif, D. Von Dollen, H. Chen,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.02989 (2020), ar...

    2003 arXiv

  265. [274]

    com/quantumlib/Cirq(2024), google Quantum AI

    Cirq Developers, Cirq: An open source framework for programming quantum computers,https://github. com/quantumlib/Cirq(2024), google Quantum AI

    2024

  266. [275]

    Javadi-Abhari, M

    A. Javadi-Abhari, M. Treinish, K. Krsulich,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.08810 (2024), arXiv:2405.08810

    2024 arXiv

  267. [276]

    Bayraktar, A

    H. Bayraktar, A. Charara, D. Clark, S. Cohen, T. Costa, Y.-L. L. Fang, Y. Gao, J. Guan, J. Gunnels, A. Haidar, et al., in2023 IEEE International Conference on Quan- tum Computing and Engineering (QCE)(IEEE, 2023) pp. 1050–1061, arXiv:2308.01999; published at IEEE Quan- tum Week 2023

    2023 arXiv

  268. [277]

    The CUDA-Q development team, CUDA-Q: A plat- form for hybrid quantum-classical computing,https:// github.com/NVIDIA/cuda-quantum(2025), nVIDIA; for- merly CUDA Quantum

    2025

  269. [278]

    Z.Kolarovszki,T.Rybotycki,P.Rakyta,etal.,Quantum9, 1708 (2025)

    2025

  270. [279]

    N.Heurtel,A.Fyrillas,G.deGliniasty,etal.,Quantum7, 931 (2023)

    2023

  271. [280]

    B.Gupt,J.Izaac,andN.Quesada,JournalofOpenSource Software4, 1705 (2019)

    2019

  272. [281]

    Kuzmin, B

    V. Kuzmin, B. Kyriacou, T. Protasevich, M. Papierz, M. Kordzanganeh, and A. Melnikov, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04891 (2025)

    2025

  273. [282]

    Robbiati, A

    M. Robbiati, A. Papaluca, A. Pasquale,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11773 (2025), arXiv:2510.11773

    2025

  274. [283]

    Trancoso, ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing 7, 1 (2025), arXiv:2410.12660 [quant-ph]

    A.Cicero,M.A.Maleki,M.W.Azhar,A.F.Kockum,and P. Trancoso, ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing 7, 1 (2025), arXiv:2410.12660 [quant-ph]

    2025

  275. [284]

    DeCross, R

    M. DeCross, R. Haghshenas, M. Liu,et al., Physical Re- view X15, 021052 (2025)

    2025

  276. [285]

    D.Kielpinski,C.Monroe,andD.J.Wineland,Nature417, 709 (2002)

    2002

  277. [286]

    J.M.Pino,J.M.Dreiling,C.Figgatt,etal.,Nature592,209 (2021)

    2021

  278. [287]

    A.SørensenandK.Mølmer,PhysicalReviewA62,022311 (2000)

    2000

  279. [288]

    Balewski, M

    J. Balewski, M. Kornjača, K. Klymko, S. Darbha, M. R. Hirsbrunner, P. L. Lopes, F. Liu, and D. Camps, in2024 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)(IEEE, 2024) pp. 1221–1227

    2024

  280. [289]

    Bluvstein, S

    D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kalinowski, D. Hangleiter,et al., Nature626, 58 (2024)

    2024

  281. [290]

    Kornjača, H.-Y

    M. Kornjača, H.-Y. Hu, C. Zhao, J. Wurtz, P. Weinberg, M. Hamdan, A. Zhdanov, S. H. Cantu, H. Zhou, R. A. Bravo,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02553 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  282. [291]

    J. E. Bourassa, R. N. Alexander, M. Vasmer, A. Patil, I. Tzitrin, T. Matsuura, D. Su, B. Q. Baragiola, S. Guha, G. Dauphinais,et al., Quantum5, 392 (2021)

    2021

  283. [292]

    M. V. Larsen, J. E. Bourassa, S. Kocsis,et al., Nature642, 587 (2025)

    2025

  284. [293]

    Alexander, A

    K. Alexander, A. Benyamini, D. Black,et al., Nature641, 876 (2025)

    2025

  285. [294]

    C.Taballione,M.C.Anguita,M.d.Goede,etal.,Quantum 7, 1071 (2023)

    2023

  286. [295]

    Maring, A

    N. Maring, A. Fyrillas, M. Pont,et al., Nature Photonics 18, 603 (2024)

    2024

  287. [296]

    Paparelle, J

    I. Paparelle, J. Henaff, J. García-Beni, É. Gillet, D. Mon- tesinos, G. L. Giorgi, M. C. Soriano, R. Zambrini, and V. Parigi, Nature Photonics20, 413 (2026)

    2026

  288. [297]

    Sedrakyan and A

    T. Sedrakyan and A. Salavrakos, Optica Quantum2, 458 (2024)

    2024

  289. [298]

    C. M. Dawson and M. A. Nielsen, Quantum Information & Computation6, 81 (2006)

    2006

  290. [299]

    N.J.RossandP.Selinger,QuantumInformation&Com- putation16, 901 (2016)

    2016

  291. [300]

    Kliuchnikov, arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.3200 (2013)

    V. Kliuchnikov, arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.3200 (2013)

    2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.