pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.13629 · v2 · pith:AFQUI455new · submitted 2025-11-17 · ✦ hep-ex · hep-ph

Sensitivity to low-mass WIMPs with an improved liquid argon ionization response model within the DarkSide programme

F. Acerbi , P. Adhikari , P. Agnes , I. Ahmad , S. Albergo , I. F. Albuquerque , T. Alexander , A. K. Alton
show 289 more authors
P. Amaudruz M. Angiolilli E. Aprile M. Atzori Corona D. J. Auty M. Ave I. C. Avetisov O. Azzolini H. O. Back Z. Balmforth A. I. Barrado Olmedo P. Barrillon G. Batignani S. Bharat P. Bhowmick S. Blua V. Bocci W. Bonivento B. Bottino M. G. Boulay T. Braun A. Buchowicz S. Bussino J. Busto M. Cadeddu R. Calabrese V. Camillo A. Caminata N. Canci M. Caravati M. C\'ardenas-Montes N. Cargioli M. Carlini P. Cavalcante S. Cebrian S. Chashin A. Chepurnov S. Choudhary L. Cifarelli B. Cleveland Y. Coadou I. Coarasa V. Cocco E. Conde Vilda L. Consiglio A. F. V. Cortez B. S. Costa M. Czubak S. D'Auria M. D. Da Rocha Rolo A. Dainty G. Darbo S. Davini R. de Asmundis S. De Cecco M. De Napoli G. Dellacasa A. V. Derbin L. Di Noto P. Di Stefano L. K. Dias D. D\'iaz Mairena C. Dionisi G. Dolganov F. Dordei V. Dronik A. Elersich T. Erjavec N. Fearon M. Fern\'andez D\'iaz L. Ferro A. Ficorella G. Fiorillo D. Fleming P. Franchini D. Franco H. Frandini Gatti E. Frolov F. Gabriele D. Gahan C. Galbiati G. Gali\'nski G. Gallina M. Garbini P. Garcia Abia A. Gawdzik G. K. Giovanetti V. Goicoechea Casanueva A. Gola L. Grandi G. Grauso G. Grilli di Cortona A. Grobov M. Gromov J. Guerrero C\'anovas M. Gulino B. R. Hackett A. L. Hallin M. Haranczyk B. Harrop T. Hessel C. Hidalgo J. Hollingham J. Hu F. Hubaut D. Huff T. Hugues E. V. Hungerford An. Ianni V. Ippolito A. Jamil C. Jillings R. Keloth N. Kemmerich M. Kimura A. Klenin K. Kondo G. Korga L. Kotsiopoulou S. Koulosousas A. Kubankin P. Kunz\'e M. Kuss M. Ku\'zniak M. Kuzwa M. La Commara M. Lai E. Le Guirriec E. Leason A. Leoni L. Lidey J. Lipp M. Lissia L. Luzzi O. Lychagina O. Macfadyen I. Machts I. N. Machulin S. Manecki I. Manthos L. Mapelli A. Marasciulli S. M. Mari C. Mariani J. Maricic M. Martinez C. J. Martoff G. Matteucci K. Mavrokoridis A. B. McDonald S. Merzi A. Messina R. Milincic S. Minutoli A. Mitra J. Monroe M. Morrocchi A. Morsy V. N. Muratova M. Murra P. Musico R. Nania M. Nessi G. Nieradka K. Nikolopoulos E. Nikoloudaki I. Nikulin J. Nowak K. Olchanski A. Oleinik V. Oleynikov P. Organtini A. Ortiz de Sol\'orzano A. Padmanabhan M. Pallavicini L. Pandola E. Pantic E. Paoloni D. Papi B. Park G. Pastuszak G. Paternoster R. Pavarani A. Peck K. Pelczar R. Perez V. Pesudo S. Piacentini N. Pino G. Plante A. Pocar S. Pordes P. Pralavorio E. Preosti D. Price M. Pronesti S. Puglia M. Queiroga Bazetto F. Raffaelli F. Ragusa Y. Ramachers A. Ramirez S. Ravinthiran M. Razeti A. L. Renshaw A. Repond M. Rescigno S. Resconi F. Retiere L. P. Rignanese A. Ritchie-Yates A. Rivetti A. Roberts C. Roberts G. Rogers L. Romero M. Rossi D. Rudik J. Runge M. A. Sabia D. Sablone P. Salomone O. Samoylov S. Sanfilippo D. Santone R. Santorelli E. M. Santos I. Sargeant M. L. Sarsa C. Savarese E. Scapparone F. G. Schuckman D. A. Semenov C. Seoane M. Sestu V. Shalamova S. Sharma Poudel A. Sheshukov M. Simeone P. Skensved M. D. Skorokhvatov O. Smirnov T. Smirnova B. Smith F. Spadoni M. Spangenberg A. Steri V. Stornelli S. Stracka A. Sung C. Sunny Y. Suvorov A. M. Szelc O. Taborda R. Tartaglia A. Taylor J. Taylor G. Testera K. Thieme A. Thompson S. Torres-Lara A. Tricomi S. Tullio E. V. Unzhakov M. Van Uffelen P. Ventura G. Vera D\'iaz S. Viel A. Vishneva R. B. Vogelaar J. Vossebeld B. Vyas M. Wada M. Walczak Y. Wang S. Westerdale L. Williams M. M. Wojcik M. Wojcik C. Yang J. Yin A. Zabihi P. Zakhary A. Zani Y. Zhang T. Zhu A. Zichichi G. Zuzel M. P. Zykova
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 20:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex hep-ph
keywords liquid argonnuclear recoilsionization responsescreening functionWIMP dark matterlow-mass WIMPsrecombination modelDarkSide programme
0
0 comments X

