Bayesian Learning in Structural Dynamics: A Comprehensive Review and Emerging Trends

Costas Papadimitriou; Jiang Mo; Ka-Veng Yuen; Lin-Feng Mei; Michael Beer; Wang-Ji Yan; Yuan-Wei Yin

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 294 references

Bayesian Learning in Structural Dynamics: A Comprehensive Review and Emerging Trends

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A review organizes three decades of Bayesian learning in structural dynamics into two branches—physical-model learning and data-centric statistical-model learning—sharing inference tools and a common task set.

desk verdict A genuinely useful, broad review of Bayesian structural dynamics whose physical-vs-data-centric taxonomy is helpful but not clean — the overlap between surrogate-based updating and data-centric surrogates needs a hybrid category. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22223 v2 pith:AQR2UDZF submitted 2025-05-28 physics.data-an physics.comp-ph

Wang-Ji Yan , Lin-Feng Mei , Yuan-Wei Yin , Jiang Mo , Costas Papadimitriou , Ka-Veng Yuen , Michael Beer This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.data-anphysics.comp-ph MSC 62F1562-0265C0568T07 PACS 02.50.Tt02.70.Uu46.40.-f

keywords Bayesianinferencestructuraldynamicssystemidentificationhealthmonitoringuncertaintyquantificationmodelupdatingvariationalneuralnetworks

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims to be the first review to organize the three-decade evolution of Bayesian learning in structural dynamics according to what is being learned: the parameters of a physical model of the structure, or the parameters of a purely statistical, data-centric model. On the physical side it traces the line from the founding Bayesian system-identification framework through hierarchical, sparse, and likelihood-free (approximate Bayesian computation) extensions; on the data-centric side it covers Bayesian nonparametric clustering, Gaussian processes, Bayesian dynamic linear models, and Bayesian neural networks. Both branches are assessed against the same application tasks—modal analysis, model updating, damage diagnosis, model class selection, and reliability updating—so that a researcher can see which tool families exist and where each has been tried. A sympathetic reader would take the paper's central value to be this structured map, together with its explicit agenda of open problems, rather than any single new method.

What carries the argument

The organizing machinery is a two-way taxonomy of learning regimes built on a shared Bayesian foundation. Bayes' theorem—posterior proportional to likelihood times prior—is the common engine, and the three recurring computational tools are Laplace approximation, stochastic (Markov chain Monte Carlo) sampling, and variational inference. The distinction that carries the review is the target of learning: physical model learning infers the parameters of mechanics-based models, with hierarchical, sparse, and approximate-Bayesian extensions, while data-centric statistical model learning infers the parameters or latent functions of probabilistic machine-learning models, specifically Dirichlet process mixture models, Gaussian processes, Bayesian dynamic linear models, and Bayesian neural networks. The same application tasks—modal analysis, model updating, damage diagnosis, model class selection, and reliability updating—serve as the common yardstick for both branches, which is what turns the survey into a usable map.

What would settle it

A bibliometric census would settle the claim: systematically collect Bayesian structural-dynamics papers from the past three decades and test whether every method falls cleanly into the physical-model branch or the data-centric statistical-model branch; a substantial residue that fits neither, such as Bayesian physics-informed neural networks or standalone Bayesian state-space filters, would refute the taxonomy's completeness. A cheaper check is to compare the methods covered here with those in two existing specialized reviews and look for important omissions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that Bayesian practice in structural dynamics splits into two learning regimes that share one mathematical core, Bayes' theorem together with three posterior-inference strategies: Laplace approximation, stochastic sampling, and variational inference. In physical model learning, the parameters of mechanics-based models—typically finite element models—are updated from measured dynamic response through a prediction-error model that bridges simulation and data, and the review organizes this branch into mainstream Bayesian system identification, hierarchical Bayesian models that separate test-to-test variability from identification uncertainty, sparse Bayesian learning that imposes sparsity through hierarchical priors, and approximate Bayesian computation for models whose likelihood is intractable. In data-centric statistical model learning, the same machinery is applied to four families of probabilistic machine-learning models—Dirichlet process mixture models, Gaussian processes, Bayesian dynamic linear models, and Bayesian neural networks trained mainly by variational inference or Monte Carlo dropout—with the posterior predictive distribution as the vehicle for uncertainty-aware output. The two branches are then measured against a common list of structural dynamics tasks, and the paper argues that, if its taxonomy is accepted, the scattered literature becomes navigable as a matrix of learning regime by application task, with shared inference tools as the unifying thread.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the authors' selection of the literature is faithful and complete and that every important Bayesian method in structural dynamics falls into one of the two categories, physical-model learning or data-centric statistical-model learning.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A researcher facing a new structural dynamics problem can short-list candidate Bayesian methods by learning regime and task, using the review's taxonomy instead of searching the literature method by method.
The account of two generations of Bayesian operational modal analysis documents a progression from general but expensive formulations to fast, field-deployable algorithms with analytical uncertainty laws, implying that computational cost is the field's binding constraint.
The data-centric branch's emphasis on posterior predictive distributions positions Bayesian machine learning as a route to uncertainty-aware response prediction and reliability assessment, directly addressing the overconfidence of deterministic deep-learning predictions.
The review's challenge section—surrogate and reduced-order models, hybrid variational-sampling schemes, non-Gaussian and non-stationary error models, and online Bayesian learning—amounts to a concrete research agenda for the next phase of the field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The physical-versus-data-centric split may be a staging ground rather than a permanent boundary: the same inference machinery appears on both sides, and the review's own inclusion of physics-informed machine learning points toward a convergence in which physical and statistical models are learned jointly.
The taxonomy is likely portable to other inverse-problem disciplines that pair mechanistic models with data-driven surrogates—geophysics, biomechanics, or energy systems—as a two-axis literature-mapping device.
A bibliometric census of Bayesian structural-dynamics papers over the same three decades would test the taxonomy's completeness directly: any substantial residue of methods that fits neither branch, such as standalone Bayesian filtering for state estimation, would reveal blind spots.
Using the same tasks to showcase both branches invites a benchmarking program the paper does not run: matching physical-model and data-centric methods on identical damage-detection or model-updating problems to learn empirically where each regime earns its keep.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Adam, quick take on arXiv:2505.22223. This is a broad, genuinely useful review of Bayesian methods in structural dynamics. The organizing frame — physical model learning versus data-centric statistical model learning — is a real contribution, and the paper does a good job of mapping a large literature onto it. The coverage of recent Bayesian ML methods (GPs, BNNs, BDLMs, DPMMs) alongside the established physics-based Bayesian updating literature is better than anything else I've seen in one place. It's a review, so don't look for new math, but the summaries are mostly faithful to the cited work and the citation list is extensive.

The main soft spot is the taxonomy, and the stress-test note is right: it isn't exclusive. Section 3.2.2 includes GP-surrogate-accelerated model updating under physical model learning, and Section 4.2.2 puts the same kind of surrogate under data-centric learning. The paper gives no rule for resolving the overlap, which weakens the 'first comprehensive review organized by this perspective' claim. This isn't fatal — the chapters are each informative — but a referee should ask for a hybrid category or an explicit decision rule, plus a mapping table.

A second issue: 'comprehensive' is asserted without a search protocol. No databases, inclusion criteria, or screening steps, so the coverage claim can't be independently checked. For a review that explicitly claims to be first and comprehensive, that's a real omission. Minor points: there's a duplicated subsection number (3.2.2.3) and some abstract language about 'groundbreaking methodologies' oversells.

Self-citation is heavy but not unfair given these authors did much of the foundational work; the reader's burden about that is not a flaw. Overall, the paper deserves serious peer review. Send it out. A good referee will ask for the taxonomy to be sharpened and the search methodology made transparent, but the core value is solid.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper is a review of Bayesian learning in structural dynamics, organized around a binary taxonomy: Bayesian inference for physical models (Section 3) versus Bayesian inference for data-centric statistical models (Section 4). It covers posterior inference strategies (Laplace approximation, stochastic simulation, variational inference), then surveys applications including operational modal analysis, model updating, damage diagnosis, model class selection, and reliability updating, and closes with challenges and future directions (Section 5). The authors claim this is the first comprehensive review organized from this physical-versus-data-centric perspective.

Significance. If the organizational taxonomy is made rigorous, the review could be a useful entry point for researchers: it assembles a large body of literature, correctly presents the standard textbook formulas for Bayes' theorem and posterior approximation, and gives a structured overview of applications across structural dynamics. The survey also highlights genuine open problems in Section 5, including computational efficiency, non-Gaussian noise modeling, and prior selection. The work is not novel in a mathematical sense—it derives no new results—but a well-organized review with extensive references is valuable to the community. The paper does not ship code, data, or machine-checked proofs; its contribution is the taxonomic framing and literature synthesis. That framing is currently the main source of risk, as the binary categories overlap in several places (notably surrogate-assisted model updating), and the 'comprehensive' claim is not backed by a reproducible search protocol.

major comments (2)

[§3.2.2.1] The core organizing scheme—physical model learning versus data-centric statistical model learning—is not exclusive. In §3.2.2.1(2), surrogate-accelerated Bayesian model updating (e.g., Song et al. [179], Ni et al. [180]) is presented as physical model learning because the goal is inference of finite-element parameters. In §4.2.2, the first category explicitly places GPR and BNN surrogates that 'serve as efficient alternatives to costly physical forward solvers' under data-centric statistical learning, even though those surrogates are used to infer physical parameters. The same pipeline can therefore be filed in either chapter depending on which component is emphasized. The paper offers no hybrid category and no decision rule for resolving the overlap. Since the novelty claim rests on this taxonomy being jointly exhaustive and mutually exclusive, this is a load-bearing issue that needs to be fixed by adding a hybrid category or by defining classification criteria (e.g., classifying by the target of inference rather than by the model used for the forward map).
[§1] The manuscript claims to be a 'comprehensive review' and to 'meticulously trace the three-decade evolution of Bayesian learning in structural dynamics,' but it does not report any reproducible search or inclusion criteria. There is no statement of databases queried, years covered, keywords used, or inclusion/exclusion rules. Consequently, the comprehensiveness claim cannot be verified, and the assertion that 'there has yet to be a comprehensive review' (Section 1) is based only on the authors' belief. I do not require a PRISMA-style protocol for every review, but if the abstract and title promise comprehensiveness, the burden is on the authors to specify how the literature was selected. Without that, readers cannot distinguish missing references from deliberate scope choices.

minor comments (4)

[§3.2.2.3] The subsection numbering is duplicated: both 'Sparse Bayesian updating' and 'Approximate Bayesian updating' are labelled 3.2.2.3. Please renumber the latter as 3.2.2.4 or renumber consistently.
[§1] The phrase 'has attacked increasing attention in recent years' should read 'has attracted increasing attention in recent years.'
[§3.1.2, §3.2.1.1, §4.1.1] Several displayed equations appear corrupted or contain typographical errors in the manuscript text: Eq. (14) includes 'varablity' and the parameter labels are garbled; Eq. (20) has unclear symbols; Eqs. (31)-(33) have broken notation. While the underlying mathematics is recognizable, the rendering should be corrected for a formal publication.
[List of Abbreviations] 'RUL' is expanded as 'residual useful life'; the standard term in prognostics is 'remaining useful life.' Please check the intended terminology and use it consistently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the review is descriptive, makes no fitted predictions, and its organizing taxonomy does not reduce to its own inputs.

full rationale

This paper is a literature review. It presents no new fitted parameters, no predictive model calibrated to data, and no derivation whose conclusion is assumed in its premises. Its content is a survey of existing Bayesian methods in structural dynamics, with equations (e.g., Bayes' theorem, Laplace approximation, MCMC acceptance probabilities, variational ELBO, GP predictive equations) reproduced from established sources rather than derived from the review's own claims. There is therefore no step in which a quantity defined in terms of another is later presented as an independent prediction of it. Heavy self-citation appears in the form of references to the authors' prior work on Bayesian operational modal analysis, hierarchical Bayesian updating, and sparse Bayesian learning, but these citations are used to attribute methods and results to their originators, not to justify the review's central organizational claim. The claim that no previous comprehensive review categorizes Bayesian approaches from the physical-model versus data-centric-statistical-model perspective is a novelty assertion about the literature, not a mathematical consequence of the cited works. The skeptic's observation that the taxonomy places surrogate-assisted physical model updating in both Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 is a legitimate classification-boundary concern, but it is a question of expository consistency, not circular reasoning: the paper does not define 'physical model learning' in terms of 'data-centric statistical model learning' and then use that definition to derive a result. Absence of a reproducible search strategy is a completeness limitation, not a circularity. For these reasons, the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities are introduced because the paper contains no original derivations and no new physical or statistical constructs. The review rests on the trustworthiness of cited literature and on the completeness of its organizing taxonomy, as captured in the axioms above.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The reviewed literature is represented faithfully by the authors' summaries and citations.
The review's value rests on accurate reading of cited papers; no independent verification is provided for the hundreds of summarized works.
ad hoc to paper The dichotomy of physical model learning versus data-centric statistical model learning is a complete and useful taxonomy for Bayesian approaches in structural dynamics.
This organizing frame is introduced in the abstract and Section 1 as the paper's central contribution, but it is a heuristic categorization rather than a proven exhaustive partition of the literature.
domain assumption Comprehensiveness is achieved by the papers the authors selected, without a systematic search protocol.
The paper claims to fill a gap as the first comprehensive review from its perspective, but it does not disclose inclusion criteria or a reproducible literature search.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bayesian Learning in Structural Dynamics: A Comprehensive Review and Emerging Trends." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AQR2UDZF

