pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22889 · v1 · pith:AJOWCXONnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · 💻 cs.RO

Remote Teleoperation of Endovascular Intervention Robots: A Systematic Review

Xingyu Chen , Yinchao Yang , Nikola Fischer , Harry Robertshaw , Benjamin Jackson , Mohammad Shikh-Bahaei , Christos Bergeles , Thomas C Booth This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 05:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords teleoperationendovascular interventionrobotic systemsremote surgerysystematic reviewcatheter navigationnetwork latency
0
0 comments X

The pith

Teleoperated robotic systems navigate catheters and guidewires over distances up to 7000 km with clinically acceptable latency.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews sixteen studies on remote teleoperation of endovascular intervention robots to assess technical feasibility, communication needs, and early clinical results. It establishes that mechanical or electromagnetic systems can control catheters and guidewires across long distances when supported by robust networks. Latency in these setups stays between 30 and 163 milliseconds, which the authors treat as suitable for procedures. Small human trials reached full success, yet the bulk of data comes from animal and phantom models rather than patients. If these findings hold, the approach would cut radiation exposure for clinicians and bring specialized stroke or vascular care to distant sites.

Core claim

Teleoperated catheters and guidewires, driven by mechanical or electromagnetic systems, can be navigated across distances up to 7000 km. With robust communication infrastructure, network latency remained within clinically acceptable limits (30-163 ms). Although initial outcomes highlighted 100% procedural success in small-scale human trials, most evidence stemmed from animal or phantom models.

What carries the argument

Teleoperated endovascular robotic systems using mechanical or electromagnetic actuation for remote catheter and guidewire control over long distances with low-latency networks.

If this is right

  • Clinicians face reduced radiation exposure and physical strain during interventions.
  • Specialized vascular care reaches patients in geographically distant regions.
  • Time-sensitive procedures such as mechanical thrombectomy become feasible from remote locations.
  • Healthcare systems can allocate expert operators more efficiently across sites.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending trials to low- and middle-income country settings could reveal infrastructure barriers not visible in current high-resource models.
  • Combining these systems with local imaging teams might create hybrid workflows that reduce the need for full remote control.
  • Longitudinal data on operator fatigue or network stability over repeated sessions could identify limits not captured in short proof-of-concept tests.

Load-bearing premise

The sixteen included studies, predominantly from animal or phantom models, are sufficient to support conclusions on clinical feasibility, safety, and generalization to diverse human patient populations and real-world settings.

What would settle it

A multi-center human trial under varied real-world network conditions that records complication rates higher than standard endovascular procedures or latency above 163 ms would falsify the feasibility conclusion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22889 by Benjamin Jackson, Christos Bergeles, Harry Robertshaw, Mohammad Shikh-Bahaei, Nikola Fischer, Thomas C Booth, Xingyu Chen, Yinchao Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of a teleoperated endovascular intervention setup. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: PRISMA flow diagram showing the number of articles searched and excluded at each stage of the literature search after screening titles, abstracts, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparative analysis of robotic surgical platforms and their interfaces. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An overview of the global layout of teleoperated endovascular intervention experiments, with each line illustrating the distinct city-to-city connections [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Latency variability compared to distance under diverse experimental [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Diagram depicting the anatomical region of interest for each study. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Remote robotic-assisted endovascular intervention offers a promising approach to reduce clinician radiation exposure and physical strain, while extending specialized vascular care to geographically distant regions. Despite advancements, teleoperated endovascular intervention remains underexplored, especially for time-sensitive interventions like mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke. The aim of the current review was to determine the evidence regarding teleoperated endovascular robotic systems, covering technical feasibility, communication infrastructure, and clinical outcomes. The review further identified research gaps and future directions. Following PRISMA guidelines, 16 studies were included that met the inclusion criteria out of 2501 initial search results. We found that teleoperated catheters and guidewires, driven by mechanical or electromagnetic systems, can be navigated across distances up to 7000 km. With robust communication infrastructure, network latency remained within clinically acceptable limits (30-163 ms). Although initial outcomes highlighted 100% procedural success in small-scale human trials, most evidence stemmed from animal or phantom models. Overall, the findings suggest that teleoperated endovascular intervention can reduce occupational hazards, expand patient access to urgent procedures, and optimize resource allocation. Future research should be conducted in low and middle income countries to demonstrate broader geographical access. Ultimately, multi-center clinical trials are required to validate the safety, efficacy, and generalization in diverse clinical settings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a PRISMA-guided systematic review that screened 2501 records and included 16 studies on remote teleoperation of endovascular intervention robots. It reports that mechanical or electromagnetic systems can navigate catheters and guidewires over distances up to 7000 km, with network latencies of 30-163 ms under robust infrastructure remaining clinically acceptable, and 100% procedural success in small-scale human trials (though most evidence derives from animal and phantom models). The review concludes that the approach can reduce occupational hazards and expand access to urgent procedures, while calling for multi-center clinical trials and studies in low- and middle-income countries.

