Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 25 references

Coating polystyrene microsphere lattices with tantalum pentoxide shells of 10–70 nm red-shifts their optical resonances and enhances Rhodamine 6G fluorescence, with the largest gains at 30–50 nm shells.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Coating hexagonally packed plastic microspheres with 10-70 nm of tantalum pentoxide tunes their optical resonances across the visible and enhances Rhodamine 6G fluorescence, maximally at 30-50 nm shells.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-02 challenge →

load-bearing objection A credible experimental study of Ta2O5-coated microsphere SEF with a clean thickness series; the main caveat is that the numerical validation is partly a fit and the fluorescence enhancement lacks dye-loading normalization. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2603.25828 v2 pith:AD5SCTRQ submitted 2026-03-26 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hall

Metasurface Engineering with Tantalum Pentoxide-Coated Microspheres: Tailoring Optical Resonances and Enhancing Local Density of States

Alexandra F\u{a}lama\c{s} , Ana Maria M. Gherman , Renaud Vall\'ee , Cosmin Farc\u{a}u This is my paper
classification physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords tantalum pentoxidemicrosphere monolayersdielectric metasurfaceslocal density of statesPurcell factorsurface-enhanced fluorescenceRhodamine 6Gphotonic resonances
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a hexagonally packed monolayer of polystyrene microspheres, coated with a conformal tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) shell, forms a scalable dielectric metasurface whose optical resonances can be tuned simply by changing the shell thickness. Experimentally, shells of 10–70 nm produce transmittance dips that red-shift from about 526 nm to 608 nm and, for surface-deposited Rhodamine 6G, enhance fluorescence relative to flat Ta2O5 films; the largest integrated enhancement occurs at 30–50 nm shells, where the resonances overlap the dye's excitation and emission bands. Finite-cluster finite-difference time-domain simulations reproduce the measured spectra when the shell is modeled as conformal, and periodic-cell dipole simulations of Purcell factors and directional beta-factors, after averaging over emitter positions and orientations, agree quantitatively with measured Purcell factors. If right, this makes shell thickness a practical design handle for tailoring the local density of optical states and fluorescence output over wafer-scale areas.

Core claim

The central claim is that Ta2O5-coated microsphere lattices act as low-loss dielectric metasurfaces in which the shell thickness controls both far-field resonances and the local density of optical states. The resonance follows an effective-thickness condition mλ ≈ 2 n_eff d, shifting monotonically red with shell thickness. Fluorescence enhancement is not a monotonic function of thickness: it peaks at 30–50 nm shells, because the largest detected emission requires the resonance to overlap the dye's excitation and emission bands and to direct radiation into the upper half-space, not merely to accelerate decay. The paper further claims that a conformal-shell geometry explains the far-field spec

What carries the argument

The key object is the Ta2O5 shell thickness t_shell on a hexagonally packed polystyrene microsphere monolayer. The argument runs through three linked tools: (i) the resonance condition mλ ≈ 2 n_eff d, where n_eff and d are the effective index and thickness of the hybrid shell–lattice layer, which explains the red-shift; (ii) single-dipole Purcell factors Fp(λ) and directional beta-factors β_top(λ) from periodic-cell simulations, combined into emission-weighted figures of merit F_p^em and F_p,rad^em to connect LDOS with top-side fluorescence; and (iii) a cap/valley population model with a logistic probability that averages single-emitter responses over positions, polarizations, and spectral s

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the evaporated Ta2O5 forms a uniform, conformal shell of the stated thickness over the spheres and the interstices; every simulation and fitted parameter assumes this geometry, so if the real film is non-conformal, porous, or thickness-nonuniform, the predicted resonances and LDOS enhancements would shift.

