What is the Quark-Gluon Plasma made of?

Berndt M\"uller

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

What is the Quark-Gluon Plasma made of?

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Next-to-leading-order hard-thermal-loop theory says the quark-gluon plasma is a strongly coupled liquid of massive, very short-lived quark and gluon quasiparticles that carries a well-defined phonon mode.

desk verdict A well-hedged review that makes a plausible case for the quasiparticle-liquid picture, but the central evidence rests on an uncontrolled NLO HTL extrapolation at g≈2. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07181 v2 pith:APGTUCWD submitted 2025-06-08 nucl-th hep-ph

Berndt Müller This is my paper

classification nucl-thhep-ph

keywords quark-gluonplasmahard-thermal-loopperturbationtheoryquasiparticlesphononmodeshearviscosityjetquenchingfunctionalrenormalizationgrouplatticeQCD

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review synthesizes theory and experiment to answer what the fully developed quark-gluon plasma is made of. It argues that the QGP is neither a weakly coupled gas of nearly free quarks and gluons nor a structureless liquid, but a strongly coupled plasma of massive, very short-lived quark and gluon quasiparticles, with a well-defined phonon mode at low momenta. The central synthesis rests on next-to-leading-order hard-thermal-loop perturbation theory, supported by lattice QCD, functional renormalization group results, and heavy-ion collision data. A sympathetic reader would care because this resolves an apparent contradiction between early asymptotic-freedom expectations and the near-perfect fluidity observed at relativistic heavy-ion colliders.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the next-to-leading-order hard-thermal-loop (HTL) effective theory, which resums dynamically screened quark and gluon propagators and includes radiative (1↔2) processes at NLO. The key identities are the momentum-dependent quasiparticle widths, γ_g(k) = (g²N_c)/(4π) r(g,k) T for gluons and γ_ph(k) = (2η)/(3sT) k² for phonons, which determine when each mode is a well-defined quasiparticle. The radiative corrections to the collision kernel C(q) change its low-momentum behavior from $q^{{-2}}$ to $q^{{-3}}$, greatly enhancing small-angle scattering and reducing η/s to values around 0.1–0.2, which is what makes the phonon mode well defined at thermal momenta.

What would settle it

A nonperturbative determination of the transverse gluon spectral function at T≈250 MeV showing no quasiparticle peak for momenta around 2T, combined with measured transport coefficients (η/s and heavy-quark diffusion constant) that disagree strongly with the NLO HTL predictions at g≈2, would falsify the quasiparticle-liquid picture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the quark-gluon plasma at temperatures well above the crossover (T > ~200 MeV) is a strongly coupled plasma composed of massive, very short-lived quarks and gluon quasiparticles. At physical coupling g≈2 (αs≈0.3), thermal gluons have widths γ≈T, so they live only about 0.3 fm/c, and the gluon mode gradually dissolves at increasing coupling while a collective phonon mode becomes well defined for momenta below about 2T. This picture is supported by the agreement of NNLO HTL thermodynamics with lattice QCD, by functional renormalization group spectral functions, and by transport coefficients extracted from heavy-ion data, including η/s ≈ 0.1–0.2, 2πT D_s ≈ 3–5, and q̂/T³ ≈ 8±2.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that next-to-leading-order hard-thermal-loop perturbation theory remains quantitatively reliable at the physical coupling g≈2 (αs≈0.3), even though the expansion parameter is not small and g=3 is already outside the perturbative regime.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The QGP's near-perfect fluidity arises from short-lived quasiparticles, not from being a structureless liquid.
The phonon mode is the dominant propagating excitation at momenta below about 2T, which is why hydrodynamic descriptions work so well.
Measurements of jet substructure and the Molière screening angle can probe the transition scale from quasiparticle to liquid-like behavior.
Thermal photon production is a relatively clean probe of the quark quasiparticle structure because it is only indirectly sensitive to soft radiative processes.
Small collision systems (R ≈ 1 fm) should exhibit nearly the same transport properties as large ones, consistent with observed collectivity in small systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the NLO HTL quasiparticle picture is right, the label 'quasiparticle' applies to excitations whose lifetime is comparable to their inverse energy; a more precise characterization would be a 'resonant liquid' with broad, Breit–Wigner-like modes rather than stable particles.
The paper's argument suggests a unification of the previously competing gas and liquid pictures: the same screened quasiparticles produce both the short mean free path (liquid-like viscosity) and the identifiable partonic carriers that jet quenching and quark coalescence observe.
A testable extension would be to compute the Molière screening angle from the NLO HTL broadening kernel and compare with jet substructure data to see whether the quasiparticle scale matches the screening length predicted at g≈2.
The review implies a possible theory of relativistic liquids based on absorptive (saturating) interactions rather than short-distance repulsion; this could be explored in simplified models with large imaginary parts in the effective potential.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is an invited review, not a research paper. No new derivations, measurements, or fits. What is new is the framing: the review pulls together NLO HTL, lattice QCD, fRG, and heavy-ion data to argue that the QGP is a liquid of massive, very short-lived quark and gluon quasiparticles, with a phonon mode dominating the low-momentum response. That synthesis is clearly presented and mostly honest about its own limitations. The author repeatedly flags where perturbation theory should not be trusted, distinguishes controlled lattice results from model-dependent fRG truncations, and even questions whether a mode with width Γ≈2T deserves to be called a quasiparticle. The figures are illustrative re-renderings of published results, but they do help the reader see the crossover from gluon-dominated to phonon-dominated response.

The main soft spot is the one the stress-test note identifies. The central quasiparticle picture rests on NLO HTL at g≈2, where the expansion parameter is borderline at best. The paper itself says g=3 is outside the reliable regime; g=2 is not far from that edge. The widths shown in Fig. 1 are interpolations between static and high-momentum limits, and the phonon branch is inserted from the hydrodynamic η/s value rather than emerging from a full NLO spectral function. So the summary statement in Section 7 that it is 'plausible' the QGP is a quasiparticle liquid is a fair characterization of the evidence, but a reader should not mistake the figures for a controlled NLO calculation of the spectral functions. The review does not oversell this too much, but it could have said more clearly how much of the picture depends on the interpolation.

Reference bias is admitted by the author, and self-citation is noticeable but not egregious for a review by one of the field's senior people. The phenomenological sections are balanced and update the reader on recent Bayesian extractions and jet substructure results.

Bottom line: this is a useful snapshot for graduate students and non-specialists who want to understand the current structural picture of the QGP. It deserves a serious referee, but a referee should push on whether the interpolated widths and the phonon insertion can carry the conceptual weight put on them. I would not cite it as a primary source for any specific number, but I would point people to it as a readable overview.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This review surveys the theoretical and phenomenological evidence on the internal structure of the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) at temperatures above the crossover region. The author argues that the QGP is best described as a strongly coupled liquid composed of massive, very short-lived quark and gluon quasiparticles, together with a well-defined phonon mode at low momenta. The theoretical part covers hard-thermal-loop (HTL) perturbation theory at NLO, lattice QCD, and the functional renormalization group; the phenomenological part discusses bulk flow, jet quenching, heavy-quark diffusion, and electromagnetic probes. The paper contains no new derivations, but it presents a synthesis of the literature and a list of future measurements. The central claim is presented in Section 7, where the QGP is said to be 'after all, a strongly coupled plasma composed of massive, very short-lived quarks and gluon quasiparticles.'

Significance. If the synthesis is correct, it resolves a long-standing dichotomy between the picture of the QGP as a weakly coupled gas of quarks and gluons and the picture of it as a structureless perfect liquid. The review is valuable because it is generally fair to the cited literature, it clearly separates controlled lattice results from truncation-dependent fRG calculations, and it repeatedly flags the limits of thermal perturbation theory (for example, the g=3 disclaimer in Section 2). It also names concrete falsifiable prospects, such as energy-energy correlators, D-bar-D azimuthal correlations, multicharm baryon yields, and dilepton spectra. The main weakness is that the headline assertion in Section 7 is stronger than the evidence base: at the physical coupling g≈2 the NLO HTL expansion is not controlled, and the key figures for quasiparticle widths are interpolations rather than full NLO spectral functions. This does not invalidate the review, but the central claim needs to be reframed as a convergent but partly extrapolated picture.

major comments (3)

[Section 2, Eq. (1) and Figs. 1-2] The gluon width γ_g = (g²N_c/4π) r(g,k) T is an interpolation between the static and high-momentum limits of the damping rate, not the width of a pole extracted from a full NLO spectral function. Similarly, the phonon branch is inserted from the hydrodynamic form γ_ph = (2η/3sT) k², rather than from a computed collective-mode pole. The statement in the text that the dispersion relations in Fig. 1 are 'calculated in thermal perturbation theory' is therefore too strong for the widths. Because the quasiparticle-liquid picture depends directly on these widths, please label the shaded regions as interpolated/schematic and adjust the strength of the Section 7 summary accordingly.
[Section 2 and Section 5] The paper correctly states that g=3 is outside the regime where thermal perturbation theory is reliable, but g≈2 is close to that boundary: the effective loop parameter is g²N_c/(4π) ≈ 0.95, and the review itself reports large NLO corrections to η/s and qhat. The 'hope' that higher-order corrections are modest is not a controlled estimate. Since the central claim of short-lived quasiparticles with γ≈T is built on NLO HTL at this coupling, please either provide a quantitative estimate of the truncation uncertainty or explicitly present this part of the picture as an extrapolation that is consistent with, but not proven by, NLO HTL.
[Section 3.2, Fig. 4, and Section 7] The fRG gluon spectral function shown in Fig. 4 is for quenched QCD at T = 2.77 T_c and is subject to systematic truncation uncertainties, and lattice determinations of transport coefficients require model-dependent analytic continuation. The review acknowledges these limitations in Section 3.1, but Section 7's summary presents the quasiparticle picture as established ('the QGP is, after all, ...'). Please temper the summary so that it distinguishes the strongest support (NNLO HTL thermodynamics and NLO transport coefficients) from the more qualitative support (fRG spectral functions, analytic continuation from the lattice).

minor comments (7)

[Section 1] The name 'Cabbibo' in the first paragraph should be 'Cabibbo'.
[Section 2, Fig. 2 caption] The phrase 'strongly damped fork| > 6 T' should read 'strongly damped for |k| > 6 T'.
[Section 3.1] The text refers to 'lattice QCT predictions'; this should be 'lattice QCD predictions'.
[Section 5] The parenthetical in the paragraph on hydrodynamic modeling is missing a closing parenthesis: '(see e. g. [121], the results obtained in these simulations ...' should end the parenthesis after '[121]'.
[Section 6.1] There are several typos: 'referencess' should be 'references', 'idenitfied' should be 'identified', and 'color screening lnegth' should be 'color screening length'.
[Section 6.1] The phrase 'changes in the angular distribution of subjects' should likely be 'changes in the angular distribution of subjets'.
[Section 7] The final sentence contains 'what the QGP is made off'; this should be 'made of'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a review whose synthesis rests on external, independently supported NLO HTL, lattice, and fRG results, and its own interpolations are explicitly labeled as such.