Significance. If the synthesis holds, the review usefully consolidates preliminary evidence on a technology with clear potential to mitigate radiation exposure for operators and improve geographic equity in time-critical interventions such as thrombectomy. The manuscript earns credit for explicitly qualifying its findings with the predominance of preclinical data and for issuing an appropriately cautious call for further validation rather than claiming clinical readiness. The PRISMA adherence and transparent search-to-inclusion numbers are strengths that make the work a solid foundation for subsequent research.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Methods: Although the paper states that it follows PRISMA guidelines, there is no description or table reporting a formal risk-of-bias assessment for the 16 included studies. This omission is load-bearing for the central claims on procedural success rates and clinical feasibility, given that the majority of studies are preclinical and the human data are described as small-scale.
  2. [Results] Results: The reported latency range (30-163 ms) and 100% success rate are presented without indicating how many of the 16 studies contributed to each metric, without any measure of variability, and without error or sensitivity analysis across different robotic platforms or network conditions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and Results: The number of human trials (versus animal/phantom) contributing to the 100% success figure should be stated explicitly so readers can immediately gauge the scale of the clinical evidence.
  2. [Discussion] Discussion: The term 'clinically acceptable limits' for latency is used without citing the specific clinical benchmarks or guidelines that define this range.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback and positive assessment of the manuscript's significance. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Although the paper states that it follows PRISMA guidelines, there is no description or table reporting a formal risk-of-bias assessment for the 16 included studies. This omission is load-bearing for the central claims on procedural success rates and clinical feasibility, given that the majority of studies are preclinical and the human data are described as small-scale.

    Authors: We agree that a formal risk-of-bias or study quality assessment is a standard PRISMA expectation and would strengthen the review, particularly given the mix of preclinical and limited human data. Although many included studies are feasibility-oriented rather than clinical trials, we will add a Methods subsection describing our approach to quality assessment (adapted for preclinical and technical studies) and include a summary table in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] The reported latency range (30-163 ms) and 100% success rate are presented without indicating how many of the 16 studies contributed to each metric, without any measure of variability, and without error or sensitivity analysis across different robotic platforms or network conditions.

    Authors: We accept that the Results section would benefit from greater transparency on the number of studies underpinning each aggregate metric and any available variability information. In the revision we will explicitly report the number of studies contributing to the latency range and success rates, note any heterogeneity across platforms or conditions, and add a brief discussion of data limitations where a formal sensitivity analysis is not feasible due to study heterogeneity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

This paper is a PRISMA-guided systematic review that aggregates and reports findings from 16 prior studies on teleoperated endovascular systems. It contains no derivations, equations, predictions, fitted parameters, or ansatzes; all quantitative statements (e.g., 7000 km distance, 30-163 ms latency, 100% success in small human trials) are direct citations of external results with explicit caveats about animal/phantom predominance. No load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness claims appear. The synthesis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits no reduction of outputs to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review depends on the PRISMA framework for study selection and the assumption that non-human model results generalize to clinical human use; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption PRISMA guidelines produce a complete and unbiased set of relevant studies on teleoperated endovascular robots
    Invoked to justify inclusion of 16 studies from 2501 initial results.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5787 in / 1246 out tokens · 27542 ms · 2026-05-25T05:53:52.664847+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Overview of contemporary interventional fluo- roscopy procedures,

    Miller, Donald L, “Overview of contemporary interventional fluo- roscopy procedures,”,Health physics, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 638–644, 2008

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    Cur- rent and Emerging Robot-Assisted Endovascular Catheterization Tech- nologies: A Review,

    Rafii-Tari, Hedyeh, Payne, Christopher J., Yang, Guang-Zhong, “Cur- rent and Emerging Robot-Assisted Endovascular Catheterization Tech- nologies: A Review,”,Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 697–715, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10439-013-0946-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s10439-013-0946-8 2014

  3. [3]

    Miller, Donald L., Vano, Eliseo, Bartal, Gabriel, Balter, Stephen, Dixon, Robert, Padovani, Renato, Schueler, Beth, Cardella, John F., de Baere, Thierry, “Occupational Radiation Protection in Interventional Radiology: A Joint Guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radi- ology,”,Card...

    work page doi:10.1007/s00270-009-9756-7 2010

  4. [4]

    Prevalence of Spinal Disc Disease Among Interventional Cardiologists,

    Ross, Allan M., Segal, Jerome, Borenstein, David, Jenkins, Ellen, Cho, Shuyan, “Prevalence of Spinal Disc Disease Among Interventional Cardiologists,”,American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 68–70, 1997, doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00678-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00678-9 1997

  5. [5]

    Robotics in neurointerventional surgery: a system- atic review of the literature,

    Crinnion, William, Jackson, Ben, Sood, Avnish, Lynch, Jeremy, Berge- les, Christos, Liu, Hongbin, Rhode, Kawal, Pereira, Vitor Mendes, Booth, Thomas C, “Robotics in neurointerventional surgery: a system- atic review of the literature,”,Journal of neurointerventional surgery, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 539–545, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Impact of robotics and a suspended lead suit on physician radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary intervention,

    Madder, Ryan D., VanOosterhout, Stacie, Mulder, Abbey, Elmore, Matthew, Campbell, Jessica, Borgman, Andrew, Parker, Jessica, Wohns, David, “Impact of robotics and a suspended lead suit on physician radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary intervention,”,Car- diovascular Revascularization Medicine, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 190–196, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.c...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2016.12.011 2017

