Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

General finite two-loop amplitude integrand for photoproduction in quark annihilation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A new integrand for two-loop diphoton production removes transient singularities locally

desk verdict The new reflection counterterm introduces uncanceled poles at isolated momenta, so the central local-finiteness claim fails as stated, even though the integrated amplitude is likely unchanged. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.07805 v1 pith:ALO2XLU4 submitted 2025-09-09 hep-ph hep-th

Charalampos Anastasiou , Julia Karlen , Roshni Sahoo , George Sterman , Matilde Vicini This is my paper
classification hep-phhep-th
keywords two-loopamplitudeslocalinfraredsubtractiontransientsingularitiesphotoproductionquarkannihilationmomentum-spaceintegrandloopmomentumreflectionreal-photonfinalstates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

At two loops, amplitudes for quark-antiquark annihilation into real photons contain integrand singularities that vanish after integration—"transient" singularities caused by the masslessness of the final-state photons. This paper constructs a modified two-loop integrand in which these transient singularities are absent from the start, while the integrated value of the amplitude stays unchanged because every added counterterm integrates to zero. The construction extends earlier locally finite two-loop integrands for off-shell or massive colorless final states to real photons, and it also eliminates power-like singularities from self-energy corrections. The same counterterm vertex is extended to gluon emission from virtual quarks, a step toward jet production. If correct, this gives a concrete starting point for numerical evaluation of two-loop photoproduction amplitudes that currently resist analytic integration.

What carries the argument

The central new object is the counterterm vertex Delta^mu_gamma(r,q,l,k), defined in Eq. (4.6): an insertion at the photon-quark-quark vertex built from a one-loop subgraph with loop momentum l and its reflection across the plane transverse to the photon momentum q. Because the reflected term appears with a minus sign, the vertex vanishes upon integration over l, yet in the collinear limit r parallel q it produces exactly the negative of the transient singularity from the triangle subgraph, cancelling it locally. A second ingredient is momentum-flow symmetrization of self-energy subgraphs—l <-> -l-k-p1+q1 for subleading color and l <-> k-l-p1+q1 for leading color—which implements tensor redu

What would settle it

Look for a two-loop diagram in q qbar -> gamma gamma whose transient singularity is not one of the three classes treated, and expand the full integrand of Eq. (5.1) in that region; if any term scales like 1/rho^4 or worse without a cancelling partner, the local-finiteness claim fails. Concretely, one can expand the integrand in the region r = k+p1 collinear to q1 with hard l, and in the region R = k+p1-q1 collinear to an arbitrary light-like vector chi after substituting the tensor-reduced self-energies, and check whether residual power singularities remain. A numerical Monte Carlo integration

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the two-loop amplitude integrand for q qbar -> gamma gamma—and, by direct generalization, any colorless final state containing real photons—can be made locally finite by adding four classes of terms that integrate to zero. First, a new photon-quark-quark vertex counterterm cancels final-state loop polarizations from triangle subgraphs at real-photon vertices. Second and third, averaging over loop momentum flows in the leading- and subleading-color sectors tensor-reduces one-loop self-energy subgraphs adjacent to the photons, removing the doubled propagators that produce power-like collinear singularities while preserving the Ward-identity cancellations needed for initia

