pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.09829 · v2 · pith:AQLEUWVQnew · submitted 2026-05-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.CO

Stardust Galaxies at z>9: A Dust-Origin Transition Behind the Excess of UV-Bright Galaxies

D. Burgarella , V. Buat , A.K. Inoue , T.T. Takeuchi , C. Aurin , J.-C. Bouret , P. Dayal , T. Dewachter
show 4 more authors
M. Dickinson C. Kobayashi G. P. Nikopoulos R. S. Somerville
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 23:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO
keywords high-redshift galaxiessupernova dustUV attenuationdust opacityJWST observationsgalaxy evolutionearly universeluminosity function
0
0 comments X

The pith

A transition to low-opacity supernova dust explains the excess of UV-bright galaxies at z>9 by reducing attenuation without removing gas.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Recent JWST observations reveal more UV-bright galaxies at redshifts above 9 than pre-JWST models expected. The paper tests whether this excess stems from a change in dust origin, where supernova-produced dust with low ultraviolet opacity dominates before interstellar grain growth becomes efficient. Models combining specific extinction laws for this supernova dust, metallicity-dependent opacities, and porous geometries that permit some UV light to leak out reproduce the observed low attenuation levels even in gas-rich systems. This approach accounts for the prevalence of galaxies with extremely low dust attenuation that appear in the data. If the claim holds, early galaxy populations feature a distinct dust composition that naturally boosts their observable ultraviolet brightness.

Core claim

The observed A_FUV-M_star relation at z > 9 is best reproduced for an intrinsic FUV dust opacity kappa_UV(dust) of 10^3 - 10^4 cm2/g, characteristic of low-opacity SNe dust. This regime naturally produces very low attenuation even in gas-rich galaxies and reproduces galaxies with extremely low dust attenuation (GELDAs) that dominate observed samples at z > 9. Applied to intrinsic UV luminosity function models, the SNe-dominated and hybrid prescriptions mainly suppress the brightest galaxies, bringing predictions into agreement with JWST measurements without requiring extreme star-formation efficiencies or dust-free interstellar media.

What carries the argument

Physically motivated attenuation framework combining extinction laws for reverse-shock-processed SNe dust, metallicity- and dust-to-metal-dependent opacity scalings, and porous radiative-transfer geometries allowing partial UV-photon leakage.

If this is right

  • The UV-bright excess at z>9 arises from dust composition and geometry rather than large-scale gas outflows or extreme star-formation rates.
  • Galaxies can retain substantial gas reservoirs while exhibiting very low effective UV attenuation under SNe dust conditions.
  • SNe-dominated and hybrid attenuation models align the predicted UV luminosity function with JWST counts by suppressing the brightest end.
  • A later shift toward ISM grain-growth dust would increase attenuation as metallicity rises and galaxies evolve.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Dust composition signatures in high-redshift spectra could directly test whether the low-opacity SNe regime dominates before a transition occurs.
  • This framework implies that UV-based estimates of star formation rates at z>9 may need adjustment for evolving dust opacity rather than assuming constant properties.
  • Extending the model across redshift could predict the epoch when the UV excess fades as grain growth overtakes supernova dust production.

Load-bearing premise

Reverse-shock-processed supernova dust has intrinsically low UV opacity in the range 10^3-10^4 cm2/g and this SNe-dominated regime applies before efficient ISM grain growth at z>9.