The pith

Refined ionization model for liquid argon tightens limits on low-mass WIMP interactions in the 1-3 GeV range.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper combines new calibration measurements with existing data sets to constrain atomic screening effects in the response of liquid argon to low-energy nuclear recoils. This constraint is applied inside the recombination framework used for prior analyses of the DarkSide-50 detector. The resulting model produces tighter upper bounds on the cross section for WIMP-nucleon scattering at WIMP masses between 1 and 3 GeV per speed of light squared. The same model also raises the expected reach of the larger detector now under construction for discovering such light dark matter particles.

Core claim

By fixing the screening function in the recombination framework with the combined calibration data, the ionization yield from nuclear recoils below a few keV is modeled more accurately. Inserting this updated response into the DarkSide-50 analysis framework yields stronger exclusion limits on spin-independent WIMP-nucleon interactions for WIMP masses in the 1–3 GeV/c² interval than those obtained with earlier response models. The same change improves the projected sensitivity of the next-stage detector to low-mass dark matter candidates.

What carries the argument

The screening function inside the recombination framework that adjusts predicted ionization yield from nuclear recoils according to atomic effects in liquid argon.

If this is right

  • Stronger upper limits on WIMP-nucleon cross sections for masses between 1 and 3 GeV/c² from existing DarkSide-50 data.
  • Higher projected discovery reach for the larger detector under construction.
  • Reduced uncertainty in the low-energy nuclear recoil response used by liquid argon dark matter searches.
  • A template for tightening response models in other noble-liquid detectors through additional calibration data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same data-driven adjustment of the screening function could be tested in xenon-based detectors to check whether the improvement is material-specific.
  • If the refined model holds at still lower energies, it may also sharpen background estimates for coherent neutrino scattering experiments that use argon.
  • Repeating the calibration program at additional recoil energies would provide an independent check on whether the screening function remains stable.

Load-bearing premise

The recombination framework continues to describe ionization response accurately once its screening function has been fixed by the combined calibration measurements.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of ionization yield or recombination fraction at nuclear recoil energies around 1 keV that lies well outside the band predicted by the updated screening function would undermine the new exclusion limits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.13629 by A. B. McDonald, A. Buchowicz, A. Caminata, A. Chepurnov, A. Dainty, A. Elersich, A. Ficorella, A. F. V. Cortez, A. Gawdzik, A. Gola, A. Grobov, A. I. Barrado Olmedo, A. Jamil, A. K. Alton, A. Klenin, A. Kubankin, A. Leoni, A. L. Hallin, A. L. Renshaw, A. Marasciulli, A. Messina, A. Mitra, A. Morsy, A. M. Szelc, An. Ianni, A. Oleinik, A. Ortiz de Sol\'orzano, A. Padmanabhan, A. Peck, A. Pocar, A. Ramirez, A. Repond, A. Ritchie-Yates, A. Rivetti, A. Roberts, A. Sheshukov, A. Steri, A. Sung, A. Taylor, A. Thompson, A. Tricomi, A. V. Derbin, A. Vishneva, A. Zabihi, A. Zani, A. Zichichi, B. Bottino, B. Cleveland, B. Harrop, B. Park, B. R. Hackett, B. S. Costa, B. Smith, B. Vyas, C. Dionisi, C. Galbiati, C. Hidalgo, C. Jillings, C. J. Martoff, C. Mariani, C. Roberts, C. Savarese, C. Seoane, C. Sunny, C. Yang, D. A. Semenov, D. D\'iaz Mairena, D. Fleming, D. Franco, D. Gahan, D. Huff, D. J. Auty, D. Papi, D. Price, D. Rudik, D. Sablone, D. Santone, E. Aprile, E. Conde Vilda, E. Frolov, E. Leason, E. Le Guirriec, E. M. Santos, E. Nikoloudaki, E. Pantic, E. Paoloni, E. Preosti, E. Scapparone, E. V. Hungerford, E. V. Unzhakov, F. Acerbi, F. Dordei, F. Gabriele, F. G. Schuckman, F. Hubaut, F. Raffaelli, F. Ragusa, F. Retiere, F. Spadoni, G. Batignani, G. Darbo, G. Dellacasa, G. Dolganov, G. Fiorillo, G. Gali\'nski, G. Gallina, G. Grauso, G. Grilli di Cortona, G. K. Giovanetti, G. Korga, G. Matteucci, G. Nieradka, G. Pastuszak, G. Paternoster, G. Plante, G. Rogers, G. Testera, G. Vera D\'iaz, G. Zuzel, H. Frandini Gatti, H. O. Back, I. Ahmad, I. C. Avetisov, I. Coarasa, I. F. Albuquerque, I. Machts, I. Manthos, I. Nikulin, I. N. Machulin, I. Sargeant, J. Busto, J. Guerrero C\'anovas, J. Hollingham, J. Hu, J. Lipp, J. Maricic, J. Monroe, J. Nowak, J. Runge, J. Taylor, J. Vossebeld, J. Yin, K. Kondo, K. Mavrokoridis, K. Nikolopoulos, K. Olchanski, K. Pelczar, K. Thieme, L. Cifarelli, L. Consiglio, L. Di Noto, L. Ferro, L. Grandi, L. K. Dias, L. Kotsiopoulou, L. Lidey, L. Luzzi, L. Mapelli, L. Pandola, L. P. Rignanese, L. Romero, L. Williams, M. Angiolilli, M. A. Sabia, M. Atzori Corona, M. Ave, M. Cadeddu, M. Caravati, M. C\'ardenas-Montes, M. Carlini, M. Czubak, M. D. Da Rocha Rolo, M. De Napoli, M. D. Skorokhvatov, M. Fern\'andez D\'iaz, M. Garbini, M. G. Boulay, M. Gromov, M. Gulino, M. Haranczyk, M. Kimura, M. Kuss, M. Ku\'zniak, M. Kuzwa, M. La Commara, M. Lai, M. Lissia, M. L. Sarsa, M. Martinez, M. Morrocchi, M. Murra, M. M. Wojcik, M. Nessi, M. Pallavicini, M. Pronesti, M. P. Zykova, M. Queiroga Bazetto, M. Razeti, M. Rescigno, M. Rossi, M. Sestu, M. Simeone, M. Spangenberg, M. Van Uffelen, M. Wada, M. Walczak, M. Wojcik, N. Canci, N. Cargioli, N. Fearon, N. Kemmerich, N. Pino, O. Azzolini, O. Lychagina, O. Macfadyen, O. Samoylov, O. Smirnov, O. Taborda, P. Adhikari, P. Agnes, P. Amaudruz, P. Barrillon, P. Bhowmick, P. Cavalcante, P. Di Stefano, P. Franchini, P. Garcia Abia, P. Kunz\'e, P. Musico, P. Organtini, P. Pralavorio, P. Salomone, P. Skensved, P. Ventura, P. Zakhary, R. B. Vogelaar, R. Calabrese, R. de Asmundis, R. Keloth, R. Milincic, R. Nania, R. Pavarani, R. Perez, R. Santorelli, R. Tartaglia, S. Albergo, S. Bharat, S. Blua, S. Bussino, S. Cebrian, S. Chashin, S. Choudhary, S. D'Auria, S. Davini, S. De Cecco, S. Koulosousas, S. Manecki, S. Merzi, S. Minutoli, S. M. Mari, S. Piacentini, S. Pordes, S. Puglia, S. Ravinthiran, S. Resconi, S. Sanfilippo, S. Sharma Poudel, S. Stracka, S. Torres-Lara, S. Tullio, S. Viel, S. Westerdale, T. Alexander, T. Braun, T. Erjavec, T. Hessel, T. Hugues, T. Smirnova, T. Zhu, V. Bocci, V. Camillo, V. Cocco, V. Dronik, V. Goicoechea Casanueva, V. Ippolito, V. N. Muratova, V. Oleynikov, V. Pesudo, V. Shalamova, V. Stornelli, W. Bonivento, Y. Coadou, Y. Ramachers, Y. Suvorov, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, Z. Balmforth.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Simultaneous fit to the ReD, ARIS, SCENE, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Probability density functions of the expected WIMP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. DarkSide-50 (red) exclusion limits with 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. DarkSide-50 exclusion limits (red) and DarkSide-20k [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Global fit under the ZBL screening model. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Same as above, for the Lenz-Jensen model. The confi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Same as above, for the Molière screening model. Note [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Dark matter detection experiments using liquid argon rely on a precise characterization of the ionization response to nuclear recoils, especially in the keV energy range relevant for light dark matter interactions. In this work, we present a comprehensive analysis that combines new measurements from the ReD setup, part of the DarkSide experimental program, with calibration data from DarkSide-50, as well as results from the ARIS and SCENE experiments. These combined datasets enable improved constraints on atomic screening effects in the modeling of the ionization response of liquid argon to nuclear recoils. The analysis is performed within the Thomas-Imel recombination framework adopted in previous DarkSide studies, and is here further constrained by the inclusion of ReD data, which allow the screening function to be determined from calibration measurements. By including the updated ionization model into the DarkSide-50 analysis framework, we obtain stronger exclusion limits on low-mass WIMP interactions, setting new world-leading constraints in the 1-3 GeV/c^2 WIMP mass range. Finally, we recast the sensitivity projections for the upcoming DarkSide-20k detector, demonstrating a significantly enhanced discovery potential for low-mass dark matter candidates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript combines new ReD calibration data with prior DarkSide-50, ARIS, and SCENE measurements to constrain the screening function within the Thomas-Imel recombination model for liquid-argon nuclear recoils. The updated ionization response is then inserted into the DarkSide-50 analysis pipeline, yielding stronger exclusion limits on low-mass WIMPs (new world-leading bounds in the 1–3 GeV/c² window) and recast sensitivity projections for DarkSide-20k.