Load-bearing premise

The classification of transient singularities is complete: the paper assumes the only sources at two loops are self-energy subgraphs adjacent to a real photon, triangle subgraphs at the photon vertex, and nested self-energies of massless propagators, so if a fourth diagram class produces an uncanceled local singularity, Eq. (5.3) is not locally finite.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The locally finite integrand of Eq. (5.1) can serve as input to numerical momentum-space integration methods for two-loop diphoton and triphoton production in quark annihilation.
  • The same construction applies to any colorless final state containing real photons together with massive or off-shell particles, with no additional process-specific analysis.
  • All one-loop self-energy corrections to massless propagators that appear as nested subgraphs are tensor-reduced, so the final integrand has no loop propagator raised to the second power, simplifying energy-integration steps in time-ordered and loop-tree formalisms.
  • The non-abelian version of the counterterm vertex, Eq. (6.6), provides a direct ingredient for local infrared subtraction methods for processes with final-state gluons and jets.
  • After UV and form-factor subtractions, the subtracted diphoton amplitude is finite in all potentially singular infrared and ultraviolet limits, as the paper states it has explicitly and analytically confirmed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not perform numerical integration; a direct check would be to Monte Carlo integrate each added counterterm at fixed external momenta and confirm that it vanishes within errors, which would isolate and validate the claimed local finiteness.
  • The reflection-based counterterm relies only on the transversality of the external massless vector boson, so the same construction should transfer to gluons and, in unbroken-phase limits, to electroweak gauge bosons.
  • At three loops, transient singularities may arise from two-loop subgraphs, so the classification will need extension; existing three-loop local subtraction ingredients for quark annihilation are the natural testing ground for such an extension.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper extends the authors' earlier locally-finite two-loop amplitude integrand construction (Ref. [9]) from off-shell or massive colorless final states to final states containing real photons, with the process q bar-q → γγ as the concrete example. The new ingredients are: (i) symmetrization/averaging over loop-momentum flows for self-energy subgraphs adjacent to an on-shell photon, which implements tensor reduction and removes power-like transient singularities (Sec. 3 and Eqs. (3.7), (3.12)); (ii) a new counterterm vertex Δ^μ_γ, Eq. (4.6), whose integral vanishes by antisymmetry, Eq. (4.7), and which cancels 'final-state loop polarizations' from triangle subgraphs at photon vertices (Sec. 4); and (iii) a revised full integrand A^(2),local, Eq. (5.1), together with a generalization to arbitrary colorless final states, Eq. (5.3), and a non-abelian analogue for gluon emission (Sec. 6). The central claim is that after UV subtractions and initial-state form-factor subtractions, the resulting integrand is locally finite in all infrared limits and free of transient singularities.