full rationale

This is a review article that presents no new derivation from which a circular input-output relation could arise. The central claim, that the QGP is a strongly coupled plasma of massive, very short-lived quark and gluon quasiparticles, is supported by citations to published NLO hard-thermal-loop calculations (e.g., Refs. [25,27,30,33,34,45]), lattice QCD results, and fRG spectral functions. Those external results are not defined in terms of the review's conclusion. The figure widths in Eqs. (1)-(2) are explicitly interpolations between known static and high-momentum limits, and the phonon width is the standard hydrodynamic relation from viscosity; these are not fitted parameters re-branded as predictions. The author's self-citations (e.g., Refs. [34,107,141,171]) are used as sources for specific published calculations or historical context, not as the sole justification for the central picture. The review even acknowledges the main scientific caveat - that NLO HTL at g approximately 2 is near the edge of perturbative reliability - which is an evidence-quality concern, not a circularity concern. Therefore the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to its external sources, and no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no new free parameters, axioms beyond standard QCD physics, or invented entities. Its conclusions depend on domain assumptions about the reliability of NLO HTL at g≈2, the transferability of N=4 SYM phonon physics to QCD, the interpretation of constituent-quark scaling, and the adequacy of fRG truncations. These are all assumptions inherited from the cited literature, not new postulates of this paper.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption NLO hard-thermal-loop perturbation theory at coupling g≈2 (αs≈0.3) is quantitatively reliable for describing QGP quasiparticle dispersion relations and widths.
Used throughout Sections 2 and 5 to define Fig. 1 and to estimate gluon lifetime τ≈1/(2γ)≈0.3 fm/c; the paper itself notes g=3 is beyond reliability, so the assumption is load-bearing for the g=2 conclusions.
domain assumption The phonon mode picture from N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at intermediate 't Hooft coupling carries over to QCD.
Invoked in Sections 2 and 7 to argue that the phonon becomes the most well-defined quasiparticle at strong coupling; the review acknowledges SYM 'differs in important aspects from QCD' but still uses it as supporting evidence.
domain assumption The constituent quark number scaling of elliptic flow implies that hadrons form via quark coalescence from a deconfined partonic phase.
Section 5 interprets v2 scaling as 'the most natural explanation' of coalescence, but does not rule out alternative hydrodynamic explanations; the claim is used as indirect evidence that quarks are deconfined in the QGP.
domain assumption Functional renormalization group results with physically motivated truncations capture the nonperturbative structure of the QGP near Tc.
Section 3.2 relies on fRG spectral functions and transport coefficients computed with truncated effective actions, and the review notes 'in practice, implementations... have applied physically motivated truncations'.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of What is the Quark-Gluon Plasma made of?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/APGTUCWD

@misc{pith2026250607181,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: What is the Quark-Gluon Plasma made of?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/APGTUCWD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07181}
}

read the original abstract

This article surveys our present understanding of the internal structure of the fully developed quark-gluon plasma at temperatures outside the crossover region. The theoretical part of the review covers perturbative and nonperturbative approaches to quark-gluon plasma structure, in particular, hard-thermal loop effective theory, lattice QCD and the functional renormalization group. The phenomenological part of the review scrutinizes the information that has been derived from bulk observables and hard probes in relativistic heavy ion collisions in terms of how it informs our knowledge about the structure of the quark-gluon plasma. The final section lists possible avenues for future progress.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

A Resummed Hydrodynamic Description of Relativistic Heavy-ion Collisions
nucl-th 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A resummed hydrodynamic scheme with tunable caps on shear and bulk viscous stress is introduced; it reduces to standard second-order hydrodynamics for small stresses and is used to quantify flow-observable uncertainti...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

254 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Collins, M.J

J.C. Collins, M.J. Perry, Superdense Matter: Neutrons Or Asymptotically Free Quarks? Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1353 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.34.1353

1975
[2]

Cabibbo, G

N. Cabibbo, G. Parisi, Exponential Hadronic Spectrum and Quark Liberation. Phys. Lett. B 59, 67–69 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(75)90158-6

doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90158-6 1975
[3]

Gyulassy, L

M. Gyulassy, L. McLerran, New forms of QCD matter discovered at RHIC. Nucl. Phys. A 750, 30–63 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.10.034. arXiv:nucl-th/0405013

arXiv 2005
[4]

Borsanyi, Z

S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J.N. Guenther, R. Kara, S.D. Katz, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, K.K. Szabo, QCD Crossover at Finite Chemical Potential from Lattice Simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125(5), 052001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.125.052001. arXiv:2002.02821 [hep-lat]

arXiv 2020
[5]

Hippert, J

M. Hippert, J. Grefa, T.A. Manning, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Por- tillo Vazquez, C. Ratti, R. Rougemont, M. Trujillo, Bayesian location of the QCD critical point from a holographic perspective. Phys. Rev. D 110(9), 094006 22 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.094006. arXiv:2309.00579 [nucl- th]

arXiv 2024
[6]

Clarke, P

D.A. Clarke, P. Dimopoulos, F. Di Renzo, J. Goswami, C. Schmidt, S. Singh, K. Zambello, Searching for the QCD critical endpoint using multi-point Pad´ e approximations (2024). arXiv:2405.10196 [hep-lat]

arXiv 2024
[7]

Borsanyi, Z

S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J.N. Guenther, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, V. Vovchenko, C.H. Wong, Lattice QCD constraints on the critical point from an improved precision equation of state (2025). arXiv:2502.10267 [hep-lat]

arXiv 2025
[8]

McLerran, K

L. McLerran, K. Redlich, C. Sasaki, Quarkyonic Matter and Chiral Symme- try Breaking. Nucl. Phys. A 824, 86–100 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. nuclphysa.2009.04.001. arXiv:0812.3585 [hep-ph]

arXiv 2009

Show all 254 references

[9]

W.j. Fu, J.M. Pawlowski, R.D. Pisarski, F. Rennecke, R. Wen, S. Yin, QCD moat regime and its real-time properties. Phys. Rev. D 111(9), 094026 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.094026. arXiv:2412.15949 [hep-ph]

2025 arXiv
[10]

Klimov, Collective Excitations in a Hot Quark Gluon Plasma

V.V. Klimov, Collective Excitations in a Hot Quark Gluon Plasma. Sov. Phys. JETP 55, 199–204 (1982)

1982
[11]

Weldon, Covariant Calculations at Finite Temperature: The Relativistic Plasma

H.A. Weldon, Covariant Calculations at Finite Temperature: The Relativistic Plasma. Phys. Rev. D 26, 1394 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.26. 1394

1982 doi
[12]

Pisarski, Renormalized Gauge Propagator in Hot Gauge Theories

R.D. Pisarski, Renormalized Gauge Propagator in Hot Gauge Theories. Physica A 158, 146–157 (1989)

1989
[13]

Weldon, Dynamical Holes in the Quark - Gluon Plasma

H.A. Weldon, Dynamical Holes in the Quark - Gluon Plasma. Phys. Rev. D 40, 2410 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.40.2410

1989 doi
[14]

Pisarski, Renormalized Fermion Propagator in Hot Gauge Theories

R.D. Pisarski, Renormalized Fermion Propagator in Hot Gauge Theories. Nucl. Phys. A 498, 423C–428C (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(89) 90620-9

1989 doi
[15]

Kapusta, Quantum Chromodynamics at High Temperature

J.I. Kapusta, Quantum Chromodynamics at High Temperature. Nucl. Phys. B 148, 461–498 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(79)90146-9

1979 doi
[16]

Linde, Infrared Problem in Thermodynamics of the Yang-Mills Gas

A.D. Linde, Infrared Problem in Thermodynamics of the Yang-Mills Gas. Phys. Lett. B 96, 289–292 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(80)90769-8

1980 doi
[17]

Philipsen, On the problem of the magnetic mass , in 1st International Conference on Strong and Electroweak Matter (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9406307

O. Philipsen, On the problem of the magnetic mass , in 1st International Conference on Strong and Electroweak Matter (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9406307

1994 arXiv
[18]

Braaten, R.D

E. Braaten, R.D. Pisarski, Soft Amplitudes in Hot Gauge Theories: A Gen- eral Analysis. Nucl. Phys. B 337, 569–634 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0550-3213(90)90508-B 23

1990
[19]

Taylor, S.M.H

J.C. Taylor, S.M.H. Wong, The Effective Action of Hard Thermal Loops in QCD. Nucl. Phys. B 346, 115–128 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(90) 90240-E

1990 doi
[20]

Blaizot, E

J.P. Blaizot, E. Iancu, The quark gluon plasma: Collective dynamics and hard thermal loops. Phys. Rept. 359, 355–528 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0370-1573(01)00061-8. arXiv:hep-ph/0101103

2002 arXiv
[21]

Selikhov, M

A. Selikhov, M. Gyulassy, Color diffusion and conductivity in a quark - gluon plasma. Phys. Lett. B 316, 373–380 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0370-2693(93)90341-E. arXiv:nucl-th/9307007

1993 arXiv
[22]

Rebhan, The NonAbelian Debye mass at next-to-leading order

A.K. Rebhan, The NonAbelian Debye mass at next-to-leading order. Phys. Rev. D 48, R3967–R3970 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.48.R3967. arXiv:hep-ph/9308232

1993 arXiv
[23]

Arnold, L.G

P.B. Arnold, L.G. Yaffe, The NonAbelian Debye screening length beyond leading order. Phys. Rev. D 52, 7208–7219 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 52.7208. arXiv:hep-ph/9508280

1995 arXiv
[24]

Laine, P

M. Laine, P. Schicho, Y. Schr¨ oder, A QCD Debye mass in a broad temperature range. Phys. Rev. D 101(2), 023532 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 101.023532. arXiv:1911.09123 [hep-ph]

2020 arXiv
[25]

Ekstedt, Propagation of gauge fields in hot and dense plasmas at higher orders (2023)

A. Ekstedt, Propagation of gauge fields in hot and dense plasmas at higher orders (2023). arXiv:2304.09255 [hep-ph]

2023 arXiv
[26]

Bieletzki, K

D. Bieletzki, K. Lessmeier, O. Philipsen, Y. Schroder, Resummation scheme for 3d Yang-Mills and the two-loop magnetic mass for hot gauge theories. JHEP 05, 058 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2012)058. arXiv:1203.6538 [hep-ph]

