Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 64 references

Signatures of emergent surface states across a displacive topological phase transition in Bi$_4$I$_4$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Bi4I4 crosses a displacive topological transition near 300 K: the β phase's gapless surface states carry current, the α phase's surfaces gap out, and telegraphic noise near the switch traces tunneling through α-domain edge modes.

desk verdict Promising transport evidence for switchable surface states in Bi4I4, but the c-AFM edge current needs a real artifact control before the headline claim can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03469 v1 pith:ANBVHRJ7 submitted 2025-09-03 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 72.70.+m73.20.At71.70.Ej
keywords Bi4I4topologicalphasetransitiondisplacivestructuralweakinsulatorsurfacestatesconductiveatomicforcemicroscopyresistancenoisespectroscopytelegraphic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Bi4I4 is a quasi-one-dimensional crystal that changes its electron topology along with its lattice near room temperature: in the high-temperature β phase, current flows through gapless surface states on the crystal's side faces, while in the low-temperature α phase those surfaces go gapped and conduction shifts to localized hinge channels. The paper claims direct transport evidence for this switch. Conductive atomic force microscopy maps show bright current along side-surface step edges in the β phase, vanishing when the sample cools into the α phase and reappearing when it is reheated. Resistance-fluctuation spectroscopy near the transition reveals two-level telegraphic noise with a characteristic corner frequency around 20 mHz, which the authors attribute to electrons tunneling between β domains through the edge modes of intervening α domains. A minimal theory coupling a phonon order parameter to the topological edge electrons reproduces both the first-order displacive character of the transition and the noise frequency scale, marking Bi4I4 as a candidate where a classical structural transition drives a topological one.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the scalar order parameter φ of a φ³ free energy, L = (a/2)φ² − (1/3)φ³ + (1/4)φ⁴ with a ∝ (T − TS), which describes the first-order displacive lattice transition between the β phase (⟨φ⟩ = 0) and the α phase (⟨φ⟩ ≠ 0). The low-energy electrons are treated as quantum spin Hall edge fermions with Hamiltonian H = ħvF ky σx ⊗ τz + λφ(1 ⊗ τz + 1 ⊗ τx): the φ coupling gaps the surface Dirac cone while preserving a topological regime for −2 < λφ < 0, characterized by a quantized spin winding number. The two-level fluctuations are carried by a generation-recombination trap mechanism: edge modes of α domains act as trap centers, and their energy splitting ΔE_edge = W exp(−

What would settle it

Cool the same exfoliated flake into the α phase and scan a region with intentionally steep, freshly cleaved steps under identical bias: if the edge-current contrast persists at comparable magnitude, the β-phase contrast is a topographic tip artifact rather than surface-state transport. Alternatively, a two-terminal measurement of a single side surface in the β phase should show a finite, roughly temperature-independent conductance of order e²/h per surface that drops abruptly and reproducibly near 300 K; if the conductance change tracks bulk resistivity instead, the edge current is not carryin

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the room-temperature structural change in Bi4I4 is a displacive topological phase transition, not just a lattice change: below roughly 300 K the α phase is gapped on its surfaces and hosts localized hinge (edge) modes, while above it the β phase supports gapless Dirac surface states that actually conduct. The evidence is twofold. First, c-AFM current maps of exfoliated flakes show strong conduction at side-surface step edges in the β phase (about 304 K), which disappears in the α phase (about 292 K) and returns on reheating, with the same hysteresis seen in resistivity. Second, normalized resistance-noise spectra near the transition acquire a Lorentzian component on