Significance. If the model holds, the work meaningfully advances low-mass WIMP searches in liquid argon by tightening the nuclear-recoil ionization yield description through joint calibration constraints. The multi-experiment dataset combination and direct propagation into existing DarkSide-50 limits constitute a concrete improvement in sensitivity that can be tested with future data.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (screening-function extraction): the claim that the Thomas-Imel framework remains accurate once the screening function is fixed by the joint ReD+DS-50+ARIS+SCENE dataset requires explicit validation. No withheld low-energy cross-check or quantitative assessment of residual field dependence or dataset tension is shown; any mismatch directly affects the reported 1–3 GeV/c² exclusion curve.
  2. [§5.2] §5.2 (DarkSide-50 limit recast): the improvement in exclusion power is stated to be “stronger,” yet the manuscript does not tabulate the change in the ionization-yield systematic uncertainty budget or demonstrate that the new screening parameters do not introduce additional tension with the original calibration data.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 7] Figure 7 (exclusion plot): previous DarkSide-50 limits should be overlaid with the same line style as the new result for direct visual comparison.
  2. Notation: the screening function is referred to both as S(E) and f_screen in different sections; a single consistent symbol and definition would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have made revisions where appropriate to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (screening-function extraction): the claim that the Thomas-Imel framework remains accurate once the screening function is fixed by the joint ReD+DS-50+ARIS+SCENE dataset requires explicit validation. No withheld low-energy cross-check or quantitative assessment of residual field dependence or dataset tension is shown; any mismatch directly affects the reported 1–3 GeV/c² exclusion curve.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation strengthens the analysis. In the revised manuscript we add a withheld low-energy cross-check using a subset of ReD data excluded from the fit, together with a quantitative assessment of residual field dependence across the electric-field values of the input experiments and a global chi-squared evaluation of dataset tensions. These additions confirm that the Thomas-Imel framework remains accurate within uncertainties and support the reported 1–3 GeV/c² limits. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.2] §5.2 (DarkSide-50 limit recast): the improvement in exclusion power is stated to be “stronger,” yet the manuscript does not tabulate the change in the ionization-yield systematic uncertainty budget or demonstrate that the new screening parameters do not introduce additional tension with the original calibration data.

