Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Trust in AutoML: Exploring Information Needs for Establishing Trust in Automated Machine Learning Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.06509 v1 pith:AELHEYVM submitted 2020-01-17 cs.LG cs.CYcs.HCstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CYcs.HCstat.ML
keywords trustautomldatainformationautomatedestablishingfeatureslearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We explore trust in a relatively new area of data science: Automated Machine Learning (AutoML). In AutoML, AI methods are used to generate and optimize machine learning models by automatically engineering features, selecting models, and optimizing hyperparameters. In this paper, we seek to understand what kinds of information influence data scientists' trust in the models produced by AutoML? We operationalize trust as a willingness to deploy a model produced using automated methods. We report results from three studies -- qualitative interviews, a controlled experiment, and a card-sorting task -- to understand the information needs of data scientists for establishing trust in AutoML systems. We find that including transparency features in an AutoML tool increased user trust and understandability in the tool; and out of all proposed features, model performance metrics and visualizations are the most important information to data scientists when establishing their trust with an AutoML tool.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools