Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

CNN-based Density Estimation and Crowd Counting: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.12783 v1 pith:AP4JFNCI submitted 2020-03-28 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords countingcrowddensitydevelopmentworksevaluationmanyanalyze
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Accurately estimating the number of objects in a single image is a challenging yet meaningful task and has been applied in many applications such as urban planning and public safety. In the various object counting tasks, crowd counting is particularly prominent due to its specific significance to social security and development. Fortunately, the development of the techniques for crowd counting can be generalized to other related fields such as vehicle counting and environment survey, if without taking their characteristics into account. Therefore, many researchers are devoting to crowd counting, and many excellent works of literature and works have spurted out. In these works, they are must be helpful for the development of crowd counting. However, the question we should consider is why they are effective for this task. Limited by the cost of time and energy, we cannot analyze all the algorithms. In this paper, we have surveyed over 220 works to comprehensively and systematically study the crowd counting models, mainly CNN-based density map estimation methods. Finally, according to the evaluation metrics, we select the top three performers on their crowd counting datasets and analyze their merits and drawbacks. Through our analysis, we expect to make reasonable inference and prediction for the future development of crowd counting, and meanwhile, it can also provide feasible solutions for the problem of object counting in other fields. We provide the density maps and prediction results of some mainstream algorithm in the validation set of NWPU dataset for comparison and testing. Meanwhile, density map generation and evaluation tools are also provided. All the codes and evaluation results are made publicly available at https://github.com/gaoguangshuai/survey-for-crowd-counting.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Depth-Guided Video Object Counting in Crowded Scenes

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A RGB-D video counting method with depth-based feature fusion and occlusion-adaptive tracking reduces counting errors in crowded scenes, validated on a new dataset.

  2. DSGC-Net: A Dual-Stream Graph Convolutional Network for Crowd Counting via Feature Correlation Mining

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A dual-stream graph convolutional network with density-driven and representation-driven graphs achieves MAE 48.9 on ShanghaiTech Part A, 5.9 on Part B, and 79.3 on UCF-QNRF.

  3. One-Shot Crowd Counting With Density Guidance For Scene Adaptation

    cs.CV 2026-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A one-shot crowd-counting method uses EM-clustered local and global density features from one labeled support image to adapt a fixed model to an unseen surveillance scene.

  4. Symmetry-preserving neural networks in lattice field theories

    hep-lat 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Translation- and gauge-equivariant neural networks (L-CNNs) predict Wilson loops, topological charge, and flux observables with orders-of-magnitude lower error than symmetry-breaking baselines, and neural gradient flo...

Pith tools