Significance. If the construction is correct, this is a meaningful step toward numerical evaluation of NNLO electroweak-production amplitudes with massless final-state particles, and the extension to a non-abelian gluon vertex in Sec. 6 is useful for future jet-production subtractions. The counterterms are original and have the appealing property that they integrate to zero by exact antisymmetry or momentum-shift identities, with no free parameters fitted to the target amplitude. The paper explicitly checks the collinear limits r∥q1 and k∥p1,p2 in Eqs. (4.8)–(4.9) and (3.13)–(3.14). However, the central claim of local finiteness is not fully established: the manuscript's own Appendix A admits a remaining logarithmic local singularity, and the reflected denominator in Eq. (4.6) can vanish at generic isolated loop momenta, producing uncanceled poles. These issues are load-bearing for the paper's stated goal.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, Eq. (4.6)] The counterterm vertex Δ^μ_γ contains reflected propagators such as (]l+r − r)^2 in the subleading-color term. Since the reflection (4.5) is linear and involutive, (]l+r − r)=0 at l = ]r − r = −2 r_perp, where r_perp is the transverse part of r with respect to q1 and η1. For generic external phase space r_perp ≠ 0, this is an isolated real point in l-space. At that point the original denominators l^2, (l+r)^2, (l+r−q)^2 are nonzero, and the numerator (]l+r)^μ (]slash l + slash r) is generically nonzero. Hence Δ^μ_γ has an uncanceled 1/(l−l0)^2 pole. The checks in Eqs. (4.8)–(4.9) cover only r∥q1 and the initial-state collinear limits, not the zeroes of the reflected denominator. Unless additional cancellations from the other terms of Eq. (5.1) are demonstrated, the integrand is not locally finite.
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (A.4)] The text explicitly states that after tensor reduction the nested self-energy singularity 'remains logarithmic, however, at the local level. It can still be avoided altogether by a contour deformation.' This is a direct limitation of the claimed construction. Eq. (5.1) contains the diagram class of Eq. (A.1) through A^(2) (the last diagram of Eq. (2.19)), and no counterterm in Eq. (5.1) removes this local logarithmic singularity. The Abstract's claim of integrands 'free of infrared and ultraviolet singularities' and the Conclusion's claim that the subtracted amplitude is 'finite in all potentially singular infrared and ultraviolet limits' do not cover this remaining local singularity. Since the paper's goal is local finiteness for numerical integration, this is a load-bearing gap.
  3. [§5, Eq. (5.3)] The construction presumes that the only sources of transient final-state singularities are self-energy subgraphs adjacent to real photons (Sec. 3) and triangle subgraphs at photon vertices (Sec. 4). No exhaustive enumeration of all two-loop topologies with final-state photons is given; the diagram classification in Eq. (2.17) is inherited from Ref. [9], which treated off-shell final states. If any other diagram class (e.g., crossed nested diagrams or four-point subgraphs) produces an uncanceled local singularity at fixed loop momentum, Eq. (5.3) is not locally finite. Please provide a systematic power-counting classification of all potential transient singularities, or explicitly state and test the completeness assumption.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (4.6) and Sec. 4] The notation for reflections of sum momenta, such as ](l+r) and ](l−k+r), is introduced only verbally. Define these combinations explicitly in terms of the linear reflection (4.5) to avoid ambiguity.
  2. [Eqs. (2.18)–(2.20)] The diagrammatic equations are rendered as garbled ASCII in the submitted text. Publication-quality figures are needed for the reader to verify the momentum flows.
  3. [Abstract and Sec. 7] The wording 'integrands free of infrared and ultraviolet singularities' and 'finite in all potentially singular infrared and ultraviolet limits' is stronger than what is actually demonstrated, given Appendix A. Please qualify the claims to distinguish between integrated finiteness and local integrand finiteness.
  4. [Throughout] Minor typos and formatting issues, e.g., 'Z¨ urich' in the author list and 'F ramework' in the table of contents, should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the new counterterms are exact zero-integral shifts matched to the stated singular limits, and prior self-citations provide external, parameter-free framework results rather than reproducing the photon claim.