What would settle it

A direct structural check—such as cross-sectional electron microscopy or ellipsometry on a tilted lattice—showing that the Ta2O5 layer is appreciably thicker in valleys than on sphere caps, or a control experiment where a flat Ta2O5 film of equal average mass produces the same resonance shift and fluorescence enhancement as the coated lattice, would refute the conformal-shell model and the thickness-tunable LDOS claim.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Tunable resonances across the visible allow matching lattice resonances to the excitation or emission bands of different fluorophores by choosing shell thickness.
  • The 30–50 nm thickness window provides the best integrated fluorescence enhancement, so SEF devices should target that range for Rh6G-type dyes.
  • Because lifetime shortens monotonically with thickness while detected fluorescence peaks at intermediate thickness, optimizing a SEF substrate requires tuning LDOS and out-coupling together, not just accelerating decay.
  • The quantitative match between modeled and measured Purcell factors indicates that the emitter–environment description can be used predictively to design LDOS-engineered surfaces.
  • The conformal-shell reproduction of far-field spectra implies that e-beam evaporation under these conditions coats the lattice uniformly, validating the fabrication route for large-area metasurfaces.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If conformality is truly required, alternative deposition methods that change shell continuity or porosity should measurably alter the resonance positions and enhancement factors, providing a direct comparison test.
  • The cap-versus-valley population model predicts that the enhancement factor depends on the wetting and drying conditions during dye deposition; changing the solvent or the dye's molecular size could shift emission-weighted enhancement by changing where the dye sits.
  • Because the resonance wavelength shifts monotonically with shell thickness and with the surrounding medium, the same lattices could serve as label-free refractive-index sensors, with sensitivity controlled by shell thickness.
  • The described framework may generalize to other high-index oxide shells or other emitter bands by rescaling the optimal thickness to the target wavelength, though the paper does not test this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a combined experimental and numerical study of hexagonally packed polystyrene microsphere monolayers coated with Ta2O5 shells of 10–70 nm thickness. The main experimental claims are that the lattice resonance red-shifts monotonically with shell thickness (526→608 nm), that Rh6G fluorescence is enhanced relative to a reference, with the largest integrated enhancement for 30–50 nm shells, and that TCSPC lifetimes decrease monotonically from 3.48 ns (glass) to 1.89 ns (70 nm shell). Finite-cluster FDTD simulations are used to reproduce far-field spectra, and periodic-cell dipole simulations provide Purcell factors Fp(λ) and β-top factors. A spatial, polarization, and spectral averaging model, including a logistic on-cap probability and per-shell smoothing and wavelength shifts, is compared with experimentally extracted Purcell factors. The paper concludes that Ta2O5-coated microsphere lattices are scalable, low-loss dielectric metasurfaces whose resonances and LDOS can be engineered by shell thickness.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the system is an attractive additively manufactured dielectric SEF platform: it uses a low-loss high-index material, is scalable via colloidal self-assembly, and offers resonance tuning by shell thickness. The experimental dataset is substantial, combining far-field spectroscopy, steady-state fluorescence, and lifetime measurements. The qualitative trends—resonance red-shift, intermediate-thickness fluorescence peak, and monotonic lifetime shortening—are consistent with the proposed physical picture. The modeling effort is ambitious, and the explicit goal of connecting single-dipole LDOS calculations to ensemble Purcell-factor measurements is commendable. However, as detailed below, the quantitative support for several claims is currently incomplete: the fluorescence enhancement is not normalized for dye areal density, the Purcell-factor comparison relies on per-thickness fitted parameters, and the geometry-validating simulations use a different sphere diameter and largely miss the measured resonance position. These issues must be addressed before the conclusions can be considered established.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.3, §3.2, Eq. (5)] The fluorescence enhancement factor is computed from raw ensemble spectra of spin-coated Rh6G/PVP, referenced to a glass control, and then interpreted through Eq. (5), which is a per-emitter emission-weighted metric. No normalization is provided for the number of dye molecules per collection area. A microsphere monolayer has a substantially larger corrugated surface area than a flat reference, and the PVP layer conforms to the spheres, so equal dye uptake between sample and reference is not plausible. Shell thickness may further change wetting and loading. Without an areal-density normalization (e.g., dye absorption or dissolution assay), the reported 30–50 nm enhancement peak and the statement that LDOS controls fluorescence are not uniquely established. The TCSPC lifetime trend supports per-emitter rate changes but does not correct the steady-state spectra.
