Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 39 references

2D CFT and efficient Bethe ansatz for exactly solvable Richardson-Gaudin models

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the Bethe equations of the Richardson and Gaudin models are the saddle-point equations of a Yang–Yang function that coincides, up to a factor and an additive constant, with the Yang–Yang function of irregular…

desk verdict The paper's real value is the review and the solver; the headline CFT route to W_R^crit is a conjecture, asserted in Sec. 3.3 and deferred in Sec. 7. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.22734 v1 pith:AFIUHZO3 submitted 2025-07-30 hep-th cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con

Grzegorz Biskowski , Franco Ferrari , Marcin R. Piatek This is my paper
classification hep-thcond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con MSC 81T4081R1282B23 PACS 11.25.Hf
keywords Richardson-GaudinmodelsBetheansatzYang-YangfunctionirregularconformalblocksVirasoroCFTreducedBCSmodelBaxterpolynomialclassical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the exact solution of the Richardson (reduced BCS) pairing model can be read off from a two-dimensional conformal field theory: the model's Yang–Yang potential, whose stationary points are the Bethe equations, coincides, for unit degeneracies and with the coupling identified with the irregularity parameter, with the Yang–Yang function of irregular degenerate Virasoro conformal blocks, up to a factor and a constant term. If that identification holds, the conserved charges of the reduced BCS model and of the Gaudin central-spin model are generated by the critical value of this Yang–Yang function, and can be approximated by classical (large-central-charge) conformal-block power series instead of by direct solution of the Bethe equations. The paper also develops a numerical solver that tracks Cooper-pair rapidities in the complex plane as the coupling grows, reproduces known merging and branching arcs, and extends the computation to finite-temperature observables.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are (i) the Richardson Yang–Yang function $W_R(z,E) = -\sum_{i<j}\log(z_i-z_j) - 4\sum_{\nu<\mu}\log(E_\nu-E_\mu) + 2\sum_{i,\nu}\log(z_i-E_\nu) + \tfrac{1}{g}\left(-\sum_i z_i + 2\sum_\nu E_\nu\right)$, whose stationary conditions are the Richardson equations, and (ii) the irregular degenerate Virasoro block integral $F_\Gamma(z,k) = \int_\Gamma \exp\left[-b^{-2} W^{GW}(z,E,k)\right] dE_1\cdots dE_M$ with $W^{GW}$ given by (3.30). The identity $W_R = -2W^{GW}|_{k_i=1,\Lambda=1/g} + 2\pi i L M$ ties the two, and the argument proceeds by taking the classical ($b\to 0$) limit of the null-vector equations satisfied by the degenerate block, whose saddle-point equations are the Richardson equations. In the numerical part, the Baxter polynomial $P(z)=\prod_j (z-\lambda_j)$ and its logarithmic derivative $\Lambda(z)=P'(z)/P(z)$ convert the Bethe equations into quadratic equations for $\Lambda$ at the single-particle energies, solved by Newton–Raphson with LU decomposition, followed by Laguerre root-finding with polynomial deflation.