What would settle it

Multi-wavelength observations or spectroscopy revealing UV opacities significantly above 10^4 cm2/g or extinction curves inconsistent with reverse-shock-processed SNe dust in z>9 galaxies would disprove the low-attenuation regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.09829 by A.K. Inoue, C. Aurin, C. Kobayashi, D. Burgarella, G. P. Nikopoulos, J.-C. Bouret, M. Dickinson, P. Dayal, R. S. Somerville, T. Dewachter, T.T. Takeuchi, V. Buat.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the three dust–star geometries [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Predicted FUV attenuation, AFUV, as a function of stellar mass. This figure corresponds to a far-UV mass absorption coef￾ficient, κ0.15 = 103 cm2 g −1 . Rows correspond to different porous geometries: leaky screen and leaky mixed configurations (top), Poisson clump geometry (middle), and the gas–route attenuation model (bottom). For the leaky and Poisson cases, ISM-, SN-, and hybrid-type dust tracks are sh… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Observed rest-frame UV luminosity functions from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as Fig.3 but for dust-free UVLF predictions from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: AFUV versus log10(Mstar/M⊙) for the sample presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: AFUV versus log10(Mstar/M⊙) for the sample presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent JWST observations suggest that galaxies at z > 9 may be dominated by low-opacity SNe-produced dust before efficient ISM grain growth is established. This transition in dust origin and opacity could explain both the prevalence of galaxies with extremely low dust attenuation and the excess of UV-bright galaxies relative to most pre-JWST predictions. We investigate whether this transition, combined with evolving star-formation efficiency, can reproduce these observed properties. We develop a physically motivated attenuation framework combining (i) extinction laws for reverse-shock-processed SNe dust, (ii) metallicity- and dust-to-metal-dependent opacity scalings, and (iii) porous radiative-transfer geometries allowing partial UV-photon leakage. Unlike outflow-driven scenarios requiring large-scale gas evacuation, our approach preserves gas reservoirs while reducing effective UV opacity through dust composition and geometry. We introduce extinction-based, gas-based, and hybrid attenuation prescriptions linking SNe-dominated and ISM grain-growth dust regimes. We find that the observed A_FUV-M_star relation at z > 9 is best reproduced for an intrinsic FUV dust opacity kappa_UV(dust)=10^3 - 10^4 cm2/g, characteristic of low-opacity SNe dust, naturally producing very low attenuation even in gas-rich galaxies. This regime reproduces galaxies with extremely low dust attenuation (GELDAs), which dominate observed samples at z > 9. Applied to intrinsic UV luminosity function models, our SNe-dominated and hybrid prescriptions mainly suppress the brightest galaxies, bringing predictions into agreement with JWST measurements without requiring extreme star-formation efficiencies or dust-free interstellar media. Our results suggest that the UV-bright galaxy excess at z > 9 reflects a transition in dust origin and opacity during the earliest phases of galaxy evolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that the excess of UV-bright galaxies at z>9 is explained by a transition to low-opacity dust from supernovae before efficient ISM grain growth. The authors introduce an attenuation framework combining extinction laws for reverse-shock-processed SNe dust, metallicity- and dust-to-metal-dependent opacity scalings, and porous radiative-transfer geometries. They report that an intrinsic FUV dust opacity of kappa_UV(dust)=10^3-10^4 cm2/g best reproduces the observed A_FUV-M_star relation at z>9, produces galaxies with extremely low dust attenuation (GELDAs), and brings UV luminosity function predictions into agreement with JWST data without extreme star-formation efficiencies or dust-free media.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work supplies a physically motivated alternative to outflow-driven or extreme-efficiency scenarios for JWST high-redshift observations. It preserves gas reservoirs while reducing effective UV attenuation through dust origin, composition, and geometry, and offers a framework linking SNe-dominated and ISM grain-growth regimes with testable implications for early galaxy evolution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and attenuation framework] Abstract: the claim that kappa_UV(dust)=10^3-10^4 cm2/g is 'characteristic of low-opacity SNe dust' and 'naturally producing very low attenuation' is load-bearing, yet the text presents this range as the value that best reproduces the observed A_FUV-M_star relation rather than deriving it independently from the extinction laws or reverse-shock processing steps in the framework. This raises the risk that the opacity is tuned to the target JWST data.
  2. [Results and methods] Results and methods description: the reproduction of the UV luminosity function and A_FUV-M_star relation lacks explicit details on the observational samples employed, any data exclusion criteria, error propagation or fitting procedures, and the quantitative steps that convert the hybrid prescriptions into the reported suppression of the brightest galaxies.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Notation and figures] Clarify the exact definition and units of the porous geometry leakage parameter when first introduced, and ensure all figures label the three attenuation prescriptions (extinction-based, gas-based, hybrid) consistently.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. Their comments identify areas where additional clarity and methodological transparency will strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and attenuation framework] Abstract: the claim that kappa_UV(dust)=10^3-10^4 cm2/g is 'characteristic of low-opacity SNe dust' and 'naturally producing very low attenuation' is load-bearing, yet the text presents this range as the value that best reproduces the observed A_FUV-M_star relation rather than deriving it independently from the extinction laws or reverse-shock processing steps in the framework. This raises the risk that the opacity is tuned to the target JWST data.