@misc{pith2026250522223,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bayesian Learning in Structural Dynamics: A Comprehensive Review and Emerging Trends},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AQR2UDZF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22223}
}

read the original abstract

Bayesian learning has emerged as a compelling and vital research direction in the field of structural dynamics, offering a probabilistic lens to understand and refine the analysis of complex dynamical systems. This review meticulously traces the three-decade evolution of Bayesian learning in structural dynamics, illuminating core principles, groundbreaking methodologies, and diverse applications that have significantly influenced the field. The narrative commences by delving into the basics of Bayesian theory, clarifying essential concepts, and introducing primary methods for deriving posterior distributions, with an in-depth exploration of three types: Laplace approximation, stochastic sampling, and variational inference. Subsequently, the text explores the implementation of two types of Bayesian learning in structural dynamics: physical model learning and data-centric statistical model learning. Physical model learning emphasizes inferring physical model parameters within a Bayesian framework for system identification and prediction, while statistical model learning integrates Bayesian learning methodologies into data-centric statistical modeling within probabilistic machine learning. Both types resonate across various applications, such as modal analysis, model updating, damage detection, and reliability updating, highlighting their pivotal role in enhancing comprehension of dynamical systems and decision-making. The paper also navigates obstacles by proposing ways to enhance existing Bayesian inference strategies. Distinguished from previous research, this study offers a thorough examination of both traditional and cutting-edge Bayesian methods. It not only underscores the transformative influence of Bayesian approaches but also serves as a beacon, guiding researchers in the judicious selection and refinement of suitable methods for various challenges in structural dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22223 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** A schematic overview of Bayesian statistics for structural dynamics, where both the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** (a) A schematic diagram of the contents included in this review; (b) Roadmap of the review structure. 2 Fundamentals of Bayesian Inference 2.1 Bayes’ theorem Named after Thomas Bayes, the Bayes’ theorem stands as a potent instrument for recalibrating probability distributions in light of fresh evidence. With a storied past and broadranging applications across various disciplines, it stands as a fundamental pillar i… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

294 extracted references · 135 canonical work pages

[179]

Sampling -based adaptive Bayesian quadrature for probabilistic model updating

Song, J., Z. Liang, P. Wei, and M. Beer (2025). "Sampling -based adaptive Bayesian quadrature for probabilistic model updating." Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 433: 117467. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2024.117467

arXiv 2025
[180]

Probabilistic model updating via variational Bayesian inference and adaptive Gaussian process modeling

Ni, P., J. Li, H. Hao, Q. Han, and X. Du (2021). "Probabilistic model updating via variational Bayesian inference and adaptive Gaussian process modeling." Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 383: 113915. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113915

arXiv 2021
[92]

Novel sparseness-inducing dual Kalman filter and its application to tracking time-varying spatially-sparse structural stiffness changes and inputs

Huang, Y ., J. Yu, J.L. Beck, H. Zhu, and H. Li (2020). "Novel sparseness-inducing dual Kalman filter and its application to tracking time-varying spatially-sparse structural stiffness changes and inputs." Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineer ing 372: 113411. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113411

arXiv 2020
[110]

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.03.022

work page doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2016.03.022 2016
[135]

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.03.013

work page doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.03.013 2019
[153]

A hybrid optimization algorithm with Bayesian inference for probabilistic model updating

Sun, H. and R. Betti (2015). "A hybrid optimization algorithm with Bayesian inference for probabilistic model updating." Computer -Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 30(8): 602 -619. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12142

work page doi:10.1111/mice.12142 2015
[154]

Structural health monitoring and fatigue damage estimation using vibration measurements and finite element model updating

Giagopoulos, D., A. Arailopoulos, V . Dertimanis, C. Papadimitriou, E. Chatzi, and K. Grompanopoulos (2019). "Structural health monitoring and fatigue damage estimation using vibration measurements and finite element model updating." Structural Health Moni toring 18(4): 1189 -1206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718790188

work page doi:10.1177/1475921718790188 2019
[155]

Learning functional priors and posteriors from data and physics

Meng, X., L. Yang, Z. Mao, J. del Águila Ferrandis, and G.E. Karniadakis (2022). "Learning functional priors and posteriors from data and physics." Journal of Computational Physics 457: 111073. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111073

arXiv 2022

Show all 294 references

[156]

Model updating using noisy response measurements without knowledge of the input spectrum

Yuen, K.-V . and L.S. Katafygiotis (2005). "Model updating using noisy response measurements without knowledge of the input spectrum." Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 34(2): 167 -187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.415

2005 doi
[157]

On prediction error correlation in Bayesian model updating

Simoen, E., C. Papadimitriou, and G. Lombaert (2013). "On prediction error correlation in Bayesian model updating." Journal of Sound and Vibration 332(18): 4136 -4152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.03.019

2013 doi
[158]

Katafygiotis, L. and O. Sedehi (2017). Bayesian time -domain model updating considering correlation of prediction errors. 12th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability . Vienna, Austria : 2500-2509

2017
[159]

Bayesian system identification for structures considering spatial and temporal correlation

Koune, I., Á. Rózsás, A. Slobbe, and A. Cicirello (2023). "Bayesian system identification for structures considering spatial and temporal correlation." Data -Centric Engineering 4: e22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/dce.2023.18

2023 doi
[160]

A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations

Au, S.K. and J.L. Beck (1999). "A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations." Structural Safety 21(2): 135-158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(99)00014-4

1999 doi
[161]

Bayesian model updating of a coupled-slab system using field test data utilizing an enhanced Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation algorithm

Lam, H.-F., J. Yang, and S.-K. Au (2015). "Bayesian model updating of a coupled-slab system using field test data utilizing an enhanced Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation algorithm." Engineering Structures 102: 144-155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.08.005

2015 doi
[162]

DRAM: Efficient adaptive MCMC

Haario, H., M. Laine, A. Mira, and E. Saksman (2006). "DRAM: Efficient adaptive MCMC." Statistics 125 and Computing 16(4): 339-354. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-006-9438-0

2006 doi
[163]

A new Gibbs sampling based algorithm for Bayesian model updating with incomplete complex modal data

Cheung, S.H. and S. Bansal (2017). "A new Gibbs sampling based algorithm for Bayesian model updating with incomplete complex modal data." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 92: 156 -172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.01.015

2017 doi
[164]

Transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo: observations and improvements

Betz, W., I. Papaioannou, and D. Straub (2016). "Transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo: observations and improvements." Journal of Engineering Mechanics 142(5): 04016016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001066

2016
[165]

Bayesian annealed sequential importance sampling (BASIS): an unbiased version of transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo

Wu, S., P. Angelikopoulos, C. Papadimitriou, and P. Koumoutsakos (2018). "Bayesian annealed sequential importance sampling (BASIS): an unbiased version of transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo." ASCE - ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Sys tems, Part B: Mecha...

2018 doi
[166]

X -TMCMC: Adaptive kriging for Bayesian inverse modeling

Angelikopoulos, P., C. Papadimitriou, and P. Koumoutsakos (2015). "X -TMCMC: Adaptive kriging for Bayesian inverse modeling." Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 289: 409-428. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.01.015

2015 doi
[167]

An efficient and robust sampler for Bayesian inference: Transitional ensemble Markov chain Monte Carlo

Lye, A., A. Cicirello, and E. Patelli (2022). "An efficient and robust sampler for Bayesian inference: Transitional ensemble Markov chain Monte Carlo." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 167: 108471. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108471

2022
[168]

A two -stage Bayesian model updating framework based on an iterative model reduction technique using modal responses

Sengupta, P. and S. Chakraborty (2023). "A two -stage Bayesian model updating framework based on an iterative model reduction technique using modal responses." Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 417: 116448. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.116448

2023
[169]

Cheung, S.H. (2009). Stochastic Analysis, Model and Reliability Updating of Complex Systems with Applications to Structural Dynamics, California Institute of Technology

2009
[170]

Bayesian model updating using hybrid Monte Carlo simulation with application to structural dynamic models with many uncertain parameters

Cheung, S.H. and J.L. Beck (2009). "Bayesian model updating using hybrid Monte Carlo simulation with application to structural dynamic models with many uncertain parameters." Journal of Engineering Mechanics 135(4): 243-255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:4(243)

2009 doi
[171]

Bayesian model updating of a full -scale finite element model with sensitivity-based clustering

Jang, J. and A. Smyth (2017). "Bayesian model updating of a full -scale finite element model with sensitivity-based clustering." Structural Control and Health Monitoring 24(11): e2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2004

2017 doi
[172]

Finite element model updating using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo techniques

Boulkaibet, I., L. Mthembu, T. Marwala, M.I. Friswell, and S. Adhikari (2017). "Finite element model updating using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo techniques." Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering 25(7): 1042-1070. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2016.1215446

2017
[173]

Modified Hamiltonian Monte Carlo‐based Bayesian finite element model updating of steel truss bridge

Baisthakur, S. and A. Chakraborty (2020). "Modified Hamiltonian Monte Carlo‐based Bayesian finite element model updating of steel truss bridge." Structural Control and Health Monitoring 27(8). doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2556

2020 doi
[174]

Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods for subset simulation in reliability analysis

Wang, Z., M. Broccardo, and J. Song (2019). "Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods for subset simulation in reliability analysis." Structural Safety 76: 51-67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.05.005

2019 doi
[175]

Riemannian manifold Hamiltonian Monte Carlo based subset simulation for reliability analysis in non-Gaussian space

Chen, W., Z. Wang, M. Broccardo, and J. Song (2022). "Riemannian manifold Hamiltonian Monte Carlo based subset simulation for reliability analysis in non-Gaussian space." Structural Safety 94: 102134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102134

2022
[176]

Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation using the DREAM software package: Theory, concepts, and MATLAB implementation

Vrugt, J.A. (2016). "Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation using the DREAM software package: Theory, concepts, and MATLAB implementation." Environmental Modelling & Software 75: 273 -316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.08.013

2016 doi
[177]

Computational inference of vibratory system with incomplete modal information using parallel, interactive and adaptive Markov chains

Zhou, K. and J. Tang (2021). "Computational inference of vibratory system with incomplete modal information using parallel, interactive and adaptive Markov chains." Journal of Sound and Vibration 511: 126 116331. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2021.116331

2021
[178]

Bayesian model updating for structural dynamic applications combing differential evolution adaptive Metropolis and kriging model

Zeng, J., Y .H. Kim, and S. Qin (2023). "Bayesian model updating for structural dynamic applications combing differential evolution adaptive Metropolis and kriging model." Journal of Structural Engineering 149(6): 04023070. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-10837

2023 doi
[181]

Data-driven approach for post-earthquake condition and reliability assessment with approximate Bayesian computation

Ni, P., Q. Han, X. Du, X. Cheng, and H. Zhou (2022). "Data-driven approach for post-earthquake condition and reliability assessment with approximate Bayesian computation." Engineering Structures 256: 113940. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113940

2022
[182]

Probabilistic model updating of civil structures with a decentralized variational inference approach

Ni, P., Q. Han, X. Du, J. Fu, and K. Xu (2024). "Probabilistic model updating of civil structures with a decentralized variational inference approach." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 209: 111106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111106

2024
[183]

Efficient variational Bayesian model updating by Bayesian active learning

Hong, F., P. Wei, S. Bi, and M. Beer (2025). "Efficient variational Bayesian model updating by Bayesian active learning." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 224: 112113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.112113

2025
[184]

Acerbi, L. (2018). Variational Bayesian Monte Carlo, Curran Associates, Inc

2018
[185]

Acerbi, L. (2020). Variational Bayesian Monte Carlo with Noisy Likelihoods, Curran Associates, Inc

2020
[186]

Cyclical variational Bayes Monte Carlo for efficient multi -modal posterior distributions evaluation

Igea, F. and A. Cicirello (2023). "Cyclical variational Bayes Monte Carlo for efficient multi -modal posterior distributions evaluation." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 186: 109868. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109868

2023
[187]

StocIPNet: A novel probabilistic interpretable network with affine-embedded reparameterization layer for high -dimensional stochastic inverse problems

Mo, J. and W.-J. Yan (2024). "StocIPNet: A novel probabilistic interpretable network with affine-embedded reparameterization layer for high -dimensional stochastic inverse problems." Mechanical Systems Signal Processing 220: 111623. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111623

2024
[188]

Past, present and future of nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics

Kerschen, G., K. Worden, A.F. Vakakis, and J.-C. Golinval (2006). "Past, present and future of nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 20(3): 505 -592. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.04.008

2006 doi
[189]

Bayesian updating and identifiability assessment of nonlinear finite element models

Ramancha, M.K., R. Astroza, R. Madarshahian, and J.P. Conte (2022). "Bayesian updating and identifiability assessment of nonlinear finite element models." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 167: 108517. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108517

2022
[191]

Nonlinear finite element model updating for damage identification of civil structures using batch Bayesian estimation

Ebrahimian, H., R. Astroza, J.P. Conte, and R.A. de Callafon (2017). "Nonlinear finite element model updating for damage identification of civil structures using batch Bayesian estimation." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 84: 194-222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ym...