2012 arXiv
[27]

Arnold, L.G

P.B. Arnold, L.G. Yaffe, High temperature color conductivity at next-to-leading log order. Phys. Rev. D 62, 125014 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 62.125014. arXiv:hep-ph/9912306

2000 arXiv
[28]

Caron-Huot, O(g) plasma effects in jet quenching

S. Caron-Huot, O(g) plasma effects in jet quenching. Phys. Rev. D 79, 065039 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.065039. arXiv:0811.1603 [hep-ph]

2009 arXiv
[29]

Ghiglieri, G.D

J. Ghiglieri, G.D. Moore, D. Teaney, Jet-Medium Interactions at NLO in a Weakly-Coupled Quark-Gluon Plasma. JHEP 03, 095 (2016). https://doi.org/ 10.1007/JHEP03(2016)095. arXiv:1509.07773 [hep-ph]

2016 arXiv
[30]

Ghiglieri, G.D

J. Ghiglieri, G.D. Moore, D. Teaney, QCD Shear Viscosity at (almost) NLO. JHEP 03, 179 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2018)179. arXiv:1802.09535 [hep-ph] 24

2018 arXiv
[31]

Danhoni, G.D

I. Danhoni, G.D. Moore, Hot and dense QCD shear viscosity at (almost) NLO. JHEP 09, 075 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2024)075. arXiv:2408.00524 [hep-ph]

2024 arXiv
[32]

Schlichting, I

S. Schlichting, I. Soudi, Splitting rates in QCD plasmas from a nonpertur- bative determination of the momentum broadening kernel C(q ⊥). Phys. Rev. D 105(7), 076002 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.076002. arXiv:2111.13731 [hep-ph]

2022 arXiv
[33]

Moore, S

G.D. Moore, S. Schlichting, N. Schlusser, I. Soudi, Non-perturbative deter- mination of collisional broadening and medium induced radiation in QCD plasmas. JHEP 10, 059 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2021)059. arXiv:2105.01679 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[34]

M¨ uller, η/s − ˆq/t3 relation at next-to-leading order in qcd

B. M¨ uller, η/s − ˆq/t3 relation at next-to-leading order in qcd. Phys. Rev. D 104(7), L071501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L071501. arXiv:2107.14775 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[35]

Bazavov, J.H

A. Bazavov, J.H. Weber, Color Screening in Quantum Chromodynamics. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 116, 103823 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2020. 103823. arXiv:2010.01873 [hep-lat]

2021 arXiv
[36]

Bazavov, N

A. Bazavov, N. Brambilla, P. Petreczky, A. Vairo, J.H. Weber, Color screening in (2+1)-flavor QCD. Phys. Rev. D 98(5), 054511 (2018). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.98.054511. arXiv:1804.10600 [hep-lat]

2018 arXiv
[37]

Teaney, Finite temperature spectral densities of momentum and R-charge correlators in N = 4 Yang Mills theory

D. Teaney, Finite temperature spectral densities of momentum and R-charge correlators in N = 4 Yang Mills theory. Phys. Rev. D 74, 045025 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.045025. arXiv:hep-ph/0602044

2006 arXiv
[38]

Baier, P

R. Baier, P. Romatschke, D.T. Son, A.O. Starinets, M.A. Stephanov, Relativistic viscous hydrodynamics, conformal invariance, and holography. JHEP 04, 100 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/100. arXiv:0712.2451 [hep- th]

2008 arXiv
[39]

Casalderrey-Solana, S

J. Casalderrey-Solana, S. Grozdanov, A.O. Starinets, Transport Peak in the Thermal Spectral Function of N = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Plasma at Intermediate Coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(19), 191603 (2018). https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.191603. arXiv:1806.10997 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[40]

Braaten, R.D

E. Braaten, R.D. Pisarski, Calculation of the gluon damping rate in hot QCD. Phys. Rev. D 42, 2156–2160 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.42.2156

1990 doi
[41]

Kovtun, G.D

P. Kovtun, G.D. Moore, P. Romatschke, The stickiness of sound: An absolute lower limit on viscosity and the breakdown of second order relativistic hydrody- namics. Phys. Rev. D 84, 025006 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 84.025006. arXiv:1104.1586 [hep-ph] 25

2011 arXiv
[42]

Bazavov, N

A. Bazavov, N. Brambilla, X. Garcia i Tormo, P. Petreczky, J. Soto, A. Vairo, Determination of αs from the QCD static energy. Phys. Rev. D 86, 114031 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.114031. arXiv:1205.6155 [hep-ph]

2012 arXiv
[43]

Andersen, L.E

J.O. Andersen, L.E. Leganger, M. Strickland, N. Su, NNLO hard-thermal-loop thermodynamics for QCD. Phys. Lett. B 696, 468–472 (2011). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.physletb.2010.12.070. arXiv:1009.4644 [hep-ph]

2011 arXiv
[44]

Andersen, L.E

J.O. Andersen, L.E. Leganger, M. Strickland, N. Su, Three-loop HTL QCD thermodynamics. JHEP 08, 053 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2011)

2011 doi
[45]

Andersen, N

J.O. Andersen, N. Haque, M.G. Mustafa, M. Strickland, N. Su, Equation of State for QCD at finite temperature and density. Resummation versus lattice data. AIP Conf. Proc. 1701(1), 020003 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4938592. arXiv:1411.1253 [hep-ph]

2016 arXiv
[46]

Borsanyi, G

S. Borsanyi, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, A. Jakovac, S.D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, K.K. Szabo, The QCD equation of state with dynamical quarks. JHEP 11, 077 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2010)077. arXiv:1007.2580 [hep-lat]

2010 arXiv
[47]

Arnold, G.D

P.B. Arnold, G.D. Moore, L.G. Yaffe, Effective kinetic theory for high tempera- ture gauge theories. JHEP 01, 030 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/ 2003/01/030. arXiv:hep-ph/0209353

2003 arXiv
[48]

Mrowczynski, B

S. Mrowczynski, B. Schenke, M. Strickland, Color instabilities in the quark–gluon plasma. Phys. Rept. 682, 1–97 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physrep.2017.03.003. arXiv:1603.08946 [hep-ph]

2017 arXiv
[49]

Arnold, J

P.B. Arnold, J. Lenaghan, G.D. Moore, L.G. Yaffe, Apparent thermaliza- tion due to plasma instabilities in quark-gluon plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 072302 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.072302. arXiv:nucl- th/0409068

2005
[50]

Sch¨ afer, E.V

T. Sch¨ afer, E.V. Shuryak, The Interacting instanton liquid in QCD at zero and finite temperature. Phys. Rev. D 53, 6522–6542 (1996). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.53.6522. arXiv:hep-ph/9509337

1996 arXiv
[51]

Sch¨ afer, E.V

T. Sch¨ afer, E.V. Shuryak, Instantons in QCD. Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 323–426 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.70.323. arXiv:hep-ph/9610451

1998 arXiv
[52]

J. Liao, E. Shuryak, Strongly coupled plasma with electric and magnetic charges. Phys. Rev. C 75, 054907 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.75.054907. arXiv:hep-ph/0611131

2007 arXiv
[53]

arXiv:1103.2528 [hep-ph]

arXiv
[54]

J. Liao, E. Shuryak, Magnetic Scenario for the QCD Fluid at RHIC , in 34th International Conference on High Energy Physics (2008), arXiv:0809.2419 26

2008 arXiv
[55]

Antonov, Contributions of stochastic background fields to the shear and bulk viscosities of the gluon plasma

D. Antonov, Contributions of stochastic background fields to the shear and bulk viscosities of the gluon plasma. Annals Phys. 325, 1304–1315 (2010). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2010.02.003. arXiv:1002.2406 [hep-ph]

2010 arXiv
[56]

Pisarski, V.V

R.D. Pisarski, V.V. Skokov, Chiral matrix model of the semi-QGP in QCD. Phys. Rev. D 94(3), 034015 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94. 034015. arXiv:1604.00022 [hep-ph]

2016 arXiv
[57]

F. Gao, J. Chen, Y.X. Liu, S.X. Qin, C.D. Roberts, S.M. Schmidt, Phase diagram and thermal properties of strong-interaction matter. Phys. Rev. D 93(9), 094019 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.094019. arXiv:1507.00875 [nucl- th]

2016 arXiv
[58]

Fischer, QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential from Dyson–Schwinger equations

C.S. Fischer, QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential from Dyson–Schwinger equations. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 105, 1–60 (2019). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.01.002. arXiv:1810.12938 [hep-ph]

2019 arXiv
[59]

Casalderrey-Solana, H

J. Casalderrey-Solana, H. Liu, D. Mateos, K. Rajagopal, U. Achim Wiede- mann, Gauge/String Duality, Hot QCD and Heavy Ion Collisions (Cambridge University Press, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009403504

2014 doi
[60]

Rougemont, J

R. Rougemont, J. Grefa, M. Hippert, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Portillo, C. Ratti, Hot QCD phase diagram from holographic Einstein–Maxwell–Dilaton models. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135, 104093 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ppnp.2023.104093. arXiv:2307.03885 [nucl-th]

2024
[61]

Wegner, A

F.J. Wegner, A. Houghton, Renormalization group equation for critical phenom- ena. Phys. Rev. A 8, 401–412 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.8. 401

1973 doi
[62]

Polchinski, Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians

J. Polchinski, Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians. Nucl. Phys. B 231, 269–295 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(84)90287-6

1984 doi
[63]

Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential

C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential. Phys. Lett. B 301, 90–94 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(93)90726-X. arXiv:1710.05815 [hep-th]

1993 arXiv
[64]

Polonyi, Lectures on the functional renormalization group method

J. Polonyi, Lectures on the functional renormalization group method. Central Eur. J. Phys. 1, 1–71 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2478/BF02475552. arXiv:hep- th/0110026

2003
[65]

Gies, Introduction to the functional RG and applications to gauge the- ories

H. Gies, Introduction to the functional RG and applications to gauge the- ories. Lect. Notes Phys. 852, 287–348 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-642-27320-9 6. arXiv:hep-ph/0611146

2012 arXiv
[66]

Dupuis, L

N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J.M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier, N. Wschebor, The nonperturbative functional renormalization group and its 27 applications. Phys. Rept. 910, 1–114 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep. 2021.01.001. arXiv:2006.04853 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2021 arXiv
[67]

Borsanyi, Z

S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S.D. Katz, S. Krieg, K.K. Szabo, Full result for the QCD equation of state with 2+1 flavors. Phys. Lett. B 730, 99–104 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.01.007. arXiv:1309.5258 [hep- lat]

2014 arXiv
[68]

Bazavov, et al., Equation of state in ( 2+1 )-flavor QCD

A. Bazavov, et al., Equation of state in ( 2+1 )-flavor QCD. Phys. Rev. D 90, 094503 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.094503. arXiv:1407.6387 [hep-lat]

2014 arXiv
[69]

Ratti, Equation of state for QCD from lattice simulations

C. Ratti, Equation of state for QCD from lattice simulations. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 129, 104007 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.104007

2023
[70]

Bors´ anyi, Z

S. Bors´ anyi, Z. Fodor, J.N. Guenther, R. Kara, S.D. Katz, P. Parotto, A. P´ asztor, C. Ratti, K.K. Szab´ o, Lattice QCD equation of state at finite chemical potential from an alternative expansion scheme. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(23), 232001 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysR...