What would settle it

Compute the first few coefficients of the classical limit of an irregular degenerate Virasoro block with several screenings (e.g., $M_1=2$, $M_2=1$) by expanding the null-vector differential equations in powers of $x$, and compare them with $-W_R^{\rm crit}$ obtained by numerically solving the Richardson equations for the corresponding parameters; disagreement beyond numerical precision would refute the correspondence. A simpler test is to evaluate the closed-form identity (6.6) with $M_1=M_2=2$ against a direct saddle-point integration, which the paper states has not been done.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is the identity $W_R(z,E) = -2W(z,E) + 2\pi i L M$, where $W_R$ is the Richardson Yang–Yang function (3.24), $W$ is the Yang–Yang function of the irregular degenerate Virasoro conformal block (3.30) with all $k_i=1$, and the Richardson coupling $g$ is identified with the irregularity parameter $\Lambda$ through $1/g = \Lambda$. Consequently the extremal value $W_R^{\rm crit}(z,E_c)$, evaluated at a solution $E_c$ of the Richardson equations, encodes the conserved charges $\lambda_i$ of the reduced BCS model through $\lambda_i = -(1/\Lambda)\,\partial W_{\rm crit}/\partial z_i$ at $z_i = 2\epsilon_i$. The paper argues that these critical values can be obtained from the classical limit of the null-vector differential equations satisfied by irregular degenerate blocks, because the saddle-point equations of the block integral reproduce the Bethe equations; a concrete four-point example, equation (6.6), expresses a classical block as $-W_{\rm crit}$ plus constant terms from the integral asymptotics.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim depends on the unproven assertion that the classical (large central charge) limit of the null-vector equations for the irregular degenerate Virasoro blocks reproduces exactly the equations for the critical Richardson Yang–Yang function, a step asserted in the final paragraph of Section 3.3; the only closed-form check of the classical-block identity (6.6) was for $M_1=M_2=1$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If $W_R^{\rm crit}$ is computable from the classical limit of irregular degenerate Virasoro blocks, the Richardson–Gaudin spectrum can be obtained by truncating a conformal-block power series, bypassing direct numerical solution of the Bethe equations.
  • The conserved charges $\lambda_i$ of the reduced BCS model, equivalently the Gaudin central-spin Hamiltonian, are then read off as derivatives of one function, $W_R^{\rm crit}$, so the full set of commuting integrals follows from a single object.
  • The eigenvalue-based numerical reformulation converts the Bethe equations into algebraic equations for $P'/P$ and yields rapidity trajectories that merge and branch in the complex plane, reproducing picket-fence, harmonic-oscillator, and hydrogen-like spectra in the paper's examples.
  • In the degenerate case $M>L$, assigning small complex shifts to energy levels through (4.18) makes the linear system solvable while preserving the reality of the total energy, allowing tracking of branchings in highly degenerate spectra.
  • The finite-temperature extension computes canonical-ensemble pairing energies and heat capacities directly from exact rapidities, avoiding mean-field or grand-canonical approximations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the same correspondence could turn the CFT route into a proof rather than a conjecture if the classical limit of irregular degenerate blocks were constructed rigorously, by analogy with existing rigorous treatments of torus one-point blocks; as written, the large-$c$ step is asserted at the level of a saddle-point statement.
  • One could test the correspondence at high orders before solving any Bethe equations by generating classical block coefficients recursively from the null-vector equations for an irregular block with several screening charges; the paper exhibits a closed-form check only for $M_1=M_2=1$.
  • The same Yang–Yang/classical-block machinery is likely transferable to elliptic Calogero–Moser models and to four-dimensional gauge-theory duals, since the paper identifies analogous correspondences for WZW and torus blocks as motivations but does not develop them.
  • The degeneracy splitting (4.18) introduces an apparently ad hoc imaginary shift, yet the paper's numerical tests indicate the real spectrum is insensitive to its magnitude; a systematic study of that invariance would clarify when the complex-extension trick is legitimate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a two-part contribution. The first part reviews classical and quantum integrability, the algebraic Bethe ansatz, and the Richardson (reduced BCS) and Gaudin spin models, with self-contained derivations of the hard-core boson algebra and the Richardson equations in Appendices B and C. The central analytical claim, in Section 3.3, is that the Richardson Yang–Yang function W_R is related to the Gaiotto–Witten irregular degenerate Virasoro-block Yang–Yang function W by W_R = −2W + 2πiLM when 1/g = Λ, so that the critical value W_R^crit generates the conserved charges of the reduced BCS model; the paper further asserts that the classical (large-c) limit of the BPZ equations for these degenerate blocks recovers the equations governing W_R^crit. The second part develops a numerical solver for the Bethe equations based on the eigenvalue reformulation of Section 4, using Newton–Raphson with LU decomposition and Laguerre root-finding with deflation; the code is released on GitHub (Section 5.4). The solver is applied to picket-fence, harmonic oscillator, hydrogen-like, and degenerate spectra, with a finite-temperature extension in Section 6.3. Section 6.4 presents the four-point-block example of the classical conformal-block/Yang–Yang correspondence, and Section 7 outlines matrix-model, 2D-CFT, and 4D-gauge-theory programs as future work.