2017 doi
[192]

Bayesian optimal estimation for output-only nonlinear system and damage identification of civil structures

Ebrahimian, H., R. Astroza, J.P. Conte, and C. Papadimitriou (2018). "Bayesian optimal estimation for output-only nonlinear system and damage identification of civil structures." Structural Control and Health Monitoring 25(4): e2128. doi: 10.1002/stc.2128

2018 doi
[193]

Bayesian nonlinear structural FE model and seismic input identification for damage assessment of civil structures

Astroza, R., H. Ebrahimian, Y . Li, and J.P. Conte (2017). "Bayesian nonlinear structural FE model and seismic input identification for damage assessment of civil structures." Mechanical Systems Signal 127 Processing 93: 661-687. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.01.040

2017 doi
[194]

Bayesian updating and model class selection for hysteretic structural models using stochastic simulation

Muto, M. and J.L. Beck (2008). "Bayesian updating and model class selection for hysteretic structural models using stochastic simulation." Journal of Vibration and Control 14(1 -2): 7 -34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546307079400

2008 doi
[195]

Parameter estimation and model selection for a class of hysteretic systems using Bayesian inference

Worden, K. and J. Hensman (2012). "Parameter estimation and model selection for a class of hysteretic systems using Bayesian inference." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 32: 153 -169. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.03.019

2012 doi
[196]

Bayesian system identification of a nonlinear dynamical system using a novel variant of simulated annealing

Green, P.L. (2015). "Bayesian system identification of a nonlinear dynamical system using a novel variant of simulated annealing." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 52 -53: 133 -146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.07.010

2015 doi
[197]

Bayesian calibration of hysteretic parameters with consideration of the model discrepancy for use in seismic structural health monitoring

Ceravolo, R., A. Faraci, and G. Miraglia (2020). "Bayesian calibration of hysteretic parameters with consideration of the model discrepancy for use in seismic structural health monitoring." Applied Sciences 10(17): 5813. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10175813

2020 doi
[198]

Papadioti, C

Giagopoulos, D., D. Papadioti, C. Papadimitriou, and S. Natsiavas (2013). Bayesian uncertainty quantification and propagation in nonlinear structural dynamics. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series

2013
[199]

Bayesian model updating of nonlinear systems using nonlinear normal modes

Song, M., L. Renson, J.P. Noël, B. Moaveni, and G. Kerschen (2018). "Bayesian model updating of nonlinear systems using nonlinear normal modes." Structural Control and Health Monitoring 25(12). doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2258

2018 doi
[200]

Bayesian model updating and class selection of a wing -engine structure with nonlinear connections using nonlinear normal modes

Song, M., L. Renson, B. Moaveni, and G. Kerschen (2022). "Bayesian model updating and class selection of a wing -engine structure with nonlinear connections using nonlinear normal modes." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 165: 108337. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss...

2022
[201]

Bayesian model identification of higher- order frequency response functions for structures assembled by bolted joints

Teloli, R.D.O., S. Da Silva, T.G. Ritto, and G. Chevallier (2021). "Bayesian model identification of higher- order frequency response functions for structures assembled by bolted joints." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 151: 107333. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss...

2021
[202]

An online coupled state/input/parameter estimation approach for structural dynamics

Naets, F., J. Croes, and W. Desmet (2015). "An online coupled state/input/parameter estimation approach for structural dynamics." Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics Engineering 283: 1167 -1188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2014.08.010

2015 doi
[203]

Parameter identification of a differentiable Bouc-Wen model using constrained extended Kalman filter

Li, D. and Y . Wang (2021). "Parameter identification of a differentiable Bouc-Wen model using constrained extended Kalman filter." Structural Health Monitoring 20(1): 360 -378. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720929434

2021 doi
[204]

The unscented Kalman filter and particle filter methods for nonlinear structural system identification with non-collocated heterogeneous sensing

Chatzi, E.N. and A.W. Smyth (2009). "The unscented Kalman filter and particle filter methods for nonlinear structural system identification with non-collocated heterogeneous sensing." Structural Control and Health Monitoring 16(1): 99-123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.290

2009 doi
[205]

Material parameter identification in distributed plasticity FE models of frame-type structures using nonlinear stochastic filtering

Astroza, R., H. Ebrahimian, and J.P. Conte (2015). "Material parameter identification in distributed plasticity FE models of frame-type structures using nonlinear stochastic filtering." Journal of Engineering Mechanics 141(5): 04014149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.19...

2015
[206]

An offline approach for output -only Bayesian identification of stochastic nonlinear systems using unscented Kalman filtering

Erazo, K. and S. Nagarajaiah (2017). "An offline approach for output -only Bayesian identification of stochastic nonlinear systems using unscented Kalman filtering." Journal of Sound and Vibration 397: 222-

2017
[207]

Constrained unscented Kalman filter for parameter identification of structural systems

Li, D. and Y . Wang (2022). "Constrained unscented Kalman filter for parameter identification of structural systems." Structural Control and Health Monitoring 29(4): e2908. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2908

2022 doi
[208]

Dynamic strain estimation for fatigue assessment of an offshore monopile wind turbine using filtering and modal expansion 128 algorithms

Maes, K., A. Iliopoulos, W. Weijtjens, C. Devriendt, and G. Lombaert (2016). "Dynamic strain estimation for fatigue assessment of an offshore monopile wind turbine using filtering and modal expansion 128 algorithms." Mechanical Systems Signal Processing 76: 592 -611. doi: http...

2016 doi
[209]

Joint input-response estimation for structural systems based on reduced-order models and vibration data from a limited number of sensors

Lourens, E., C. Papadimitriou, S. Gillijns, E. Reynders, G. De Roeck, and G. Lombaert (2012). "Joint input-response estimation for structural systems based on reduced-order models and vibration data from a limited number of sensors." Mechanical Systems Si gnal Processing 29: 3...

2012 doi
[210]

An augmented Kalman filter for force identification in structural dynamics

Lourens, E., E. Reynders, G. De Roeck, G. Degrande, and G. Lombaert (2012). "An augmented Kalman filter for force identification in structural dynamics." Mechanical systems signal processing 27: 446 -460. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.09.025

2012 doi
[211]

A dual Kalman filter approach for state estimation via output-only acceleration measurements

Azam, S.E., E. Chatzi, and C. Papadimitriou (2015). "A dual Kalman filter approach for state estimation via output-only acceleration measurements." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 60: 866-886. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.02.001

2015 doi
[212]

Online correction of drift in structural identification using artificial white noise observations and an unscented Kalman filter

Chatzi, E.N. and C. Fuggini (2015). "Online correction of drift in structural identification using artificial white noise observations and an unscented Kalman filter." Smart Structures and Systems 16(2): 295 -328. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.16.2.295

2015 doi
[213]

Stable force identification in structural dynamics using Kalman filtering and dummy -measurements

Naets, F., J. Cuadrado, and W. Desmet (2015). "Stable force identification in structural dynamics using Kalman filtering and dummy -measurements." Mechanical Systems Signal Processing 50: 235 -248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.05.042

2015 doi
[214]

Real‐time system identification: an algorithm for simultaneous model class selection and parametric identification

Yuen, K.V . and H.Q. Mu (2015). "Real‐time system identification: an algorithm for simultaneous model class selection and parametric identification." Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 30(10): 785-801. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12146

2015 doi
[215]

Identifiability‐enhanced Bayesian frequency‐domain substructure identification

Yuen, K.V . and K. Huang (2018). "Identifiability‐enhanced Bayesian frequency‐domain substructure identification." Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 33(9): 800 -812. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12377

2018 doi
[216]

A dual adaptive filtering approach for nonlinear finite element model updating accounting for modeling uncertainty

Astroza, R., A. Alessandri, and J.P. Conte (2019). "A dual adaptive filtering approach for nonlinear finite element model updating accounting for modeling uncertainty." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 115: 782-800. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.06.014

2019 doi
[217]

Joint parameter -input estimation for digital twinning of the Block Island wind turbine using output -only measurements

Song, M., B. Moaveni, H. Ebrahimian, E. Hines, and A. Bajric (2023). "Joint parameter -input estimation for digital twinning of the Block Island wind turbine using output -only measurements." Mechanical Systems Signal Processing 198: 110425. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss...

2023
[218]

Adaptive Kalman filters for nonlinear finite element model updating

Song, M., R. Astroza, H. Ebrahimian, B. Moaveni, and C. Papadimitriou (2020). "Adaptive Kalman filters for nonlinear finite element model updating." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 143: 106837. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106837

2020
[219]

Adaptive Bayesian inference framework for joint model and noise identification

Nabiyan, M.-S., H. Ebrahimian, B. Moaveni, and C. Papadimitriou (2022). "Adaptive Bayesian inference framework for joint model and noise identification." Journal of Engineering Mechanics 148(3): 04021165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0002084

2022
[220]

A variational Bayesian inference technique for model updating of structural systems with unknown noise statistics

Nabiyan, M. -S., M. Sharifi, H. Ebrahimian, and B. Moaveni (2023). "A variational Bayesian inference technique for model updating of structural systems with unknown noise statistics." Frontiers in Built Environment 9: 1143597. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1143597

2023
[221]

Bayesian finite element model inversion of offshore wind turbine structures for joint parameter -load estimation

Valikhani, M., M. Nabiyan, M. Song, V . Jahangiri, H. Ebrahimian, and B. Moaveni (2024). "Bayesian finite element model inversion of offshore wind turbine structures for joint parameter -load estimation." Ocean Engineering 313: 119458. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2...

2024
[222]

Extended Kalman filter for material parameter estimation in nonlinear structural finite element models using direct differentiation method

Ebrahimian, H., R. Astroza, and J.P. Conte (2015). "Extended Kalman filter for material parameter estimation in nonlinear structural finite element models using direct differentiation method." Earthquake 129 Engineering & Structural Dynamics 44(10): 1495-1522. doi: https://doi...

2015 doi
[223]

Dual estimation of partially observed nonlinear structural systems: a particle filter approach

Azam, S.E. and S. Mariani (2012). "Dual estimation of partially observed nonlinear structural systems: a particle filter approach." Mechanics Research Communications 46: 54 -61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2012.08.006

2012 doi
[224]

Tracking of inputs, states and parameters of linear structural dynamic systems

Maes, K., F. Karlsson, and G. Lombaert (2019). "Tracking of inputs, states and parameters of linear structural dynamic systems." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 130: 755 -775. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.048

2019 doi
[225]

Data fusion based EKF -UI for real -time simultaneous identification of structural systems and unknown external inputs

Liu, L., Y . Su, J. Zhu, and Y . Lei (2016). "Data fusion based EKF -UI for real -time simultaneous identification of structural systems and unknown external inputs." Measurement 88: 456 -467. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.02.002

2016 doi
[226]

A novel unscented Kalman filter for recursive state- input-system identification of nonlinear systems

Lei, Y ., D. Xia, K. Erazo, and S. Nagarajaiah (2019). "A novel unscented Kalman filter for recursive state- input-system identification of nonlinear systems." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 127: 120 -

2019
[227]

Input-state-parameter estimation of structural systems from limited output information

Dertimanis, V .K., E. Chatzi, S.E. Azam, and C. Papadimitriou (2019). "Input-state-parameter estimation of structural systems from limited output information." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 126: 711-

2019
[228]

Auto -regressive model based input and parameter estimation for nonlinear finite element models

Castiglione, J., R. Astroza, S.E. Azam, and D. Linzell (2020). "Auto -regressive model based input and parameter estimation for nonlinear finite element models." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 143: 106779. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106779

2020
[229]

On the application of Gaussian process latent force models for joint input-state-parameter estimation: With a view to Bayesian operational identification

Rogers, T., K. Worden, and E. Cross (2020). "On the application of Gaussian process latent force models for joint input-state-parameter estimation: With a view to Bayesian operational identification." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 140: 106580. doi: https://doi.org/1...