2021 arXiv
[71]

Hayrapetyan, et al., Extracting the speed of sound in quark–gluon plasma with ultrarelativistic lead–lead collisions at the LHC

A. Hayrapetyan, et al., Extracting the speed of sound in quark–gluon plasma with ultrarelativistic lead–lead collisions at the LHC. Rept. Prog. Phys. 87(7), 077801 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ad4b9b. arXiv:2401.06896 [nucl-ex]

2024 arXiv
[72]

Gardim, A.V

F.G. Gardim, A.V. Giannini, J.Y. Ollitrault, Accessing the speed of sound in relativistic ultracentral nucleus-nucleus collisions using the mean transverse momentum. Phys. Lett. B 856, 138937 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physletb.2024.138937. arXiv:2403.06052 [nucl-th]

2024
[73]

Gavassino, H

L. Gavassino, H. Hirvonen, J.F. Paquet, M. Singh, G. Soares Rocha, Can the speed of sound of quark-gluon plasma be measured from the multiplicity and mean pT of ultracentral heavy-ion collisions? (2025). arXiv:2503.20765 [hep-ph]

2025
[74]

Borsanyi, Z

S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, S.D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, K.K. Szabo, Freeze-out parameters: lattice meets experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 062005 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.062005. arXiv:1305.5161 [hep-lat]

2013 arXiv
[75]

Ratti, R

C. Ratti, R. Bellwied, The Deconfinement Transition of QCD: Theory Meets Experiment, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 981 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-030-67235-5

2021
[76]

Borsanyi, Z

S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S.D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, K.K. Szabo, Is there still any Tc mystery in lattice QCD? Results with physical masses in the continuum limit III. JHEP 09, 073 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP09(2010)073. arXiv:1005.3508 [hep-lat] 28

2010 arXiv
[77]

Bazavov, et al., The chiral and deconfinement aspects of the QCD transition

A. Bazavov, et al., The chiral and deconfinement aspects of the QCD transition. Phys. Rev. D 85, 054503 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.054503. arXiv:1111.1710 [hep-lat]

2012 arXiv
[78]

Mogliacci, J.O

S. Mogliacci, J.O. Andersen, M. Strickland, N. Su, A. Vuorinen, Equation of State of hot and dense QCD: Resummed perturbation theory confronts lat- tice data. JHEP 12, 055 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2013)055. arXiv:1307.8098 [hep-ph]

2013 arXiv
[79]

Maezawa, S

Y. Maezawa, S. Aoki, S. Ejiri, T. Hatsuda, N. Ishii, K. Kanaya, N. Ukita, T. Umeda, Electric and Magnetic Screening Masses at Finite Temperature from Generalized Polyakov-Line Correlations in Two-flavor Lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 81, 091501 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysR...

2010 arXiv
[80]

Braaten, A

E. Braaten, A. Nieto, Free energy of QCD at high temperature. Phys. Rev. D 53, 3421–3437 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.3421. arXiv:hep- ph/9510408

1996
[81]

A. Hart, M. Laine, O. Philipsen, Static correlation lengths in QCD at high temperatures and finite densities. Nucl. Phys. B 586, 443–474 (2000). https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00418-1. arXiv:hep-ph/0004060

2000 arXiv
[82]

Aarts, A

G. Aarts, A. Nikolaev, Electrical conductivity of the quark-gluon plasma: per- spective from lattice QCD. Eur. Phys. J. A 57(4), 118 (2021). https://doi.org/ 10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00436-5. arXiv:2008.12326 [hep-lat]

2021 arXiv
[83]

Meyer, A Calculation of the shear viscosity in SU(3) gluodynamics

H.B. Meyer, A Calculation of the shear viscosity in SU(3) gluodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 76, 101701 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.101701. arXiv:0704.1801 [hep-lat]

2007 arXiv
[84]

Mages, S

S.W. Mages, S. Bors´ anyi, Z. Fodor, A. Sch¨ afer, K. Szab´ o, Shear Viscosity from Lattice QCD. PoS LA TTICE2014, 232 (2015). https://doi.org/10.22323/1. 214.0232

2015 doi
[85]

Altenkort, A.M

L. Altenkort, A.M. Eller, A. Francis, O. Kaczmarek, L. Mazur, G.D. Moore, H.T. Shu, Viscosity of pure-glue QCD from the lattice. Phys. Rev. D 108(1), 014503 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.014503. arXiv:2211.08230 [hep- lat]

2023 arXiv
[86]

Aarts, C

G. Aarts, C. Allton, A. Amato, P. Giudice, S. Hands, J.I. Skullerud, Electrical conductivity and charge diffusion in thermal QCD from the lattice. JHEP 02, 186 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2015)186. arXiv:1412.6411 [hep- lat]

2015 arXiv
[87]

Altenkort, D

L. Altenkort, D. de la Cruz, O. Kaczmarek, R. Larsen, G.D. Moore, S. Mukher- jee, P. Petreczky, H.T. Shu, S. Stendebach, Quark Mass Dependence of Heavy 29 Quark Diffusion Coefficient from Lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132(5), 051902 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett....

2024 arXiv
[88]

Altenkort, O

L. Altenkort, O. Kaczmarek, R. Larsen, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, H.T. Shu, S. Stendebach, Heavy Quark Diffusion from 2+1 Flavor Lattice QCD with 320 MeV Pion Mass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130(23), 231902 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.231902. arXiv:2302.08501 [hep-lat]

2023 arXiv
[89]

J. Hong, D. Teaney, Spectral densities for hot QCD plasmas in a leading log approximation. Phys. Rev. C 82, 044908 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.82.044908. arXiv:1003.0699 [nucl-th]

2010 arXiv
[90]

Petreczky, D

P. Petreczky, D. Teaney, Heavy quark diffusion from the lattice. Phys. Rev. D 73, 014508 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.73.014508. arXiv:hep- ph/0507318

2006
[91]

Braun, L

J. Braun, L. Fister, J.M. Pawlowski, F. Rennecke, From Quarks and Gluons to Hadrons: Chiral Symmetry Breaking in Dynamical QCD. Phys. Rev. D 94(3), 034016 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.034016. arXiv:1412.1045 [hep-ph]

2016 arXiv
[92]

Rennecke, Vacuum structure of vector mesons in QCD

F. Rennecke, Vacuum structure of vector mesons in QCD. Phys. Rev. D 92(7), 076012 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.076012. arXiv:1504.03585 [hep-ph]

2015 arXiv
[93]

Braun, M

J. Braun, M. Leonhardt, M. Pospiech, Fierz-complete NJL model study III: Emergence from quark-gluon dynamics. Phys. Rev. D 101(3), 036004 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.036004. arXiv:1909.06298 [hep-ph]

2020 arXiv
[94]

W.j. Fu, J.M. Pawlowski, F. Rennecke, QCD phase structure at finite tempera- ture and density. Phys. Rev. D 101(5), 054032 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.101.054032. arXiv:1909.02991 [hep-ph]

2020 arXiv
[95]

Fu, QCD at finite temperature and density within the fRG approach: an overview

W.j. Fu, QCD at finite temperature and density within the fRG approach: an overview. Commun. Theor. Phys. 74(9), 097304 (2022). https://doi.org/10. 1088/1572-9494/ac86be. arXiv:2205.00468 [hep-ph]

2022 arXiv
[96]

Cyrol, M

A.K. Cyrol, M. Mitter, J.M. Pawlowski, N. Strodthoff, Nonperturbative finite- temperature Yang-Mills theory. Phys. Rev. D 97(5), 054015 (2018). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.054015. arXiv:1708.03482 [hep-ph]

2018 arXiv
[97]

Pawlowski, N

J.M. Pawlowski, N. Strodthoff, Real time correlation functions and the func- tional renormalization group. Phys. Rev. D 92(9), 094009 (2015). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.094009. arXiv:1508.01160 [hep-ph] 30

2015 arXiv
[98]

M. Haas, L. Fister, J.M. Pawlowski, Gluon spectral functions and transport coefficients in Yang–Mills theory. Phys. Rev. D 90, 091501 (2014). https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.091501. arXiv:1308.4960 [hep-ph]

2014 arXiv
[99]

Christiansen, M

N. Christiansen, M. Haas, J.M. Pawlowski, N. Strodthoff, Transport Coefficients in Yang–Mills Theory and QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115(11), 112002 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.112002. arXiv:1411.7986 [hep-ph]

2015 arXiv
[100]

Cyrol, J.M

A.K. Cyrol, J.M. Pawlowski, A. Rothkopf, N. Wink, Reconstructing the gluon. SciPost Phys. 5(6), 065 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.5.6.065. arXiv:1804.00945 [hep-ph]

2018 arXiv
[101]

Boguslavski, A

K. Boguslavski, A. Kurkela, T. Lappi, J. Peuron, Spectral function for overoc- cupied gluodynamics from real-time lattice simulations. Phys. Rev. D 98(1), 014006 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.014006. arXiv:1804.01966 [hep-ph]

2018 arXiv
[102]

Boguslavski, T

K. Boguslavski, T. Lappi, M. Mace, S. Schlichting, Spectral function of fermions in a highly occupied non-Abelian plasma. Phys. Lett. B 827, 136963 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.136963. arXiv:2106.11319 [hep-ph]

2022
[103]

Boguslavski, A

K. Boguslavski, A. Kurkela, T. Lappi, J. Peuron, Broad excitations in a 2+1D overoccupied gluon plasma. JHEP 05, 225 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP05(2021)225. arXiv:2101.02715 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[104]

Satz, Hard probes of dense matter

H. Satz, Hard probes of dense matter. Nucl. Phys. A 590, 63C–80C (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(95)00226-Q. arXiv:hep-ph/9502322

1995 arXiv
[105]

Satz, X.N

H. Satz, X.N. Wang, Hard processes in hadronic interactions. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 10, 2881–2883 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X95001376