full rationale

The paper's central new objects are the counterterm shifts ΔA^(2),SLC, ΔA^(2),LC, ΔA^(2),fslp and ΔA^(2),IR. Their vanishing integrals are not assumed or fitted; they are proven by exact momentum-shift antisymmetry (Eqs. (3.7), (3.12), and (4.7)) for the symmetrized self-energy averaging and the reflection vertex Δ^μ_γ. The cancellation of the triangle-subgraph transient singularity is shown explicitly by matching the collinear limit of the counterterm, Eq. (4.8), to the negative of the original singular limit, Eq. (4.3), so the local singularity is cancelled algebraically rather than by renaming. The construction inherits the IR-factorization and UV-subtraction framework of Refs. [9,10,12], all by the same authors or overlapping authors, but those are external, published, parameter-free constructions whose stated assumptions (off-shell/massive final states) do not include the present on-shell-photon claim; they are therefore independent support rather than load-bearing self-citation. The main limitation—completeness of the classification of transient-singularity sources in Secs. 3, 4 and App. A is asserted by construction and not by exhaustive enumeration of all two-loop topologies—is a correctness/completeness risk, not a circularity. Similarly, any concern about uncanceled poles in reflected propagators of Eq. (4.6) is a technical-finiteness question, not a derivation that reduces the result to its inputs. No parameter is fitted to the target amplitude, and no prediction is equivalent by definition to an input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on no fitted numbers. It introduces one non-physical subtraction vertex that integrates to zero, the consistency of which is guaranteed by momentum-shift identities. The principal axioms are the inherited factorization and UV-subtraction framework from the authors' prior Refs. [9,10,12], and the completeness of the transient-singularity classification. No free parameters are fitted to data.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Initial-state collinear singularities factorize locally through the projection operator P1 and the form-factor subtractions of Ref. [9], unchanged by on-shell photons.
    Invoked throughout Secs. 2-5; the paper states the form-factor structure of Ref. [9] 'will remain unchanged' (Sec. 2, after Eq. 2.5).
  • domain assumption Power counting identifies all singular regions via the rho-scaling of Sec. 2.1 (Eq. 2.10) and its analogues.
    Used to classify transient singularities in Secs. 3 and 4; relies on the standard assumption that collinear/soft regions exhaust the non-integrable configurations.
  • standard math The self-energy averaging identity (Eq. 3.3) and reflection antisymmetry (Eq. 4.7) are valid under dimensional regularization.
    These are exact momentum-shift identities; the paper relies on them to prove the counterterms integrate to zero.
  • domain assumption The UV subtraction scheme of Ref. [9] remains compatible with the new final-state counterterms.
    Sec. 5 states 'we have implemented a set of ultraviolet subtractions which were proposed in Ref. [9]' and verified compatibility, but the verification is not shown in detail.
invented entities (1)
  • Counterterm vertex Delta_mu_gamma (and non-abelian Delta_mu,c_qgq)
    purpose: Local subtraction of transient final-state collinear singularities from one-loop triangle corrections to photon (or gluon) emission; integrates to zero by reflection antisymmetry.
    This is a bookkeeping subtraction vertex, not a physical degree of freedom; it has no observable consequences by itself, so there is no falsifiable handle outside the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of General finite two-loop amplitude integrand for photoproduction in quark annihilation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ALO2XLU4

@misc{pith2026250907805,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: General finite two-loop amplitude integrand for photoproduction in quark annihilation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ALO2XLU4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07805}
}
read the original abstract

The construction of integrands free of infrared and ultraviolet singularities may enable the application of numerical methods to evaluate loop amplitudes that are inaccessible with analytic techniques. At two loops, finite amplitude integrands have been constructed for the production of off-shell or massive colorless particles via quark annihilation. In this article, we extend this class of processes to include real photons in the final state. To achieve this, we introduce appropriate momentum flows and counterterms to eliminate singularities that occur because the photons are massless. These singularities arise only locally at the integrand level and do not lead to divergences upon integration. Our treatment also eliminates all power singularities arising from self-energy corrections in the integrand. We extend the analysis to gluon emission from virtual quarks. We believe these new insights will be useful for future extensions of infrared subtraction methods to processes with final-state jets.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Pseudo-Evanescent Feynman Integrals from Local Subtraction

    hep-th 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Local subtraction reduces pseudo-evanescent Feynman integrals to products of one-loop integrals or one-fold integrals, with the finite part of the two-loop all-plus five-point amplitude arising solely from ultraviolet...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [9]

    Anastasiou and G

    C. Anastasiou and G. Sterman,Locally finite two-loop QCD amplitudes from IR universality for electroweak production,JHEP05(2023) 242 [2212.12162]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    Sen,Asymptotic Behavior of the Wide Angle On-Shell Quark Scattering Amplitudes in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,Phys

    A. Sen,Asymptotic Behavior of the Wide Angle On-Shell Quark Scattering Amplitudes in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 860

    1983

  3. [2]

    Catani,The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order,Phys

    S. Catani,The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order,Phys. Lett. B427 (1998) 161 [hep-ph/9802439]

    arXiv 1998

  4. [3]

    Sterman and M.E

    G.F. Sterman and M.E. Tejeda-Yeomans,Multiloop amplitudes and resummation,Phys. Lett. B552(2003) 48 [hep-ph/0210130]

    arXiv 2003

  5. [4]

    Dixon, L

    L.J. Dixon, L. Magnea and G.F. Sterman,Universal structure of subleading infrared poles in gauge theory amplitudes,JHEP08(2008) 022 [0805.3515]

    arXiv 2008

  6. [5]