Load-bearing premise

The bright current the c-AFM tip records at side-surface step edges in the β phase is assumed to be genuine topological surface-state conduction, although sharp steps are known to enhance tip current for purely topographic and contact reasons, and no control on a topologically trivial sample or quantitative conductance check is reported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The β phase of Bi4I4 transports electricity on its side (100)-type surfaces through gapless topological states; the same flakes show no such edge current in the α phase, so the current map is a direct readout of the surface band topology.
  • The β↔α transition is first-order and displacive, with roughly 10 K of resistivity hysteresis; the surface conduction reappears after repeated thermal cycling, so the effect is intrinsic and reversible.
  • Near the transition, resistance fluctuations carry a Lorentzian two-level component whose corner frequency encodes the domain size; the observed fc of about 20 mHz implies α domains of order 380 nm interleaved with β domains.
  • Because the surface gap in the α phase is only about 25 meV while the bulk gaps are 60–130 meV, ambient-temperature transport in Bi4I4 is dominated by surface and hinge electrons, making the material a workable platform for room-temperature topological surface conduction.
  • The same theory predicts that the α phase hosts topological hinge modes (spin winding number 1) even though its surfaces are gapped, so one displacive transition connects a weak topological insulator (β) to a higher-order topological insulator (α).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the surface-state reading of the c-AFM maps is correct, a suitably contacted β-phase flake should show a nearly quantized two-terminal conductance (of order e²/h per surface) that drops abruptly at the transition; that measurement would turn local imaging into a transport number.
  • A decisive control would be the same c-AFM scan on a topologically trivial flake with comparable step morphology, or on the same flake in the α phase with deliberately steep edges: persistent edge contrast would point to a topographic or contact artifact rather than surface-state transport. The paper reports no such control.
  • The noise signature offers a practical probe of phase coexistence: monitoring fc across the hysteresis loop could map α-domain sizes as a function of sweep rate and thermal history, using edge modes as a local thermometer of the displacive transition.
  • The same φ-coupled-edge-fermion mechanism should apply to isostructural bismuth halides such as Bi4Br4 and Bi4Br2I2, so the predicted telegraphic-noise peak and its fc-versus-temperature curve are testable predictions for the broader material family.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports experimental and theoretical work on the room-temperature β→α transition in the quasi-one-dimensional topological material Bi4I4. Using XRD and resistivity, the authors identify a first-order displacive transition near 300 K. Conductive-AFM current maps on exfoliated flakes show current contrast at side-surface step edges in the β phase, its absence in the α phase, and its reappearance upon reheating. Low-frequency resistance noise measurements near the transition show telegraphic switching and a Lorentzian component in the power spectral density. A φ^3 theory of the displacive transition is coupled to a one-dimensional fermion model, yielding topological edge modes in a parameter window; the McWhorter generation-recombination model is used to relate the Lorentzian corner frequency fc to the α-domain size. The paper concludes that β-Bi4I4 transports through gapless side-surface states and that α-Bi4I4 hosts hinge/edge modes responsible for the noise signature.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper would provide a rare transport-level signature of a temperature-driven topological surface-state transition in a quasi-one-dimensional material, complementing existing ARPES/STS studies. The strengths are the reproducible c-AFM contrast on several flakes with reversible thermal cycling, the explicit six-surface DFT surface-state calculation (Fig. S5), and the quantitative fitting of the noise spectra as 1/f plus a Lorentzian. However, the two central interpretive steps—the surface-state origin of the c-AFM edge current and the extraction of α-domain sizes from fc—are not yet established to the standard required for the headline claims. The c-AFM measurement lacks controls for topographic/contact artifacts, and the domain-size estimate is circular as presented.