2020
[230]

Real-time simultaneous input -state-parameter estimation with modulated colored noise excitation

Huang, K., K. -V . Yuen, and L. Wang (2022). "Real-time simultaneous input -state-parameter estimation with modulated colored noise excitation." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 165: 108378. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108378

2022
[231]

Online updating and uncertainty quantification using nonstationary output-only measurement

Yuen, K.-V . and S.-C. Kuok (2016). "Online updating and uncertainty quantification using nonstationary output-only measurement." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 66 -67: 62 -77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.05.019

2016 doi
[232]

Identification and uncertainty estimation of structural parameters

Koh, C.G. and L.M. See (1994). "Identification and uncertainty estimation of structural parameters." Journal of Engineering Mechanics 120(6). doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733- 9399(1994)120:6(1219)

1994 doi
[233]

Covariance matching based adaptive unscented Kalman filter for direct filtering in INS/GNSS integration

Meng, Y ., S. Gao, Y . Zhong, G. Hu, and A. Subic (2016). "Covariance matching based adaptive unscented Kalman filter for direct filtering in INS/GNSS integration." Acta Astronautica 120: 171 -181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.12.014

2016 doi
[234]

A generalized autocovariance least-squares method for Kalman filter tuning

Åkesson, B.M., J.B. Jørgensen, N.K. Poulsen, and S.B. Jørgensen (2008). "A generalized autocovariance least-squares method for Kalman filter tuning." Journal of Process Control 18(7 -8): 769 -779. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2007.11.003

2008 doi
[235]

Joint input -state estimation in structural dynamics

Maes, K., A. Smyth, G. De Roeck, and G. Lombaert (2016). "Joint input -state estimation in structural dynamics." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 70: 445 -466. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.07.025

2016 doi
[236]

Selection of noise parameters for Kalman filter

Yuen, K. -V ., K.-I. Hoi, and K. -M. Mok (2007). "Selection of noise parameters for Kalman filter." Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 6(1): 49 -56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-007- 0659-9

2007 doi
[237]

Online estimation of noise parameters for Kalman filter

Yuen, K.-V ., P.-F. Liang, and S.-C. Kuok (2013). "Online estimation of noise parameters for Kalman filter." 130 Structural Engineering and Mechanics 47(3): 361-381. doi: https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.47.3.361

2013 doi
[238]

Estimation of time-varying noise parameters for unscented Kalman filter

Yuen, K.-V ., Y .-S. Liu, and W.-J. Yan (2022). "Estimation of time-varying noise parameters for unscented Kalman filter." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 180: 109439. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109439

2022
[239]

Input -state-parameter-noise identification and virtual sensing in dynamical systems: A Bayesian expectation -maximization (BEM) perspective

Teymouri, D., O. Sedehi, L.S. Katafygiotis, and C. Papadimitriou (2023). "Input -state-parameter-noise identification and virtual sensing in dynamical systems: A Bayesian expectation -maximization (BEM) perspective." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 185: 109758. doi: h...

2023
[240]

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.03.001

2017 doi
[241]

Hierarchical Bayesian modeling framework for model updating and robust predictions in structural dynamics using modal features

Jia, X., O. Sedehi, C. Papadimitriou, L.S. Katafygiotis, and B. Moaveni (2022). "Hierarchical Bayesian modeling framework for model updating and robust predictions in structural dynamics using modal features." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 170: 108784. doi: https://...

2022
[242]

Hierarchical Bayesian model updating for structural identification

Behmanesh, I., B. Moaveni, G. Lombaert, and C. Papadimitriou (2015). "Hierarchical Bayesian model updating for structural identification." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 64 -65: 360-376. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.03.026

2015 doi
[243]

Accounting for environmental variability, modeling errors, and parameter estimation uncertainties in structural identification

Behmanesh, I. and B. Moaveni (2016). "Accounting for environmental variability, modeling errors, and parameter estimation uncertainties in structural identification." Journal of Sound and Vibration 374: 92 -

2016
[244]

Modeling error estimation and response prediction of a 10 -story building model through a hierarchical Bayesian model updating framework

Song, M., I. Behmanesh, B. Moaveni, and C. Papadimitriou (2019). "Modeling error estimation and response prediction of a 10 -story building model through a hierarchical Bayesian model updating framework." Frontiers in Built Environment 5: 7. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil....

2019
[246]

Bayesian multilevel model calibration for inverse problems under uncertainty with perfect data

Nagel, J.B. and B. Sudret (2015). "Bayesian multilevel model calibration for inverse problems under uncertainty with perfect data." Journal of Aerospace Information Systems 12(1): 97 -113. doi: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.I010264

2015 doi
[247]

A unified framework for multilevel uncertainty quantification in Bayesian inverse problems

Nagel, J.B. and B. Sudret (2016). "A unified framework for multilevel uncertainty quantification in Bayesian inverse problems." Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 43: 68 -84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.09.007

2016 doi
[248]

Bayesian calibration of hysteretic reduced order structural models for earthquake engineering applications

Patsialis, D., A.P. Kyprioti, and A.A. Taflanidis (2020). "Bayesian calibration of hysteretic reduced order structural models for earthquake engineering applications." Engineering Structures 224: 111204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111204

2020
[249]

Hierarchical Bayesian modeling for calibration and uncertainty quantification of constitutive material models: Application to a uniaxial steel material model

Kurumbhati, M., M. Ramancha, B. Aakash, J. Conte, and K. Lotfizadeh (2024). "Hierarchical Bayesian modeling for calibration and uncertainty quantification of constitutive material models: Application to a uniaxial steel material model." Engineering Struct ures 318: 118409. doi...

2024
[250]

An efficient hierarchical Bayesian framework for multiscale material modeling

Pyrialakos, S., I. Kalogeris, and V . Papadopoulos (2025). "An efficient hierarchical Bayesian framework for multiscale material modeling." Composite Structures 351: 118570. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118570. 131

2025
[251]

Probabilistic hierarchical Bayesian framework for time-domain model updating and robust predictions

Sedehi, O., C. Papadimitriou, and L.S. Katafygiotis (2019). "Probabilistic hierarchical Bayesian framework for time-domain model updating and robust predictions." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 123: 648-673. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.09.041

2019 doi
[252]

On the integration of Physics- Based Machine Learning with hierarchical Bayesian modeling techniques

Sedehi, O., A.M. Kosikova, C. Papadimitriou, and L.S. Katafygiotis (2024). "On the integration of Physics- Based Machine Learning with hierarchical Bayesian modeling techniques." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 208: 111021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.111021

2024
[253]

Nonlinear model updating through a hierarchical Bayesian modeling framework

Jia, X., O. Sedehi, C. Papadimitriou, L.S. Katafygiotis, and B. Moaveni (2022). "Nonlinear model updating through a hierarchical Bayesian modeling framework." Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 392: 114646. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.114646

2022
[254]

Hierarchical Bayesian learning framework for multi -level modeling using multi -level data

Jia, X. and C. Papadimitriou (2022). "Hierarchical Bayesian learning framework for multi -level modeling using multi -level data." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 179: 109179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109179

2022
[255]

Hierarchical Bayesian finite element model updating: Optimal weighting of modal residuals with application to FINO3 offshore platform

Teymouri, D., O. Sedehi, M. Song, B. Moaveni, C. Papadimitriou, and L.S. Katafygiotis (2024). "Hierarchical Bayesian finite element model updating: Optimal weighting of modal residuals with application to FINO3 offshore platform." Mechanical Systems and S ignal Processing 211:...

2024
[256]

Hierarchical Bayesian uncertainty quantification of Finite Element models using modal statistical information

Sedehi, O., C. Papadimitriou, and L.S. Katafygiotis (2022). "Hierarchical Bayesian uncertainty quantification of Finite Element models using modal statistical information." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 179: 109296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109296

2022
[257]

A hierarchical Bayesian framework embedded with an improved orthogonal series expansion for Gaussian processes and fields identification

Ping, M., X. Jia, C. Papadimitriou, X. Han, C. Jiang, and W. Yan (2023). "A hierarchical Bayesian framework embedded with an improved orthogonal series expansion for Gaussian processes and fields identification." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 18 7: 109933. doi: http...

2023
[258]

A hierarchical Bayesian modeling framework for identification of Non -Gaussian processes

Ping, M., X. Jia, C. Papadimitriou, X. Han, C. Jiang, and W. -J. Yan (2024). "A hierarchical Bayesian modeling framework for identification of Non -Gaussian processes." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 208: 110968. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110968

2024
[259]

Learning non-stationary model of prediction errors with hierarchical Bayesian modeling

Ping, M., W.-J. Yan, X. Jia, C. Papadimitriou, and K. -V . Yuen (2025). "Learning non-stationary model of prediction errors with hierarchical Bayesian modeling." Reliability Engineering & System Safety 260: 111012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111012

2025
[260]

Sparse Bayesian learning for structural damage detection using expectation–maximization technique

Hou, R., Y . Xia, X. Zhou, and Y . Huang (2019). "Sparse Bayesian learning for structural damage detection using expectation–maximization technique." Structural Control and Health Monitoring 26(5): e2343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2343

2019 doi
[261]

Laplace approximation in sparse Bayesian learning for structural damage detection

Wang, X., R. Hou, Y . Xia, and X. Zhou (2020). "Laplace approximation in sparse Bayesian learning for structural damage detection." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106701

2020
[262]

Structural damage detection based on variational Bayesian inference and delayed rejection adaptive Metropolis algorithm

Wang, X., R. Hou, Y . Xia, and X. Zhou (2021). "Structural damage detection based on variational Bayesian inference and delayed rejection adaptive Metropolis algorithm." Structural Health Monitoring 20(4): 1518-

2021
[263]

Full Gibbs sampling procedure for Bayesian system identification incorporating sparse Bayesian learning with automatic relevance determination

Huang, Y . and J.L. Beck (2018). "Full Gibbs sampling procedure for Bayesian system identification incorporating sparse Bayesian learning with automatic relevance determination." Computer -Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 33(9): 712-730. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/...

2018 doi
[264]

Bayesian system identification based on hierarchical sparse Bayesian learning and Gibbs sampling with application to structural damage assessment

Huang, Y ., J.L. Beck, and H. Li (2017). "Bayesian system identification based on hierarchical sparse Bayesian learning and Gibbs sampling with application to structural damage assessment." Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 318: 382 -411. doi: 132 https://d...

2017 doi
[265]

Sparse Bayesian learning with model reduction for probabilistic structural damage detection with limited measurements

Li, J., Y . Huang, and P. Asadollahi (2021). "Sparse Bayesian learning with model reduction for probabilistic structural damage detection with limited measurements." Engineering Structures 247: 113183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113183

2021
[266]

Fractal dimension based damage identification incorporating multi-task sparse Bayesian learning

Huang, Y ., H. Li, S. Wu, and Y . Yang (2018). "Fractal dimension based damage identification incorporating multi-task sparse Bayesian learning." Smart Materials and Structures 27(7): 075020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aac248

2018 doi
[267]

Multitask sparse Bayesian learning with applications in structural health monitoring

Huang, Y ., J.L. Beck, and H. Li (2019). "Multitask sparse Bayesian learning with applications in structural health monitoring." Computer -Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 34(9): 732 -754. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12408

2019 doi
[268]

Damage localization and robust diagnostics in guided-wave testing using multitask complex hierarchical sparse Bayesian learning

Xue, S., W. Zhou, J.L. Beck, Y . Huang, and H. Li (2023). "Damage localization and robust diagnostics in guided-wave testing using multitask complex hierarchical sparse Bayesian learning." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 197: 110365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yms...