    Authors: We agree that a tabulated uncertainty budget and explicit tension check improve transparency. The revised §5.2 now contains a table comparing the ionization-yield systematic uncertainties before and after the update, together with chi-squared values and residual distributions for the original calibration datasets under the new screening parameters. These checks show no additional tension and quantify the improvement in exclusion power. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model constrained by independent calibrations then applied to search data

full rationale

The derivation begins with the Thomas-Imel recombination framework adopted from prior DarkSide work and constrains its screening function using combined calibration datasets from ReD, DarkSide-50 calibrations, ARIS, and SCENE. These calibration measurements are distinct from the WIMP search dataset in DarkSide-50. The updated ionization model is then inserted into the existing DarkSide-50 analysis pipeline to produce revised exclusion limits. No equation or step reduces the final limit to a fit performed on the search data itself, nor does any load-bearing premise collapse to a self-citation whose validity is assumed without external support. The chain remains self-contained against the stated calibration benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the continued validity of the Thomas-Imel recombination model for keV-scale nuclear recoils in liquid argon and on the assumption that the new ReD measurements correctly isolate the atomic screening effect.

free parameters (1)
  • screening function parameters
    Determined from the combined ReD, DarkSide-50, ARIS, and SCENE calibration data sets inside the Thomas-Imel framework.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Thomas-Imel recombination framework accurately describes ionization yield for nuclear recoils in liquid argon at keV energies.
    Explicitly adopted from previous DarkSide studies as stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 7171 in / 1279 out tokens · 52724 ms · 2026-05-17T20:42:03.542208+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Search for Long-Lived Dark Photons from Dark Radiation at the LHC

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Dark radiation from dark matter produced in Z decays generates long-lived dark photons that dominate over meson decays and bremsstrahlung for small kinetic mixing and masses above the GeV scale, allowing FASER2, FACET...

  2. Dive deeper with SUBMARINE: SUB-Mev dArk matter diRect detectIon using bilayer grapheNE

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bilayer graphene enables sub-MeV dark matter detection via electronic excitations with small exposure and sidereal modulation signatures.

  3. New benchmarks for direct detection of freeze-in dark matter in vector portal models

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Freeze-in at low reheating temperatures allows MeV-scale dark matter in vector portal models to be probed by future direct detection experiments in nuclear recoils for 50-500 MeV masses and via enhanced solar neutrino...

  4. Characterization of argon recoils at the keV scale with ReD and ReD+

    hep-ex 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    New measurements of argon's ionization yield for nuclear recoils extend coverage to 2 keV and show higher yields at lower energies than prior models.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Agneset al.(DarkSide), Calibration of the liquid ar- gon ionization response to low energy electronic and nu- clear recoils with DarkSide-50, Phys

    P. Agneset al.(DarkSide), Calibration of the liquid ar- gon ionization response to low energy electronic and nu- clear recoils with DarkSide-50, Phys. Rev. D104, 082005 (2021), arXiv:2107.08087 [physics.ins-det]

  2. [2]

    Measurement of the liquid argon energy response to nuclear and electronic recoils

    P. Agneset al., Measurement of the liquid argon energy response to nuclear and electronic recoils, Phys. Rev. D 97, 112005 (2018), arXiv:1801.06653 [physics.ins-det]

  3. [3]

    Measurement of Scintillation and Ionization Yield and Scintillation Pulse Shape from Nuclear Recoils in Liquid Argon

    H. Caoet al.(SCENE), Measurement of Scintillation and Ionization Yield and Scintillation Pulse Shape from Nu- clear Recoils in Liquid Argon, Phys. Rev.D91, 092007 (2015), arXiv:1406.4825 [physics.ins-det]

  4. [4]

    J. F. Ziegler, M. D. Ziegler, and J. P. Biersack, SRIM – The stopping and range of ions in matter (2010), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B268, 1818 (2010)

  5. [5]

    Moliere, Theorie der Streuung schneller geladener Teilchen I

    G. Moliere, Theorie der Streuung schneller geladener Teilchen I. Einzelstreuung am abgeschirmten Coulomb- Feld, Z. Naturforsch. A2, 133 (1947)

  6. [6]

    Lenz, Über die anwendbarkeit der statistischen meth- ode auf ionengitter, Zeitschrift für Physik77, 713 (1932)

    W. Lenz, Über die anwendbarkeit der statistischen meth- ode auf ionengitter, Zeitschrift für Physik77, 713 (1932)

  7. [7]

    Jensen, Die ladungsverteilung in ionen und die git- terkonstante des rubidiumbromids nach der statistischen methode, Zeitschrift für Physik77, 722 (1932)

