Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Chunking: Continual Learning is not just about Distribution Shift

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.02206 v2 pith:AEQ6PBZT submitted 2023-10-03 cs.LG stat.ML

Chunking: Continual Learning is not just about Distribution Shift

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords chunkingdatadistributionperformancelearningshiftsub-problemwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Work on continual learning (CL) has thus far largely focused on the problems arising from shifts in the data distribution. However, CL can be decomposed into two sub-problems: (a) shifts in the data distribution, and (b) dealing with the fact that the data is split into chunks and so only a part of the data is available to be trained on at any point in time. In this work, we look at the latter sub-problem, the chunking of data. We show that chunking is an important part of CL, accounting for around half of the performance drop from offline learning in our experiments. Furthermore, our results reveal that current CL algorithms do not address the chunking sub-problem, only performing as well as plain SGD training when there is no shift in the data distribution. Therefore, we show that chunking is both an important and currently unaddressed sub-problem and until it is addressed CL methods will be capped in performance. Additionally, we analyse why performance drops when learning occurs on identically distributed chunks of data, and find that forgetting, which is often seen to be a problem due to distribution shift, still arises and is a significant problem. We also show that performance on the chunking sub-problem can be increased and that this performance transfers to the full CL setting, where there is distribution shift. Hence, we argue that work on chunking can help advance CL in general.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Forgetting is Everywhere

    cs.LG 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    Forgetting is defined as violation of predictive self-consistency under self-generated updates, yielding the measure Γ_k(t); exact Bayesian learners are shown to have Γ = 0.