2023
[269]

Efficient Laplace prior -based sparse Bayesian learning for structural damage identification and uncertainty quantification

Xie, D., Z. -R. Lu, G. Li, J. Liu, and L. Wang (2023). "Efficient Laplace prior -based sparse Bayesian learning for structural damage identification and uncertainty quantification." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 188: 110000. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.110000

2023
[270]

Probabilistic damage identification incorporating approximate Bayesian computation with stochastic response surface

Fang, S.-E., S. Chen, Y .-Q. Lin, and Z.-L. Dong (2019). "Probabilistic damage identification incorporating approximate Bayesian computation with stochastic response surface." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 128: 229-243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.03.044

2019 doi
[271]

A grey Bayesian inference framework for structural damage assessment

Fang, S.-E. and S. Chen (2022). "A grey Bayesian inference framework for structural damage assessment." Structural Control and Health Monitoring 29(3): e2889. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2889

2022 doi
[272]

Dervilis, D

Abdessalem, M.-A.B., N. Dervilis, D. Wagg, and K. Worden (2016). Identification of nonlinear dynamical systems using approximate Bayesian computation based on a sequential Monte Carlo sampler. ISMA, KU Leuven, Departement Werktuigkunde

2016
[273]

Dervilis, D

Abdessalem, A.B., N. Dervilis, D. Wagg, and K. Worden (2019). An Efficient Likelihood -Free Bayesian Computation for Model Selection and Parameter Estimation Applied to Structural Dynamics , Springer International Publishing

2019
[274]

Approximate Bayesian computation by subset simulation using hierarchical state -space models

Vakilzadeh, M.K., Y . Huang, J.L. Beck, and T. Abrahamsson (2017). "Approximate Bayesian computation by subset simulation using hierarchical state -space models." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 84: 2-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.02.024

2017 doi
[275]

Adaptive approximate Bayesian computation by subset simulation for structural model calibration

Barros, J., M. Chiachío, J. Chiachío, and F. Cabanilla (2022). "Adaptive approximate Bayesian computation by subset simulation for structural model calibration." Computer -Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 37(6): 726-745. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12762

2022 doi
[276]

Reduction of Petri net maintenance modeling complexity via approximate Bayesian computation

Chiachío, M., A. Saleh, S. Naybour, J. Chiachío, and J. Andrews (2022). "Reduction of Petri net maintenance modeling complexity via approximate Bayesian computation." Reliability Engineering & System Safety 222: 108365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108365

2022
[277]

Probabilistic updating of structural models for damage assessment using approximate Bayesian computation

Feng, Z., Y . Lin, W. Wang, X. Hua, and Z. Chen (2020). "Probabilistic updating of structural models for damage assessment using approximate Bayesian computation." Sensors 20(11): 3197. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113197

2020 doi
[278]

Identification of piecewise- linear mechanical oscillators via Bayesian model selection and parameter estimation

Nayek, R., A.B. Abdessalem, N. Dervilis, E.J. Cross, and K. Worden (2023). "Identification of piecewise- linear mechanical oscillators via Bayesian model selection and parameter estimation." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 196: 110300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.y...

2023
[279]

Uncertainty quantification metrics with varying statistical information in model calibration and validation

Bi, S., S. Prabhu, S. Cogan, and S. Atamturktur (2017). "Uncertainty quantification metrics with varying statistical information in model calibration and validation." AIAA Journal 55(10): 3570 -3583. doi: 133 https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055733

2017 doi
[280]

Comparison between distance functions for approximate Bayesian computation to perform stochastic model updating and model validation under limited data

Lye, A., S. Ferson, and S. Xiao (2024). "Comparison between distance functions for approximate Bayesian computation to perform stochastic model updating and model validation under limited data." ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Sys tems, Part A: Civil E...

2024 doi
[281]

Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) method for estimating parameters of the gamma process using noisy data

Hazra, I., M.D. Pandey, and N. Manzana (2020). "Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) method for estimating parameters of the gamma process using noisy data." Reliability Engineering & System Safety 198: 106780. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106780

2020
[282]

The role of the Bhattacharyya distance in stochastic model updating

Bi, S., M. Broggi, and M. Beer (2019). "The role of the Bhattacharyya distance in stochastic model updating." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 117: 437 -452. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.08.017

2019 doi
[283]

Distribution -free stochastic model updating of dynamic systems with parameter dependencies

Kitahara, M., S. Bi, M. Broggi, and M. Beer (2022). "Distribution -free stochastic model updating of dynamic systems with parameter dependencies." Structural Safety 97: 102227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2022.102227

2022
[284]

Enriching stochastic model updating metrics: An efficient Bayesian approach using Bray -Curtis distance and an adaptive binning algorithm

Zhao, W., L. Yang, C. Dang, R. Rocchetta, M. Valdebenito, and D. Moens (2022). "Enriching stochastic model updating metrics: An efficient Bayesian approach using Bray -Curtis distance and an adaptive binning algorithm." Mechanical Systems and Signal Proces sing 171: 108889. do...

2022
[285]

Rytter, A. (1993). Vibration based inspection of civil engineering structures, PhD thesis, Aalborg University

1993
[286]

Vibration-based damage detection for structural connections using incomplete modal data by Bayesian approach and model reduction technique

Yin, T., Q.-H. Jiang, and K.-V . Yuen (2017). "Vibration-based damage detection for structural connections using incomplete modal data by Bayesian approach and model reduction technique." Engineering Structures 132: 260-277. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.035

2017 doi
[287]

Structural damage localization and quantification based on additional virtual masses and Bayesian theory

Hou, J., Y . An, S. Wang, Z. Wang, Ł. Jankowski, and J. Ou (2018). "Structural damage localization and quantification based on additional virtual masses and Bayesian theory." Journal of Engineering Mechanics 144(10). doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001523

2018
[288]

Application of transmissibility matrix and random matrix to Bayesian system identification with response measurements only

Yan, W.-J. and L.S. Katafygiotis (2016). "Application of transmissibility matrix and random matrix to Bayesian system identification with response measurements only." Smart Materials and Structures 25(10): 105017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/10/105017

2016 doi
[289]

Sparse Bayesian learning for structural damage detection under varying temperature conditions

Hou, R., X. Wang, Q. Xia, and Y . Xia (2020). "Sparse Bayesian learning for structural damage detection under varying temperature conditions." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 145: 106965. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106965

2020
[290]

A Bayesian machine learning approach for online detection of railway wheel defects using track -side monitoring

Ni, Y .-Q. and Q.-H. Zhang (2021). "A Bayesian machine learning approach for online detection of railway wheel defects using track -side monitoring." Structural Health Monitoring 20(4): 1536 -1550. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720921772

2021 doi
[291]

Sparse Bayesian learning for damage identification using nonlinear models: Application to weld fractures of steel‐frame buildings

Filippitzis, F., M.D. Kohler, T.H. Heaton, and J.L. Beck (2022). "Sparse Bayesian learning for damage identification using nonlinear models: Application to weld fractures of steel‐frame buildings." Structural Control and Health Monitoring 29(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2870

2022 doi
[292]

Towards high-precision data modeling of SHM measurements using an improved sparse Bayesian learning scheme with strong generalization abil ity

Wang, Q.-A., Y . Dai, Z.-G. Ma, J.-F. Wang, J.-F. Lin, Y .-Q. Ni, W.-X. Ren, J. Jiang, X. Yang, and J.-R. Yan (2024). "Towards high-precision data modeling of SHM measurements using an improved sparse Bayesian learning scheme with strong generalization abil ity." Structural He...

2024 doi
[293]

Guided wave -based characterisation of cracks in pipes utilising approximate Bayesian computation

Zeng, Z., M. Gao, C.T. Ng, and A.H. Sheikh (2023). "Guided wave -based characterisation of cracks in pipes utilising approximate Bayesian computation." Thin -Walled Structures 192: 111138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.111138. 134

2023
[294]

A Bayesian approach for damage localization in plate-like structures using Lamb waves

Yan, G. (2013). "A Bayesian approach for damage localization in plate-like structures using Lamb waves." Smart Materials and Structures 22(3): 035012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/3/035012

2013 doi
[295]

Guided wave -based identification of multiple cracks in beams using a Bayesian approach

He, S. and C. -T. Ng (2017). "Guided wave -based identification of multiple cracks in beams using a Bayesian approach." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 84: 324 -345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.07.013

2017 doi
[296]

A multilevel Bayesian method for ultrasound-based damage identification in composite laminates

Chiachío, J., N. Bochud, M. Chiachío, S. Cantero, and G. Rus (2017). "A multilevel Bayesian method for ultrasound-based damage identification in composite laminates." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 88: 462-477. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.09.035

2017 doi
[297]

A probabilistic crack size quantification method using in -situ Lamb wave test and Bayesian updating

Yang, J., J. He, X. Guan, D. Wang, H. Chen, W. Zhang, and Y . Liu (2016). "A probabilistic crack size quantification method using in -situ Lamb wave test and Bayesian updating." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 78: 118-133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.06.017

2016 doi
[298]

Quantifying uncertainty in parameter estimates of ultrasonic inspection system using Bayesian computational framework

Abdessalem, A.B., F. Jenson, and P. Calmon (2018). "Quantifying uncertainty in parameter estimates of ultrasonic inspection system using Bayesian computational framework." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 109: 89-110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.02.037

2018 doi
[299]

Bayesian inference for damage identification based on analytical probabilistic model of scattering coefficient estimators and ultrafast wave scattering simulation scheme

Yan, W.-J., D. Chronopoulos, C. Papadimitriou, S. Cantero -Chinchilla, and G. -S. Zhu (2020). "Bayesian inference for damage identification based on analytical probabilistic model of scattering coefficient estimators and ultrafast wave scattering simulation scheme." Journal of...

2020
[300]

Chronopoulos, S

Yan, W.-J., D. Chronopoulos, S. Cantero -Chinchilla, K. -V . Yuen, and C. Papadimitriou (2020). "A fast Bayesian inference scheme for identification of local structural properties of layered composites based on wave and finite element -assisted metamodeling s trategy and ultra...

2020
[301]

Two-stage Bayesian inference for rail model updating and crack detection with ultrasonic guided wave measurements and advanced wave propagation simulation

Zhan, J.-Z., W.-J. Yan, W. Wu, K.-V . Yuen, and D. Chronopoulos (2025). "Two-stage Bayesian inference for rail model updating and crack detection with ultrasonic guided wave measurements and advanced wave propagation simulation." Journal of Sound and Vibra tion 599: 118914. do...

2025
[302]

Bayesian damage localization and identification based on a transient wave propagation model for composite beam structures

Cantero-Chinchilla, S., M.K. Malik, D. Chronopoulos, and J. Chiachío (2021). "Bayesian damage localization and identification based on a transient wave propagation model for composite beam structures." Composite Structures 267: 113849. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct...

2021
[303]

Damage quantification and identification in structural joints through ultrasonic guided wave -based features and an inverse Bayesian scheme

Wu, W., S. Cantero -Chinchilla, W. -j. Yan, M. Chiachio Ruano, R. Remenyte -Prescott, and D. Chronopoulos (2023). "Damage quantification and identification in structural joints through ultrasonic guided wave -based features and an inverse Bayesian scheme." Se nsors 23(8): 4160...

2023 doi
[304]

A Bayesian approach for sparse flaw detection from noisy signals for ultrasonic NDT

Wu, B., Y . Huang, and S. Krishnaswamy (2017). "A Bayesian approach for sparse flaw detection from noisy signals for ultrasonic NDT." NDT & E International 85: 76 -85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.10.005

2017 doi
[305]

Efficient Lamb-wave based damage imaging using multiple sparse Bayesian learning in composite laminates

Zhang, H., J. Hua, F. Gao, and J. Lin (2020). "Efficient Lamb-wave based damage imaging using multiple sparse Bayesian learning in composite laminates." NDT & E International 116: 102277. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102277

2020
[306]

Sparse Bayesian learning approach for propagation distance recognition and damage localization in plate -like structures using guided waves

Zhao, M., W. Zhou, Y . Huang, and H. Li (2021). "Sparse Bayesian learning approach for propagation distance recognition and damage localization in plate -like structures using guided waves." Structural Health Monitoring 20(1): 3-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720902277

2021 doi
[307]

Multivariate sparse Bayesian learning for guided wave‐ based multidamage localization in plate‐like structures

Zhao, M., Y . Huang, W. Zhou, and H. Li (2022). "Multivariate sparse Bayesian learning for guided wave‐ based multidamage localization in plate‐like structures." Structural Control and Health Monitoring 29(4). 135 doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2923

2022 doi
[308]

A Bayesian approach for damage assessment in welded structures using Lamb -wave surrogate models and minimal sensing

Fakih, M.A., M. Chiachío, J. Chiachío, and S. Mustapha (2022). "A Bayesian approach for damage assessment in welded structures using Lamb -wave surrogate models and minimal sensing." NDT & E International 128: 102626. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2022.102626

2022
[309]

Sivia, D. and J. Skilling (2006). Data Analysis: A Bayesian Tutorial, OUP Oxford

2006
[310]

Structural model updating and health monitoring with incomplete modal data using Gibbs sampler

Ching, J., M. Muto, and J.L. Beck (2006). "Structural model updating and health monitoring with incomplete modal data using Gibbs sampler." Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 21(4): 242-257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2006.00432.x

2006
[311]

Calculation of posterior probabilities for Bayesian model class assessment and averaging from posterior samples based on dynamic system data

Cheung, S.H. and J.L. Beck (2010). "Calculation of posterior probabilities for Bayesian model class assessment and averaging from posterior samples based on dynamic system data." Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 25(5): 304-321. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j...