Significance. The algebraic core of the paper is sound: the identity W_R = −2W + 2πiLM with 1/g = Λ follows by direct term-by-term comparison of Eqs. (3.24) and (3.30), and the derivative formula λ_i = −(1/Λ)∂W_crit/∂z_i follows from Eq. (3.23) in two lines. This parameter-free comparison is a genuine contribution, and the manuscript ships checkable derivations (Appendices B–D), a publicly released solver with a transparent algorithm description (Section 5.4), and a falsifiable prediction: a classical-block computation of λ_i would have to match Eq. (3.23). However, the main concern raised in review is confirmed by the manuscript itself: Section 3.3 asserts that the classical limit of the BPZ equations for the irregular degenerate blocks recovers the equations for W_R^crit, while Section 7, item 2, lists that same derivation as the primary future objective, and Section 6.4 admits that the numerical analysis of the key correspondence is still required. The only closed-form evidence, Eq. (6.6), treats the regular four-point block and was verified in [25] only for M1 = M2 = 1.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.3, final paragraph; §7, item 2] The final paragraph of Section 3.3 states that “by taking the classical (large-c, b→0) limit of those BPZ equations and performing a saddle-point analysis, one recovers precisely the equations governing W_R^crit,” but no derivation or check of this statement appears anywhere in the manuscript. Section 7, item 2, then describes the very same step as the paper’s “primary objective” for future work, and Section 6.4 concedes that detailed numerical analysis of the classical-block correspondence “is required” and will be presented in a forthcoming paper. As printed, the manuscript is internally inconsistent about whether the identification has been established. Because the CFT-based computation of the conserved charges λ_i — the paper’s headline claim — rests on this one step, the authors must either supply the derivation (or at least a non-trivial check, e.g., recovering the λ_i of Eq. (3.23) from the classical BPZ limit for M = 1 or M = 2), or explicitly re-label the assertion as a conjecture in Section 3.3.
  2. [§6.4, Eq. (6.6)] Eq. (6.6) is the only concrete closed-form evidence offered in support of the classical conformal-block/Yang–Yang correspondence, but it concerns the regular four-point Virasoro block rather than the irregular Gaiotto–Witten blocks on which the central claim of Section 3.3 rests, and it is imported from the authors’ earlier paper [25], where it was verified only for M1 = M2 = 1. The text itself states that “a more detailed numerical analysis is required to explore the analytic structure of the classical block” and announces the results for a forthcoming paper. For the correspondence to be load-bearing, this manuscript should either reproduce the M1 = M2 = 1 check, add a test with M1 + M2 > 2, or explicitly present Eq. (6.6) and the surrounding proposition as conjectural.
  3. [§4.2, Eq. (4.18); §6.2] Eq. (4.18) is inconsistent as printed with its own example: the progression k = −dj − 1/2, −dj − 1/2 + 1, …, dj − 1/2 − 1, dj − 1/2 contains 2dj + 1 terms, whereas the example “dj = 3 … εj = ǫj − i, ǫj, ǫj + i” requires exactly three values. Additionally, the claim that the symmetric distribution of complex shifts “preserves the reality of the total energy” is made without proof, and the assertion in Section 6.2 that “detailed numerical tests confirm that the magnitude of this initial separation does not affect the real spectrum” is not backed by any shown data. Since the degenerate regime is one of the two cases the solver is claimed to handle, the formula must be corrected and the reality/independence property either proved or demonstrated with the actual numerical tests.
  4. [§6, Figures 2–15; Abstract; §7] The abstract and Section 7 claim that the solver “accurately reproduces known rapidity trajectories,” but no quantitative comparison with an independent benchmark is presented: all of the displayed curves are the solver’s own outputs, and the two-level model of Section 6.2, for which exact spectra are known (e.g., Ciechan–Wysokiński [23] computed M = 10), is discussed only qualitatively. To substantiate the accuracy claim, at least one published dataset or exact solution should be reproduced with quantified residuals (for instance, the residual norm of Eq. (4.1) along the computed trajectories).
minor comments (6)
  1. [§6.1, text and captions of Figures 2 and 3] The model ǫj = j + 1/2 is described in the text of Section 6.1 as the “one-dimensional quantum harmonic oscillator” but is labeled “picket-fence model” in the captions of Figures 2 and 3; the terminology should be reconciled.
  2. [§6.2] The degeneracy convention “ǫj = 2j, j = 0, 1, 2, …, with degeneracies Dj = j” is inconsistent with the stated configuration “M = 6 Cooper pairs … where the first three levels are fully occupied”: the first three levels accommodate 0 + 1 + 2 = 3 pairs, not 6. The likely intended convention is j = 1, 2, … with Dj = j (giving 1 + 2 + 3 = 6), and the text should be corrected accordingly.
  3. [§6.1, p. 30] The sentence “Despite multiplying both g and ǫj by 10, the resulting spectra are identical” is imprecise: Figures 2–3 and Figures 4–5 are identical only up to the rescaling of both axes by 10 that is visible in the figure ranges. This is the expected scale invariance of Eq. (4.1), and the text should say so explicitly.
  4. [§4.2, Eq. (4.17)] The text states that (4.17) is “a set of L linear equations for M−1 coefficients,” but with P0 = 1 fixed the unknown coefficients P1, …, PM number M; in addition, for the non-degenerate examples in Section 6.1 one has L > M, so the system is overdetermined and the paper should specify how it is solved (e.g., least squares or selection of M rows).
  5. [References [18], [19]] References [18] and [19] are both listed with the arXiv identifier 2311.07960, which cannot be correct for two distinct papers; one of the two identifiers should be corrected.
  6. [§3.3, text after Eq. (3.30)] The parameter Λ is described only as a constant “directly proportional to the eigenvalue” of L1 on the irregular state; since the entire identification W_R = −2W + 2πiLM hinges on setting 1/g = Λ, the paper should specify the proportionality constant and its normalization.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central W_R = -2W identity is an exact algebraic comparison of independently defined Yang-Yang functions; the main weakness is an unproven (not circular) large-c BPZ claim deferred to future work.