    Collins,Foundations of perturbative QCD, vol

    J. Collins,Foundations of perturbative QCD, vol. 32, Cambridge University Press (11, 2013)

    2013

  7. [6]

    Feige and M.D

    I. Feige and M.D. Schwartz,Hard-Soft-Collinear Factorization to All Orders,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 105020 [1403.6472]

    arXiv 2014

  8. [7]

    Ultraviolet divergences and factorization for coordinate-space amplitudes

    O. Erdo˘ gan and G. Sterman,Ultraviolet divergences and factorization for coordinate-space amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 065033 [1411.4588]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

Show all 54 references
  1. [8]

    Ma,A Forest Formula to Subtract Infrared Singularities in Amplitudes for Wide-angle Scattering,JHEP05(2020) 012 [1910.11304]

    Y. Ma,A Forest Formula to Subtract Infrared Singularities in Amplitudes for Wide-angle Scattering,JHEP05(2020) 012 [1910.11304]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Anastasiou, J

    C. Anastasiou, J. Karlen, G. Sterman and A. Venkata,Locally finite two-loop amplitudes for electroweak production through gluon fusion,JHEP11(2024) 043 [2403.13712]. – 30 –

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Haindl,Local form factor subtraction for three-loop QCD corrections to electroweak production in quark-antiquark annihilation,JHEP06(2025) 257 [2502.00572]

    R. Haindl,Local form factor subtraction for three-loop QCD corrections to electroweak production in quark-antiquark annihilation,JHEP06(2025) 257 [2502.00572]

    2025

  4. [12]

    Anastasiou, R

    C. Anastasiou, R. Haindl, G. Sterman, Z. Yang and M. Zeng,Locally finite two-loop amplitudes for off-shell multi-photon production in electron-positron annihilation,JHEP04 (2021) 222 [2008.12293]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Sterman,Mass Divergences in Annihilation Processes

    G.F. Sterman,Mass Divergences in Annihilation Processes. 1. Origin and Nature of Divergences in Cut Vacuum Polarization Diagrams,Phys. Rev.D17(1978) 2773

    1978

  6. [14]

    Sterman,Mass Divergences in Annihilation Processes

    G.F. Sterman,Mass Divergences in Annihilation Processes. 2. Cancellation of Divergences in Cut Vacuum Polarization Diagrams,Phys. Rev. D17(1978) 2789

    1978

  7. [15]

    Kermanschah and M

    D. Kermanschah and M. Vicini,N f -contribution to the virtual correction for electroweak vector boson production at NNLO,2407.18051

  8. [16]

    Capatti, V

    Z. Capatti, V. Hirschi, D. Kermanschah, A. Pelloni and B. Ruijl,Numerical Loop-Tree Duality: contour deformation and subtraction,JHEP04(2020) 096 [1912.09291]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Bodwin,Factorization of the Drell-Yan Cross-Section in Perturbation Theory,Phys

    G.T. Bodwin,Factorization of the Drell-Yan Cross-Section in Perturbation Theory,Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 2616

    1985

  10. [18]

    Collins, D.E

    J.C. Collins, D.E. Soper and G.F. Sterman,Factorization for Short Distance Hadron - Hadron Scattering,Nucl. Phys. B261(1985) 104

    1985

  11. [19]

    Sterman,An Introduction to quantum field theory, Cambridge University Press (8, 1993)

    G.F. Sterman,An Introduction to quantum field theory, Cambridge University Press (8, 1993)

    1993

  12. [20]

    Sterman,Partons, factorization and resummation, TASI 95, inQCD and beyond

    G.F. Sterman,Partons, factorization and resummation, TASI 95, inQCD and beyond. Proceedings, Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics, TASI-95, Boulder, USA, June 4-30, 1995, pp. 327–408, 1995 [hep-ph/9606312]