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Fig. 2a–f and Figs. S6–S7] The c-AFM edge-current contrast is the only direct experimental evidence that β-Bi4I4 transports through side-surface states. The α-phase null is a partial control, but the first-order transition changes bulk resistivity and likely tip-sample contact, so it does not exclude topographic/contact artifacts. The paper reports no measurement on a topologically trivial flake with comparable stepped topography, no top-surface step on the same flake, and no comparison of the measured current (~400 pA at 1 V; several nA at 4–5 V in the SI) to the conductance expected from a gapless surface state or to a metallic reference. Because conductive-AFM tips routinely show enhanced current at sharp steps due to field concentration and contact-area changes, this leaves a plausible artifact path. This premise underpins the headline claim; without such controls, the transport conclusion is not robust.
  2. [SI Section S10, Eq. (19) and Fig. S16; Section 5, last paragraph] The domain size l is estimated by inverting Eq. (19) from the measured Lorentzian corner frequency fc (Fig. S16), and the same l is then used in the main text to state that 'a typical domain of size l∼380 nm leads to fc∼20 mHz which is consistent with experimentally observed values.' This is circular: fc cannot simultaneously fix l and serve as a confirmation of the model. The exponential sensitivity of Eq. (19) to l/ξ makes even order-of-magnitude agreement weak unless l is determined independently (e.g., by structural imaging or scattering) or unless the extraction is explicitly treated as a fit with uncertainty propagation. As written, the noise interpretation is not falsifiable.
  3. [Abstract and Section 5; Conclusion] The abstract asserts that the α-phase hosts 'hinge states' and the paper concludes with 'transport signatures of the topological states in both phases.' The α-phase boundary modes are never directly observed: the c-AFM maps show only the absence of edge current in α, and the noise analysis is an indirect, model-dependent interpretation. The effective one-dimensional Hamiltonian in Eq. (6)/(8) supports zero-energy edge modes of a model chain, but this is not a demonstration of the three-dimensional hinge states of α-Bi4I4. Ordinary two-level fluctuators—domain boundaries, charge traps, contact instabilities—can also produce telegraphic resistance noise near a first-order transition. The claims about α-phase hinge states should be explicitly softened unless direct evidence (e.g., spectroscopy or length-dependent transport on α-phase flakes) is provided.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2] Axis labels in several panels are garbled ('4120.40Current (pA)', '0 856 (nm)', etc.); the figures need re-typesetting.
  2. [Section 5 vs. SI Section S10] There is a numerical inconsistency: the main text says l≈380 nm gives fc≈20 mHz, while the SI says the same l gives fc≈10 mHz. Please harmonize the statement and check the evaluation of Eq. (19).
  3. [Fig. S6 caption] The caption says 'current variation (top left)' for a panel that appears to be bottom left; please correct the panel references.
  4. [Fig. 3c,e] No error bars, number of devices, or cooling-cycle comparison is reported for the fc(T) and ⟨δR²⟩/R² plots. At minimum, a statement on run-to-run and sample-to-sample reproducibility is needed.
  5. [General notation] The terms TLF and RTN are used interchangeably; please define them once and use them consistently throughout.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The fc-versus-domain-size consistency check is circular: l is estimated from the measured fc via Eq. 19, so the claimed agreement is by construction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 5 (main text) and SI Section S10, Eq. 19 / Fig. S16]
    "Main text: "Thus, matching hfc ∼ ΔEedge, a typical domain of size l ∼ 380 nm leads to fc ∼ 20 mHz which is consistent with experimentally observed values." SI S10: "Given the experimentally observed fc values with temperature (see Figure 3e in the main text), from Eq. 19, we estimate the typical domain length scale l of the α-domain near the displacive topological phase transition. ... Thus a typical domain of size l ∼ 380 nm leads to fc ∼ 10 mHz.""