  7. [7]

    The role of robotic endovascular catheters in fenestrated stent grafting,

    Riga, Celia V ., Cheshire, Nicholas J. W., Hamady, Mohamad S., Bicknell, Colin D., “The role of robotic endovascular catheters in fenestrated stent grafting,”,Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 810–820, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.101

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.101 2010

  8. [8]

    Telemanipulated Vascular In- tervention System for Minimally Invasive Surgery,

    Wei, Siyi, Wu, Zhiwei, Zhang, Jinhui, Gu, Shaomeng, Geng, Zhanxin, Luo, Jiahao, Gao, Yueyang, Li, Zheng, “Telemanipulated Vascular In- tervention System for Minimally Invasive Surgery,”,IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Simultaneous Local- ization and Actuation Using Electromagnetic Navigation Systems,

    von Arx, Denis, Fischer, Cedric, Torlakcik, Harun, Pane, Sal- vador, Nelson, Bradley J., Boehler, Quentin, “Simultaneous Local- ization and Actuation Using Electromagnetic Navigation Systems,”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 40, pp. 1292–1308, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TRO.2023.3340324

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2023.3340324 2024

  10. [10]

    Telerobotic neurovascular interventions with magnetic manipulation,

    Kim, Yoonho, Genevriere, Emily, Harker, Pablo, Choe, Jaehun, Balicki, Marcin, Regenhardt, Robert W, Vranic, Justin E, Dmytriw, Adam A, Patel, Aman B, Zhao, Xuanhe, “Telerobotic neurovascular interventions with magnetic manipulation,”,Science Robotics, vol. 7, no. 65, pp. eabg9907, 2022

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Multilevel Operation Strategy of a Vascular Interventional Robot System for Surgical Safety in Teleoperation,

    Bao, Xianqiang, Guo, Shuxiang, Guo, Yangming, Yang, Cheng, Shi, Liwei, Li, Youxiang, Jiang, Yuhua, “Multilevel Operation Strategy of a Vascular Interventional Robot System for Surgical Safety in Teleoperation,”,IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 2238–2250, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TRO.2022.3140887

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2022.3140887 2022

  12. [12]

    First-in-human, robotic-assisted neu- roendovascular intervention,

    Pereira, Vitor Mendes, Cancelliere, Nicole Mariantonia, Nicholson, Patrick, Radovanovic, Ivan, Drake, Kaitlyn E., Sungur, John-Michael, Krings, Timo, Turk, Aquilla, “First-in-human, robotic-assisted neu- roendovascular intervention,”,Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 338–340, 2020, doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019- 015671.rep

    work page doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019- 2020

  13. [13]

    Remote magnetic navigation enables precision telesurgery,

    Nelson, Bradley J., Bendok, Bernard R., Turcotte, Evelyn L., Batjer, H. Hunt, “Remote magnetic navigation enables precision telesurgery,”,Science Robotics, vol. 9, no. 87, pp. eado3187, 2024, doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.ado3187

    work page doi:10.1126/scirobotics.ado3187 2024

  14. [14]

    E-069 Remotely operated neurovascular robotic system,

    Bell, D., “E-069 Remotely operated neurovascular robotic system,”, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, vol. 16, no. Suppl 1, pp. A123–A123, 2024, doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-SNIS.174

    work page doi:10.1136/jnis-2024-snis.174 2024

  15. [15]

    Mark Nicholls speaks to Professor Eric Durand and Professor Remi Sabatier about Europe’s first remote robotic-assisted angioplasty procedure,

    Nicholls, Mark, “Mark Nicholls speaks to Professor Eric Durand and Professor Remi Sabatier about Europe’s first remote robotic-assisted angioplasty procedure,”,European Heart Journal, vol. 42, no. 32, pp. 3033–3035, 2021, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab085

    work page doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab085 2021

  16. [16]

    Artificial intelligence in the autonomous navigation of endovascular interventions: a systematic review,

    Robertshaw, Harry, Karstensen, Lennart, Jackson, Benjamin, Sadati, Hadi, Rhode, Kawal, Ourselin, Sebastien, Granados, Alejandro, Booth, Thomas C., “Artificial intelligence in the autonomous navigation of endovascular interventions: a systematic review,”,Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 17, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1239374

    work page doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1239374 2023

  17. [17]

    Inequalities in access to minimally invasive general surgery: a comprehensive na- tionwide analysis across 20 years,

    Schneider, Marcel Andr ´e, Gero, Daniel, M ¨uller, Matteo, Horisberger, Karoline, Rickenbacher, Andreas, Turina, Matthias, “Inequalities in access to minimally invasive general surgery: a comprehensive na- tionwide analysis across 20 years,”,Surgical endoscopy, vol. 35, pp. 6227–6243, 2021

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Time to reperfusion and treatment effect for acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial,

    Fransen, Puck SS, Berkhemer, Olvert A, Lingsma, Hester F, Beumer, Debbie, Van Den Berg, Lucie A, Yoo, Albert J, Schonewille, Wouter J, V os, Jan Albert, Nederkoorn, Paul J, Wermer, Marieke JH, others, “Time to reperfusion and treatment effect for acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial,”,JAMA neurology, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 190– 196, 2016