    Authors: We agree that the presentation in the abstract could be clarified to avoid any impression of post-hoc tuning. The opacity range is motivated by independent theoretical calculations of reverse-shock-processed supernova dust (referenced in Section 2.2 of the manuscript), which predict low FUV opacities in the 10^3–10^4 cm²/g regime for the relevant grain sizes and compositions. However, we acknowledge that the manuscript does not explicitly walk through the step-by-step mapping from those extinction laws to the adopted range without reference to the observational comparison. In the revised version we will (i) move the numerical range out of the abstract’s lead claim, (ii) add a short paragraph in the methods that derives the expected opacity interval directly from the SNe dust models and reverse-shock processing, and (iii) state explicitly that this interval is then tested against the A_FUV–M⋆ relation. This change will make the logical order clearer while preserving the physical motivation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and methods] Results and methods description: the reproduction of the UV luminosity function and A_FUV-M_star relation lacks explicit details on the observational samples employed, any data exclusion criteria, error propagation or fitting procedures, and the quantitative steps that convert the hybrid prescriptions into the reported suppression of the brightest galaxies.

    Authors: We accept this criticism and will substantially expand the methods and results sections. The revised manuscript will include: (1) a table or paragraph listing the specific JWST photometric and spectroscopic samples used for the A_FUV–M⋆ and UVLF comparisons, together with the redshift and magnitude cuts applied; (2) a description of the error propagation (including uncertainties on dust-to-metal ratios and porosity parameters) and the fitting metric used to identify the best-matching opacity range; and (3) an explicit quantitative example showing how the hybrid attenuation prescription alters the bright-end slope of the intrinsic UVLF, including the fractional suppression at M_UV < –21. These additions will allow readers to reproduce the reported suppression without ambiguity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Kappa_UV(dust) range selected to best reproduce observed A_FUV-M_star relation

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "We find that the observed A_FUV-M_star relation at z > 9 is best reproduced for an intrinsic FUV dust opacity kappa_UV(dust)=10^3 - 10^4 cm2/g, characteristic of low-opacity SNe dust, naturally producing very low attenuation even in gas-rich galaxies. This regime reproduces galaxies with extremely low dust attenuation (GELDAs), which dominate observed samples at z > 9."

    The paper explicitly states the relation is 'best reproduced for' this kappa range. The value is therefore chosen because it matches the observations, rendering the subsequent claim that the SNe-dominated regime 'naturally' yields low attenuation and matches the UV luminosity function a direct consequence of the fit rather than a first-principles output of the extinction laws or dust-origin transition.

full rationale

The paper constructs an attenuation framework from extinction laws, metallicity scalings, and porous geometries, then reports that the observed A_FUV-M_star relation is best reproduced specifically for kappa_UV(dust) in the 10^3-10^4 cm2/g range. This selection step makes the claim of 'naturally producing very low attenuation' and GELDAs reduce to a fit to the target JWST data rather than an independent derivation. The framework supplies some physical content, so the circularity is partial rather than total.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a fitted opacity range and domain assumptions about dust composition and geometry at high redshift; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • kappa_UV(dust) = 10^3 - 10^4 cm2/g
    Intrinsic FUV dust opacity chosen in the range 10^3-10^4 cm2/g to best reproduce the observed A_FUV-M_star relation at z>9
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Reverse-shock-processed SNe dust follows specific extinction laws with low UV opacity before ISM grain growth dominates
    Invoked in the attenuation framework to explain low attenuation in gas-rich galaxies

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5911 in / 1485 out tokens · 45086 ms · 2026-05-20T23:14:15.296680+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

151 extracted references · 151 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J., Conselice, C

    Adams, N. J., Conselice, C. J., Ferreira, L., et al.\ 2023, , 518, 3, 4755. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3347

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3347 2023

  2. [2]

    J., Conselice, C

    Adams, N. J., Conselice, C. J., Austin, D., et al.\ 2024, , 965, 2, 169. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a7b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a7b 2024

  3. [3]

    L., et al

    Arrabal Haro, P., Dickinson, M., Finkelstein, S. L., et al.\ 2023, , 951, L22. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdd54

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdd54 2023

  4. [4]