    Eq. 19 is fc = (W/h) exp(−ΔESurfα l/ℏvF) with W, ΔESurfα, and vF fixed from DFT. The SI explicitly inverts this relation using the experimentally measured fc to estimate l (Fig. S16), and the main text then cites l ≈ 380 nm as producing fc ≈ 20 mHz "consistent with experimentally observed values." Since l was obtained from those same fc values, the agreement is tautological; no independent determination of the α-domain size is provided. Section 4 already presupposes "large domains of α-phase (say ∼ 400 nm)", so the later 380 nm is not an independent prediction. The noise analysis therefore contains a fitted parameter (domain size) renamed as a consistency check.

full rationale

The paper's structural, DFT, and c-AFM observations are not, by themselves, circular: the β-phase side-surface conduction is compared with DFT surface-state calculations and disappears in the α phase, which is an independent check. The effective-theory calculation of the topological character is also a self-contained model calculation. However, the specific claim that the Lorentzian corner frequency is "explained" by a ~380 nm α-domain is circular because Eq. 19 is inverted to infer l from the measured fc, and then that same l is presented as reproducing the observed fc. The c-AFM edge-current interpretation lacks a trivial-control measurement (e.g., a topologically trivial stepped flake), but that is an experimental correctness risk rather than a constructional circularity, so it is not scored as a circular step. Overall score 6 reflects one central consistency claim that reduces by construction, while the rest of the paper retains substantial independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central physical picture rides on the known structural transition and the known surface topology, which are imported from the cited literature rather than derived here. The genuinely new quantitative elements are the noise model and the effective phi3-plus-fermion theory. The noise model's quantitative success depends on a domain size extracted from the very frequency it explains (Eq. 19 inverted in SI S10). The effective theory introduces a scalar phonon field and a fermion coupling whose magnitude is fixed to the DFT surface gap; its topological regime is shown in dimensionless toy-model units with no demonstrated mapping to the physical parameters. No invented entities beyond the standard order parameter.

free parameters (4)
  • alpha-domain size l = ~380 nm (main text); inferred from fc (SI Fig. S16)
    SI S10 inverts Eq. 19 using the measured Lorentzian corner frequency fc to estimate l; the main text's 'l~380 nm gives fc~20 mHz' is a fitted consistency, not an independent prediction.
  • Lorentzian corner frequency fc = ~10-20 mHz near 306.6-306.8 K
    Fit parameter of the PSD model SR/R^2 = A/f^alpha + B fc/(f^2+fc^2) (SI S8); no uncertainties reported; used to infer domain size and claimed to match the edge-mode energy splitting.
  • 1/f noise exponent alpha and amplitudes A, B = alpha ranges ~1 to 1.5 across temperatures; A, B not tabulated
    Free parameters of the PSD fit (SI S8, Fig. S10); their temperature dependence is not analyzed.
  • Effective fermion-phonon coupling magnitude |lambda-phi| = 14.849 x 10^-3 eV
    Set by matching 2*sqrt(2)|lambda-phi| to the DFT alpha-phase surface gap (~0.042 eV, SI S9). The toy-lattice topological window (-2 < lambda-phi < 0) is quoted in dimensionless hopping units; the paper does not demonstrate that the physical lambda-phi lands inside it for the Landau phi_min.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The beta-to-alpha lattice transition is a displacive, first-order transition describable by phi3 Landau theory with a single scalar phonon order parameter.
    Adopted in Section 2 (Fig. 1e,f) and SI S9; the paper does not measure a soft phonon or discriminate displacive from order-disorder character, so this is assumed from Ref. 31.
  • domain assumption Low-energy physics of the (100) surface reduces to weakly coupled 1D chains along b, so an effective 1D model captures the topological transition.
    SI S9: 'this enables us to reduce the spatial dimension... the effective theory reduces to one spatial dimension along the b-axis'. Weak c-axis coupling is asserted, not computed.
  • domain assumption Telegraphic noise near TS is caused by edge-mode-mediated tunneling between beta domains through alpha domains (McWhorter generation-recombination), not by generic defects or domain-wall fluctuators.
    Section 4 and SI S10; the text notes telegraphic noise usually arises from traps in films and devices and is 'surprising' in a bulk crystal, but does not exclude those conventional mechanisms for this sample.
  • domain assumption DFT-PBE surface and bulk gaps (surface gap ~25 meV, bulk gaps 60-130 meV) and the Wannier-derived bands are quantitatively reliable inputs for the localization length and fc estimates.
    Used in Eq. 3 and Eq. 19 (main text Section 5, SI S3 and S10); PBE-level gap accuracy is not cross-checked against hybrid functionals or experiment.
  • domain assumption The finite-size edge-mode splitting formula Delta_E_edge = W exp(-l/xi) applies to the domain landscape reduced from 3D to 1D.
    Standard exponential splitting for gapped 1D topological edge states, applied here to alpha-domain boundaries; prefactor W and localization length xi are taken from DFT without an explicit derivation for the actual domain geometry.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Signatures of emergent surface states across a displacive topological phase transition in Bi$_4$I$_4$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ANBVHRJ7

