REVIEW 2 cited by
Mean estimation in the add-remove model of differential privacy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Differential privacy is often studied under two different models of neighboring datasets: the add-remove model and the swap model. While the swap model is frequently used in the academic literature to simplify analysis, many practical applications rely on the more conservative add-remove model, where obtaining tight results can be difficult. Here, we study the problem of one-dimensional mean estimation under the add-remove model. We propose a new algorithm and show that it is min-max optimal, achieving the best possible constant in the leading term of the mean squared error for all $\epsilon$, and that this constant is the same as the optimal algorithm under the swap model. These results show that the add-remove and swap models give nearly identical errors for mean estimation, even though the add-remove model cannot treat the size of the dataset as public information. We also demonstrate empirically that our proposed algorithm yields at least a factor of two improvement in mean squared error over algorithms frequently used in practice. One of our main technical contributions is a new hour-glass mechanism, which might be of independent interest in other scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Factorization by extremal privacy mechanisms: new insights into efficiency
Under alpha-local differential privacy, the maximal Fisher information equals roughly alpha^2/4 times the squared mean absolute score as alpha goes to zero, and an optimal extremal mechanism exists.
-
Managing Correlations in Data and Privacy Demand
AHDP, an add-remove heterogeneous differential privacy framework, protects both user data and the user's privacy demand, and correlation-agnostic mechanisms exist for mean, frequency, and linear regression estimation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.