1995 doi
[106]

Fetter, J.D

A.L. Fetter, J.D. Walecka, Quantum theory of many-particle systems (Courier Corporation, 2012)

2012
[107]

Hofmann, P.J

H. Hofmann, P.J. Siemens, Linear response theory for dissipation in heavy- ion collisions. Nucl. Phys. A 257, 165–188 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0375-9474(76)90481-4

1976
[108]

M¨ uller, Physics and signatures of the quark - gluon plasma

B. M¨ uller, Physics and signatures of the quark - gluon plasma. Rept. Prog. Phys. 58, 611–636 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/58/6/002. arXiv:nucl- th/9410005

1995
[109]

Teaney, J

D. Teaney, J. Lauret, E.V. Shuryak, Flow at the SPS and RHIC as a quark gluon plasma signature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4783–4786 (2001). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.86.4783. arXiv:nucl-th/0011058 31

2001 arXiv
[110]

P.F. Kolb, P. Huovinen, U.W. Heinz, H. Heiselberg, Elliptic flow at SPS and RHIC: From kinetic transport to hydrodynamics. Phys. Lett. B 500, 232–240 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00079-X. arXiv:hep- ph/0012137

2001
[111]

Kolb, U.W

P.F. Kolb, U.W. Heinz, Hydrodynamic description of ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions pp. 634–714 (2003). arXiv:nucl-th/0305084

2003 arXiv
[112]

Ackermann, et al., Elliptic flow in Au + Au collisions at √sNN = 130 GeV

K.H. Ackermann, et al., Elliptic flow in Au + Au collisions at √sNN = 130 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 402–407 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86

2001 doi
[113]

Adcox, et al., Flow measurements via two particle azimuthal correlations in Au+Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 130-GeV

K. Adcox, et al., Flow measurements via two particle azimuthal correlations in Au+Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 130-GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 212301 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.212301. arXiv:nucl- ex/0204005

2002
[114]

Adler, et al., Elliptic flow from two and four particle correlations in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 130 GeV

C. Adler, et al., Elliptic flow from two and four particle correlations in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 130 GeV. Phys. Rev. C 66, 034904 (2002). https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevC.66.034904. arXiv:nucl-ex/0206001

2002 arXiv
[115]

Romatschke, U

P. Romatschke, U. Romatschke, Viscosity Information from Relativistic Nuclear Collisions: How Perfect is the Fluid Observed at RHIC? Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 172301 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.172301. arXiv:0706.1522 [nucl-th]

2007 arXiv
[116]

Teaney, The Effects of viscosity on spectra, elliptic flow, and HBT radii

D. Teaney, The Effects of viscosity on spectra, elliptic flow, and HBT radii. Phys. Rev. C 68, 034913 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.68.034913. arXiv:nucl-th/0301099

2003 arXiv
[117]

Song, S.A

H. Song, S.A. Bass, U. Heinz, T. Hirano, C. Shen, 200 A GeV Au+Au collisions serve a nearly perfect quark-gluon liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 192301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.192301. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 109, 139904 (2012)]. arXiv:1011.2783 [nucl-th]

2011 arXiv
[118]

Luzum, P

M. Luzum, P. Romatschke, Conformal Relativistic Viscous Hydrodynamics: Applications to RHIC results at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV. Phys. Rev. C 78, 034915 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.034915. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 79, 039903 (2009)]. arXiv:0804.4015 [nucl-th]

2008 arXiv
[119]

C. Gale, S. Jeon, B. Schenke, Hydrodynamic Modeling of Heavy-Ion Colli- sions. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1340011 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0217751X13400113. arXiv:1301.5893 [nucl-th] 32

2013 arXiv
[120]

Schenke, S

B. Schenke, S. Jeon, C. Gale, Elliptic and triangular flow in event-by-event (3+1)D viscous hydrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 042301 (2011). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.042301. arXiv:1009.3244 [hep-ph]

2011 arXiv
[121]

Plumberg, D

C. Plumberg, D. Almaalol, T. Dore, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, Causal- ity violations in realistic simulations of heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 105(6), L061901 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.L061901. arXiv:2103.15889 [nucl-th]

2022 arXiv
[122]

C. Shen, Z. Qiu, H. Song, J. Bernhard, S. Bass, U. Heinz, The iEBE-VISHNU code package for relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 199, 61–85 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2015.08.039. arXiv:1409.8164 [nucl- th]

2016 arXiv
[123]

Bernhard, J.S

J.E. Bernhard, J.S. Moreland, S.A. Bass, Bayesian estimation of the specific shear and bulk viscosity of quark–gluon plasma. Nature Phys.15(11), 1113–1117 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0611-8

2019 doi
[124]

Bernhard, J.S

J.E. Bernhard, J.S. Moreland, S.A. Bass, J. Liu, U. Heinz, Applying Bayesian parameter estimation to relativistic heavy-ion collisions: simultaneous character- ization of the initial state and quark-gluon plasma medium. Phys. Rev. C 94(2), 024907 (2016). https://doi.org/10.110...

2016 arXiv
[125]

G. Nijs, W. van der Schee, U. G¨ ursoy, R. Snellings, Bayesian analysis of heavy ion collisions with the heavy ion computational framework Trajectum. Phys. Rev. C 103(5), 054909 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.054909. arXiv:2010.15134 [nucl-th]

2021 arXiv
[126]

Everett, et al., Multisystem Bayesian constraints on the transport coefficients of QCD matter

D. Everett, et al., Multisystem Bayesian constraints on the transport coefficients of QCD matter. Phys. Rev. C 103(5), 054904 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.103.054904. arXiv:2011.01430 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[127]

Buchel, Resolving disagreement for eta/s in a CFT plasma at finite coupling

A. Buchel, Resolving disagreement for eta/s in a CFT plasma at finite coupling. Nucl. Phys. B 803, 166–170 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008. 05.024. arXiv:0805.2683 [hep-th]

2008 arXiv
[128]

S.C. Huot, S. Jeon, G.D. Moore, Shear viscosity in weakly coupled N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory compared to QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 172303 (2007). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.172303. arXiv:hep-ph/0608062

2007 arXiv
[129]

Casalderrey-Solana, D

J. Casalderrey-Solana, D. Teaney, Heavy quark diffusion in strongly coupled N = 4 Yang-Mills. Phys. Rev. D 74, 085012 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.74.085012. arXiv:hep-ph/0605199

2006 arXiv
[130]

Caron-Huot, G.D

S. Caron-Huot, G.D. Moore, Heavy quark diffusion in perturbative QCD at next-to-leading order. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 052301 (2008). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.100.052301. arXiv:0708.4232 [hep-ph]

2008 arXiv
[131]

Abelev, et al., Long-range angular correlations on the near and away side in p-Pb collisions at √sN N = 5 .02 TeV

B. Abelev, et al., Long-range angular correlations on the near and away side in p-Pb collisions at √sN N = 5 .02 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 719, 29–41 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.01.012. arXiv:1212.2001 [nucl-ex]

2013 arXiv
[132]

Khachatryan, et al., Observation of Long-Range Near-Side Angular Cor- relations in Proton-Proton Collisions at the LHC

V. Khachatryan, et al., Observation of Long-Range Near-Side Angular Cor- relations in Proton-Proton Collisions at the LHC. JHEP 09, 091 (2010). 33 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2010)091. arXiv:1009.4122 [hep-ex]

2010 arXiv
[133]

Aidala, et al., Creation of quark–gluon plasma droplets with three distinct geometries

C. Aidala, et al., Creation of quark–gluon plasma droplets with three distinct geometries. Nature Phys. 15(3), 214–220 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-018-0360-0. arXiv:1805.02973 [nucl-ex]

2019
[134]

Sirunyan, et al., Elliptic flow of charm and strange hadrons in high- multiplicity pPb collisions at √sNN = 8.16 TeV

A.M. Sirunyan, et al., Elliptic flow of charm and strange hadrons in high- multiplicity pPb collisions at √sNN = 8.16 TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(8), 082301 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.082301. arXiv:1804.09767 [hep-ex]

2018 arXiv
[135]

Abelev, et al., Mass, quark-number, and √sN N dependence of the sec- ond and fourth flow harmonics in ultra-relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions

B.I. Abelev, et al., Mass, quark-number, and √sN N dependence of the sec- ond and fourth flow harmonics in ultra-relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions. Phys. Rev. C 75, 054906 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.75.054906. arXiv:nucl-ex/0701010

2007 arXiv
[136]

Adare, et al., Scaling properties of azimuthal anisotropy in Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at s(NN) = 200-GeV

A. Adare, et al., Scaling properties of azimuthal anisotropy in Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at s(NN) = 200-GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 162301 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.162301. arXiv:nucl-ex/0608033

2007 arXiv
[137]

Abelev, et al., Centrality dependence of charged hadron and strange hadron elliptic flow from s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV Au + Au collisions

B.I. Abelev, et al., Centrality dependence of charged hadron and strange hadron elliptic flow from s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV Au + Au collisions. Phys. Rev. C77, 054901 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.77.054901. arXiv:0801.3466 [nucl-ex]

2008 arXiv
[138]

Afanasiev, et al., Elliptic flow for phi mesons and (anti)deuterons in Au + Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV

S. Afanasiev, et al., Elliptic flow for phi mesons and (anti)deuterons in Au + Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 052301 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.052301. arXiv:nucl-ex/0703024

2007 arXiv
[139]

Acharya, et al., Anisotropic flow of identified particles in Pb-Pb colli- sions at √sNN = 5 .02 TeV

S. Acharya, et al., Anisotropic flow of identified particles in Pb-Pb colli- sions at √sNN = 5 .02 TeV. JHEP 09, 006 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP09(2018)006. arXiv:1805.04390 [nucl-ex]

2018 arXiv
[140]

Adamczyk, et al., Centrality and transverse momentum dependence of elliptic flow of multistrange hadrons and ϕ meson in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV

L. Adamczyk, et al., Centrality and transverse momentum dependence of elliptic flow of multistrange hadrons and ϕ meson in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(6), 062301 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.116.062301. arXiv:1507.05247 [nucl-ex]

2016 arXiv
[141]

Fries, B

R.J. Fries, B. M¨ uller, C. Nonaka, S.A. Bass, Hadron production in heavy ion collisions: Fragmentation and recombination from a dense parton phase. Phys. Rev. C 68, 044902 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.68.044902. arXiv:nucl-th/0306027

2003 arXiv
[142]

Molnar, S.A

D. Molnar, S.A. Voloshin, Elliptic flow at large transverse momenta from quark coalescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 092301 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.91.092301. arXiv:nucl-th/0302014 34

2003 arXiv
[143]

Fries, B

R.J. Fries, B. M¨ uller, C. Nonaka, S.A. Bass, Hadronization in heavy ion col- lisions: Recombination and fragmentation of partons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 202303 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.202303. arXiv:nucl- th/0301087

2003
[144]

Greco, C.M

V. Greco, C.M. Ko, P. Levai, Parton coalescence at RHIC. Phys. Rev. C 68, 034904 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.68.034904. arXiv:nucl- th/0305024

2003
[145]

P. Koch, B. M¨ uller, J. Rafelski, Strangeness in Relativistic Heavy Ion Colli- sions. Phys. Rept. 142, 167–262 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(86) 90096-7

1986 doi
[146]

Rafelski, B

J. Rafelski, B. M¨ uller, Strangeness Production in the Quark - Gluon Plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1066 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.48

1982 doi
[147]

Becattini, J

F. Becattini, J. Manninen, M. Gazdzicki, Energy and system size dependence of chemical freeze-out in relativistic nuclear collisions. Phys. Rev. C 73, 044905 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.73.044905. arXiv:hep-ph/0511092

2006 arXiv
[148]

Becattini, E

F. Becattini, E. Grossi, M. Bleicher, J. Steinheimer, R. Stock, Centrality depen- dence of hadronization and chemical freeze-out conditions in heavy ion collisions at √sN N= 2.76 TeV. Phys. Rev. C 90(5), 054907 (2014). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevC.90.054907. arXiv:1405.07...

