Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Science with the TianQin observatory: Preliminary result on extreme-mass-ratio inspirals

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.08212 v3 pith:ANBY5SFJ submitted 2020-05-17 astro-ph.HE gr-qc

Science with the TianQin observatory: Preliminary result on extreme-mass-ratio inspirals

classification astro-ph.HE gr-qc
keywords tianqinemriserrorsfindallowastrophysicalblackdetectors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Systems consisting of a massive black hole and a stellar-origin compact object (CO), known as extreme-mass-ratio inspirals (EMRIs), are of great significance for space-based gravitational-wave detectors, as they will allow for testing gravitational theories in the strong field regime, and for checking the validity of the black hole no-hair theorem. In this work, we present a calculation of the EMRI rate and parameter estimation capabilities of the TianQin observatory, for various astrophysical models for these sources. We find that TianQin can observe EMRIs involving COs with mass of 10$M_\odot$ up to redshift $\sim2$. We also find that detections could reach tens or hundreds per year in the most optimistic astrophysical scenarios. Intrinsic parameters are expected to be recovered to within fractional errors of $\sim 10^{-6}$, while typical errors on the luminosity distance and sky localization are 10% and 10 deg$^2$, respectively. TianQin observation of EMRIs can also constrain possible deviations from the Kerr quadrupole moment to within fractional errors $\lesssim10^{-4}$. We also find that a network of multiple detectors would allow for improvements in both detection rates (by a factor $\sim 1.5$ -$3$) and in parameter estimation precision (20-fold improvement for the sky localization and fivefold improvement for the other parameters).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Constructing a gravitational wave analysis pipeline for extremely large mass ratio inspirals

    astro-ph.HE 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    A hierarchical semi-coherent F-statistic plus particle-swarm pipeline recovers an injected Sgr A* XMRI from 90 days of simulated TianQin data with sub-percent parameter precision.

  2. Massive scalar fields in eccentric regime: Detectability and constraints from LISA observations of extreme mass-ratio inspirals

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Computes scalar and tensor fluxes for eccentric EMRIs with massive scalars, quantifies dephasing, and shows via Fisher matrix that LISA can constrain scalar charge and mass.

  3. Gravitational waveforms from periodic orbits around a novel regular black hole

    gr-qc 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Numerical study finds that a deviation parameter in a regular black hole with Minkowski core produces phase shifts and amplitude changes in kludge waveforms from periodic orbits, making them distinguishable from Schwa...

  4. Chaotic Imprints in Gravitational Waves from Conformal-Anomaly-Corrected Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals

    gr-qc 2026-07 reject novelty 4.0

    Gravitational-wave imprints are computed for trapped orbits in a conformal-anomaly-corrected black hole spacetime, but the chaotic motion is produced by an external harmonic potential rather than the anomaly itself.

  5. Measuring the Hubble constant with strongly lensed gravitational waves from space-based detector networks

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Simulations indicate joint Taiji+LISA analysis of five SLGW events yields H0 95% credible interval uncertainties of 0.11 (source redshift unknown) or 0.042 (source redshift known).