Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Taxonomy and Survey on Remote Human Input Systems for Driving Automation Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.08599 v4 pith:AQEYSLAI submitted 2021-09-17 cs.RO

Taxonomy and Survey on Remote Human Input Systems for Driving Automation Systems

classification cs.RO
keywords systemsremotetaxonomyapproachesdrivingautomationhumanhumans
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Corner cases for driving automation systems can often be detected by the system itself and subsequently resolved by remote humans. There exists a wide variety of technical approaches on how remote humans can resolve such issues. Over multiple domains, no common taxonomy on those approaches has developed yet, though. As the scaling of automated driving systems continues to increase, a uniform taxonomy is desirable to improve communication within the scientific community, but also beyond to policymakers and the general public. In this paper, we provide a survey on recent terminologies and propose a taxonomy for remote human input systems, classifying the different approaches based on their complexity.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.