  2. [§3.5, Eq. (10)] The Purcell-factor comparison is presented as strong validation ('very good agreement'), but Eq. (10) contains per-thickness smoothing factors s and wavelength shifts Δλ that are 'adjusted per shell,' in addition to global logistic-curvature parameters optimized across all thicknesses. This is essentially a fitting procedure with several free parameters; the resulting R² values do not constitute an independent test of the emitter–environment model. The paper should either quantify the number of free parameters and report cross-validation results, or constrain the model independently (e.g., by SEM-derived emitter positions or wetting measurements). As written, the agreement mainly shows that the model is flexible enough to accommodate the data.
  3. [§3.3, Fig. 4, §3.1] The finite-cluster FDTD simulation is described as 'reproducing the measured transmittance and reflectance spectra, confirming the assumed geometry.' However, the simulations use sphere diameters of 400, 450, and 500 nm while the nominal experimental diameter is 460 nm, and for the 70 nm shell the simulated coated resonance shifts only to 540–550 nm, whereas the measured resonance is at 608 nm. The text does not quantify the mismatch or explain it. Since all subsequent Purcell/LDOS simulations are based on the same conformal-shell geometry with D=460 nm, the geometry is not independently confirmed. The authors should simulate the actual diameter and shell thicknesses used in the experiments and report the residual spectral discrepancies.
  4. [Abstract, §2.3, Conclusions] The abstract and conclusions state that fluorescence is enhanced 'relative to flat Ta2O5 films,' but the fluorescence measurements in §2.3 are explicitly referenced to a glass slide, and Fig. 2 shows only the glass reference. No fluorescence data for a flat Ta2O5 film are presented. Either the flat-film fluorescence comparison should be added, or the wording should be changed to 'relative to a glass reference' and the comparison to flat Ta2O5 should be limited to the transmission/reflection spectra.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.3] The phrase 'quantified owing to the integration' should be replaced with 'quantified by integrating' or similar.
  2. [§2.5] The simulation geometry is described inconsistently: 'a conformal Ta2O5 shell of thickness t_shell surrounding the PS sphere upper halves' versus 'covering the sphere lattice' and 'residual film.' Please specify precisely whether the shell covers the full sphere or only the upper half, and how the interstice/residual film is modeled.
  3. [References] Reference [18] (Mie 1908) does not appear to be the appropriate citation for large-area two-dimensional colloidal crystal self-assembly; a colloidal crystal assembly reference would be more accurate. Reference [21] (Bidault et al.) is listed but does not appear to be cited in the main text.
  4. [Supporting Information] Key parts of the averaging model—Sections S2–S8 of the Supporting Information—are not included in the manuscript or the arXiv submission visible to the referee. Since the main text relies on them for the Purcell-factor comparison, the SI should be made available and the main text should summarize the model enough for the reader to assess its degrees of freedom.
  5. [§3.2] The statement that enhancement is 'consistent with ... the spacer role of Ta2O5 in mitigating quenching at very small separations' is speculative; no quenching data or distance-dependent measurements are shown. Please either provide evidence or label this as a hypothesis.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The 'complementary test' of the emitter–environment model fits its free parameters to the experimental Purcell factors it then claims to reproduce.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.5, Eq. (10) and preceding paragraph]
    "The probabilities are modeled as a logistic function of the dimensionless curvature ratio tshell/Rsphere, derived from a two-state Boltzmann partition between capillary suction into the interstices and contact-line pinning on the caps [25, 24], and constrained by a global optimization across all four shell thicknesses (see SI). ... F modelP (λ) = F P + s[⟨FP(λ+ Δλ)⟩ − F P] ... Global parameters controlling the curvature dependence are shared across all thicknesses, while s and Δλ are adjusted per shell."

