Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Mean estimation in the add-remove model of differential privacy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.06658 v2 pith:ADSRAK3M submitted 2023-12-11 cs.DS cs.CRcs.ITmath.ITstat.ML

classification cs.DScs.CRcs.ITmath.ITstat.ML
keywords modeladd-removemeanswapalgorithmestimationunderconstant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Differential privacy is often studied under two different models of neighboring datasets: the add-remove model and the swap model. While the swap model is frequently used in the academic literature to simplify analysis, many practical applications rely on the more conservative add-remove model, where obtaining tight results can be difficult. Here, we study the problem of one-dimensional mean estimation under the add-remove model. We propose a new algorithm and show that it is min-max optimal, achieving the best possible constant in the leading term of the mean squared error for all $\epsilon$, and that this constant is the same as the optimal algorithm under the swap model. These results show that the add-remove and swap models give nearly identical errors for mean estimation, even though the add-remove model cannot treat the size of the dataset as public information. We also demonstrate empirically that our proposed algorithm yields at least a factor of two improvement in mean squared error over algorithms frequently used in practice. One of our main technical contributions is a new hour-glass mechanism, which might be of independent interest in other scenarios.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Factorization by extremal privacy mechanisms: new insights into efficiency

    math.ST 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under alpha-local differential privacy, the maximal Fisher information equals roughly alpha^2/4 times the squared mean absolute score as alpha goes to zero, and an optimal extremal mechanism exists.

  2. Managing Correlations in Data and Privacy Demand

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AHDP, an add-remove heterogeneous differential privacy framework, protects both user data and the user's privacy demand, and correlation-agnostic mechanisms exist for mean, frequency, and linear regression estimation.

Pith tools