2010
[312]

Bayesian updating and model class selection with subset simulation

DiazDelaO, F., A. Garbuno -Inigo, S. Au, and I. Yoshida (2017). "Bayesian updating and model class selection with subset simulation." Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 317: 1102 -

2017
[313]

Model selection and parameter estimation in structural dynamics using approximate Bayesian computation

Abdessalem, A.B., N. Dervilis, D. Wagg, and K. Worden (2018). "Model selection and parameter estimation in structural dynamics using approximate Bayesian computation." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 99: 306-325. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.017

2018 doi
[314]

Self‐calibrating Bayesian real‐time system identification

Yuen, K.V ., S.C. Kuok, and L. Dong (2019). "Self‐calibrating Bayesian real‐time system identification." Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 34(9): 806 -821. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12441

2019 doi
[315]

Ditlevsen, O. and H.O. Madsen (1996). Structural Reliability Methods, Wiley

1996
[316]

Der Kiureghian, A. (2022). Structural and System Reliability, Cambridge University Press

2022
[317]

Updating robust reliability using structural test data

Papadimitriou, C., J.L. Beck, and L.S. Katafygiotis (2001). "Updating robust reliability using structural test data." Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 16(2): 103 -113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266- 8920(00)00012-6

2001 doi
[318]

Strain monitoring based bridge reliability assessment using parametric Bayesian mixture model

Ni, Y . and R. Chen (2021). "Strain monitoring based bridge reliability assessment using parametric Bayesian mixture model." Engineering Structures 226: 111406. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111406

2021
[319]

An efficient analytical Bayesian method for reliability and system response updating based on Laplace and inverse first -order reliability computations

Guan, X., J. He, R. Jha, and Y . Liu (2012). "An efficient analytical Bayesian method for reliability and system response updating based on Laplace and inverse first -order reliability computations." Reliability Engineering System Safety 97(1): 1-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.10...

2012 doi
[320]

The use of updated robust reliability measures in stochastic dynamical systems

Jensen, H., C. Vergara, C. Papadimitriou, and E. Millas (2013). "The use of updated robust reliability measures in stochastic dynamical systems." Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 267: 293-317. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2013.08.015

2013 doi
[321]

Π4U: A high performance computing framework for Bayesian uncertainty quantification of complex models

Hadjidoukas, P.E., P. Angelikopoulos, C. Papadimitriou, and P. Koumoutsakos (2015). " Π4U: A high performance computing framework for Bayesian uncertainty quantification of complex models." Journal of Computational Physics 284: 1-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.006

2015 doi
[322]

Real -time reliability estimation for serviceability limit states in structures with uncertain dynamic excitation and incomplete output data

Ching, J. and J. Beck (2007). "Real -time reliability estimation for serviceability limit states in structures with uncertain dynamic excitation and incomplete output data." Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 22(1): 50-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2006.05.006

2007 doi
[323]

A new stochastic simulation algorithm for updating robust reliability of linear structural dynamic systems subjected to future Gaussian excitations

Bansal, S. and S.H. Cheung (2017). "A new stochastic simulation algorithm for updating robust reliability of linear structural dynamic systems subjected to future Gaussian excitations." Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics Engineering 326: 481-504. doi: https://doi.org/10.101...

2017 doi
[324]

Bayesian analysis of rare events

Straub, D., I. Papaioannou, and W. Betz (2016). "Bayesian analysis of rare events." Journal of 136 Computational Physics 314: 538-556. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.03.018

2016 doi
[325]

New perspective on reliability updating with equality information under line sampling

Wang, J., Z. Lu, L. Wang, and K. Feng (2023). "New perspective on reliability updating with equality information under line sampling." Structural Safety 103: 102347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2023.102347

2023
[327]

Bayesian updating and marginal likelihood estimation by cross entropy based importance sampling

Engel, M., O. Kanjilal, I. Papaioannou, and D. Straub (2023). "Bayesian updating and marginal likelihood estimation by cross entropy based importance sampling." Journal of Computational Physics 473: 111746. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111746

2023
[329]

Hierarchical Bayesian modeling for uncertainty quantification and reliability updating using data

Jia, X., W. Hou, and C. Papadimitriou (2024). "Hierarchical Bayesian modeling for uncertainty quantification and reliability updating using data." Journal of Reliability Science and Engineering. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/3050-2454/adc580

2024 doi
[330]

A review of data‐driven discovery for dynamic systems

North, J.S., C.K. Wikle, and E.M. Schliep (2023). "A review of data‐driven discovery for dynamic systems." International Statistical Review. doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.10663

2023 doi arXiv
[331]

Machine learning-based methods in structural reliability analysis: A review

Afshari, S.S., F. Enayatollahi, X. Xu, and X. Liang (2022). "Machine learning-based methods in structural reliability analysis: A review." Reliability Engineering & System Safety 219: 108223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108223

2022
[332]

Data -driven structural health monitoring and damage detection through deep learning: State -of-the-art review

Azimi, M., A.D. Eslamlou, and G. Pekcan (2020). "Data -driven structural health monitoring and damage detection through deep learning: State -of-the-art review." Sensors 20(10): 2778. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102778

2020 doi
[333]

Unsupervised learning methods for data -driven vibration- based structural health monitoring: a review

Eltouny, K., M. Gomaa, and X. Liang (2023). "Unsupervised learning methods for data -driven vibration- based structural health monitoring: a review." Sensors 23(6): 3290. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063290

2023 doi
[334]

Deep learning and process understanding for data -driven Earth system science

Reichstein, M., G. Camps -Valls, B. Stevens, M. Jung, J. Denzler, N. Carvalhais, and f. Prabhat (2019). "Deep learning and process understanding for data -driven Earth system science." Nature 566(7743): 195 -

2019
[335]

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1

doi
[336]

Bayesian nonparametric models

Orbanz, P. and Y .W. Teh (2010). "Bayesian nonparametric models." Encyclopedia of Machine Learning 1: 81-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_66

2010 doi
[337]

A tutorial on Bayesian nonparametric models

Gershman, S.J. and D.M. Blei (2012). "A tutorial on Bayesian nonparametric models." Journal of Mathematical Psychology 56(1): 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1106.2697

2012 doi arXiv
[338]

Semi‐supervised clustering methods

Bair, E. (2013). "Semi‐supervised clustering methods." Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 5(5): 349-361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1270

2013 doi
[339]

Semi-supervised damage classification with constrained Bayesian nonparametric mixture models and transmissibility -guided knowledge transfer

Mei, L.-F., W.-J. Yan, and K. -V . Yuen (2025). "Semi-supervised damage classification with constrained Bayesian nonparametric mixture models and transmissibility -guided knowledge transfer." Available at SSRN 5170306. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5170306

2025 doi
[340]

A Bayesian non - parametric clustering approach for semi-supervised structural health monitoring

Rogers, T., K. Worden, R. Fuentes, N. Dervilis, U. Tygesen, and E. Cross (2019). "A Bayesian non - parametric clustering approach for semi-supervised structural health monitoring." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 119: 100-119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.09.013

2019 doi
[341]

Structural novelty detection based on Laplace asymptotic expansion of the Bhattacharyya distance of transmissibility function and Bayesian resampling scheme

Mei, L.-F., W.-J. Yan, K.-V . Yuen, and M. Beer (2022). "Structural novelty detection based on Laplace asymptotic expansion of the Bhattacharyya distance of transmissibility function and Bayesian resampling scheme." Journal of Sound and Vibration: 117277. doi: https://doi.org/...

2022
[342]

Structure damage identification in dams using sparse polynomial chaos expansion combined with hybrid K -means clustering optimizer and genetic algorithm

Li, Y ., H.-L. Minh, S. Khatir, T. Sang -To, T. Cuong-Le, C. MaoSen, and M.A. Wahab (2023). "Structure damage identification in dams using sparse polynomial chaos expansion combined with hybrid K -means clustering optimizer and genetic algorithm." Engineerin g Structures 283: ...

2023
[343]

Linear approaches to modeling nonlinearities in long-term monitoring of bridges

Figueiredo, E. and E. Cross (2013). "Linear approaches to modeling nonlinearities in long-term monitoring of bridges." Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring 3: 187-194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349- 013-0038-3

2013 doi
[344]

Transmissibility -based damage detection with hierarchical clustering enhanced by multivariate probabilistic distance accommodating uncertainty and correlation

Mei, L. -F., W.-J. Yan, K. -V . Yuen, W.-X. Ren, and M. Beer (2023). "Transmissibility -based damage detection with hierarchical clustering enhanced by multivariate probabilistic distance accommodating uncertainty and correlation." Mechanical Systems and Sign al Processing 203...

2023
[345]

Dirichlet process

Teh, Y .W. (2010). "Dirichlet process." Encyclopedia of Machine Learning 1063: 280 -287. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1_219

2010 doi
[346]

A constructive definition of Dirichlet priors

Sethuraman, J. (1994). "A constructive definition of Dirichlet priors." Statistica Sinica: 639 -650. doi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24305538

1994
[347]

Chen, R. (2019). Parametric and nonparametric bayesian mixture models for bridge condition assessment, Ph.D. Thesis, Hong Kong Polytechnic University

2019
[348]

An adaptive learning damage estimation method for structural health monitoring

Chakraborty, D., N. Kovvali, A. Papandreou -Suppappola, and A. Chattopadhyay (2015). "An adaptive learning damage estimation method for structural health monitoring." Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 26(2): 125-143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X14522531

2015 doi
[349]

Murphy, K.P. (2012). Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective, MIT press

2012
[350]

A Gaussian processes-based approach for damage detection of concrete structure using temperature-induced strain

Fu, W., B. Sun, H. Wan, Y . Luo, and W. Zhao (2022). "A Gaussian processes-based approach for damage detection of concrete structure using temperature-induced strain." Engineering Structures 268: 114740. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114740

2022
[351]

Crack damage identification of a thick composite sandwich structure based on Gaussian Processes classification

Liu, Z., M. Ardabilian, A. Zine, and M. Ichchou (2021). "Crack damage identification of a thick composite sandwich structure based on Gaussian Processes classification." Composite Structures 255: 112825. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112825

2021
[352]

Damage quantification using transfer component analysis combined with Gaussian process regression

Omori Yano, M., S. da Silva, E. Figueiredo, and L.G. Giacon Villani (2023). "Damage quantification using transfer component analysis combined with Gaussian process regression." Structural Health Monitoring 22(2): 1290-1307. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217221094500

2023 doi
[353]

Melo, J. (2012). Gaussian processes for regression: a tutorial. Technical Report

2012
[354]

Analytical uncertainty quantification approach based on adaptive generalized co‐Gaussian process model

Wan, H.P., Z.N. Zhang, Y . Luo, W.X. Ren, and M.D. Todd (2022). "Analytical uncertainty quantification approach based on adaptive generalized co‐Gaussian process model." International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 123(24): 6032-6051. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002...

2022 doi
[355]

On the use of the GP-NARX model for predicting hysteresis effects of bolted joint structures

de Oliveira Teloli, R., L.G. Villani, S. da Silva, and M.D. Todd (2021). "On the use of the GP-NARX model for predicting hysteresis effects of bolted joint structures." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 159: 107751. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107751

2021
[356]

Characterization of dynamic response of structures with uncertainty by using Gaussian processes

Xia, Z. and J. Tang (2013). "Characterization of dynamic response of structures with uncertainty by using Gaussian processes." Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 135(5). doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023998

2013 doi
[357]

Vibration -based structural damage detection using Twin Gaussian Process (TGP)

Talaei, S., A. Beitollahi, S. Moshirabadi, and M. Fallahian (2018). "Vibration -based structural damage detection using Twin Gaussian Process (TGP)." Structures 16: 10 -19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.08.006

2018 doi
[358]

A Gaussian process –based approach to cope with uncertainty in structural health monitoring

Teimouri, H., A.S. Milani, J. Loeppky, and R. Seethaler (2017). "A Gaussian process –based approach to cope with uncertainty in structural health monitoring." Structural Health Monitoring 16(2): 174 -184. doi: 138 https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921716669722

2017 doi
[359]

West, M. and J. Harrison (2006). Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models, Springer Science & Business Media

2006
[360]

Modeling and forecasting of temperature-induced strain of a long -span bridge using an improved Bayesian dynamic linear model

Wang, H., Y .-M. Zhang, J.-X. Mao, H.-P. Wan, T.-Y . Tao, and Q.-X. Zhu (2019). "Modeling and forecasting of temperature-induced strain of a long -span bridge using an improved Bayesian dynamic linear model." Engineering Structures 192: 220-232. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j....

