Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Aggregate Cyber-Risk Management in the IoT Age: Cautionary Statistics for (Re)Insurers and Likes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.01792 v1 pith:AIWZKHWS submitted 2021-05-04 cs.PF cs.SYeess.SYq-fin.RM

classification cs.PFcs.SYeess.SYq-fin.RM
keywords cyber-riskaggregatemanagementtheorygeneralalongsideassumingbest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we provide (i) a rigorous general theory to elicit conditions on (tail-dependent) heavy-tailed cyber-risk distributions under which a risk management firm might find it (non)sustainable to provide aggregate cyber-risk coverage services for smart societies, and (ii)a real-data driven numerical study to validate claims made in theory assuming boundedly rational cyber-risk managers, alongside providing ideas to boost markets that aggregate dependent cyber-risks with heavy-tails.To the best of our knowledge, this is the only complete general theory till date on the feasibility of aggregate cyber-risk management.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AI-Native Insurance for Agentic AI: Pricing, Underwriting, and End-to-End Automation

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A formal contract-design framework maps agentic-AI deployment characteristics to insurance premiums, deductibles, limits, and governance requirements, with insurability characterized as a region in risk-state space.

Pith tools