    L., et al.\ 2023, , 622, 7984, 707

    Arrabal Haro, P., Dickinson, M., Finkelstein, S. L., et al.\ 2023, , 622, 7984, 707. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06521-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06521-7 2023

  5. [5]

    S., Takeuchi, T

    Asano, R. S., Takeuchi, T. T., Hirashita, H., & Inoue, A. K.\ 2013, EPS, 65, 213

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    S., Takeuchi T

    Asano R. S., Takeuchi T. T., Hirashita H., Nozawa T., 2014, MNRAS, 440, 134. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu208

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu208 2014

  7. [7]

    J., et al

    Atek, H., Shuntov, M., Furtak, L. J., et al.\ 2023, , 519, 1, 1201. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3144

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3144 2023

  8. [8]

    2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Roehlly, Y., et al.\ 2019, , 622, A103. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834156 2019

  9. [9]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1014

    Bouwens, R., Illingworth, G., Oesch, P., et al.\ 2023, , 523, 1, 1009. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1014

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1014 2023

  10. [10]

    J., Illingworth, G

    Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., et al.\ 2023, , 954, 128. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace0d8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace0d8 2023

  11. [11]

    doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01950-2

    Boylan-Kolchin, M.\ 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 731. doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01950-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01950-2 2023

  12. [12]

    & Larson, R

    Bromm, V. & Larson, R. B.\ 2004, , 42, 79

    work page 2004

  13. [13]

    doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/11/112901

    Bromm, V.\ 2013, Reports on Progress in Physics, 76, 112901. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/11/112901

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/11/112901 2013

  14. [14]

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102608

    Bromm, V., & Yoshida, N.\ 2011, , 49, 373. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102608

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102608 2011

  15. [15]

    2012, A&A, 545, A141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219405

    Buat, V., Noll, S., Burgarella, D., et al.\ 2012, , 545, A141. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219405

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219405 2012

  16. [16]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554231

    Burgarella, D., Buat, V., Theul \'e , P., et al.\ 2025, , 699, A336. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554231

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554231 2025

  17. [17]

    C., Kinney A

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al.\ 2000, , 533, 682. doi:10.1086/308692

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  18. [18]

    2023, ApJL, 948, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/accea5 16Ferrara et al

    Castellano, M., Fontana, A., Treu, T., et al.\ 2023, , 948, 2, L14. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/accea5

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/accea5 2023

  19. [19]

    2024, ApJ, 972, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88

    Castellano, M., Napolitano, L., Fontana, A., et al.\ 2024, , 972, 2, 143. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88 2024

  20. [20]

    A Simple Model for the Absorption of Starlight by Dust in Galaxies

    Charlot, S. & Fall, S. M.\ 2000, , 539, 718. doi:10.1086/309250

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/309250 2000

  21. [21]

    Chemerynska, I., Atek, H., Dayal, P., et al.\ 2024, , 976, L15

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Cherchneff, I., & Dwek, E.\ 2009, , 703, 642

    work page 2009

  23. [23]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stt318

    Chevallard, J., Charlot, S., Wandelt, B., & Wild, V.\ 2013, , 432, 2061. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt318

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt318 2013

  24. [24]

    R., Kere s , D., Sandstrom, K

    Choban, C. R., Kere s , D., Sandstrom, K. M., et al.\ 2024, , 529, 2356. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae716

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae716 2024

  25. [25]

    R., Hutter, A., Dayal, P., et al.\ 2024, , 686, A138

    Cueto, E. R., Hutter, A., Dayal, P., et al.\ 2024, , 686, A138. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349017

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349017 2024

  26. [26]

    J., Donnan, C

    Cullen, F., McLure, R. J., Donnan, C. T., et al.\ 2023, , 520, 14. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad131

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad131 2023

  27. [27]

    C., Scholte, D., et al

    Cullen, F., Carnall, A. C., Scholte, D., et al.\ 2025, , 540, 3, 2176. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf838

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf838 2025

  28. [28]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 425, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2737

    Curti, M., D'Eugenio, F., Carniani, S., et al.\ 2023, , 518, 1, 425. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2737

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2737 2023

  29. [29]

    2022, MNRAS, 512, 989, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac537

    Dayal, P., Ferrara, A., Sommovigo, L., et al.\ 2022, , 512, 989. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac537

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac537 2022

  30. [30]