2014 arXiv
[149]

T.S. Biro, P. Levai, B. M¨ uller, Strangeness production with ’massive’ gluons. Phys. Rev. D 42, 3078–3087 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3078

1990 doi
[150]

Arnold, W

P.B. Arnold, W. Xiao, High-energy jet quenching in weakly-coupled quark-gluon plasmas. Phys. Rev. D 78, 125008 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 78.125008. arXiv:0810.1026 [hep-ph]

2008 arXiv
[151]

H. Liu, K. Rajagopal, U.A. Wiedemann, Calculating the jet quenching param- eter from AdS/CFT. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 182301 (2006). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.97.182301. arXiv:hep-ph/0605178 35

2006 arXiv
[152]

Kurkela, A

A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, Chemical equilibration in weakly coupled QCD. Phys. Rev. D 99(5), 054018 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99. 054018. arXiv:1811.03068 [hep-ph]

2019 arXiv
[153]

Baier, Y.L

R. Baier, Y.L. Dokshitzer, A.H. Mueller, S. Peigne, D. Schiff, Radiative energy loss of high-energy quarks and gluons in a finite volume quark - gluon plasma. Nucl. Phys. B 483, 291–320 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(96) 00553-6. arXiv:hep-ph/9607355

1997 arXiv
[154]

Gyulassy, P

M. Gyulassy, P. Levai, I. Vitev, NonAbelian energy loss at finite opacity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5535–5538 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5535. arXiv:nucl-th/0005032

2000 arXiv
[155]

Gubser, D.R

S.S. Gubser, D.R. Gulotta, S.S. Pufu, F.D. Rocha, Gluon energy loss in the gauge-string duality. JHEP 10, 052 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/ 2008/10/052. arXiv:0803.1470 [hep-th]

2008 arXiv
[156]

Chesler, K

P.M. Chesler, K. Rajagopal, Jet quenching in strongly coupled plasma. Phys. Rev. D 90(2), 025033 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.025033. arXiv:1402.6756 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[157]

Chesler, K

P.M. Chesler, K. Rajagopal, On the Evolution of Jet Energy and Opening Angle in Strongly Coupled Plasma. JHEP 05, 098 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP05(2016)098. arXiv:1511.07567 [hep-th]

2016 arXiv
[158]

Wiedemann, Gluon radiation off hard quarks in a nuclear environment: Opacity expansion

U.A. Wiedemann, Gluon radiation off hard quarks in a nuclear environment: Opacity expansion. Nucl. Phys. B 588, 303–344 (2000). https://doi.org/10. 1016/S0550-3213(00)00457-0. arXiv:hep-ph/0005129

2000 arXiv
[159]

Casalderrey-Solana, Y

J. Casalderrey-Solana, Y. Mehtar-Tani, C.A. Salgado, K. Tywoniuk, New picture of jet quenching dictated by color coherence. Phys. Lett. B 725, 357–360 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.07.046. arXiv:1210.7765 [hep-ph]

2013 arXiv
[160]

Busza, K

W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, W. van der Schee, Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 339–376 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-020852. arXiv:1802.04801 [hep- ph]

2018 arXiv
[161]

Mehtar-Tani, C.A

Y. Mehtar-Tani, C.A. Salgado, K. Tywoniuk, Jets in QCD Media: From Color Coherence to Decoherence. Phys. Lett. B 707, 156–159 (2012). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.12.042. arXiv:1102.4317 [hep-ph]

2012 arXiv
[162]

Andres, F

C. Andres, F. Dominguez, R. Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, J. Holguin, C. Marquet, I. Moult, Resolving the Scales of the Quark-Gluon Plasma with Energy Cor- relators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130(26), 262301 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.130.262301. arXiv:2209.11236 [hep-ph] 36

2023 arXiv
[163]

Andres, F

C. Andres, F. Dominguez, J. Holguin, C. Marquet, I. Moult, A coherent view of the quark-gluon plasma from energy correlators. JHEP 09, 088 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2023)088. arXiv:2303.03413 [hep-ph]

2023 arXiv
[164]

Harris, B

J.W. Harris, B. M¨ uller, ”QGP Signatures” Revisited. Eur. Phys. J. C84(3), 247 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12533-y. arXiv:2308.05743 [hep-ph]

2024 arXiv
[165]

Andres, F

C. Andres, F. Dominguez, J. Holguin, C. Marquet, I. Moult, Towards an inter- pretation of the first measurements of energy correlators in the quark-gluon plasma. JHEP 03, 166 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2025)166. arXiv:2407.07936 [hep-ph]

2025 arXiv
[166]

A. Rai, H. Bossi, A.S. Kudinoor, I. Moult, D. Pablos, K. Rajagopal, Imaging the Wake of a Jet with Energy Correlators. PoS LHCP2024, 296 (2025). https://doi.org/10.22323/1.478.0296

2025 doi
[167]

Z. Yang, Y. He, I. Moult, X.N. Wang, Probing the Short-Distance Struc- ture of the Quark-Gluon Plasma with Energy Correlators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132(1), 011901 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.011901. arXiv:2310.01500 [hep-ph]

2024 arXiv
[168]

Rai, Probing Jet Modification in the QGP using N -Point Energy Correlators in Pb-Pb collisions at ALICE (2025)

A. Rai, Probing Jet Modification in the QGP using N -Point Energy Correlators in Pb-Pb collisions at ALICE (2025). Parallel talk at Quark Matter 2025

2025
[169]

Ehlers, et al., Bayesian Inference analysis of jet quenching using inclusive jet and hadron suppression measurements (2024)

R. Ehlers, et al., Bayesian Inference analysis of jet quenching using inclusive jet and hadron suppression measurements (2024). arXiv:2408.08247 [hep-ph]

2024
[170]

Chekhovsky, et al., Observation of nuclear modification of energy-energy correlators inside jets in heavy ion collisions (2025)

V. Chekhovsky, et al., Observation of nuclear modification of energy-energy correlators inside jets in heavy ion collisions (2025). arXiv:2503.19993 [nucl-ex]

2025 arXiv
[171]

Majumder, B

A. Majumder, B. M¨ uller, X.N. Wang, Small shear viscosity of a quark-gluon plasma implies strong jet quenching. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 192301 (2007). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.192301. arXiv:hep-ph/0703082

2007 arXiv
[172]

Casalderrey-Solana, D.C

J. Casalderrey-Solana, D.C. Gulhan, J.G. Milhano, D. Pablos, K. Rajagopal, A Hybrid Strong/Weak Coupling Approach to Jet Quenching. JHEP 10, 019 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2015)175. [Erratum: JHEP 09, 175 (2015)]. arXiv:1405.3864 [hep-ph]

2014 arXiv
[173]

Burke, et al., Extracting the jet transport coefficient from jet quenching in high-energy heavy-ion collisions

K.M. Burke, et al., Extracting the jet transport coefficient from jet quenching in high-energy heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 90(1), 014909 (2014). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.014909. arXiv:1312.5003 [nucl-th]

2014 arXiv
[174]

Arnold, D

P. Arnold, D. Vaman, Jet quenching in hot strongly coupled gauge theories simplified. JHEP 04, 027 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)027. 37 arXiv:1101.2689 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[175]

Casalderrey-Solana, Z

J. Casalderrey-Solana, Z. Hulcher, G. Milhano, D. Pablos, K. Rajagopal, Simul- taneous description of hadron and jet suppression in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 99(5), 051901 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.051901. arXiv:1808.07386 [hep-ph]

2019 arXiv
[176]

Casalderrey-Solana, D

J. Casalderrey-Solana, D. Gulhan, G. Milhano, D. Pablos, K. Rajagopal, Angular Structure of Jet Quenching Within a Hybrid Strong/Weak Coupling Model. JHEP 03, 135 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2017)135. arXiv:1609.05842 [hep-ph]

2017 arXiv
[177]

Z. Yang, T. Luo, W. Chen, L.G. Pang, X.N. Wang, 3D Structure of Jet- Induced Diffusion Wake in an Expanding Quark-Gluon Plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130(5), 052301 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.052301. arXiv:2203.03683 [hep-ph]

2023 arXiv
[178]

Neufeld, Thermal field theory derivation of the source term induced by a fast parton from the quark energy-momentum tensor

R.B. Neufeld, Thermal field theory derivation of the source term induced by a fast parton from the quark energy-momentum tensor. Phys. Rev. D 83, 065012 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.065012. arXiv:1011.4979 [hep-ph]

2011 arXiv
[179]

Casalderrey-Solana, J.G

J. Casalderrey-Solana, J.G. Milhano, D. Pablos, K. Rajagopal, X. Yao, Jet Wake from Linearized Hydrodynamics. JHEP 05, 230 (2021). https://doi.org/10. 1007/JHEP05(2021)230. arXiv:2010.01140 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[180]

D’Eramo, M

F. D’Eramo, M. Lekaveckas, H. Liu, K. Rajagopal, Momentum Broadening in Weakly Coupled Quark-Gluon Plasma (with a view to finding the quasiparticles within liquid quark-gluon plasma). JHEP 05, 031 (2013). https://doi.org/10. 1007/JHEP05(2013)031. arXiv:1211.1922 [hep-ph]