@misc{pith2026250903469,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Signatures of emergent surface states across a displacive topological phase transition in Bi$_4$I$_4$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ANBVHRJ7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03469}
}
abstract

Topological phase transitions involving crystalline symmetry breaking provide a fertile ground to explore the interplay between symmetry, topology, and emergent quantum phenomena. Recently discovered quasi-one-dimensional topological material, Bi$_4$I$_4$, has been predicted to host topologically non-trivial gapless surfaces at high temperature, which undergo a finite temperature phase transition to a low temperature gapped phase. Here we present experimental signatures of this room temperature phase transition from a high-temperature $\beta$-phase with a surface state to a gapped $\alpha$-phase hosting hinge states. Using real-space current mapping and resistance fluctuation spectroscopy, we identify signatures of a displacive topological phase transition mediated by a first-order thermodynamic structural change. Near the emergence of $\beta$-phase, we observe pronounced telegraphic noise, indicating fluctuating phase domains with topological surface states. The spatially resolved current map reveals electron transport via the gapless surface states in the $\beta$-phase, which vanishes upon transitioning to the $\alpha$-phase with localized conduction channels (or hinge modes). Our experimental results, supported by first principles estimates and effective theory of a topological displacive phase transition, establish Bi$_4$I$_4$ as a candidate material showing intricate interplay of classical thermodynamic phase transitions with topological quantum phenomena.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03469 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Room temperature topological phase transition. a, Room-temperature XRD data for Cu Kα X-ray source projected on ab plane of Bi4I4 crystal for both β (top) and α (bottom) phase. b, Image of as￾grown single crystals on a millimeter-scale graph paper (left) and its scanning electron microscopy image (right). c-d, Schematic representation of Bi4I4 crystal structure inferred from Laue-diffraction for β and α phases respe… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Evidence of vanishing surface current across the transition of Bi4I4 flakes. a-b, Spatial current map (topography in the inset) of a exfoliated Bi4I4 flake (thickness ∼ 400 nm) β-phase at T ∼ 304 K and plot of current variation (left) and flake thickness (right ) along the respective lines, respectively. The scans are recorded with a bias voltage of 1 V DC and a standard scan rate of 1 Hz. c-d, Spatial current map (… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Two level fluctuations near topological phase crossover. a, Time series of normalized resistance fluctuations at a few representative temperatures in the very vicinity of the phase transition in heating cycle. b, Power spectral density of the representative time series data. A clear deviation from the 1/f behavior is observed near the TLF region. c, Enhancement in integrated normalized noise spectra (noise variance)… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Edge-modes as fluctuation channel: a, Energy spectrum of the effective one-dimensional Hamil￾tonian in the α-phase host zero-energy modes within the bulk gap for the parameter regime −2 < λϕ < 0. b, The global minima ϕmin of the total free energy density (with both ele…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fu, L., Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Topological insulators in three dimensions.Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 106803 (2007). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.106803

  2. [2]

    Qi, X.-L., Hughes, T. L. & Zhang, S.-C. Topological field theory of time-reversal invariant insulators. Phys. Rev. B 78, 195424 (2008). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 78.195424

  3. [3]

    Hsieh, D. et al. A topological dirac insulator in a quantum spin hall phase.Nature 452, 970–974 (2008). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06843

  4. [5]

    Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: topological insulators. Reviews of modern physics 82, 3045 (2010). URL https://journals.aps.org/rmp/abstract/10.1103/RevModPhys. 82.3045

  5. [6]

    & Zhang, S.-C

    Qi, X.-L. & Zhang, S.-C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057–1110 (2011). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1057

  6. [7]

    & Das, T

    Bansil, A., Lin, H. & Das, T. Colloquium: Topological band theory.Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 021004 (2016). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.021004

  7. [8]

    Karzig, T. et al. Scalable designs for quasiparticle-poisoning-protected topological quantum computa- tion with majorana zero modes. Phys. Rev. B 95, 235305 (2017). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.235305

  8. [9]

    Schindler, F. et al. Higher-order topology in bismuth. Nature physics 14, 918–924 (2018)