    H. Jensen, Die ladungsverteilung in ionen und die git- terkonstante des rubidiumbromids nach der statistischen methode, Zeitschrift für Physik77, 722 (1932)

  8. [8]

    Interplay between scintillation and ionization in liquid xenon Dark Matter searches

    F. Bezrukov, F. Kahlhoefer, and M. Lindner, Inter- play between scintillation and ionization in liquid xenon Dark Matter searches, Astropart. Phys.35, 119 (2011), arXiv:1011.3990 [astro-ph.IM]

  9. [9]

    K.B.Winterbon,Heavy-ionrangeprofilesandassociated damage distributions, Radiation Effects13, 215 (1972)

  10. [10]

    P. Sigmund, Interatomic potentials, scattering and nu- clear stopping, inParticle Penetration and Radiation Ef- fects Volume 2: Penetration of Atomic and Molecular Ions(SpringerInternationalPublishing,Cham,2014)pp. 235–280

  11. [11]

    W. D. Wilson, L. G. Haggmark, and J. P. Biersack, Cal- culations of nuclear stopping, ranges, and straggling in the low-energy region, Phys. Rev. B15, 2458 (1977)

  12. [12]

    Agnes et al

    P. Agneset al.(DarkSide-50), Search for low-mass dark matter WIMPs with 12 ton-day exposure of DarkSide- 50, Phys. Rev. D107, 063001 (2023), arXiv:2207.11966 [hep-ex]

  13. [13]

    Acerbiet al.(DarkSide-20k), DarkSide-20k sensitivity to light dark matter particles, Commun

    F. Acerbiet al.(DarkSide-20k), DarkSide-20k sensitivity to light dark matter particles, Commun. Phys.7, 422 (2024), arXiv:2407.05813 [hep-ex]

  14. [14]

    Thomas and D

    J. Thomas and D. A. Imel, Recombination of electron- ion pairs in liquid argon and liquid xenon, Phys. Rev. A 36, 614 (1987)

  15. [15]

    Agneset al., Characterization the ionization response of argon to nuclear recoils at the kev scale with the red experiment (2025), arXiv:2510.16404 [nucl-ex]

    P. Agneset al., Characterization the ionization response of argon to nuclear recoils at the kev scale with the red experiment (2025), arXiv:2510.16404 [nucl-ex]

  16. [16]

    Agneset al., Performance of the ReD TPC, a novel double-phase LAr detector with silicon photo- multiplier readout, Eur

    P. Agneset al., Performance of the ReD TPC, a novel double-phase LAr detector with silicon photo- multiplier readout, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 1014 (2021), arXiv:2106.13168 [physics.ins-det]

  17. [17]

    Jeffreys,The Theory of Probability, 3rd ed

    H. Jeffreys,The Theory of Probability, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, 1961)

  18. [18]

    R. E. Kass and A. E. Raftery, Bayes Factors, J. Am. Statist. Assoc.90, 773 (1995)

  19. [19]

    Agneset al.(DarkSide-50), Characterization of spurious-electron signals in the double-phase argon TPC oftheDarkSide-50experiment, (2025),arXiv:2507.23003 [hep-ex]

    P. Agneset al.(DarkSide-50), Characterization of spurious-electron signals in the double-phase argon TPC oftheDarkSide-50experiment, (2025),arXiv:2507.23003 [hep-ex]

  20. [20]

    Aprileet al

    E. Aprileet al.(XENON), First Search for Light Dark Matter in the Neutrino Fog with XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 111802 (2025), arXiv:2409.17868 [hep-ex]

  21. [21]

    Ma et al.,Search for Solar B8 Neutrinos in the PandaX-4T Experiment Using Neutrino-Nucleus Coherent Scattering, Phys

    W. Maet al.(PandaX), Search for Solar B8 Neutrinos in the PandaX-4T Experiment Using Neutrino-Nucleus Co- herent Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 021802 (2023), arXiv:2207.04883 [hep-ex]

  22. [22]

    Li et al

    S. Liet al.(PandaX), Search for Light Dark Matter with Ionization Signals in the PandaX-4T Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 261001 (2023), arXiv:2212.10067 [hep- ex]

  23. [23]

    C. A. J. O’Hare, New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 251802 (2021), arXiv:2109.03116 [hep-ph]. 9 End Matter Global Fit Contours and Posterior AnalysisThis Appendix presents the results of the global fits per- formed under the three screening potential models: ZBL, Lenz-Jensen, and Molière. The fits co...