    The paper presents the comparison of modeled and measured Purcell factors (Fig. 5) as a 'complementary test' of the emitter–environment model. But the model is not parameter-free: s and Δλ are 'adjusted per shell,' and the on-cap probabilities are 'constrained by a global optimization across all four shell thicknesses'—i.e., fit to the very experimental Purcell-factor data being compared. With these degrees of freedom, the 'very good agreement' in Fig. 5 is substantially a report of the optimized fit, not an independent prediction derived from first principles. The circularity is partial and localized to this validation step; the resonance red-shift and fluorescence trends rest on independent measurements and simulations, so the central claim is not fully circular.

full rationale

The central resonance-engineering claim is not circular: the measured thickness-dependent red-shift is an independent observation, and the finite-cluster FDTD simulations are not explicitly fitted to those spectra (though their agreement is loose: the simulated 70 nm resonance shifts only to 540–550 nm while the measured 70 nm resonance is at 608 nm, and the simulated sphere diameters are 400/450/500 nm against a nominal 460 nm). The periodic-cell LDOS simulations also are not fitted to the fluorescence enhancement data; they use the measured Rh6G spectrum only as a spectral weight. The genuinely circular element is confined to Section 3.5: Eq. (10) is a fitting formula with per-shell parameters s and Δλ, and the on-cap probabilities are globally optimized against the same experimental Purcell factors used for the comparison. Therefore the claim that the averaging model 'yields very good agreement across all shells' is partly a restatement of the fit rather than a parameter-free validation. The missing dye areal-density normalization in the steady-state fluorescence enhancement is a separate correctness concern, not a circularity; I have not counted it in the score. Overall, the paper has one concrete reduction-by-fitting step, warranting a 6 rather than an extreme score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The experimental backbone is nearly parameter-free. The free-parameter burden sits almost entirely in the §3.5 Purcell model: two fitted values per shell thickness (s, Δλ) plus globally optimized occupation parameters (P_on/P_bet), used to produce the reported R² values. The far-field FDTD comparison also depends on a hand-chosen sphere-diameter spread (400-500 nm vs nominal 460 nm) and on the assumed conformal shell morphology, which is itself only supported by those simulations. The fluorescence/LDOS interpretation assumes the high-quantum-yield factorization of Eq. (3). No invented physical entities — particles, forces, or new conserved quantities — are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Per-shell spectral smoothing factor s = s < 0.13 (values shown in Fig. 5 inset; numerical values not given in main text)
    Eq. (10) uses s to damp oscillations in simulated Purcell spectra; adjusted per shell thickness to match the experimental ensemble data.
  • Per-shell wavelength shift Δλ = Indicated in Fig. 5 inset; numerical values not stated in main text
    Eq. (10) shifts simulated Purcell spectra to absorb discrepancies between nominal and actual shell thickness/refractive index; adjusted per shell.
  • Global curvature/occupation parameters of the logistic on-cap probability model = P_on rises from ~0.05 (10 nm) to ~0.74 (70 nm)
    Eq. (9) models emitter placement with a logistic/Boltzmann function of t_shell/R_sphere, 'constrained by a global optimization across all four shell thicknesses' (§3.5) — i.e., fitted against the same experimental Purcell data used for the R² values in Fig. 5.
  • Simulated sphere diameters for finite-cluster FDTD = 400, 450, 500 nm vs experimental nominal 460 nm
    Hand-chosen spread (§2.5) used to represent the 460 nm spheres; contributes to the 540-550 nm vs 608 nm gap between simulated and measured 70 nm resonance, and is not derived from a size distribution measurement.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption High-quantum-yield factorization: detected top-side emission ∝ S(λ)F_p(λ)β_top(λ) (Eq. 3) with negligible thickness-dependent non-radiative quenching
    Required to identify the measured EF with F_em_p,rad. The TCSPC data show total decay rate rising steeply with shell thickness, so the radiative-only interpretation is an assumption (§2.3, §3.2).
  • domain assumption e-beam-deposited Ta2O5 forms a uniform conformal shell of thickness t_shell over spheres and interstices
    Central geometric input to all Lumerical and Tidy3D simulations; its only support is the far-field match of simulations that assume it (§2.5, §3.3). The main text's quantitative match is loose (540-550 nm vs measured 608 nm for 70 nm shells).
  • ad hoc to paper Spin-coated dye molecules sit only on the outer shell surface, on caps or in valleys, with probabilities P_on/P_bet given by a two-state capillary model
    Eq. (9) and the averaging model of §3.5; the functional form is motivated by capillarity [24,25] but its parameters are optimized against the very Purcell data being compared, and no direct measurement of emitter spatial distribution is provided.
  • standard math Standard Maxwell electrodynamics as implemented in commercial FDTD solvers (Lumerical, Tidy3D)
    The simulations treat classical dipoles in a passive dielectric geometry; the solver implementations are not independently verified in this paper.

reviewed 2026-08-02 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Metasurface Engineering with Tantalum Pentoxide-Coated Microspheres: Tailoring Optical Resonances and Enhancing Local Density of States." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AD5SCTRQ