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    Estimating the number of UK stroke pa- tients eligible for endovascular thrombectomy,

    McMeekin, Peter, White, Philip, James, Martin A, Price, Christopher I, Flynn, Darren, Ford, Gary A, “Estimating the number of UK stroke pa- tients eligible for endovascular thrombectomy,”,European Stroke Jour- nal, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 319–326, 2017, doi: 10.1177/2396987317733343

    work page doi:10.1177/2396987317733343 2017

  20. [20]

    Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials,

    Goyal, Mayank, Menon, Bijoy K, Van Zwam, Wim H, Dippel, Diederik WJ, Mitchell, Peter J, Demchuk, Andrew M, D ´avalos, Antoni, Majoie, Charles BLM, van Der Lugt, Aad, De Miquel, Maria A, others, “Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials,”, The Lancet, vol. 387, no....

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme,

    Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership, “Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme, ”Stroke: SSNAP annual report 2024”,”, 2024

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis,

    Saver, Jeffrey L., Goyal, Mayank, van der Lugt, Aad, Menon, Bijoy K., Majoie, Charles B. L. M., Dippel, Diederik W., Campbell, Bruce C., Nogueira, Raul G., Demchuk, Andrew M., Tomasello, Alejandro, Cardona, Pere, Devlin, Thomas G., Frei, Donald F., du Mesnil de Rochemont, Richard, Berkhemer, Olvert A., Jovin, Tudor G., Siddiqui, Adnan H., van Zwam, Wim H....

    work page doi:10.1001/jama.2016.13647 2016

  23. [23]

    The evolution of acute stroke care in Germany from 2019 to 2021: analysis of nation-wide admin- istrative datasets,

    Ungerer, Matthias N, Bartig, Dirk, Richter, Daniel, Krogias, Christos, Hacke, Werner, Gumbinger, Christoph, “The evolution of acute stroke care in Germany from 2019 to 2021: analysis of nation-wide admin- istrative datasets,”,Neurological Research and Practice, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 4, 2024

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Trends in ischemic stroke hospitalization and outcomes in the United States pre-and peri-COVID-19 pandemic: A National Inpatient Sample study,

    Jafarli, Alibay, Di Napoli, Mario, Kasper, Rachel S, Saver, Jeffrey L, McCullough, Louise D, Salehi-Omran, Setareh, Mansouri, Behnam, Lioutas, Vasileios Arsenios, Ismail, Mohammed, Divani, Afshin A, “Trends in ischemic stroke hospitalization and outcomes in the United States pre-and peri-COVID-19 pandemic: A National Inpatient Sample study,”,Journal of Cl...

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Rates of intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in China between 2019 and 2020,

    Ye, Qing, Zhai, Feifei, Chao, Baohua, Cao, Lei, Xu, Yun, Zhang, Peilan, Han, Hongxing, Wang, Lihua, Xu, Bing, Chen, Wenhuo, others, “Rates of intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in China between 2019 and 2020,”,The Lancet Regional Health–Western Pacific, vol. 21, 2022

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Telemedicine and robotic surgery: a narrative review to 15 analyze advantages, limitations and future developments,

    Picozzi, Paola, Nocco, Umberto, Puleo, Greta, Labate, Chiara, Cimolin, Veronica, “Telemedicine and robotic surgery: a narrative review to 15 analyze advantages, limitations and future developments,”,Electronics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 124, 2023

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Mul- tisociety consensus quality improvement revised consensus statement for endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke,

    Sacks, D, Baxter, B, Campbell, BCV , Carpenter, JS, Cognard, C, Dippel, D, Eesa, M, Fischer, U, Hausegger, K, Hirsch, JA, others, “Mul- tisociety consensus quality improvement revised consensus statement for endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke,”,Int. J. Stroke, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 612–632, 2018

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Re- mote robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: An animal feasibility study,

    Eleid, Mackram F, Zheng, Park P, Gulati, Rajiv, Bergman, Per, Kot- tenstette, Nicholas, Li, Yao, Lerman, Amir, Sandhu, Gurpreet S, “Re- mote robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: An animal feasibility study,”,Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. E274–E279, 2021

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Network latency and long-distance robotic telestenting: exploring the potential impact of network delays on telestenting performance,

    Madder, Ryan D, VanOosterhout, Stacie, Mulder, Abbey, Bush, Jared, Martin, Samuel, Rash, Adam J, Tan, Jose Mariano, Parker, Jessica L, Kalafut, Andrew, Li, Yao, others, “Network latency and long-distance robotic telestenting: exploring the potential impact of network delays on telestenting performance,”,Catheterization and Cardiovascular In- terventions, ...