Show all 64 references
  1. [10]

    & Ali, M

    Wang, Y ., Lee, G.-H. & Ali, M. N. Topology and superconductivity on the edge. Nature Physics 17, 542–546 (2021). URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-021-01190-7

  2. [11]

    A., Bernevig, B

    Benalcazar, W. A., Bernevig, B. A. & Hughes, T. L. Quantized electric multipole insulators. Sci- ence 357, 61–66 (2017). URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science. aah6442

  3. [12]

    Schindler, F. et al. Higher-order topological insulators. Science advances 4, eaat0346 (2018). URL https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aat0346

  4. [13]

    M., Brzezicki, W

    Nguyen, N. M., Brzezicki, W. & Hyart, T. Corner states, hinge states, and majorana modes in SnTe nanowires. Phys. Rev. B 105, 075310 (2022). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.105.075310. 11

  5. [14]

    Higher-order topological insulators and semimetals on the breathing kagome and pyrochlore lattices

    Ezawa, M. Higher-order topological insulators and semimetals on the breathing kagome and pyrochlore lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 026801 (2018). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.120.026801

  6. [15]

    Yue, C. et al. Symmetry-enforced chiral hinge states and surface quantum anomalous hall effect in the magnetic axion insulator Bi 2−xSmxSe3. Nature Physics 15, 577–581 (2019). URL https://doi. org/10.1038/s41567-019-0457-0

  7. [16]

    & Dai, X

    Xu, Y ., Song, Z., Wang, Z., Weng, H. & Dai, X. Higher-order topology of the axion insulator EuIn2As2. Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 256402 (2019). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.122.256402

  8. [17]

    Yu, S. et al. Observation of robust one-dimensional edge channels in a three-dimensional quantum spin hall insulator. Physical Review X 14, 041048 (2024). URL https://journals.aps.org/prx/ abstract/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.041048

  9. [18]

    Shumiya, N. et al. Evidence of a room-temperature quantum spin hall edge state in a higher-order topological insulator. Nature Materials 21, 1111–1115 (2022). URL https://www.nature.com/ articles/s41563-022-01304-3

  10. [19]

    Li, X. et al. Pressure-induced phase transitions and superconductivity in a quasi-1-dimensional topo- logical crystalline insulator α−Bi4Br4. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 17696– 17700 (2019). URL https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1909276116

  11. [20]

    Hsu, C.-H. et al. Purely rotational symmetry-protected topological crystalline insulator-Bi 4Br4. 2D Materials 6, 031004 (2019). URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/ 2053-1583/ab1607/meta

  12. [21]

    Zhong, J. et al. Coalescence of multiple topological orders in quasi-one-dimensional bismuth halide chains. Nature Communications 16, 1163 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-025-56593-4

  13. [22]

    Hossain, M. S. et al. Quantum transport response of topological hinge modes. Nature Physics 20, 776–782 (2024). URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-024-02388-1# citeas

  14. [23]

    Huang, J. et al. Room-temperature topological phase transition in quasi-one-dimensional material Bi4I4. Phys. Rev. X 11, 031042 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX. 11.031042

  15. [24]

    Yang, M. et al. Mass acquisition of dirac fermions in Bi4I4 by spontaneous symmetry breaking.Physical Review Letters133, 256601 (2024). URL https://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.133.256601. 12

  16. [25]

    Noguchi, R. et al. A weak topological insulator state in quasi-one-dimensional bismuth iodide. Nature 566, 518–522 (2019). URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-0927-7

  17. [26]

    Noguchi, R. et al. Robust weak topological insulator in the bismuth halide Bi 4Br2I2. Physical Review Letters 133, 086602 (2024). URL https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.133.086602

  18. [27]

    & Zhang, F

    Yoon, C., Liu, C.-C., Min, H. & Zhang, F. Quasi-one-dimensional higher-order topological insulators (2020). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14710. 2005.14710

  19. [28]

    Zhao, W. et al. Topological phase transition in quasi-one-dimensional bismuth iodide Bi 4I4. npj Quantum Materials 9, 103 (2024). URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41535-024-00711-w