full rationale

The central identity in Section 3.3 is not circular. The Richardson Yang-Yang function W_R in Eq. (3.24) and the Gaiotto-Witten Yang-Yang function W in Eq. (3.30) are independently defined objects. Substituting k_i = 1 and 1/g = Lambda into Eq. (3.30) gives, by direct algebra, W_R(z,E) = -2W(z,E) + 2 pi i L M; this is an exact comparison of two closed-form expressions, not a fit of one quantity in terms of the other. The subsequent formula lambda_i = -1/Lambda partial W_crit/partial z_i follows from the same identity together with Sierra's Eq. (3.23), so it is also a derived consequence rather than a prediction forced by an input parameter. The paper does contain a minor self-citation: Eq. (6.6) is imported from the authors' previous paper [25], where it was verified only for M1 = M2 = 1. However, this concrete closed-form example concerns the regular four-point Virasoro block and is not the load-bearing ingredient for the central Richardson/Gaiotto-Witten identity; it is an illustrative application of the classical-block correspondence. The genuinely weak point is the closing paragraph of Section 3.3, which asserts that 'by taking the classical (large-c, b->0) limit of those BPZ equations and performing a saddle-point analysis, one recovers precisely the equations governing W_R^crit', while Section 7, item 2, describes the same derivation as 'Our primary objective' for future work. This is an internal inconsistency and a missing proof, but it is not circular: the BPZ equations are not used as an input to define W_R^crit, and the asserted recovery is not shown to be equivalent to the claim by construction. The score of 2 reflects the minor self-citation and the unproven, deferred BPZ step, not a reduction of the central result to its own assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No genuinely new physical entity is introduced; the analytical chain reuses Sierra's KZ realization, Gaiotto-Witten irregular blocks, and the authors' own classical-block formula [25]. The only ad hoc input is the complex degeneracy-splitting prescription, which behaves like a free parameter and is misprinted. The central CFT route to W_R^crit therefore rests on cited and partially verified premises rather than a self-contained derivation.