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Remote telesurgery in humans: a systematic review,

    Barba, Patrick, Stramiello, Joshua, Funk, Emily K, Richter, Florian, Yip, Michael C, Orosco, Ryan K, “Remote telesurgery in humans: a systematic review,”,Surgical endoscopy, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 2771–2777, 2022

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    BSNR training guidance for mechanical thrombectomy,

    Lenthall, Robert, McConachie, Norman, White, Philip, Clifton, An- drew, Rowland-Hill, Christopher, others, “BSNR training guidance for mechanical thrombectomy,”,Clin Radiol, vol. 72, no. 175, pp. e11–175, 2017

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery,

    Marescaux, Jacques, Leroy, Joel, Gagner, Michel, Rubino, Francesco, Mutter, Didier, Vix, Michel, Butner, Steven E., Smith, Michelle K., “Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery,”,Nature, vol. 413, no. 6854, pp. 379–380, 2001, doi: 10.1038/35096636

    work page doi:10.1038/35096636 2001

  33. [33]

    Impact of network performance on remote robotic-assisted endovascular interventions in porcine model,

    Legeza, Peter, Britz, Gavin W., Shah, Alpesh, Sconzert, Kalyna, Sungur, John-Michael, Chinnadurai, Ponraj, Sinha, Kavya, Lumsden, Alan B., “Impact of network performance on remote robotic-assisted endovascular interventions in porcine model,”,Journal of Robotic Surgery, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11701-021- 01196-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11701-021- 2022

  34. [34]

    A long distance telesurgical demonstration on robotic surgery phantoms over 5G,

    Moustris, George, Tzafestas, Costas, Konstantinidis, Konstantinos, “A long distance telesurgical demonstration on robotic surgery phantoms over 5G,”,International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1577–1587, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11548- 023-02913-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s11548- 2023

  35. [35]

    Telesurgery: Past, Present, and Future,

    Choi, Paul J, Oskouian, Rod J, Tubbs, R. Shane, “Telesurgery: Past, Present, and Future,”,Cureus, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. e2716, 2018, doi: 10.7759/cureus.2716

    work page doi:10.7759/cureus.2716 2018

  36. [36]

    A Teleoperation Control Method for Vascular Interventional Surgery Robot,

    Yuan, Hang, Xiao, Nan, Cheng, Mengqi, Wang, Kaidi, “A Teleoperation Control Method for Vascular Interventional Surgery Robot,”,2021 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), pp. 1027–1032, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ICMA52036.2021.9512797

    work page doi:10.1109/icma52036.2021.9512797 2021

  37. [37]

    Joint radar and communication design: Applications, state-of-the-art, and the road ahead,

    Liu, Fan, Masouros, Christos, Petropulu, Athina P, Griffiths, Hugh, Hanzo, Lajos, “Joint radar and communication design: Applications, state-of-the-art, and the road ahead,”,IEEE Transactions on Commu- nications, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 3834–3862, 2020

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Semantic communica- tions: Overview, open issues, and future research directions,

    Luo, Xuewen, Chen, Hsiao-Hwa, Guo, Qing, “Semantic communica- tions: Overview, open issues, and future research directions,”,IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 210–219, 2022

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Resource scheduling in edge computing: A survey,

    Luo, Quyuan, Hu, Shihong, Li, Changle, Li, Guanghui, Shi, Weisong, “Resource scheduling in edge computing: A survey,”,IEEE communi- cations surveys & tutorials, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2131–2165, 2021

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Determination of the latency effects on surgical performance and the acceptable latency levels in telesurgery using the dV-Trainer simulator,

    Xu, Song, Perez, Manuela, Yang, Kun, Perrenot, Cyril, Felblinger, Jacques, Hubert, Jacques, “Determination of the latency effects on surgical performance and the acceptable latency levels in telesurgery using the dV-Trainer simulator,”,Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 2569–2576, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3504-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3504-z 2014

  41. [41]

    Design of Vas- cular Interventional Surgical Robot with Network Time Delay Analysis for Master-slave Teleoperation,

    Li, Yifa, Wang, Weimin, Duan, Wenke, Olatunji Mumini, Omisore, Akinyemi, Toluwanimi, Du, Wenjing, Zheng, Yuhong, “Design of Vas- cular Interventional Surgical Robot with Network Time Delay Analysis for Master-slave Teleoperation,”,2021 4th International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems (ICoIAS), pp. 406–412, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ICoIAS53694.2021.00079

    work page doi:10.1109/icoias53694.2021.00079 2021

  42. [42]

    Transforming a surgical robot for human telesurgery,

    Butner, S.E., Ghodoussi, M., “Transforming a surgical robot for human telesurgery,”,IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 818–824, 2003, doi: 10.1109/TRA.2003.817214

    work page doi:10.1109/tra.2003.817214 2003

  43. [43]

    The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,

    Page, Matthew J., McKenzie, Joanne E., Bossuyt, Patrick M., Boutron, Isabelle, Hoffmann, Tammy C., Mulrow, Cynthia D., Shamseer, Larissa, Tetzlaff, Jennifer M., Akl, Elie A., Brennan, Sue E., Chou, Roger, Glanville, Julie, Grimshaw, Jeremy M., Hrobjartsson, Asbjrn, Lalu, Manoj M., Li, Tianjing, Loder, Elizabeth W., Mayo-Wilson, Evan, McDonald, Steve, McGu...

    work page doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 2020

  44. [44]

    QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies,

    Whiting, Penny F., Rutjes, Anne W.S., Westwood, Marie E., Mallett, Susan, Deeks, Jonathan J., Reitsma, Johannes B., Leeflang, Mariska M.G., Sterne, Jonathan A.C., Bossuyt, Patrick M.M., the QUADAS-2 Group, “QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies,”,Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 155, no. 8, pp. 529–536, 2011, ...