  20. [29]

    Aut `es, G. et al. A novel quasi-one-dimensional topological insulator in bismuth iodideβ−Bi4I4. Nature materials 15, 154–158 (2016). URL https://www.nature.com/articles/nmat4488

  21. [30]

    Liu, Y . et al. Gate-tunable transport in quasi-one-dimensional α-Bi4I4 field effect transistors. Nano letters 22, 1151–1158 (2022). URL https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs. nanolett.1c04264

  22. [31]

    Krumhansl, J. A. & Gooding, R. J. Structural phase transitions with little phonon softening and first- order character. Phys. Rev. B 39, 3047–3053 (1989). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.39.3047

  23. [32]

    & Soluyanov, A

    Wu, Q., Zhang, S., Song, H.-F., Troyer, M. & Soluyanov, A. A. Wanniertools : An open- source software package for novel topological materials. Computer Physics Communications 224, 405 – 416 (2018). URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0010465517303442

  24. [33]

    Yang, M. et al. Large-gap quantum spin hall state and temperature-induced lifshitz transition in Bi4Br4. ACS Nano 16, 3036–3044 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c10539

  25. [34]

    Gong, Z. et al. Identification of lifshitz transition, quantum oscillations, and metal-insulator tran- sition in a composite topological matter Bi4(Br 0.2I0.8)4. Sustainable Materials and Technologies 45, e01438 (2025). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S2...

  26. [35]

    & Zhang, F

    Liu, C.-C., Zhou, J.-J., Yao, Y . & Zhang, F. Weak topological insulators and composite weyl semimetals: β−Bi4I4 (X = Br, I). Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 066801 (2016). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.066801

  27. [36]

    Weissman, M. B. 1 f noise and other slow, nonexponential kinetics in condensed matter.Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 537–571 (1988). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.60.537. 13

  28. [37]

    Electronic noise and fluctuations in solids (Cambridge University Press, England, 1996)

    Kogan, S. Electronic noise and fluctuations in solids (Cambridge University Press, England, 1996)

  29. [38]

    Koushik, R. et al. Correlated conductance fluctuations close to the berezinskii-kosterlitz-thouless tran- sition in ultrathin NbN films.Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 197001 (2013). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.197001

  30. [39]

    Kalimuddin, S. et al. Exceptionally slow, long-range, and non-gaussian critical fluctuations dominate the charge density wave transition.Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 266504 (2024). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.266504

  31. [40]

    K., Vishnubhotla, P

    S, S., Kundu, H. K., Vishnubhotla, P. & Bid, A. Hidden electronic phase in strained few-layer 1T−T aS2. Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 124003 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevMaterials.5.124003

  32. [41]

    & V on Molnar, S

    Raquet, B., Anane, A., Wirth, S., Xiong, P. & V on Molnar, S. Noise probe of the dynamic phase separation in La 2/3Ca1/3MnO3. Physical Review Letters 84, 4485 (2000). URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4485

  33. [42]

    & Raychaudhuri, A

    Ghosh, A., Kar, S., Bid, A. & Raychaudhuri, A. K. A set-up for measurement of low frequency conductance fluctuation (noise) using digital signal processing techniques (2004). URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0402130. cond-mat/0402130

  34. [43]

    Li, Z. et al. Random telegraph noise from resonant tunnelling at low temperatures. Scientific reports 8, 250 (2018). URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-18579-1

  35. [44]

    & Raychaudhuri, A

    Bid, A., Guha, A. & Raychaudhuri, A. Low-frequency random telegraphic noise and 1/f noise in the rare-earth manganite Pr 0.63Ca0.37MnO3 near the charge-ordering transition. Physical Re- view B 67, 174415 (2003). URL https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/ PhysRevB.67.174415

  36. [45]

    Kundu, H. K. et al. Quantum phase transition in few-layer NbSe 2 probed through quantized conduc- tance fluctuations. Physical review letters 119, 226802 (2017). URL https://journals.aps. org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.226802

  37. [46]

