Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.08751 v2 pith:APXSPTJH submitted 2023-11-15 cond-mat.soft

Filled Colloidal Gel Rheology: Strengthening, Stiffening, and Tunability

classification cond-mat.soft
keywords colloidalfillinggelsrheologystrengthstrengtheningyieldadditional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Filler-induced strengthening is ubiquitous in materials science and is particularly well-established in polymeric nanocomposites. Despite having similar constituents, colloidal gels with solid filling exhibit distinct rheology, which is of practical interest to industry (e.g., lithium-ion batteries) yet remains poorly understood. We show, using experiments and simulations, that filling monotonically enhances the yield stress (i.e., strength) of colloidal gels while the elastic modulus (i.e., stiffness) first increases and then decreases. The latter softening effect results from a frustrated gel matrix at dense filling, evidenced by a growing inter-phase pressure. This structural frustration is, however, not detrimental to yielding resistance. Instead, fillers offer additional mechanical support to the gel backbone via percolating force chains, decreasing the yield strain at the same time. We develop a mechanistic picture of this phenomenology that leads us to a novel `filler-removal protocol,' making individual control over the strength and brittleness of a composite gel possible.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.