    work page doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180- 2011

  45. [45]

    ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions,

    Sterne, Jonathan AC, Hern ´an, Miguel A, Reeves, Barnaby C, Savovi ´c, Jelena, Berkman, Nancy D, Viswanathan, Meera, Henry, David, Alt- man, Douglas G, Ansari, Mohammed T, Boutron, Isabelle, others, “ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions,”,bmj, vol. 355, 2016

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Internet based remote control for a robotic catheter manip- ulating system,

    Guo, Shuxiang, Xiao, Nan, Gao, Baofeng, Tamiya, Takashi, Kawanishi, Masahiko, “Internet based remote control for a robotic catheter manip- ulating system,”,2012 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering (CME), pp. 540–544, 2012, doi: 10.1109/IC- CME.2012.6275614

    work page doi:10.1109/ic- 2012

  47. [47]

    Internet-based robotic catheter surgery system—System design and performance evaluation,

    Xiao, Nan, Guo, Shuxiang, Gao, Baofeng, Ma, Xu, Tamiya, Takashi, Kawanishi, Masahiko, “Internet-based robotic catheter surgery system—System design and performance evaluation,”,2012 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, pp. 634–640, 2012, doi: 10.1109/ICAL.2012.6308155

    work page doi:10.1109/ical.2012.6308155 2012

  48. [48]

    Experimental study of remote angiography using vascular interventional robot,

    Lu, Wang-sheng, Xu, Wuyi, Tian, Zengrnin, Guo, Shuxiang, Gao, Baofeng, Liu, Da, Zhao, Depeng, Wang, Daming, “Experimental study of remote angiography using vascular interventional robot,”,2013 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering, pp. 383–387, 2013, doi: 10.1109/ICCME.2013.6548274

    work page doi:10.1109/iccme.2013.6548274 2013

  49. [49]

    Long Distance Tele-Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of First-in-Human Experience,

    Patel, Tejas M., Shah, Sanjay C., Pancholy, Samir B., “Long Distance Tele-Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of First-in-Human Experience,”,eClinicalMedicine, vol. 14, pp. 53–58, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.07.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.07.017 2019

  50. [50]

    Feasibility of robotic telestenting over long geographic distances: a pre-clinical ex vivo and in vivo study,

    Madder, Ryan D., VanOosterhout, Stacie, Mulder, Abbey, Bush, Jared, Martin, Samuel, Rash, Adam, Tan, Jose Mariano, Parker, Jessica, Li, Yao, Kottenstette, Nicholas, Bergman, Per, Nowak, Brent, “Feasibility of robotic telestenting over long geographic distances: a pre-clinical ex vivo and in vivo study,”,EuroIntervention, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. e510– e512, 20...

    work page doi:10.4244/eij-d-19-00106 2019

  51. [51]

    Design and Performance Evaluation of a Novel Vascular Robotic System for Complex Percutaneous Coronary Interventions,

    Zhang, Lin-Sen, Liu, Shi-Qi, Xie, Xiao-Liang, Zhou, Xiao-Hu, Hou, Zeng-Guang, Zhou, Yan-Jie, Zhao, Han-Lin, Gui, Mei-Jiang, “An Improved Networked Predictive Controller for Vascular Robot Using 5G Networks,”,2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 4674– 4678, 2021, doi: 10.1109/EMBC46164....

    work page doi:10.1109/embc46164.2021.9630311 2021

  52. [52]

    Preclinical study testing feasibility and technical requirements for successful telerobotic long distance peripheral vascular intervention,

    Legeza, Peter, Sconzert, Kalyna, Sungur, John-Michael, Loh, Thomas M, Britz, Gavin, Lumsden, Alan, “Preclinical study testing feasibility and technical requirements for successful telerobotic long distance peripheral vascular intervention,”,The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. e2249, 2021

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Remote robotic endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke,

    Singer, Justin, VanOosterhout, Stacie, Madder, Ryan, “Remote robotic endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke,”,BMJ Neurol- ogy Open, vol. 3, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2021-000141

    work page doi:10.1136/bmjno-2021-000141 2021

  54. [54]

    Robotic telestenting performance in transcontinental and regional pre-clinical models,

    Madder, Ryan D., VanOosterhout, Stacie, Parker, Jessica, Sconzert, Kalyna, Li, Yao, Kottenstette, Nicholas, Madsen, Abigail, Sungur, John-Michael, Bergman, Per, “Robotic telestenting performance in transcontinental and regional pre-clinical models,”,Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. E327–E332, 2021, doi: 10.1002/ccd.29115

    work page doi:10.1002/ccd.29115 2021

  55. [55]

    Cloud Communication-Based Sensing Performance Evaluation of a Vascular Interventional Robot System,

    Yang, Cheng, Guo, Shuxiang, Guo, Yangming, Bao, Xianqiang, “Cloud Communication-Based Sensing Performance Evaluation of a Vascular Interventional Robot System,”,IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 9005–9017, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3160760

    work page doi:10.1109/jsen.2022.3160760 2022

  56. [56]

    Exploring telerobotic cardiac catheter ablation in a rural community hospital: A pilot study,

