pith. sign in

arxiv: 2211.02193 · v1 · pith:ATU4J2EFnew · submitted 2022-11-04 · 💻 cs.NE · cs.AI· cs.LG· cs.RO

Benchmarking Quality-Diversity Algorithms on Neuroevolution for Reinforcement Learning

classification 💻 cs.NE cs.AIcs.LGcs.RO
keywords benchmarkfitnessquality-diversitycoveragedeeplearningmetricsneuroevolution
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We present a Quality-Diversity benchmark suite for Deep Neuroevolution in Reinforcement Learning domains for robot control. The suite includes the definition of tasks, environments, behavioral descriptors, and fitness. We specify different benchmarks based on the complexity of both the task and the agent controlled by a deep neural network. The benchmark uses standard Quality-Diversity metrics, including coverage, QD-score, maximum fitness, and an archive profile metric to quantify the relation between coverage and fitness. We also present how to quantify the robustness of the solutions with respect to environmental stochasticity by introducing corrected versions of the same metrics. We believe that our benchmark is a valuable tool for the community to compare and improve their findings. The source code is available online: https://github.com/adaptive-intelligent-robotics/QDax

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DEI: Diversity in Evolutionary Inference for Quality-Diversity Search

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DEI shows a heterogeneous four-LLM ensemble achieving 124% higher QD-Score and 28% higher coverage than single-model baselines on Core War at equal compute budget.