    1995 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Sterman and A

    G. Sterman and A. Venkata,Local infrared safety in time-ordered perturbation theory,JHEP 02(2024) 101 [2309.13023]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Catani, T

    S. Catani, T. Gleisberg, F. Krauss, G. Rodrigo and J.-C. Winter,From loops to trees by-passing Feynman ’s theorem,JHEP09(2008) 065 [0804.3170]

    2008 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Aguilera-Verdugo, F

    J.J. Aguilera-Verdugo, F. Driencourt-Mangin, J. Plenter, S. Ram ´ ırez-Uribe, G. Rodrigo, G.F.R. Sborlini et al.,Causality, unitarity thresholds, anomalous thresholds and infrared singularities from the loop-tree duality at higher orders,JHEP12(2019) 163 [1904.08389]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Aguilera-Verdugo, F

    J.J. Aguilera-Verdugo, F. Driencourt-Mangin, R.J. Hern´ andez-Pinto, J. Plenter, S. Ramirez-Uribe, A.E. Renteria Olivo et al.,Open Loop Amplitudes and Causality to All Orders and Powers from the Loop-Tree Duality,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 211602 [2001.03564]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Jes´ us Aguilera-Verdugo, R.J

    J. Jes´ us Aguilera-Verdugo, R.J. Hern´ andez-Pinto, G. Rodrigo, G.F.R. Sborlini and W.J. Torres Bobadilla,Mathematical properties of nested residues and their application to multi-loop scattering amplitudes,JHEP02(2021) 112 [2010.12971]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Runkel, Z

    R. Runkel, Z. Sz˝ or, J.P. Vesga and S. Weinzierl,Causality and loop-tree duality at higher loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 111603 [1902.02135]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Capatti, V

    Z. Capatti, V. Hirschi, D. Kermanschah and B. Ruijl,Loop-Tree Duality for Multiloop Numerical Integration,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 151602 [1906.06138]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Aguilera-Verdugo, R.J

    J.J. Aguilera-Verdugo, R.J. Hernandez-Pinto, G. Rodrigo, G.F.R. Sborlini and – 31 – W.J. Torres Bobadilla,Causal representation of multi-loop Feynman integrands within the loop-tree duality,JHEP01(2021) 069 [2006.11217]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Ram ´ ırez-Uribe, R.J

    S. Ram ´ ırez-Uribe, R.J. Hern´ andez-Pinto, G. Rodrigo, G.F.R. Sborlini and W.J. Torres Bobadilla,Universal opening of four-loop scattering amplitudes to trees,JHEP 04(2021) 129 [2006.13818]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Capatti, V

    Z. Capatti, V. Hirschi, D. Kermanschah, A. Pelloni and B. Ruijl,Manifestly Causal Loop-Tree Duality,2009.05509

    2009 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Capatti, V

    Z. Capatti, V. Hirschi, D. Kermanschah, A. Pelloni and B. Ruijl,cLTD, Sept., 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7229437

    2020 doi

  24. [32]

    Sborlini,Geometrical approach to causality in multiloop amplitudes,Phys

    G.F.R. Sborlini,Geometrical approach to causality in multiloop amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D 104(2021) 036014 [2102.05062]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Torres Bobadilla,Loop-tree duality from vertices and edges,JHEP04(2021) 183 [2102.05048]

    W.J. Torres Bobadilla,Loop-tree duality from vertices and edges,JHEP04(2021) 183 [2102.05048]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Bobadilla,Lotty – The loop-tree duality automation,Eur

    W.J.T. Bobadilla,Lotty – The loop-tree duality automation,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 514 [2103.09237]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Benincasa and W.J.T

    P. Benincasa and W.J.T. Bobadilla,Physical representations for scattering amplitudes and the wavefunction of the universe,SciPost Phys.12(2022) 192 [2112.09028]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Kromin, N