free parameters (1)
  • Complex degeneracy offsets k_j in Eq. (4.18) = hand-chosen; example for d_j=3 is -i, 0, +i, but the printed range gives seven values
    Introduced so that each Cooper pair on a degenerate level gets a distinct complex energy, making the M>L linear system solvable; no derivation is given and the formula contradicts its own example.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The KZ equation (3.25) is equivalent to the eigenvalue equation for the Richardson conserved charges via the free-field realization (3.26).
    Invoked in Section 3.3 following Sierra [7]; it is the bridge from Bethe ansatz to CFT and is not re-derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption The Gaiotto-Witten irregular degenerate conformal block has the integral representation (3.29)-(3.30), whose saddle points coincide with the Richardson Bethe equations.
    Taken from refs. [17,19]; the paper specializes to k_i=1 and identifies 1/g with Λ.
  • domain assumption Eq. (6.6) expresses the four-point classical conformal block in terms of W_crit and Selberg-integral terms.
    Imported from the authors' earlier work [25], where it was verified only for M1=M2=1; the present paper relies on it for the proposed CFT computation.
  • standard math The saddle-point evaluation of the Coulomb gas integral (3.27) is valid in the limit α0→∞ and yields the Richardson equations.
    Standard saddle-point method; the validity of this limit for finite discrete Richardson systems is assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper Splitting degenerate levels as ε_j = ǫ_j + i k with symmetric offsets preserves the real total energy and the physical spectrum.
    Stated around Eq. (4.18) and used throughout Section 6.2; no proof is provided and the formula is internally inconsistent with its three-pair example.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of 2D CFT and efficient Bethe ansatz for exactly solvable Richardson-Gaudin models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AFIUHZO3

@misc{pith2026250722734,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: 2D CFT and efficient Bethe ansatz for exactly solvable Richardson-Gaudin models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AFIUHZO3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.22734}
}
read the original abstract

This work inaugurates a series of complementary studies on Richardson-Gaudin integrable models. We begin by reviewing the foundations of classical and quantum integrability, recalling the algebraic Bethe ansatz solution of the Richardson (reduced BCS) and Gaudin (central spin) models, and presenting a proof of their integrability based on the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov equations and their generalizations to perturbed affine conformal blocks. Building on this foundation, we then describe an alternative CFT-based formulation. In this approach, the Bethe ansatz equations for these exactly solvable models are embedded within two-dimensional Virasoro CFT via irregular, degenerate conformal blocks. To probe new formulations within the Richardson-Gaudin class, we develop a high-performance numerical solver. The Bethe roots are encoded in the Baxter polynomial, with initial estimates obtained from a secular matrix eigenproblem and subsequently refined using a deflation-assisted hybrid Newton-Raphson/Laguerre algorithm. The solver proves effective in practical applications: when applied to picket-fence, harmonic oscillator, and hydrogen-like spectra, it accurately reproduces known rapidity trajectories and reveals consistent merging and branching patterns of arcs in the complex rapidity plane. We also explain how to generalize our computational approach to finite temperatures, allowing us to calculate temperature-dependent pairing energies and other thermodynamic observables directly within the discrete Richardson model. We propose an application of the solver to Gaudin-type Bethe equations, which emerge in the classical (large central charge) limit of Virasoro conformal blocks. We conclude by outlining future directions: direct minimization of the Yang-Yang function as an alternative root-finding strategy; revisiting time-dependent extensions; and ... .

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [17]

    Gaiotto, E

    D. Gaiotto, E. Witten, Knot invariants from four-dimensional gauge theory , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 16 (2012) 935-1086

    work page 2012

  2. [25]

    Pi¸ atek, R.G

    M.R. Pi¸ atek, R.G. Nazmitdinov, A. Puente, A.R. Pietrykowski, Classical conformal blocks, Coulomb gas integrals and Richardson–Gaudin models , JHEP 04 (2022) 098

    work page 2022

  3. [23]

    Ciechan, K.I

    A. Ciechan, K.I. Wysokinski, Thermodynamics of the Two-Level Richardson Model , Acta Physica Polonica Series A (2007) 111(4), DOI: 10.12693/APhys PolA.111.467

    work page doi:10.12693/aphys 2007

  4. [1]

    Dukelsky, S

    J. Dukelsky, S. Pittel, G. Sierra, Colloquium: Exactly solvable Richardson–Gaudin models fo r many-body quantum systems , Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, (2004) 643-662

    work page 2004

  5. [2]