@misc{pith2026260325828,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Metasurface Engineering with Tantalum Pentoxide-Coated Microspheres: Tailoring Optical Resonances and Enhancing Local Density of States},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AD5SCTRQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.25828}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Hexagonally-packed polystyrene microsphere monolayers coated with tantalum pentoxide (Ta$_2$O$_5$) form scalable dielectric metasurfaces that support tunable photonic resonances and enhanced local density of optical states (LDOS). Here we combine fabrication, optical and fluorescence spectroscopy, and multiscale electromagnetic simulations to quantify how the thickness of the Ta$_2$O$_5$ shells control far-field resonances and Rhodamine 6G (Rh6G) emission. Experimentally, Ta$_2$O$_5$ shells of 10 - 70 nm deposited on microsphere lattices generate resonances that shift red with the thickness of the shell and systematically enhance the Rh6G fluorescence relative to flat Ta$_2$O$_5$ films. The largest enhancement is obtained for 30 - 50 nm shells, when lattice resonances overlap the Rh6G excitation and emission bands. Finite-cluster finite-difference time-domain simulations reproduce the measured transmittance and reflectance spectra, confirming the assumed geometry of the Ta$_2$O$_5$ shells covering the sphere lattice. Periodic-cell simulations of single electric dipoles yield wavelength-dependent Purcell factors $Fp(\lambda)$ and directional $\beta$-factors $\beta_{top}(\lambda)$, from which we construct emission-weighted figures of merit that link LDOS modulation to the experimentally accessible top-side fluorescence enhancement. As a complementary test of our emitter-environment model, we compare simulated and measured Purcell factors for PS/Ta$_2$O$_5$ microsphere lattices. A physically motivated averaging that accounts for emitter position, orientation and ensemble spectral smoothing yields very good agreement across all shells. Overall, our results establish Ta$_2$O$_5$-coated microsphere lattices as robust dielectric substrates for surface-enhanced fluorescence and clarify how shell thickness and emitter placement jointly control photonic resonances, LDOS and fluorescence response.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.25828 by Alexandra F\u{a}lama\c{s}, Ana Maria M. Gherman, Cosmin Farc\u{a}u, Renaud Vall\'ee.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) SEM image of the two-dimensional PS microsphere monolayer. (b and c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Fluorescence of Rh6G/PVP on Ta2O5-coated PS microsphere lattices. (a) Emission spectra for metasurfaces with Ta2O5 shells of 10, 30, 50 and 70 nm and for the glass reference (black line). (b) Normalized enhancement spectra (sample/reference), highlighting spectral regions of maximum enhancement and their correlation with the lattice resonances. Inset: integrated fluorescence enhancement factor EF as a func… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) data showing the three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Finite-cluster FDTD simulations of Ta2O5-coated PS lattices. (a) Schematic of the simulated structure: a hexagonal cluster of PS spheres on a glass substrate coated by a Ta2O5 shell and residual film. (b) Simulated transmittance and reflectance spectra for a flat Ta2O5 film, a PS microsphere monolayer, and a Ta2O5-coated microsphere monolayer. The hybrid lattice exhibits a deeper and red-shifted resonance … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison between the modeled Purcell factor (solid lines) and experimental [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    I.; Miroshnichenko, A

    Kuznetsov, A. I.; Miroshnichenko, A. E.; Brongersma, M. L.; Kivshar, Y. S.; Luther- Davies, B., Optically resonant dielectric nanostructures, Science,2016, 354(6314), aag2472

    2016

  2. [2]

    Photonics, 2017, 11, 274–284

    Staude, I.; Schmid, J., Metamaterial-inspired silicon nanophotonics, Nat. Photonics, 2017, 11, 274–284

    2017

  3. [3]

    S., Multipolar interference effects in nanophotonics, Philos

    Liu, W.; Kivshar, Y. S., Multipolar interference effects in nanophotonics, Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.,2017, 375(2090), 20160317

    2017

  4. [4]

    Novotny, L.; Hecht, B.,Principles of Nano-Optics, Cambridge University Press,2012

    2012

  5. [5]

    Lodahl, P.; Mahmoodian, S.; Stobbe, S., Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys.,2015, 87(2), 347–400

    2015

  6. [6]

    R.,Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Springer, Boston, 3rd edn, 2006

    Lakowicz, J. R.,Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Springer, Boston, 3rd edn, 2006

    2006

  7. [7]

    K¨ uhn, S.; Hakanson, U.; Rogobete, L.; Sandoghdar, V., Enhancement of Single-Molecule Fluorescence Using a Gold Nanoparticle as an Optical Nanoantenna, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2006, 97, 017402

    2006

  8. [8]

    F.; Nikolaev, I

    Lodahl, P.; van Driel, A. F.; Nikolaev, I. S.; Irman, A.; Overgaag, K.; Vanmaekelbergh, D.; Vos, W. L., Controlling the dynamics of spontaneous emission from quantum dots by photonic crystals, Nature,2004, 430, 654–657

    2004

  9. [9]

    Steinlechner, J., Development of mirror coatings for gravitational-wave detectors, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A,2018, 376, 20170282

    2018

  10. [10]