    Noise in semiconductors: spectrum of a two-parameter ran- dom signal

    Machlup, S. Noise in semiconductors: spectrum of a two-parameter ran- dom signal. Journal of Applied Physics 25, 341–343 (1954). URL https: //pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article-abstract/25/3/341/160580/ Noise-in-Semiconductors-Spectrum-of-a-Two

  38. [47]

    & Theodorou, C

    Gauthier, O., Haendler, S., Rafhay, Q. & Theodorou, C. Universality of trap-induced mobility fluctu- ations between 1/f noise and random telegraph noise in nanoscale FD-SOI mosfets. Applied Physics Letters 122, 233503 (2023). URL https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article/122/23/ 23...

  39. [48]

    & Theodorou, C

    Tataridou, A., Ghibaudo, G. & Theodorou, C. Model implementation of lorentzian spectra for circuit noise simulations in the frequency domain. IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society 10, 611–619 (2022). URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9785516

  40. [49]

    & Ghosh, A

    Islam, S., Shamim, S. & Ghosh, A. Benchmarking noise and dephasing in emerging electrical materials for quantum technologies. Advanced Materials 35, 2109671 (2023). URL https: //onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adma.202109671

  41. [50]

    & van Loon, E

    Schobert, A., Berges, J., Wehling, T. & van Loon, E. Downfolding the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model. SciPost Phys. 11, 079 (2021). URL https://scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.11. 4.079

  42. [51]

    N., Kleinpenning, T

    Hooge, F. N., Kleinpenning, T. G. M. & Vandamme, L. K. J. Experimental studies on 1/f noise.Reports on Progress in Physics 44, 479 (1981). URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/ 44/5/001

  43. [52]

    & Joubert, D

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999)

  44. [53]

    Bl ¨ochl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994)

  45. [54]

    & Furthm ¨uller, J

    Kresse, G. & Furthm ¨uller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996)

  46. [55]

    P., Burke, K

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 77.3865

  47. [56]

    Mostofi, A. A. et al. wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 685 – 699 (2008)

  48. [57]

    Franchini, C. et al. Maximally localized Wannier functions in LaMnO 3 within PBE+U, hybrid func- tionals and partially self-consistent GW: an efficient route to construct ab initio tight-binding pa- rameters for e g perovskites. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 24, 235602 ...

  49. [58]

    Gu, Q., Pandey, S. K. & Tiwari, R. A computational method to estimate spin-orbital interaction strength in solid state systems. Comput. Mater. Sci. 221, 112090 (2023). URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927025623000848

  50. [59]

    Yu, S. et al. Observation of robust one-dimensional edge channels in a three-dimensional quantum spin hall insulator. Phys. Rev. X 14, 041048 (2024). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevX.14.041048. 15

  51. [60]

    Noguchi, R. et al. Evidence for a higher-order topological insulator in a three-dimensional material built from van der waals stacking of bismuth-halide chains. Nature Materials 20, 473–479 (2021)

  52. [61]

    & Zirnbauer, M

    Altland, A. & Zirnbauer, M. R. Nonstandard symmetry classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures. Phys. Rev. B 55, 1142–1161 (1997). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.55.1142

  53. [62]

    Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors

    Kitaev, A. Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors. AIP Conference Proceedings 1134, 22–30 (2009). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3149495

  54. [63]

    C., Schnyder, A

    Chiu, C.-K., Teo, J. C., Schnyder, A. P. & Ryu, S. Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries. Reviews of Modern Physics 88, 035005 (2016)

  55. [64]

    & Shenoy, V

    Agarwala, A., Haldar, A. & Shenoy, V . B. The tenfold way redux: Fermionic systems with n-body interactions. Annals of Physics 385, 469–511 (2017). URL https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0003491617302154

  56. [65]

    & Hooge, F

    Vandamme, L. & Hooge, F. On the additivity of generation-recombination spectra part 3: The mcwhorter model for 1/f noise in mosfets. Physica B: Condensed Matter 357, 507–524 (2005). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921452604012633. 16 Supplementary infor...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.