2013 arXiv
[181]

D’Eramo, K

F. D’Eramo, K. Rajagopal, Y. Yin, Moli` ere scattering in quark-gluon plasma: finding point-like scatterers in a liquid. JHEP 01, 172 (2019). https://doi.org/ 10.1007/JHEP01(2019)172. arXiv:1808.03250 [hep-ph]

2019 arXiv
[182]

CMS-PAS-HIN-23-006 (2024)

CMS-Collaboration, Evidence of the medium response with Z-hadron correla- tions in PbPb and pp collisions at p (sNN) = 5.02 TeV. CMS-PAS-HIN-23-006 (2024)

2024
[183]

Bethe, Moliere’s theory of multiple scattering

H.A. Bethe, Moliere’s theory of multiple scattering. Phys. Rev. 89, 1256–1266 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.89.1256

1953 doi
[184]

Acharya, et al., Search for quasi-particle scattering in the quark-gluon plasma with jet splittings in pp and Pb −Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV (2024)

S. Acharya, et al., Search for quasi-particle scattering in the quark-gluon plasma with jet splittings in pp and Pb −Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV (2024). arXiv:2409.12837 [nucl-ex]

2024 arXiv
[185]

Moliere, Theory of the scattering of fast charged particles

G. Moliere, Theory of the scattering of fast charged particles. 2. Repeated and multiple scattering. Z. Naturforsch. A 3, 78–97 (1948)

1948
[186]

Matsui, H

T. Matsui, H. Satz, J/ψ Suppression by Quark-Gluon Plasma Formation. Phys. Lett. B 178, 416–422 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(86)91404-8

1986 doi
[187]

Karsch, H

F. Karsch, H. Satz, The Spectral analysis of strongly interacting matter. Z. Phys. C 51, 209–224 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01475790

1991 doi
[188]

Hayrapetyan, et al., Girth and groomed radius of jets recoiling against iso- lated photons in lead-lead and proton-proton collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV

A. Hayrapetyan, et al., Girth and groomed radius of jets recoiling against iso- lated photons in lead-lead and proton-proton collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 861, 139088 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139088. arXiv:2405.02737 [nucl-ex] 38

2025
[189]

Rothkopf, Quarkonium production and suppression: Theory

A. Rothkopf, Quarkonium production and suppression: Theory. Nucl. Phys. A 1005, 121922 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121922. arXiv:2002.04938 [hep-ph]

2021
[190]

Andronic, et al., Comparative study of quarkonium transport in hot QCD matter

A. Andronic, et al., Comparative study of quarkonium transport in hot QCD matter. Eur. Phys. J. A 60(4), 88 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/ s10050-024-01306-6. arXiv:2402.04366 [nucl-th]

2024 arXiv
[191]

Tang, Quarkonium production: An experimental overview

Z. Tang, Quarkonium production: An experimental overview. Nucl. Phys. A 1005, 121942 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121942. arXiv:2002.10793 [nucl-ex]

2021
[192]

Finazzo, J

S.I. Finazzo, J. Noronha, Debye screening mass near deconfinement from holog- raphy. Phys. Rev. D90(11), 115028 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 90.115028. arXiv:1411.4330 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[193]

Bazavov, D

A. Bazavov, D. Hoying, R.N. Larsen, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, A. Rothkopf, J.H. Weber, Unscreened forces in the quark-gluon plasma? Phys. Rev. D 109(7), 074504 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.074504. arXiv:2308.16587 [hep-lat]

2024 arXiv
[194]

D. Bak, A. Karch, L.G. Yaffe, Debye screening in strongly coupled N = 4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma. JHEP 08, 049 (2007). https://doi.org/10. 1088/1126-6708/2007/08/049. arXiv:0705.0994 [hep-th]

2007 arXiv
[195]

Burnier, A

Y. Burnier, A. Rothkopf, A hard thermal loop benchmark for the extraction of the nonperturbative Q ¯Q potential. Phys. Rev. D 87, 114019 (2013). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.114019. arXiv:1304.4154 [hep-ph]

2013 arXiv
[196]

Djordjevic, M

M. Djordjevic, M. Gyulassy, Heavy quark radiative energy loss in QCD matter. Nucl. Phys. A 733, 265–298 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003. 12.020. arXiv:nucl-th/0310076

2004 arXiv
[197]

Burnier, M

Y. Burnier, M. Laine, M. Vepsalainen, Heavy quarkonium in any channel in resummed hot QCD. JHEP 01, 043 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/ 2008/01/043. arXiv:0711.1743 [hep-ph]

2008 arXiv
[198]

Svetitsky, Diffusion of charmed quarks in the quark-gluon plasma

B. Svetitsky, Diffusion of charmed quarks in the quark-gluon plasma. Phys. Rev. D 37, 2484–2491 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.37.2484

1988 doi
[199]

Scardina, S.K

F. Scardina, S.K. Das, V. Minissale, S. Plumari, V. Greco, Estimating the charm quark diffusion coefficient and thermalization time from D meson spectra at energies available at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. C 96(4), 044...

2017 arXiv
[200]

Djordjevic, Collisional energy loss in a finite size QCD matter

M. Djordjevic, Collisional energy loss in a finite size QCD matter. Phys. Rev. C 74, 064907 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.74.064907. arXiv:nucl- th/0603066 39

2006
[201]

Ghiglieri, J

J. Ghiglieri, J. Hong, A. Kurkela, E. Lu, G.D. Moore, D. Teaney, Next-to-leading order thermal photon production in a weakly coupled quark-gluon plasma. JHEP 05, 010 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2013)010. arXiv:1302.5970 [hep-ph]

2013 arXiv
[202]

Bailhache, Thermal radiation and direct photon production in Pb–Pb and pp collisions with dielectrons

R. Bailhache, Thermal radiation and direct photon production in Pb–Pb and pp collisions with dielectrons. PoS HardProbes2023, 060 (2024). https://doi. org/10.22323/1.438.0060

2024 doi
[203]

M. He, H. van Hees, R. Rapp, Heavy-quark diffusion in the quark–gluon plasma. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 130, 104020 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp. 2023.104020. arXiv:2204.09299 [hep-ph]

2023
[204]

Massen, G

O. Massen, G. Nijs, M. Sas, W. van der Schee, R. Snellings, Effective tem- peratures of the QGP from thermal photon and dilepton production. Eur. Phys. J. C 85(4), 388 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14072-6. arXiv:2412.09671 [nucl-th]

2025 arXiv
[205]

Paquet, S.A

J.F. Paquet, S.A. Bass, Electromagnetic measurement of the temperature of quark-gluon plasma produced in central ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions (2022). arXiv:2205.12299 [nucl-th]

2022 arXiv
[206]

Shen, U.W

C. Shen, U.W. Heinz, J.F. Paquet, C. Gale, Thermal photons as a quark-gluon plasma thermometer reexamined. Phys. Rev. C 89(4), 044910 (2014). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.044910. arXiv:1308.2440 [nucl-th]

2014 arXiv
[207]

Adamczyk, et al., Direct virtual photon production in Au+Au collisions at√sNN = 200 GeV

L. Adamczyk, et al., Direct virtual photon production in Au+Au collisions at√sNN = 200 GeV. Phys. Lett. B 770, 451–458 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.physletb.2017.04.050. arXiv:1607.01447 [nucl-ex]

2017 arXiv
[208]

Arnaldi, et al., NA60 results on thermal dimuons

R. Arnaldi, et al., NA60 results on thermal dimuons. Eur. Phys. J. C 61, 711– 720 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-0878-5. arXiv:0812.3053 [nucl-ex] 40

2009 arXiv
[209]

Adare, et al., Centrality dependence of low-momentum direct-photon pro- duction in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV

A. Adare, et al., Centrality dependence of low-momentum direct-photon pro- duction in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. C 91(6), 064904 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.064904. arXiv:1405.3940 [nucl-ex]

2015
[210]

Churchill, L

J. Churchill, L. Du, C. Gale, G. Jackson, S. Jeon, Virtual Photons Shed Light on the Early Temperature of Dense QCD Matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132(17), 172301 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.172301. arXiv:2311.06951 [nucl-th]

2024 arXiv
[211]

Heinz, M

U.W. Heinz, M. Jacob, Evidence for a new state of matter: An Assessment of the results from the CERN lead beam program (2000). arXiv:nucl-th/0002042

2000 arXiv
[212]

arXiv:2402.01998 [nucl-ex]

Temperature Measurement of Quark-Gluon Plasma at Different Stages (2024). arXiv:2402.01998 [nucl-ex]

2024 arXiv
[213]

Geiger, B

K. Geiger, B. M¨ uller, Dynamics of parton cascades in highly relativistic nuclear collisions. Nucl. Phys. B 369, 600–654 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0550-3213(92)90280-O

1992
[214]

Lappi, L

T. Lappi, L. McLerran, Some features of the glasma. Nucl. Phys. A 772, 200–212 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.04.001. arXiv:hep-ph/0602189

2006 arXiv
[215]

Shuryak, Physics of Strongly coupled Quark-Gluon Plasma

E. Shuryak, Physics of Strongly coupled Quark-Gluon Plasma. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62, 48–101 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2008.09.001. arXiv:0807.3033 [hep-ph]

2009 arXiv
[216]

Kurkela, A

A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, J.F. Paquet, S. Schlichting, D. Teaney, Effective kinetic description of event-by-event pre-equilibrium dynamics in high-energy heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 99(3), 034910 (2019). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevC.99.034910. arXiv:1805.00961 [hep-ph]

2019 arXiv
[217]

Kurkela, A

A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, J.F. Paquet, S. Schlichting, D. Teaney, Matching the Nonequilibrium Initial Stage of Heavy Ion Collisions to Hydrodynamics with QCD Kinetic Theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(12), 122302 (2019). https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.122302. arXiv:1805...