    R., Ferrara, A., et al.\ 2024, , 529, 4221

    Dayal, P., Choudhury, T. R., Ferrara, A., et al.\ 2024, , 529, 4221. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae318

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae318 2024

  31. [31]

    J., Swinyard, B

    De Looze, I., Barlow, M. J., Swinyard, B. M., et al.\ 2017, , 465, 3309

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    De Vis, P., Jones, A., Viaene, S., et al.\ 2019, , 623, A5

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3702

    Di Cesare, C., Graziani, L., Schneider, R., et al.\ 2023, , 519, 4632. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3702

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3702 2023

  34. [34]

    T., McLeod, D

    Donnan, C. T., McLeod, D. J., McLure, R. J., et al.\ 2023, , 518, 6011. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3491

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3491 2023

  35. [35]

    T., McLure, R

    Donnan, C. T., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al.\ 2024, , 533, 3, 3222. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2037

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2037 2024

  36. [36]

    T.\ 2003, , 41, 241

    Draine, B. T.\ 2003, , 41, 241

    work page 2003

  37. [37]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/727/2/63

    Dwek, E., & Cherchneff, I.\ 2011, , 727, 63. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/727/2/63

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/727/2/63 2011

  38. [38]

    Feldmann, R.\ 2015, , 449, 3274

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Ferrara, A., Aiello, S., Ferrini, F., & Barsella, B.\ 1990, , 240, 259

    work page 1990

  40. [40]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac620

    Ferrara, A.\ 2022, , 512, 1598. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac620

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac620 2022

  41. [41]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 3986, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1095

    Ferrara, A., Pallottini, A., & Dayal, P.\ 2023, , 522, 3, 3986. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1095

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1095 2023

  42. [42]

    Ferrara, A., & Carniani, S.\ 2025, , 694, A215

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Arrabal Haro, P., et al.\ 2022, , 940, L55. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acad00

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acad00 2022

  44. [44]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Arrabal Haro, P., et al.\ 2023, , 946, L13. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acb66d

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acb66d 2023

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Arrabal Haro, P., et al.\ 2025, , 983, 1, L4. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adbbd3

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adbbd3 2025

  46. [46]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad235c

    Fujimoto, S., Ouchi, M., Nakajima, K., et al.\ 2024, , 964, 2, 146. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad235c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad235c 2024

  47. [47]

    C., & Hjorth, J.\ 2011, , 19, 43

    Gall, C., Andersen, A. C., & Hjorth, J.\ 2011, , 19, 43

    work page 2011

  48. [48]

    & Hjorth, J.\ 2018, , 868, 1, 62

    Gall, C. & Hjorth, J.\ 2018, , 868, 1, 62. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae520

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae520 2018

  49. [49]

    Gallerani, S., Maiolino, R., Juarez, Y., et al.\ 2010, , 523, A85

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    Galliano, F., et al.\ 2022, , 30, 2

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Habilitation Thesis , keywords =

    Galliano, F.\ 2022, Habilitation Thesis, 1. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2202.01868

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.01868 2022

  52. [52]

    D., Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Misselt, K. A., et al.\ 2003, , 594, 279. doi:10.1086/376774

    work page doi:10.1086/376774 2003

  53. [53]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa796

    Graziani, L., Schneider, R., Ginolfi, M., et al.\ 2020, , 494, 1071. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa796

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa796 2020

  54. [54]

    H., Springel, V., White, S

    Greif, T. H., Springel, V., White, S. D. M., et al.\ 2011, , 737, 75. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/75

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/75 2011

  55. [55]

    K., Mawatari, K., et al.\ 2022, , 929, 1, 1

    Harikane, Y., Inoue, A. K., Mawatari, K., et al.\ 2022, , 929, 1, 1. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac53a9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac53a9 2022

  56. [56]

    2023, ApJS, 265, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acaaa9

    Harikane, Y., Ouchi, M., Oguri, M., et al.\ 2023, , 265, 5. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acaaa9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acaaa9 2023

  57. [57]

    2024, , 942, 64

    Harikane, Y., Ouchi, M., Nakajima, K., et al. 2024, , 942, 64

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    2024, ApJ, 960, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b7e

    Harikane, Y., Nakajima, K., Ouchi, M., et al.\ 2024, , 960, 1, 56. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b7e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b7e 2024

