Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Zig-Zag Process and Super-Efficient Sampling for Bayesian Analysis of Big Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1607.03188 v2 pith:AIRRQBIU submitted 2016-07-11 stat.CO math.PR

The Zig-Zag Process and Super-Efficient Sampling for Bayesian Analysis of Big Data

classification stat.CO math.PR
keywords processzig-zagapproximatedatadistributionmcmcmethodsposterior
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Standard MCMC methods can scale poorly to big data settings due to the need to evaluate the likelihood at each iteration. There have been a number of approximate MCMC algorithms that use sub-sampling ideas to reduce this computational burden, but with the drawback that these algorithms no longer target the true posterior distribution. We introduce a new family of Monte Carlo methods based upon a multi-dimensional version of the Zig-Zag process of (Bierkens, Roberts, 2017), a continuous time piecewise deterministic Markov process. While traditional MCMC methods are reversible by construction (a property which is known to inhibit rapid convergence) the Zig-Zag process offers a flexible non-reversible alternative which we observe to often have favourable convergence properties. We show how the Zig-Zag process can be simulated without discretisation error, and give conditions for the process to be ergodic. Most importantly, we introduce a sub-sampling version of the Zig-Zag process that is an example of an {\em exact approximate scheme}, i.e. the resulting approximate process still has the posterior as its stationary distribution. Furthermore, if we use a control-variate idea to reduce the variance of our unbiased estimator, then the Zig-Zag process can be super-efficient: after an initial pre-processing step, essentially independent samples from the posterior distribution are obtained at a computational cost which does not depend on the size of the data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. State-of-art minibatches via novel DPP kernels: discretization, wavelets, and rough objectives

    stat.ML 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Wavelet DPP kernels deliver improved continuous variance reduction and a discretization procedure that preserves decay rates for discrete ML subsampling tasks including rough objectives.

  2. The Ray Tracing Sampler: Bayesian Sampling of Neural Networks for Everyone

    astro-ph.IM 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0

    A new ray-tracing MCMC sampler keeps ray speed constant, making it far more robust to stochastic gradients and able to sample billion-parameter neural networks on one GPU.