pith. sign in

arxiv: 1501.02924 · v1 · pith:AHWWGRPNnew · submitted 2015-01-13 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat· nucl-th

Remarks on the study of the X(3872) from Effective Field Theory with Pion-Exchange Interaction

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-latnucl-th
keywords statearxiveffectivefieldinteractionlettmassphys
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In a recent paper Phys.Rev.Lett. 111, 042002 (2013) (arXiv:1304.0846), the charmonium state X(3872) is studied in the framework of an effective field theory. In that work it is claimed that (i) the one-pion exchange (OPE) alone provides sufficient binding to produce the X as a shallow bound state at the $D^0\bar{D}^{*0}$ threshold, (ii) short-range dynamics (described by a contact interaction) provides only moderate corrections to the OPE, and (iii) the X-pole disappears as the pion mass is increased slightly and therefore the X should not be seen on the lattice, away from the pion physical mass point, if it were a molecular state. In this paper we demonstrate that the results of Phys.Rev.Lett. 111, 042002 (2013) (arXiv:1304.0846) suffer from technical as well as conceptual problems and therefore do not support the conclusions drawn by the authors.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Finite-volume analysis of the $H$-dibaryon including left-hand-cut effects

    hep-lat 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Finite-volume N/D analysis with left-hand cuts applied to lattice data shows a mild but statistically significant effect on H-dibaryon binding energy compared to Lüscher quantization.

  2. Radiative decays of hadronic molecules: From confusion to inspiration

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Radiative decays of hadronic molecules require careful treatment of scale hierarchies to resolve interpretive confusions, as demonstrated by reviewing decay types and instructive examples.