  59. [59]

    E., Gim \'e nez-Arteaga, C., Fujimoto, S., et al.\ 2023, , 944, 2, L30

    Heintz, K. E., Gim \'e nez-Arteaga, C., Fujimoto, S., et al.\ 2023, , 944, 2, L30. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acb2cf

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acb2cf 2023

  60. [60]

    E., Fudamoto, Y., Faisst, A

    Heintz, K. E., Fudamoto, Y., Faisst, A. L., et al.\ 2024, , 964, L15. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad2b25

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad2b25 2024

  61. [61]

    Hirano, S., et al.\ 2015, , 448, 568

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    Mignone and Jonathan C

    Hirashita, H., Nozawa, T., Takeuchi, T. T., & Kozasa, T.\ 2008, , 384, 1725. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12828.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12828.x 2008

  63. [63]

    K., Li W., Ho L

    Inayoshi, K., Harikane, Y., Inoue, A. K., et al.\ 2022, , 938, 2, L10. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9310

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9310 2022

  64. [64]

    A., okas E

    Inoue, A. K.\ 2005, , 359, 171. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08940.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08940.x 2005

  65. [65]

    K.\ 2011, Earth, Planets and Space, 63, 1027

    Inoue, A. K.\ 2011, Earth, Planets and Space, 63, 1027. doi:10.5047/eps.2011.02.013

    work page doi:10.5047/eps.2011.02.013 2011

  66. [66]

    K., Hashimoto, T., Chihara, H., et al.\ 2020, , 495, 1577

    Inoue, A. K., Hashimoto, T., Chihara, H., et al.\ 2020, , 495, 1577. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1203

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1203 2020

  67. [67]

    G., Speagle, J

    Iyer, K. G., Speagle, J. S., Caplar, N., et al.\ 2024, , 961, 1, 53. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acff64

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acff64 2024

  68. [68]

    L., & Bromm, V.\ 2019, , 488, 2, 2202

    Jaacks, J., Finkelstein, S. L., & Bromm, V.\ 2019, , 488, 2, 2202. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1529

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1529 2019

  69. [69]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323199

    Kataoka, A., Okuzumi, S., Tanaka, H., et al.\ 2014, , 568, A42. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323199

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323199 2014

  70. [70]

    Z., Redigolo, D., & Volansky, T.\ 2025, , 2025, 10, 047

    Katz, O. Z., Redigolo, D., & Volansky, T.\ 2025, , 2025, 10, 047. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/10/047

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/10/047 2025

  71. [71]

    Kawamata, R., Ishigaki, M., Shimasaku, K., et al.\ 2018, , 855, 4

    work page 2018

  72. [72]

    J., Priestley, F

    Kirchschlager, F., Barlow, M. J., Priestley, F. D., & Nozawa, T.\ 2019, , 487, 195. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1203

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1203 2019

  73. [73]

    D., Barlow, M

    Kirchschlager, F., Schmidt, F. D., Barlow, M. J., et al.\ 2019, , 489, 4, 4465. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2399

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2399 2019

  74. [74]

    Klessen, R. S. & Glover, S. C. O.\ 2023, , 61, 65. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-053453

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-053453 2023

  75. [75]

    D., Papovich, C., Trump, J

    Kocevski, D. D., Papovich, C., Trump, J. R., et al.\ 2023, , 946, L14. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acb8b5

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acb8b5 2023

  76. [76]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdffd

    Langeroodi, D., Hjorth, J., Gall, C., & Zafar, T.\ 2023, , 952, 156. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdffd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdffd 2023

  77. [77]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2410.14671

    Langeroodi, D., Hjorth, J., Ferrara, A., et al.\ 2024, arXiv:2410.14671. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2410.14671

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.14671 2024

  78. [78]

    Leung, G. C. K., Bagley, M. B., Finkelstein, S. L., et al.\ 2023, , 954, 2, L46. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf365

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf365 2023

  79. [79]

    Lewis, J. S. W., Ocvirk, P., Dubois, Y., et al.\ 2023, , 519, 5987. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad081

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad081 2023

  80. [80]

    2019, MNRAS, 490, 1425, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2684

    Li, Q., Narayanan, D., & Dav \'e , R.\ 2019, , 490, 1425. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2684

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2684 2019

Showing first 80 references.