2019 arXiv
[218]

Gelis, Color Glass Condensate and Glasma

F. Gelis, Color Glass Condensate and Glasma. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1330001 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X13300019. arXiv:1211.3327 [hep-ph]

2013 arXiv
[219]

Schenke, P

B. Schenke, P. Tribedy, R. Venugopalan, Fluctuating Glasma initial conditions and flow in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 252301 (2012). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.252301. arXiv:1202.6646 [nucl-th]

2012 arXiv
[220]

Andersen, Q

J.O. Andersen, Q. Du, M. Strickland, U. Tantary, N = 4 supersymmetric Yang- Mills thermodynamics from effective field theory. Phys. Rev. D 105(1), 015006 41 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.015006. arXiv:2111.12160 [hep- th]

2022 arXiv
[221]

Heller, A

M.P. Heller, A. Kurkela, M. Spali´ nski, V. Svensson, Hydrodynamization in kinetic theory: Transient modes and the gradient expansion. Phys. Rev. D97(9), 091503 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.091503. arXiv:1609.04803 [nucl-th]

2018 arXiv
[222]

Rebhan, P

A. Rebhan, P. Romatschke, M. Strickland, Hard-loop dynamics of non-Abelian plasma instabilities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 102303 (2005). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.94.102303. arXiv:hep-ph/0412016

2005 arXiv
[223]

Arnold, G.D

P.B. Arnold, G.D. Moore, QCD plasma instabilities: The NonAbelian cascade. Phys. Rev. D 73, 025006 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.73.025006. arXiv:hep-ph/0509206

2006 arXiv
[224]

Mrowczynski, Plasma instability at the initial stage of ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions

S. Mrowczynski, Plasma instability at the initial stage of ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Lett. B 314, 118–121 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0370-2693(93)91330-P

1993
[225]

Berges, K

J. Berges, K. Boguslavski, S. Schlichting, R. Venugopalan, Turbulent ther- malization process in heavy-ion collisions at ultrarelativistic energies. Phys. Rev. D 89(7), 074011 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.074011. arXiv:1303.5650 [hep-ph]

2014 arXiv
[226]

Asakawa, S.A

M. Asakawa, S.A. Bass, B. M¨ uller, Anomalous viscosity of an expanding quark- gluon plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 252301 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.96.252301. arXiv:hep-ph/0603092

2006 arXiv
[227]

Romatschke, R

P. Romatschke, R. Venugopalan, The Unstable Glasma. Phys. Rev. D74, 045011 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.045011. arXiv:hep-ph/0605045

2006 arXiv
[228]

Weeks, D

J.D. Weeks, D. Chandler, H.C. Andersen, Role of repulsive forces in determining the equilibrium structure of simple liquids. The Journal of chemical physics 54(12), 5237–5247 (1971)

1971
[229]

Hansen, I.R

J.P. Hansen, I.R. McDonald, Theory of simple liquids: with applications to soft matter (Academic press, 2013)

2013
[230]

Romatschke, M

P. Romatschke, M. Strickland, Collisional energy loss of a heavy quark in an anisotropic quark-gluon plasma. Phys. Rev. D 71, 125008 (2005). https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.125008. arXiv:hep-ph/0408275

2005 arXiv
[231]

Mueller, J.w

A.H. Mueller, J.w. Qiu, Gluon Recombination and Shadowing at Small Values of x. Nucl. Phys. B 268, 427–452 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(86) 90164-1

1986 doi
[232]

Jalilian-Marian, A

J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, L.D. McLerran, H. Weigert, The Intrinsic glue distribution at very small x. Phys. Rev. D 55, 5414–5428 (1997). https://doi. 42 org/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.5414. arXiv:hep-ph/9606337

1997 arXiv
[233]

Gribov, E.M

L.V. Gribov, E.M. Levin, M.G. Ryskin, Semihard Processes in QCD. Phys. Rept. 100, 1–150 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(83)90022-4

1983 doi
[234]

Nahrgang, J

M. Nahrgang, J. Aichelin, P.B. Gossiaux, K. Werner, Azimuthal correlations of heavy quarks in Pb + Pb collisions at √s = 2.76 TeV at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. C 90(2), 024907 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.90.024907. arXiv:1305.3823 [hep-ph]

2014 arXiv
[235]

Cao, G.Y

S. Cao, G.Y. Qin, S.A. Bass, Modeling of heavy-flavor pair correlations in Au- Au collisions at 200A GeV at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. Phys. Rev. C 92(5), 054909 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.054909. arXiv:1505.01869 [nucl-th]

2015 arXiv
[236]

Austern, Optical model wave functions for strongly absorbing nuclei

N. Austern, Optical model wave functions for strongly absorbing nuclei. Annals of Physics 15(3), 299–313 (1961)

1961
[237]

Andronic, P

A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, M.K. K¨ ohler, A. Mazeliauskas, K. Redlich, J. Stachel, V. Vislavicius, The multiple-charm hierarchy in the statisti- cal hadronization model. JHEP 07, 035 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP07(2021)035. arXiv:2104.12754 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[238]

ALICE-PUBLIC-2021-004 (2021)

ALICE-Collaboration, ALICE physics projections for a short oxygen-beam run at the LHC. ALICE-PUBLIC-2021-004 (2021)

2021
[239]

arXiv:2211.02491 [physics.ins-det]

ALICE-Collaboration, Letter of intent for ALICE 3: A next-generation heavy-ion experiment at the LHC (2022). arXiv:2211.02491 [physics.ins-det]

2022 arXiv
[240]

Giacalone, et al., Anisotropic Flow in Fixed-Target Pb208+Ne20 Collisions as a Probe of Quark-Gluon Plasma

G. Giacalone, et al., Anisotropic Flow in Fixed-Target Pb208+Ne20 Collisions as a Probe of Quark-Gluon Plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134(8), 082301 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.082301. arXiv:2405.20210 [nucl-th]

2025 arXiv
[241]

Hohler, R

P.M. Hohler, R. Rapp, Dileptons and Chiral Symmetry Restoration. Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 276-278, 253–256 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps. 2016.05.057. arXiv:1509.05466 [hep-ph]

2016 arXiv
[242]

Brewer, A

J. Brewer, A. Mazeliauskas, W. van der Schee, Opportunities of OO and pO collisions at the LHC , in Opportunities of OO and pO collisions at the LHC (2021), arXiv:2103.01939

2021 arXiv
[243]

G.Y. Qin, A. Majumder, Parton Transport via Transverse and Longitudinal Scattering in Dense Media. Phys. Rev. C 87(2), 024909 (2013). https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.024909. arXiv:1205.5741 [hep-ph] 43

2013 arXiv
[244]

Coleman-Smith, B

C.E. Coleman-Smith, B. Muller, Constituent mass dependence of transport coefficients in a quark-gluon plasma (2012). arXiv:1209.3328 [hep-ph]

2012 arXiv
[245]

C. Jung, L. von Smekal, Fluctuating vector mesons in analytically continued functional RG flow equations. Phys. Rev. D 100(11), 116009 (2019). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.116009. arXiv:1909.13712 [hep-ph]

2019 arXiv
[246]

Gubser, A

S.S. Gubser, A. Yarom, Universality of the diffusion wake in the gauge-string duality. Phys. Rev. D 77, 066007 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 77.066007. arXiv:0709.1089 [hep-th]

2008 arXiv
[247]

Neufeld, Fast Partons as a Source of Energy and Momentum in a Per- turbative Quark-Gluon Plasma

R.B. Neufeld, Fast Partons as a Source of Energy and Momentum in a Per- turbative Quark-Gluon Plasma. Phys. Rev. D 78, 085015 (2008). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.085015. arXiv:0805.0385 [hep-ph]

2008 arXiv
[248]

Aad, et al., Measurement of substructure-dependent suppression of large- radius jets with charged particles in Pb+Pb collisions with ATLAS (2025)

G. Aad, et al., Measurement of substructure-dependent suppression of large- radius jets with charged particles in Pb+Pb collisions with ATLAS (2025). arXiv:2504.04805 [nucl-ex]

2025
[249]

Cao, X.N

S. Cao, X.N. Wang, Jet quenching and medium response in high-energy heavy- ion collisions: a review. Rept. Prog. Phys. 84(2), 024301 (2021). https://doi. org/10.1088/1361-6633/abc22b. arXiv:2002.04028 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[250]

Kudinoor, D

A.S. Kudinoor, D. Pablos, K. Rajagopal, Visualizing How the Structure of Large- Radius Jets Shapes Their Wakes (2025). arXiv:2501.18683 [hep-ph]

2025 arXiv
[251]

B. Betz, J. Noronha, G. Torrieri, M. Gyulassy, I. Mishustin, D.H. Rischke, Universality of the Diffusion Wake from Stopped and Punch-Through Jets in Heavy-Ion Collisions. Phys. Rev. C 79, 034902 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.79.034902. arXiv:0812.4401 [nucl-th]

2009 arXiv
[254]

Barata, I

J.a. Barata, I. Moult, A.V. Sadofyev, J.a.M. Silva, Dissecting Jet Modification in the QGP with Multi-Point Energy Correlators (2025). arXiv:2503.13603 [hep-ph] 44

2025 arXiv
[402]

arXiv:nucl-ex/0009011

arXiv
[1066]

56, 2334 (1986)]

[Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 56, 2334 (1986)]

1986

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Collins, M.J

J.C. Collins, M.J. Perry, Superdense Matter: Neutrons Or Asymptotically Free Quarks? Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1353 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.34.1353

1975

[2] [2]

Cabibbo, G

N. Cabibbo, G. Parisi, Exponential Hadronic Spectrum and Quark Liberation. Phys. Lett. B 59, 67–69 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(75)90158-6

doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90158-6 1975

[3] [3]

Gyulassy, L

M. Gyulassy, L. McLerran, New forms of QCD matter discovered at RHIC. Nucl. Phys. A 750, 30–63 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.10.034. arXiv:nucl-th/0405013

arXiv 2005

[4] [4]

Borsanyi, Z

S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J.N. Guenther, R. Kara, S.D. Katz, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, K.K. Szabo, QCD Crossover at Finite Chemical Potential from Lattice Simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125(5), 052001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.125.052001. arXiv:2002.02821 [hep-lat]

arXiv 2020

[5] [5]

Hippert, J

M. Hippert, J. Grefa, T.A. Manning, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Por- tillo Vazquez, C. Ratti, R. Rougemont, M. Trujillo, Bayesian location of the QCD critical point from a holographic perspective. Phys. Rev. D 110(9), 094006 22 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.094006. arXiv:2309.00579 [nucl- th]

arXiv 2024

[6] [6]

Clarke, P

D.A. Clarke, P. Dimopoulos, F. Di Renzo, J. Goswami, C. Schmidt, S. Singh, K. Zambello, Searching for the QCD critical endpoint using multi-point Pad´ e approximations (2024). arXiv:2405.10196 [hep-lat]

arXiv 2024

[7] [7]

Borsanyi, Z

S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J.N. Guenther, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, V. Vovchenko, C.H. Wong, Lattice QCD constraints on the critical point from an improved precision equation of state (2025). arXiv:2502.10267 [hep-lat]

arXiv 2025

[8] [8]

McLerran, K

L. McLerran, K. Redlich, C. Sasaki, Quarkyonic Matter and Chiral Symme- try Breaking. Nucl. Phys. A 824, 86–100 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. nuclphysa.2009.04.001. arXiv:0812.3585 [hep-ph]

arXiv 2009