    Richardson-Gaudin models and broken integrability

    P.W. Claeys, Richardson–Gaudin models and broken integrability , Thesis (2018), arXiv:1809.04447

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  6. [3]

    Richardson, A restricted class of exact eigenstates of the pairing-forc e Hamiltonian , Phys

    R.W. Richardson, A restricted class of exact eigenstates of the pairing-forc e Hamiltonian , Phys. Lett. 3 (1963) 277-279 . – 48 –

    work page 1963

  7. [4]

    Richardson, N

    R.W. Richardson, N. Sherman, Exact eigenstates of the pairing-force Hamiltonian , Nucl. Phys. 52 (1964) 221-238

    work page 1964

  8. [5]

    Gaudin, Diagonalisation d’une classe d’Hamiltoniens de spin , J

    M. Gaudin, Diagonalisation d’une classe d’Hamiltoniens de spin , J. Phys. 37 (1976) 1087-1098

    work page 1976

Show all 39 references
  1. [6]

    Gaudin, The Bethe Wavefunction , Cambridge University Press 2014, Cambridge, translated by J.-S

    M. Gaudin, The Bethe Wavefunction , Cambridge University Press 2014, Cambridge, translated by J.-S. Caux

    2014

  2. [7]

    Sierra, Conformal field theory and the exact solution of the BCS Hamil tonian, Nucl

    G. Sierra, Conformal field theory and the exact solution of the BCS Hamil tonian, Nucl. Phys. B572 (2000) 517-534, hep-th/9911078

    2000 arXiv

  3. [8]

    Von Delft, F

    J. Von Delft, F. Braun, Superconductivity in ultrasmall grains: Introduction to R ichardson’s exact solution , In: Kulik, I.O., Ellialtioglu, R. (eds) Quantum Mesoscopic Phen omena and Mesoscopic Devices in Microelectronics. NATO Science Seri es, vol 559. Springer, Dordrecht, ...

    arXiv

  4. [9]

    G.Ortiz, J.Dukelsky, BCS-to-BEC crossover from the exact BCS solution , Phys. Rev. A72 (2005) 043611, arXiv:cond-mat/0503664

    2005 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Resare, J

    F. Resare, J. Hofmann, Few-to-many-particle crossover of pair excitations in a su perfluid, Phys. Rev. A110 (2024) 061302

    2024

  6. [11]

    W.-B. He, S. Chesi, H.-Q. Lin, X.-W. Guan, Quantum dynamics of Gaudin magnets , Commun. Theor. Phys. 74 (2022) 095102, arXiv:2201.01025

    2022 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Faribault, O

    A. Faribault, O. El Araby, C. Strater, V. Gritsev, Gaudin models solver based on the Bethe ansatz/ordinary differential equations correspondence , Phys. Rev. B 83 (2011) 235124, arXiv:1103.0472

    2011 arXiv

  8. [13]

    Retore, Introduction to classical and quantum integrability , J

    A.L. Retore, Introduction to classical and quantum integrability , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. (2022) 55 173001, arXiv:2109.14280v2

    2022 arXiv

  9. [14]

    Cambiaggio, A.M.F

    M.C. Cambiaggio, A.M.F. Rivas, M. Saraceno, Integrability of the pairing Hamiltonian , Nucl. Phys. A624 (1997) 157, nucl-th/9708031

    1997 arXiv

  10. [15]

    G. Sierra, Integrability and conformal symmetry in the BCS model , Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Statistical Field Theories, Como 18-23 June 2001, arXiv:hep- th/0111114

    2001

  11. [16]

    W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, B. P. Flannery, Numerical recipes: The art of scientific computing, Third edition , Cambridge University Press 2017

    2017

  12. [19]

    Haghighat, Y

    B. Haghighat, Y. Liu, N. Reshetikhin, Flat Connections from Irregular Conformal Blocks , Commun. Math. Phys. 406 (2025) 6, 138, arXiv:2311.07960

    2025 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Gukov, B

    S. Gukov, B. Haghighat, Y. Liu, N. Reshetikhin, Irregular KZ equations and Kac–Moody representations, arXiv:2412.16929. – 49 –

    arXiv

  14. [21]

