Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependencies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1611.01368 v1 pith:AJX4GX7Q submitted 2016-11-04 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords dependencieserrorsgrammaticallanguagelstmsabilitycapturecaptured
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The success of long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks in language processing is typically attributed to their ability to capture long-distance statistical regularities. Linguistic regularities are often sensitive to syntactic structure; can such dependencies be captured by LSTMs, which do not have explicit structural representations? We begin addressing this question using number agreement in English subject-verb dependencies. We probe the architecture's grammatical competence both using training objectives with an explicit grammatical target (number prediction, grammaticality judgments) and using language models. In the strongly supervised settings, the LSTM achieved very high overall accuracy (less than 1% errors), but errors increased when sequential and structural information conflicted. The frequency of such errors rose sharply in the language-modeling setting. We conclude that LSTMs can capture a non-trivial amount of grammatical structure given targeted supervision, but stronger architectures may be required to further reduce errors; furthermore, the language modeling signal is insufficient for capturing syntax-sensitive dependencies, and should be supplemented with more direct supervision if such dependencies need to be captured.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Language Models Largely Exhibit Human-like Constituent Ordering Preferences

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across heavy NP shift, dative alternation and multiple PP shift, LLM ordering preferences correlate with human judgments, but particle movement preferences do not.

Pith tools