    L.; Bowers, J

    Belt, M.; Davenport, M. L.; Bowers, J. E.; Blumenthal, D. J., Ultra-Low-Loss Ta 2O5- core/SiO2-clad planar waveguides on Si substrates, Optica,2017, 4(5), 532–535

    2017

  11. [11]

    Laser Technol.,2021, 138, 106925

    Wang, T.-J.; Chen, P.-K.; Li, Y.-T.; Sung, A.-N., Athermal high-Q tantalum-pentoxide- based microresonators on silicon substrates, Opt. Laser Technol.,2021, 138, 106925

    2021

  12. [12]

    Z.; Oton, C

    Subramanian, A. Z.; Oton, C. J.; Wilkinson, J. S.; Greef, R., Waveguiding and pho- toluminescence in Er 3+-doped Ta 2O5 planar waveguides, J. Luminesc.,2009, 129(8), 812–816

    2009

  13. [13]

    Liu, Z.; Yao, W.; You, M.; Yu, X.; Ding, N.; Cheng, W.; Li, Z.; Tang, X.; Guo, F.; Zhao, Q., Tantalum Pentoxide Integrated Photonics: A Promising Platform for Low- Loss Planar Lightwave Circuits with Low Thermo-Optic Coefficients, ACS Photonics, 2025, 12(3), 684–695

    2025

  14. [14]

    M.; Spektor, G.; Williams, L

    Brodnik, G. M.; Spektor, G.; Williams, L. M.; Zhang, J.; Carollo, A. R.; Dan, A.; Black, J. A.; Carlson, D. R.; Papp, S. B., Monolithic 3D integration of tantalum pentoxide photonics on arbitrary substrates, arXiv:2509.08092,2025. 13

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Zhang, C.; Chen, L.; Lin, Z.; Song, J.; Wang, D.; Li, M.; Koksal, O.; Wang, Z.; Spektor, G.; Carlson, D.; Lezec, H. J.; Zhu, W.; Papp, S.; Agrawal, A., Tantalum pentoxide: a new material platform for high-performance dielectric metasurface optics in the ultravi- olet and visible region, Light Sci. Appl.,2024, 13, 23

    2024

  16. [16]

    Schmitt, K.; Oehse, K.; Sulz, G.; Hoffmann, C., Evanescent field sensors based on tantalum pentoxide waveguides – A review, Sensors,2008, 8(2), 711–726

    2008

  17. [17]

    M.; St¨ adler, B.; Textor, M.; V¨ or¨ os, J., Waveguide excitation fluorescence microscopy: a new tool for sensing and imaging the biointerface, Biosens

    Grandin, H. M.; St¨ adler, B.; Textor, M.; V¨ or¨ os, J., Waveguide excitation fluorescence microscopy: a new tool for sensing and imaging the biointerface, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2006, 21(8), 1476–1482

    2006

  18. [18]

    Mie, G., Beitr¨ age zur Optik tr¨ uber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metall¨ osungen, Annalen der Phys.,1908, 330(3), 377–445

    1908

  19. [19]

    Nechita, N.; Farcau, C.; Tuning plasmons of metal-coated microsphere arrays towards optimized surface-enhanced spectroscopy, Optics Express2021, 29(25), 42238-42250

  20. [20]

    N; Velankar, S

    Zhang, J-T.; Wang, L.; Lamont, D. N; Velankar, S. S.; Asher, Sanford A., Fabrication of large-area two-dimensional colloidal crystals, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,2012, 51(25), 6117–6120

    2012

  21. [21]

    Bidault, S.; Devilez, A.; Ghenuche, P.; Stout, B.; Bonod, N.; Wenger, J., Competition between F¨ orster Resonance Energy Transfer and Donor Photodynamics in Plasmonic Dimer Nanoantennas, ACS Photonics,2016, 3(5), 895–903

    2016

  22. [22]

    Ansys Lumerical FDTD Simulation of Photonic Components, https://www.ansys.com/products/optics/fdtd

  23. [23]

    Flexcompute Inc., Tidy3D Electromagnetic Solver, https://www.flexcompute.com/tidy3d/

  24. [24]

    de Gennes, F

    P.-G. de Gennes, F. Brochard-Wyart, and D. Qu´ er´ e,Capillarity and Wetting Phenom- ena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves, Springer, New York (2004)

    2004

  25. [25]

    Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions,

    H. A. Kramers, “Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions,”Physica7, 284–304 (1940).doi:10.1016/S0031-8914(40)90098-2 14

    doi:10.1016/s0031-8914(40)90098-2 1940

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 2, 2026.