Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Cyber Defence: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.07745 v3 pith:AMWLPIEK submitted 2023-10-11 cs.LG

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Cyber Defence: A Survey

classification cs.LG
keywords cyberdefencelearningmethodsproblemsurveyadversarialapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid increase in the number of cyber-attacks in recent years raises the need for principled methods for defending networks against malicious actors. Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has emerged as a promising approach for mitigating these attacks. However, while DRL has shown much potential for cyber defence, numerous challenges must be overcome before DRL can be applied to the autonomous cyber defence (ACD) problem at scale. Principled methods are required for environments that confront learners with very high-dimensional state spaces, large multi-discrete action spaces, and adversarial learning. Recent works have reported success in solving these problems individually. There have also been impressive engineering efforts towards solving all three for real-time strategy games. However, applying DRL to the full ACD problem remains an open challenge. Here, we survey the relevant DRL literature and conceptualize an idealised ACD-DRL agent. We provide: i.) A summary of the domain properties that define the ACD problem; ii.) A comprehensive comparison of current ACD environments used for benchmarking DRL approaches; iii.) An overview of state-of-the-art approaches for scaling DRL to domains that confront learners with the curse of dimensionality, and; iv.) A survey and critique of current methods for limiting the exploitability of agents within adversarial settings from the perspective of ACD. We conclude with open research questions that we hope will motivate future directions for researchers and practitioners working on ACD.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Building Better Environments for Autonomous Cyber Defence

    cs.CR 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    A workshop synthesis provides a decomposition framework for RL-cyber environment interfaces and best-practice guidelines for training and evaluating autonomous cyber defence agents.