2019 doi
[361]

Anomaly detection of structural health monitoring data using the maximum likelihood estimation -based Bayesian dynamic linear model

Zhang, Y .-M., H. Wang, H. -P. Wan, J.-X. Mao, and Y .-C. Xu (2021). "Anomaly detection of structural health monitoring data using the maximum likelihood estimation -based Bayesian dynamic linear model." Structural Health Monitoring 20(6): 2936-2952. doi: https://doi.org/10.11...

2021 doi
[362]

Combinatorial Bayesian dynamic linear models of bridge monitored data and reliability prediction

Fan, X. and Y . Liu (2016). "Combinatorial Bayesian dynamic linear models of bridge monitored data and reliability prediction." Chinese Journal of Engineering 2016(1): 3648126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3648126

2016 doi
[363]

Bridge extreme stress prediction based on Bayesian dynamic linear models and non - uniform sampling

Fan, X. (2017). "Bridge extreme stress prediction based on Bayesian dynamic linear models and non - uniform sampling." Structural Health Monitoring 16(3): 253 -261. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921716688166

2017 doi
[364]

Bayesian dynamic linear models for structural health monitoring

Goulet, J.A. (2017). "Bayesian dynamic linear models for structural health monitoring." Structural Control and Health Monitoring 24(12): e2035. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2035

2017 doi
[365]

Bayesian dynamic forecasting of structural strain response using structural health monitoring data

Wang, Y . and Y . Ni (2020). "Bayesian dynamic forecasting of structural strain response using structural health monitoring data." Structural Control and Health Monitoring 27(8): e2575. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2575

2020 doi
[366]

Deep learning

LeCun, Y ., Y . Bengio, and G. Hinton (2015). "Deep learning." nature 521(7553): 436 -444. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

2015 doi
[367]

Denker, J. and Y . LeCun (1990). Transforming neural -net output levels to probability distributions . Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

1990
[368]

Neal, R.M. (1996). Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks, Springer Science & Business Media

1996
[369]

Barber, D. and C.M. Bishop (1998). Ensemble learning in Bayesian neural networks . Nato ASI Series F Computer and Systems Sciences

1998
[370]

Gal, Y . and Z. Ghahramani (2015). Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: Insights and applications. Deep Learning Workshop, International Conference on Machine Learning

2015
[371]

Gal, Y . and Z. Ghahramani (2016). Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR

2016
[372]

Improving neural networks by preventing co -adaptation of feature detectors

Hinton, G.E., N. Srivastava, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R.R. Salakhutdinov (2012). "Improving neural networks by preventing co -adaptation of feature detectors." arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580. doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1207.0580

2012 doi arXiv
[373]

Pleiss, Y

Guo, C., G. Pleiss, Y . Sun, and K.Q. Weinberger (2017). On calibration of modern neural networks . International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR

2017
[375]

Deep Bayesian neural networks for damage quantification in miter gates of navigation locks

Hoskere, V ., B. Eick, B.F. Spencer Jr, M.D. Smith, and S.D. Foltz (2020). "Deep Bayesian neural networks for damage quantification in miter gates of navigation locks." Structural Health Monitoring 19(5): 1391 -

2020
[376]

Uncertainty utilization in fault detection using Bayesian deep learning

Maged, A. and M. Xie (2022). "Uncertainty utilization in fault detection using Bayesian deep learning." Journal of Manufacturing Systems 64: 316-329. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.07.002

2022 doi
[377]

Railway tie deterioration interval estimation 139 with Bayesian deep learning and data -driven maintenance strategy

He, Q., H. Sun, M. Dobhal, C. Li, and R. Mohammadi (2022). "Railway tie deterioration interval estimation 139 with Bayesian deep learning and data -driven maintenance strategy." Construction and Building Materials 342: 128040. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128040

2022
[378]

Bengio, and A

Goodfellow, I., Y . Bengio, and A. Courville (2016). Deep Learning, MIT press

2016
[379]

Probabilistic seismic response prediction of three -dimensional structures based on Bayesian convolutional neural network

Wang, T., H. Li, M. Noori, R. Ghiasi, S.-C. Kuok, and W.A. Altabey (2022). "Probabilistic seismic response prediction of three -dimensional structures based on Bayesian convolutional neural network." Sensors 22(10): 3775. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103775

2022 doi
[380]

Dual Bayesian inference for risk‐informed vibration‐based damage diagnosis

Sajedi, S. and X. Liang (2021). "Dual Bayesian inference for risk‐informed vibration‐based damage diagnosis." Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 36(9): 1168 -1184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12642

2021 doi
[381]

A comprehensive guide to bayesian convolutional neural network with variational inference

Shridhar, K., F. Laumann, and M. Liwicki (2019). "A comprehensive guide to bayesian convolutional neural network with variational inference." arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.02731. doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.02731

2019 doi arXiv
[382]

Towards trustworthy machine fault diagnosis: A probabilistic Bayesian deep learning framework

Zhou, T., T. Han, and E.L. Droguett (2022). "Towards trustworthy machine fault diagnosis: A probabilistic Bayesian deep learning framework." Reliability Engineering & System Safety 224: 108525. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108525

2022
[383]

Uncertainty‐assisted deep vision structural health monitoring

Sajedi, S.O. and X. Liang (2021). "Uncertainty‐assisted deep vision structural health monitoring." Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 36(2): 126 -142. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12580

2021 doi
[384]

Bayesian recurrent neural networks

Fortunato, M., C. Blundell, and O. Vinyals (2017). "Bayesian recurrent neural networks." arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.02798. doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.02798

2017 doi arXiv
[385]

A Bayesian deep learning approach for random vibration analysis of bridges subjected to vehicle dynamic interaction

Li, H., T. Wang, and G. Wu (2022). "A Bayesian deep learning approach for random vibration analysis of bridges subjected to vehicle dynamic interaction." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 170: 108799. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108799

2022
[386]

A probabilistic Bayesian recurrent neural network for remaining useful life prognostics considering epistemic and aleatory uncertainties

Caceres, J., D. Gonzalez, T. Zhou, and E.L. Droguett (2021). "A probabilistic Bayesian recurrent neural network for remaining useful life prognostics considering epistemic and aleatory uncertainties." Structural Control and Health Monitoring 28(10): e2811. doi: https://doi.org...

2021 doi
[387]

A Bayesian augmented -learning framework for spectral uncertainty quantification of incomplete records of stochastic processes

Chen, Y ., E. Patelli, B. Edwards, and M. Beer (2023). "A Bayesian augmented -learning framework for spectral uncertainty quantification of incomplete records of stochastic processes." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 200: 110573. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2...

2023
[388]

Streaming variational inference -empowered Bayesian nonparametric clustering for online structural damage detection with transmissibility function

Mei, L. -F., W.-J. Yan, K. -V . Yuen, and M. Beer (2025). "Streaming variational inference -empowered Bayesian nonparametric clustering for online structural damage detection with transmissibility function." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 222: 111767. doi: https://do...

2025
[389]

A nonparametric Bayesian approach for bridge reliability assessment using structural health monitoring data

Chen, R. and Y .-Q. Ni (2023). "A nonparametric Bayesian approach for bridge reliability assessment using structural health monitoring data." Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9271433

2023 doi
[390]

Gaussian process models for mitigation of operational variability in the structural health monitoring of wind turbines

Avendano-Valencia, L.D., E.N. Chatzi, and D. Tcherniak (2020). "Gaussian process models for mitigation of operational variability in the structural health monitoring of wind turbines." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 142: 106686. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2...

2020
[391]

Uncertainty quantification in structural dynamic analysis using two -level Gaussian processes and Bayesian inference

Zhou, K. and J. Tang (2018). "Uncertainty quantification in structural dynamic analysis using two -level Gaussian processes and Bayesian inference." Journal of Sound and Vibration 412: 95 -115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.09.034

2018 doi
[392]

Kriging‐based reliability analysis for a multi‐output structural system with multiple response Gaussian process

Qian, H.M., J. Wei, H.Z. Huang, Q. Dong, and Y .F. Li (2023). "Kriging‐based reliability analysis for a multi‐output structural system with multiple response Gaussian process." Quality and Reliability Engineering International 39(5): 1622-1638. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre...

2023 doi
[393]

Transfer learning Gaussian process regression surrogate model with explainability for structural reliability analysis under variation in uncertainties

Saida, T. and M. Nishio (2023). "Transfer learning Gaussian process regression surrogate model with explainability for structural reliability analysis under variation in uncertainties." Computers & Structures 281: 107014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2023.107014

2023
[394]

Real-time defect detection of high -speed train wheels by using Bayesian forecasting and dynamic model

Wang, Y ., Y . Ni, and X. Wang (2020). "Real-time defect detection of high -speed train wheels by using Bayesian forecasting and dynamic model." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 139: 106654. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106654

2020
[395]

An efficient algorithm for architecture design of Bayesian neural network in structural model updating

Yin, T. and H.P. Zhu (2020). "An efficient algorithm for architecture design of Bayesian neural network in structural model updating." Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 35(4): 354 -372. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12492

2020 doi
[396]

A Bayesian neural network approach for probabilistic model updating using incomplete modal data

Zhang, Y .M., H. Wang, and J.X. Mao (2022). "A Bayesian neural network approach for probabilistic model updating using incomplete modal data." Structural Control and Health Monitoring 29(10): e3030. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.3030

2022 doi
[397]

Estimation of railway track longitudinal irregularity using vehicle response with information compression and Bayesian deep learning

Li, C., Q. He, and P. Wang (2022). "Estimation of railway track longitudinal irregularity using vehicle response with information compression and Bayesian deep learning." Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 37(10): 1260-1276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12802

2022 doi
[398]

Deep variational auto- encoders: A promising tool for dimensionality reduction and ball bearing elements fault diagnosis

San Martin, G., E. Lopez Droguett, V . Meruane, and M. das Chagas Moura (2019). "Deep variational auto- encoders: A promising tool for dimensionality reduction and ball bearing elements fault diagnosis." Structural Health Monitoring 18(4): 1092-1128. doi: https://doi.org/10.11...

2019 doi
[399]

An unsupervised structural health monitoring framework based on variational autoencoders and hidden Markov models

Coraça, E.M., J.V . Ferreira, and E.G. Nóbrega (2023). "An unsupervised structural health monitoring framework based on variational autoencoders and hidden Markov models." Reliability Engineering & System Safety 231: 109025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.109025

2023
[400]

Uncertainty‐aware structural damage warning system using deep variational composite neural networks

Eltouny, K.A. and X. Liang (2023). "Uncertainty‐aware structural damage warning system using deep variational composite neural networks." Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3892

2023 doi
[401]

Probabilistic evaluation of seismic responses using deep learning method

Kim, T., J. Song, and O. -S. Kwon (2020). "Probabilistic evaluation of seismic responses using deep learning method." Structural Safety 84: 101913. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.101913

2020
[402]

Probabilistic spatiotemporal wind speed forecasting based on a variational Bayesian deep learning model

Liu, Y ., H. Qin, Z. Zhang, S. Pei, Z. Jiang, Z. Feng, and J. Zhou (2020). "Probabilistic spatiotemporal wind speed forecasting based on a variational Bayesian deep learning model." Applied Energy 260: 114259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114259

2020
[403]

Physics -guided deep markov models for learning nonlinear dynamical systems with uncertainty

Liu, W., Z. Lai, K. Bacsa, and E. Chatzi (2022). "Physics -guided deep markov models for learning nonlinear dynamical systems with uncertainty." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 178: 109276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109276

2022
[404]

Neural extended Kalman filters for learning and predicting dynamics of structural systems

Liu, W., Z. Lai, K. Bacsa, and E. Chatzi (2022). "Neural extended Kalman filters for learning and predicting dynamics of structural systems." Structural Health Monitoring 23(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217231179912

2022 doi
[405]

Probabilistic method for time -varying reliability analysis of structure via variational Bayesian neural network

Dang, H.V ., R. Trestian, T. Bui-Tien, and H.X. Nguyen (2021). "Probabilistic method for time -varying reliability analysis of structure via variational Bayesian neural network." Structures 34: 3703 -3715. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.069

2021 doi
[406]

Conditional variational autoencoders for probabilistic wind turbine blade fatigue estimation using Supervisory, Control, and Data Acquisition data

Mylonas, C., I. Abdallah, and E. Chatzi (2021). "Conditional variational autoencoders for probabilistic wind turbine blade fatigue estimation using Supervisory, Control, and Data Acquisition data." Wind Energy 24(10): 1122-1139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2621

2021 doi
[407]

Maghrebi, A

Jiang, P., M. Maghrebi, A. Crosky, and S. Saydam (2017). Unsupervised deep learning for data -driven reliability and risk analysis of engineered systems. Handbook of Neural Computation, Elsevier: 417-431

2017
[408]

A Bayesian approach for condition assessment and damage alarm 141 of bridge expansion joints using long-term structural health monitoring data

Ni, Y ., Y . Wang, and C. Zhang (2020). "A Bayesian approach for condition assessment and damage alarm 141 of bridge expansion joints using long-term structural health monitoring data." Engineering Structures 212: 110520. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110520

2020
[409]

A Bayesian probabilistic approach for acoustic emission‐based rail condition assessment

Wang, J., X.Z. Liu, and Y .Q. Ni (2018). "A Bayesian probabilistic approach for acoustic emission‐based rail condition assessment." Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 33(1): 21 -34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12316

2018 doi
[410]

Uncertainty-aware structural anomaly detection under varying environmental conditions based on Bayesian nonparametric density estimation – guided probabilistic damage index

Mei, L.-F., W.-J. Yan, K.-V . Y uen, Q. Wang, and H. Wang (2025). "Uncertainty-aware structural anomaly detection under varying environmental conditions based on Bayesian nonparametric density estimation – guided probabilistic damage index." ASCE -ASME Journal of Risk and Unce...