    S. Kromin, N. Schwanemann and S. Weinzierl,Amplitudes within causal loop-tree duality, 2208.01060

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Ram ´ ırez-Uribe, R.J

    S. Ram ´ ırez-Uribe, R.J. Hern´ andez-Pinto, G. Rodrigo and G.F.R. Sborlini,From Five-Loop Scattering Amplitudes to Open Trees with the Loop-Tree Duality,Symmetry14(2022) 2571 [2211.03163]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Capatti,Exposing the threshold structure of loop integrals,Phys

    Z. Capatti,Exposing the threshold structure of loop integrals,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) L051902 [2211.09653]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Capatti,Derivation of the Cross-Free Family representation for the box diagram,PoS RADCOR2023(2024) 027 [2311.14374]

    Z. Capatti,Derivation of the Cross-Free Family representation for the box diagram,PoS RADCOR2023(2024) 027 [2311.14374]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Vicini and D

    M. Vicini and D. Kermanschah,Numerical integration of the double- and triple-box integrals using threshold subtraction,PoSLL2024(2024) 078 [2407.21511]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Soper,Techniques for QCD calculations by numerical integration,Phys

    D.E. Soper,Techniques for QCD calculations by numerical integration,Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 014009 [hep-ph/9910292]

    2000 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Nagy and D.E

    Z. Nagy and D.E. Soper,Numerical integration of one-loop Feynman diagrams for N-photon amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 093006 [hep-ph/0610028]

    2006 arXiv

  35. [43]

    W. Gong, Z. Nagy and D.E. Soper,Direct numerical integration of one-loop Feynman diagrams for N-photon amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 033005 [0812.3686]

    2009 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Becker, C

    S. Becker, C. Reuschle and S. Weinzierl,Numerical NLO QCD calculations,JHEP12(2010) 013 [1010.4187]

    2010 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Assadsolimani, S

    M. Assadsolimani, S. Becker and S. Weinzierl,A Simple formula for the infrared singular part of the integrand of one-loop QCD amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 094002 [0912.1680]

    2010 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Becker, C

    S. Becker, C. Reuschle and S. Weinzierl,Efficiency Improvements for the Numerical Computation of NLO Corrections,JHEP07(2012) 090 [1205.2096]. – 32 –

    2012 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Becker, D

    S. Becker, D. Goetz, C. Reuschle, C. Schwan and S. Weinzierl,NLO results for five, six and seven jets in electron-positron annihilation,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 032005 [1111.1733]

    2012 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Becker and S

    S. Becker and S. Weinzierl,Direct numerical integration for multi-loop integrals,Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2321 [1211.0509]

    2013 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Gnendiger et al.,Tod, or not tod: recent developments and comparisons of regularization schemes,Eur

    C. Gnendiger et al.,Tod, or not tod: recent developments and comparisons of regularization schemes,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 471 [1705.01827]

    2017 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Seth and S

    S. Seth and S. Weinzierl,Numerical integration of subtraction terms,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 114031 [1605.06646]

    2016 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Capatti, V

    Z. Capatti, V. Hirschi, A. Pelloni and B. Ruijl,Local Unitarity: a representation of differential cross-sections that is locally free of infrared singularities at any order,JHEP04 (2021) 104 [2010.01068]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Torres Bobadilla et al.,May the four be with you: Novel IR-subtraction methods to tackle NNLO calculations,Eur

    W.J. Torres Bobadilla et al.,May the four be with you: Novel IR-subtraction methods to tackle NNLO calculations,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 250 [2012.02567]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Kermanschah,Numerical integration of loop integrals through local cancellation of threshold singularities,JHEP01(2022) 151 [2110.06869]

    D. Kermanschah,Numerical integration of loop integrals through local cancellation of threshold singularities,JHEP01(2022) 151 [2110.06869]

    2022 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Rios-Sanchez and G

    J. Rios-Sanchez and G. Sborlini,Towards multiloop local renormalization within Causal Loop-Tree Duality,2402.13995. – 33 –

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.