    Belavin, A.M

    A.A. Belavin, A.M. Polyakov, A.B. Zamolodchikov, Infinite conformal symmetry in 2D quantum field theories , Nucl. Phys. B241 (1984) 333

    1984

  15. [22]

    El Araby, V

    O. El Araby, V. Gritsev, A. Faribault, Bethe Ansatz and Ordinary Differential Equation Correspondence for Degenerate Gaudin Models , Phys. Rev. B 85, 115130 (2012), arXiv:1201.5542

    2012 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Mironov, A

    A. Mironov, A. Morozov, Sh. Shakirov, Conformal blocks as Dotsenko–Fateev Integral Discriminants, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25, 16 (2010) 3173-3207

    2010

  17. [26]

    Takemura, On the eigenstates of the elliptic Calogero–Moser model , Lett

    K. Takemura, On the eigenstates of the elliptic Calogero–Moser model , Lett. Math. Phys. 53 (2000) 181-194, arXiv:math/0002104

    2000 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Alday, Y

    L.F. Alday, Y. Tachikawa, Affine SL(2) conformal blocks from 4d gauge theories , Lett. Math. Phys. 94 (2010) 87, arXiv:1005.4469

    2010 arXiv

  19. [28]

    Pi¸ atek,Classical torus conformal block, N = 2∗ twisted superpotential and the accessory parameter of Lam´ e equation, JHEP 03 (2014) 124, arXiv:1309.7672

    M. Pi¸ atek,Classical torus conformal block, N = 2∗ twisted superpotential and the accessory parameter of Lam´ e equation, JHEP 03 (2014) 124, arXiv:1309.7672

    2014 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Ghosal, G

    P. Ghosal, G. Remy, X. Sun, Y. Sun, Probabilistic conformal blocks for Liouville CFT on the torus, arXiv:2003.03802

    2003 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Desiraju, P

    H. Desiraju, P. Ghosal, A. Prokhorov, Proof of Zamolodchikov conjecture for semi-classical conformal blocks on the torus , arXiv:2407.05839

    arXiv

  22. [31]

    Barik, L

    S. Barik, L. Bakker, V. Gritsev, J. Minar, E.A. Yuzbashyan, Higher spin Richardson–Gaudin model with time-dependent coupling: Exact dynamics , arXiv:2507.10856

    arXiv

  23. [32]

    Roman, G

    J.M. Roman, G. Sierra, J. Dukelsky, Large N limit of the exactly solvable BCS model: analytics versus numerics , Nucl. Phys. B634 (2002) 483-510, arXiv:cond-mat/0202070

    2002 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Ginsparg, J. Zinn-Justin, 2D Gravity and Random Matrices , Phys. Rept. 254 (1995) 1-133, arXiv:hep-th/9306153

    1995 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Eynard, T

    B. Eynard, T. Kimura, S. Ribault, Random matrices, arXiv:1510.04430

    arXiv

  26. [35]

    Jurco, Large N and Bethe ansatz , Mod

    B. Jurco, Large N and Bethe ansatz , Mod. Phys. Lett. A19, 1661 (2004)

    2004

  27. [36]

    Manabe, P

    M. Manabe, P. Su/suppress lkowski,Quantum curves and conformal field theory , Phys. Rev. D95, 126003 (2017), arXiv:1512.05785

    2017 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Alday, D

    L. Alday, D. Gaiotto, Y. Tachikawa, Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories, Lett. Math. Phys. 91 (2010) 167-197, hep-th/0906.3219

    2010 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Nekrasov, S.L

    N.A. Nekrasov, S.L. Shatashvili, Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theories, XVIth International Congress on Mathematical Physics, pp. 26 5-289 (2010), arXiv:0908.4052

    2010 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Gaiotto, Asymptotically free N = 2 theories and irregular conformal blocks , J

    D. Gaiotto, Asymptotically free N = 2 theories and irregular conformal blocks , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 462, 012014 (2013), https://doi.org/10.10 88/1742-6596/462/1/012014. – 50 –

    2013

  31. [40]

    Gaiotto, J

    D. Gaiotto, J. Teschner, Irregular singularities in Liouville theory and Argyres–D ouglas type gauge theories. I. , JHEP 12 (2012) 050 . – 51 –

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.