    Serafini, Brian, Kim, Lanu, Saour, Basil M., James, Ryan, Han- naford, Blake, Hansen, Ryan, Kohno, Tadayoshi, Monsky, Wayne, Seslar, Stephen P., “Exploring telerobotic cardiac catheter ablation in a rural community hospital: A pilot study,”,Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 313–319, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.10.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.10.003 2022

  57. [57]

    A multi-device robotic-assisted PCI system: a proof-of concept study for left main bifurcation stenting with 16 culotte technique in a porcine model,

    Han, Wenzheng, Wang, Ming, Guan, Shaofeng, Gan, Qian, Fang, Weiyi, Xia, Kun, Qu, Xinkai, “A multi-device robotic-assisted PCI system: a proof-of concept study for left main bifurcation stenting with 16 culotte technique in a porcine model,”,Cardiology Plus, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 191, 2023, doi: 10.1097/CP9.0000000000000060

    work page doi:10.1097/cp9.0000000000000060 2023

  58. [58]

    Long-distance Tele- robotic-assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Case Report of First-in-patient in China,

    Xu, Kai, Cao, Xuebin, Liu, Haiwei, Zhou, Shenghua, Liu, Zhaochuan, Wang, Xianghe, Jing, Quanmin, Han, Yaling, “Long-distance Tele- robotic-assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Case Report of First-in-patient in China,”,Cardiology Discovery, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 245, 2024, doi: 10.1097/CD9.0000000000000131

    work page doi:10.1097/cd9.0000000000000131 2024

  59. [59]

    Transatlantic Telerobotic Coronary Angiogra- phy,

    Madder, Ryan D., VanOosterhout, Stacie, Parker, Jessica L., Can- dreva, Alessandro, “Transatlantic Telerobotic Coronary Angiogra- phy,”,JACC: Advances, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 101456, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101456

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101456 2025

  60. [60]

    A cooperation of catheters and guidewires-based novel remote-controlled vascular interventional robot,

    Bao, Xianqiang, Guo, Shuxiang, Xiao, Nan, Li, Youxiang, Yang, Cheng, Jiang, Yuhua, “A cooperation of catheters and guidewires-based novel remote-controlled vascular interventional robot,”,Biomedical Microdevices, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 20, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10544-018- 0261-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s10544-018- 2018

  61. [61]

    Application study of medical robots in vascular intervention,

    Lu, Wang-sheng, Xu, Wu-yi, Zhang, Jing, Liu, Da, Wang, Da-min, Jia, Po, Li, Zhi-cao, Wang, Tian-miao, Zhang, Da-peng, Tian, Zeng-min, others, “Application study of medical robots in vascular intervention,”, The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 361–366, 2011

    work page 2011

  62. [62]

    Design and Performance Evaluation of a Novel Vascular Robotic System for Complex Percutaneous Coronary Interventions,

    Zhao, Han-Lin, Liu, Shi-Qi, Zhou, Xiao-Hu, Xie, Xiao-Liang, Hou, Zeng-Guang, Zhou, Yan-Jie, Zhang, Lin-Sen, Gui, Mei-Jiang, Wang, Jin-Li, “Design and Performance Evaluation of a Novel Vascular Robotic System for Complex Percutaneous Coronary Interventions,”, 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (E...

    work page doi:10.1109/embc46164.2021.9629943 2021

  63. [63]

    A novel endovascular robotic- assisted system for endovascular aortic repair: first-in-human evaluation of practicability and safety,

    Song, Chao, Xia, Shibo, Zhang, Lei, Wang, Kundong, Li, Haiyan, Guo, Wenying, Zhu, Longtu, Lu, Qingsheng, “A novel endovascular robotic- assisted system for endovascular aortic repair: first-in-human evaluation of practicability and safety,”,European Radiology, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 7408–7418, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09810-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s00330-023-09810-x 2023

  64. [64]

    XCath successfully performs first public telerobotic mechanical thrombectomy demonstration,

    Bell, Jamie, “XCath successfully performs first public telerobotic mechanical thrombectomy demonstration,”,NeuroNews International, 2024, Available: https://neuronewsinternational.com/xcath-successfull y-performs-first-public-telerobotic-mechanical-thrombectomy-demon stration/

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    XCath highlights endovascular robotics innovation at SLICE Next Frontiers,

    Bell, Jamie, “XCath highlights endovascular robotics innovation at SLICE Next Frontiers,”,NeuroNews International, 2024, Available: https://neuronewsinternational.com/xcath-highlights-endovascula r-robotics-innovation-at-slice-next-frontiers/

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    Robocath performs world’s First-In-Human remote robotic coronary angioplasty between two Chinese cities 1,700 miles apart – Robocath,

    “Robocath performs world’s First-In-Human remote robotic coronary angioplasty between two Chinese cities 1,700 miles apart – Robocath,”, Available: https://www.robocath.com/robocath-performs-worlds-first-i n-human-remote-robotic-coronary-angioplasty-between-two-chinese -cities-1700-miles-apart/

    work page

  67. [67]

    Initial experience with a novel electrophysiology mapping simulator,

    Seslar, Stephen P., Patton, Kristen K., “Initial experience with a novel electrophysiology mapping simulator,”,Pacing and Clinical Electro- physiology, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 197–202, 2018, doi: 10.1111/pace.13262

    work page doi:10.1111/pace.13262 2018

  68. [68]