2025 doi
[411]

Interval model updating with irreducible uncertainty using the kriging predictor

Khodaparast, H.H., J.E. Mottershead, and K.J. Badcock (2011). "Interval model updating with irreducible uncertainty using the kriging predictor." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 25(4): 1204-1226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.10.009

2011 doi
[412]

Investigation of uncertainty changes in model outputs for finite -element model updating using structural health monitoring data

Erdogan, Y .S., M. Gul, F.N. Catbas, and P.G. Bakir (2014). "Investigation of uncertainty changes in model outputs for finite -element model updating using structural health monitoring data." Journal of Structural Engineering 140(11): 04014078. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(AS...

2014 doi
[413]

A residual-based Gaussian process model framework for finite element model updating

Wan, H.-P. and W.-X. Ren (2015). "A residual-based Gaussian process model framework for finite element model updating." Computers & Structures 156: 149 -159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.05.003

2015 doi
[414]

Structural model updating using adaptive multi -response Gaussian process meta-modeling

Zhou, K. and J. Tang (2021). "Structural model updating using adaptive multi -response Gaussian process meta-modeling." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 147: 107121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107121

2021
[415]

Model updating of rotor system based on the adaptive Gaussian process model using unbalance response

He, J., D. Jiang, D. Zhang, Z. Tang, and Q. Fei (2024). "Model updating of rotor system based on the adaptive Gaussian process model using unbalance response." Journal of Sound and Vibration 571: 118006. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2023.118006

2024
[416]

Bayesian updating of model parameters using adaptive Gaussian process regression and particle filter

Yoshida, I., T. Nakamura, and S. -K. Au (2023). "Bayesian updating of model parameters using adaptive Gaussian process regression and particle filter." Structural Safety 102: 102328. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2023.102328

2023
[417]

Probabilistic damage detection using a new likelihood -free Bayesian inference method

Zeng, J., M.D. Todd, and Z. Hu (2023). "Probabilistic damage detection using a new likelihood -free Bayesian inference method." Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring 13(2): 319 -341. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-022-00638-5

2023 doi
[418]

Bayesian finite element model updating with a variational autoencoder and polynomial chaos expansion

Li, Q., P. Ni, X. Du, Q. Han, K. Xu, and Y . Bai (2024). "Bayesian finite element model updating with a variational autoencoder and polynomial chaos expansion." Engineering Structures 316: 118606. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118606

2024
[419]

Bayesian structural model updating with multimodal variational autoencoder

Itoi, T., K. Amishiki, S. Lee, and T. Yaoyama (2024). "Bayesian structural model updating with multimodal variational autoencoder." Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 429: 117148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2024.117148

2024
[420]

Latent space -based stochastic model updating

Lee, S., T. Yaoyama, M. Kitahara, and T. Itoi (2024). "Latent space -based stochastic model updating." arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.03150. doi:

2024 arXiv
[421]

Solhjell, I.K. (2009). Bayesian forecasting and dynamic models applied to strain data from the göta river bridge, Master's thesis, University of Oslo

2009
[422]

Switching Bayesian dynamic linear model for condition assessment of bridge expansion joints using structural health monitoring data

Zhang, Y .-M., H. Wang, Y . Bai, J.-X. Mao, X. -Y . Chang, and L.-B. Wang (2021). "Switching Bayesian dynamic linear model for condition assessment of bridge expansion joints using structural health monitoring data." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 1 60: 107879. doi: ...

2021
[423]

Bayesian dynamic modelling for probabilistic prediction of pavement condition

Zhang, Y ., A.M. d’Avigneau, G.M. Hadjidemetriou, L. de Silva, M. Girolami, and I. Brilakis (2024). "Bayesian dynamic modelling for probabilistic prediction of pavement condition." Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 133: 108637. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j....

2024
[424]

Wang, Y ., Y . Yu, X. Xu, and S. Atamturktur (2023). Predicting nonlinear structural dynamic response of ODE systems using constrained Gaussian process regression. Society for Experimental Mechanics Annual Conference and Exposition, Springer

2023
[425]

Bayesian modeling approach for forecast of structural stress response using structural health monitoring data

Wan, H.-P. and Y .-Q. Ni (2018). "Bayesian modeling approach for forecast of structural stress response using structural health monitoring data." Journal of Structural Engineering 144(9): 04018130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002085

2018 doi
[426]

Bayesian multi-task learning methodology for reconstruction of structural health monitoring data

Wan, H.-P. and Y .-Q. Ni (2019). "Bayesian multi-task learning methodology for reconstruction of structural health monitoring data." Structural Health Monitoring 18(4): 1282 -1309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718794953

2019 doi
[427]

Gaussian process machine -learning method for structural reliability analysis

Su, G., B. Yu, Y . Xiao, and L. Yan (2014). "Gaussian process machine -learning method for structural reliability analysis." Advances in Structural Engineering 17(9): 1257 -1270. doi: https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.9.1257

2014 doi
[428]

A Gaussian process -based dynamic surrogate model for complex engineering structural reliability analysis

Su, G., L. Peng, and L. Hu (2017). "A Gaussian process -based dynamic surrogate model for complex engineering structural reliability analysis." Structural Safety 68: 97 -109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.06.003

2017 doi
[429]

Kernel principal component analysis -based Gaussian process regression modelling for high -dimensional reliability analysis

Zhou, T. and Y . Peng (2020). "Kernel principal component analysis -based Gaussian process regression modelling for high -dimensional reliability analysis." Computers & Structures 241: 106358. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106358

2020
[430]

A hybrid Gaussian process model for system reliability analysis

Li, M., M. Sadoughi, Z. Hu, and C. Hu (2020). "A hybrid Gaussian process model for system reliability analysis." Reliability Engineering & System Safety 197: 106816. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106816

2020
[431]

Brevault, M

Espoeys, R., L. Brevault, M. Balesdent, S. Ricci, P. Mycek, and G. Arnoult (2024). Overview and comparison of reliability analysis techniques based on multifidelity Gaussian processes. Developments in Reliability Engineering, Elsevier: 731-785

2024
[432]

Variance based sensitivity analysis for Monte Carlo and importance sampling reliability assessment with Gaussian processes

Menz, M., S. Dubreuil, J. Morio, C. Gogu, N. Bartoli, and M. Chiron (2021). "Variance based sensitivity analysis for Monte Carlo and importance sampling reliability assessment with Gaussian processes." Structural Safety 93: 102116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102116

2021
[433]

Bayesian model inversion using stochastic spectral embedding

Wagner, P.-R., S. Marelli, and B. Sudret (2021). "Bayesian model inversion using stochastic spectral embedding." Journal of Computational Physics 436: 110141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110141

2021
[434]

Component mode synthesis techniques for finite element model updating

Papadimitriou, C. and D. -C. Papadioti (2013). "Component mode synthesis techniques for finite element model updating." Computers and Structures 126: 15 -28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.10.018

2013 doi
[435]

Implementation of an adaptive meta-model for Bayesian finite element model updating in time domain

Jensen, H.A., C. Esse, V . Araya, and C. Papadimitriou (2017). "Implementation of an adaptive meta-model for Bayesian finite element model updating in time domain." Reliability Engineering and System Safety 160: 174-190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.12.005

2017 doi
[436]

A general substructure- based framework for input -state estimation using limited output measurements

Tatsis, K., V .K. Dertimanis, C. Papadimitriou, E. Lourens, and E. Chatzi (2021). "A general substructure- based framework for input -state estimation using limited output measurements." Mechanical Systems Signal Processing 150: 107223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107223

2021
[437]

Kingma, and M

Salimans, T., D. Kingma, and M. Welling (2015). Markov chain monte carlo and variational inference: Bridging the gap. International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR. 143

2015
[438]

Wenzel, and S

Buchholz, A., F. Wenzel, and S. Mandt (2018). Quasi-monte carlo variational inference . International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR

2018
[439]

A comprehensive Bayesian approach for model updating and quantification of modeling errors

Zhang, E., P. Feissel, and J. Antoni (2011). "A comprehensive Bayesian approach for model updating and quantification of modeling errors." Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 26(4): 550 -560. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2011.07.001

2011 doi
[440]

Bayesian calibration of computer models

Kennedy, M.C. and A. O'Hagan (2001). "Bayesian calibration of computer models." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 63(3): 425 -464. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467- 9868.00294

2001
[441]

Priors in bayesian deep learning: A review

Fortuin, V . (2022). "Priors in bayesian deep learning: A review." International Statistical Review 90(3): 563-591. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12502

2022 doi
[442]

On Bernoulli experiments with imprecise prior probabilities

Coolen, F.P.A. (1994). "On Bernoulli experiments with imprecise prior probabilities." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D: The Statistician 43(1): 155-167. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2348940

1994 doi
[443]

Prior near ignorance for inferences in the k -parameter exponential family

Benavoli, A. and M. Zaffalon (2015). "Prior near ignorance for inferences in the k -parameter exponential family." Statistics 49(5): 1104-1140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02331888.2014.960869

2015
[444]

Boosting prior knowledge in streaming variational bayes

Nguyen, D.A., K.A. Nguyen, C.H. Nguyen, and K. Than (2021). "Boosting prior knowledge in streaming variational bayes." Neurocomputing 424: 143-159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.10.026

2021 doi
[746]

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.02.040

2019 doi
[1121]

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.01.006

2017 doi
[1420]

doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921719882086

doi
[1535]

doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720921256

doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [179]

Sampling -based adaptive Bayesian quadrature for probabilistic model updating

Song, J., Z. Liang, P. Wei, and M. Beer (2025). "Sampling -based adaptive Bayesian quadrature for probabilistic model updating." Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 433: 117467. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2024.117467

arXiv 2025

[2] [180]

Probabilistic model updating via variational Bayesian inference and adaptive Gaussian process modeling

Ni, P., J. Li, H. Hao, Q. Han, and X. Du (2021). "Probabilistic model updating via variational Bayesian inference and adaptive Gaussian process modeling." Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 383: 113915. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113915

arXiv 2021

[3] [92]

Novel sparseness-inducing dual Kalman filter and its application to tracking time-varying spatially-sparse structural stiffness changes and inputs

Huang, Y ., J. Yu, J.L. Beck, H. Zhu, and H. Li (2020). "Novel sparseness-inducing dual Kalman filter and its application to tracking time-varying spatially-sparse structural stiffness changes and inputs." Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineer ing 372: 113411. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113411

arXiv 2020

[4] [110]

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.03.022

work page doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2016.03.022 2016

[5] [135]

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.03.013

work page doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.03.013 2019

[6] [153]

A hybrid optimization algorithm with Bayesian inference for probabilistic model updating

Sun, H. and R. Betti (2015). "A hybrid optimization algorithm with Bayesian inference for probabilistic model updating." Computer -Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 30(8): 602 -619. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12142

work page doi:10.1111/mice.12142 2015

[7] [154]

Structural health monitoring and fatigue damage estimation using vibration measurements and finite element model updating

Giagopoulos, D., A. Arailopoulos, V . Dertimanis, C. Papadimitriou, E. Chatzi, and K. Grompanopoulos (2019). "Structural health monitoring and fatigue damage estimation using vibration measurements and finite element model updating." Structural Health Moni toring 18(4): 1189 -1206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718790188

work page doi:10.1177/1475921718790188 2019

[8] [155]

Learning functional priors and posteriors from data and physics

Meng, X., L. Yang, Z. Mao, J. del Águila Ferrandis, and G.E. Karniadakis (2022). "Learning functional priors and posteriors from data and physics." Journal of Computational Physics 457: 111073. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111073

arXiv 2022