Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Fair Assortment Planning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.07341 v5 pith:ASVSYTW5 submitted 2022-08-15 cs.DS math.OC

classification cs.DSmath.OC
keywords fairproblemseparationitemsalgorithmsassortmentdualoracle
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many online platforms, ranging from online retail stores to social media platforms, employ algorithms to optimize their offered assortment of items (e.g., products and contents). These algorithms often focus exclusively on achieving the platforms' objectives, highlighting items with the highest popularity or revenue. This approach, however, can compromise the equality of opportunities for the rest of the items, in turn leading to less content diversity and increased regulatory scrutiny for the platform. Motivated by this, we introduce and study a fair assortment planning problem that enforces equality of opportunities via pairwise fairness, which requires any two items to be offered similar outcomes. We show that the problem can be formulated as a linear program (LP), called (FAIR), that optimizes over the distribution of all feasible assortments. To find a near-optimal solution to (FAIR), we propose a framework based on the Ellipsoid method, which requires a polynomial-time separation oracle to the dual of the LP. We show that finding an optimal separation oracle to the dual problem is an NP-complete problem, and hence we propose a series of approximate separation oracles, which then result in a 1/2-approx. algorithm and an FPTAS for Problem (FAIR). The approximate separation oracles are designed by (i) showing the separation oracle to the dual of the LP is equivalent to solving an infinite series of parameterized knapsack problems, and (ii) leveraging the structure of knapsack problems. Finally, we perform numerical studies on both synthetic data and real-world MovieLens data, showcasing the effectiveness of our algorithms and providing insights into the platform's price of fairness.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimal Exploration of New Products under Assortment Decisions

    cs.SI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pairing new products with top incumbents and exploring multiple new products simultaneously up to a potential-based threshold is optimal for minimizing regret in assortment-based social learning.

  2. Adaptive Two-sided Assortment Optimization: Revenue Maximization

    cs.GT 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under MNL choices, adaptive two-sided assortment with pair-dependent revenues admits a randomized static (1/2 - ε)-approximation, and (1 - 1/e - ε) when each supplier's revenue is uniform; same-order revenues admit a ...

Pith tools