    Technology readiness levels,

    Mankins, John C, others, “Technology readiness levels,”,White Paper, April, vol. 6, no. 1995, pp. 1995, 1995

    work page 1995

  69. [69]

    The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2,

    OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group, “The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2,”, 2011, Available: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/le vels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence

    work page 2011

  70. [70]

    Comparative verification of control methodology for robotic interven- tional neuroradiology procedures,

    Jackson, Benjamin, Crinnion, William, De Iturrate Reyzabal, Mikel, Robertshaw, Harry, Bergeles, Christos, Rhode, Kawal, Booth, Thomas, “Comparative verification of control methodology for robotic interven- tional neuroradiology procedures,”,International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1977–1986, 2023

    work page 1977

  71. [71]

    Advanced user interfaces for teleoperated surgical robotic systems,

    Nguyen, Chi Cong, Wong, Shing, Thai, Mai Thanh, Hoang, Trung Thien, Phan, Phuoc Thien, Davies, James, Wu, Liao, Tsai, David, Phan, Hoang-Phuong, Lovell, Nigel H, others, “Advanced user interfaces for teleoperated surgical robotic systems,”,Advanced Sensor Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 2200036, 2023

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    Autonomous navigation of catheters and guidewires in mechanical thrombectomy using inverse reinforcement learning,

    Robertshaw, Harry, Karstensen, Lennart, Jackson, Benjamin, Granados, Alejandro, Booth, Thomas C, “Autonomous navigation of catheters and guidewires in mechanical thrombectomy using inverse reinforcement learning,”,International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1569–1578, 2024

    work page 2024

  73. [73]

    Re- inforcement learning for safe autonomous two-device navigation of cerebral vessels in mechanical thrombectomy,

    Robertshaw, Harry, Jackson, Benjamin, Wang, Jiaheng, Sadati, Hadi, Karstensen, Lennart, Granados, Alejandro, Booth, Thomas C, “Re- inforcement learning for safe autonomous two-device navigation of cerebral vessels in mechanical thrombectomy,”,International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, pp. 1–10, 2025

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    A comparison of calibration methods for stereo fluoroscopic imaging systems,

    Kaptein, Bart L, Shelburne, Kevin B, Torry, Michael R, Giphart, J Erik, “A comparison of calibration methods for stereo fluoroscopic imaging systems,”,Journal of biomechanics, vol. 44, no. 13, pp. 2511–2515, 2011

    work page 2011

  75. [75]

    Medical telerobotic systems: current status and future trends,

    Avgousti, Sotiris, Christoforou, Eftychios G, Panayides, Andreas S, V oskarides, Sotos, Novales, Cyril, Nouaille, Laurence, Pattichis, Con- stantinos S, Vieyres, Pierre, “Medical telerobotic systems: current status and future trends,”,Biomedical engineering online, vol. 15, pp. 1–44, 2016

    work page 2016

  76. [76]

    AI solutions for overcoming delays in telesurgery and telementoring to enhance surgical practice and education,

    Li, Yang, Raison, Nicholas, Ourselin, Sebastien, Mahmoodi, Toktam, Dasgupta, Prokar, Granados, Alejandro, “AI solutions for overcoming delays in telesurgery and telementoring to enhance surgical practice and education,”,Journal of robotic surgery, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 403, 2024

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    Robotic-assisted intracranial aneurysm treatment: 1-year follow-up imaging and clinical outcomes,

    Cancelliere, Nicole M., Lynch, Jeremy, Nicholson, Patrick, Dobrocky, Tomas, Swaminathan, Saravana Kumar, Hendriks, Eef J., Krings, Timo, Radovanovic, Ivan, Drake, Kaitlyn E., Turner, Raymond, Sungur, John- Michael, Pereira, Vitor M., “Robotic-assisted intracranial aneurysm treatment: 1-year follow-up imaging and clinical outcomes,”,Journal of NeuroInterve...

    work page doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017865 2022

  78. [78]

    An advanced robotic system incorporating haptic feedback for precision cardiac ablation procedures,

    Zhang, Linshuai, Zuo, Jinshan, Wang, Ke, Jiang, Tao, Gu, Shuoxin, Xu, Lin, Zhang, Yujie, “An advanced robotic system incorporating haptic feedback for precision cardiac ablation procedures,”,Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 6839, 2025

    work page 2025

  79. [79]

    Autonomous robotic intracardiac catheter navigation using haptic vision,

    Fagogenis, Georgios, Mencattelli, Margherita, Machaidze, Zurab, Rosa, Benoit, Price, Karl, Wu, F, Weixler, V , Saeed, Mossab, Mayer, John E, Dupont, Pierre E, “Autonomous robotic intracardiac catheter navigation using haptic vision,”,Science robotics, vol. 4, no. 29, pp. eaaw1977, 2019

    work page 2019

  80. [80]

    Artis Q – Visionary intervention,

    Siemens Healthineers, “Artis Q – Visionary intervention,”, 2025, Avail- able: https://www.siemens-healthineers.com/en-us/angio/artis-interve ntional-angiography-systems/artis-q

    work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.