Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 17 references

Search for the in-situ production of $^{77}$Ge in the GERDA neutrinoless double-beta decay experiment

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The full GERDA Phase II data set shows zero 77Ge delayed-coincidence candidates, bounding the in-situ production rate below 0.216 nuclei per kilogram-year at 90% CL.

desk verdict Solid GERDA background measurement with a wrong abstract phrase; worth reviewing after a small fix. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.16955 v1 pith:AU6KZDBW submitted 2025-06-20 nucl-ex astro-ph.IM

M. Agostini , A. Alexander , G. Araujo , A.M. Bakalyarov , M. Balata , I. Barabanov , L. Baudis , C. Bauer
show 103 more authors
S. Belogurov A. Bettini L. Bezrukov V. Biancacci E. Bossio V. Bothe R. Brugnera A. Caldwell S. Calgaro C. Cattadori A. Chernogorov P.-J. Chiu T. Comellato V. D'Andrea E.V. Demidova N. Di Marco E. Doroshkevich M. Fomina A. Gangapshev A. Garfagnini C. Gooch P. Grabmayr V. Gurentsov K. Gusev J. Hakenmüller S. Hemmer W. Hofmann J. Huang M. Hult L.V. Inzhechik J. Janicskó Csáthy J. Jochum M. Junker V. Kazalov Y. Kermaïdic H. Khushbakht T. Kihm K. Kilgus I.V. Kirpichnikov A. Klimenko K.T. Knöpfle O. Kochetov V.N. Kornoukhov P. Krause V.V. Kuzminov M. Laubenstein M. Lindner I. Lippi A. Lubashevskiy B. Lubsandorzhiev G. Lutter C. Macolino B. Majorovits W. Maneschg G. Marshall M. Misiaszek M. Morella Y. Müller I. Nemchenok M. Neuberger L. Pandola K. Pelczar L. Pertoldi P. Piseri A. Pullia C. Ransom L. Rauscher M. Redchuk S. Riboldi N. Rumyantseva C. Sada S. Sailer F. Salamida S. Schönert J. Schreiner M. Schütt A-K. Schütz O. Schulz M. Schwarz B. Schwingenheuer O. Selivanenko E. Shevchik M. Shirchenko L. Shtembari H. Simgen A. Smolnikov D. Stukov S. Sullivan A.A. Vasenko A. Veresnikova C. Vignoli K. von Sturm T. Wester C. Wiesinger M. Wojcik E. Yanovich B. Zatschler I. Zhitnikov S.V. Zhukov D. Zinatulina A. Zschocke K. Zuber G. Zuzel
This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-exastro-ph.IM
keywords neutrinolessdouble-betadecaygermanium-77cosmogenicbackgrounddelayedcoincidenceisomericstatepile-upsignalprocessingGERDALEGEND-1000
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper searches for the in-situ production of $^{77}$Ge inside the GERDA experiment, where neutron capture on the double-$\beta$-decay isotope $^{76}$Ge can create $^{77}$Ge and its isomer $^{77\mathrm{m}}$Ge. Their $\beta$ decays have $Q$-values above the $Q_{\beta\beta}$ value of 2039 keV, so they are a potential background that could mimic a signal in the neutrinoless double-$\beta$ decay search. Using the full 103.7 kg·yr Phase II data set, the analysis looks for a delayed coincidence: the $\beta$ decay of $^{77}$Ge populates a 475 keV isomeric state in $^{77}$As with a 114 µs half-life, whose subsequent gamma emission appears as a second pulse piled on the first. No such candidate is found, yielding an upper limit of $<0.216$ nuc/(kg·yr) on the $^{77}$Ge production rate and $<0.38$ nuc/(kg·yr) for the combined $^{77}$Ge and $^{77\mathrm{m}}$Ge rate at 90% CL. The limit agrees with a Monte Carlo prediction of $(0.21\pm0.07)$ nuc/(kg·yr) and supports the expectation that this cosmogenic background stays sub-dominant in the planned LEGEND-1000 experiment.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the delayed-coincidence signature of the $^{77}$Ge decay chain. Beta decay of $^{77}$Ge ($T_{1/2}=11.21$ h) populates the $9/2^+$ isomeric state of $^{77}$As at 475 keV ($T_{1/2}=114$ µs) in about 33% of decays, and the delayed electromagnetic de-excitation emits gammas of 211, 264, or 475 keV. Because the 114 µs half-life is much longer than the roughly 1.5 µs charge-collection time of the germanium detectors, the delayed pulse arrives after the prompt pulse in the same detector and appears as pile-up on the waveform's exponential tail. New digital signal processing applies trapezoidal filters of length matched to the trigger separation, extracts the heights of both pulses, reconstructs the time difference, and is sensitive down to 4.5 µs separation; Monte Carlo simulation then fixes the combined selection efficiency at 32.4%. A unified small-signal counting procedure converts the observed zero candidates into the upper limit, with the branching-ratio uncertainties treated as nuisance parameters.

What would settle it

Reanalysing the GERDA Phase II waveforms with a time-difference threshold below 4.5 µs and a delayed-energy acceptance extended into the continuum: if this finds a cluster of candidates whose time differences follow the 114 µs exponential of the $^{77\mathrm{m}}$As isomer, the paper's $N_\mathrm{obs}=0$ result and its quoted production-rate limit would be contradicted; if no such cluster appears, the null is strengthened.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is a null observation with a sharp bound. In the full GERDA Phase II exposure of 103.7 kg·yr, after applying the delayed-coincidence selection built from the $^{77}$Ge decay chain, the observed number of candidates is $N_\mathrm{obs}=0$ against an expected random-coincidence background of $N_\mathrm{rc}=0.04$. A unified small-signal upper-limit calculation gives an upper limit of $<2.4$ delayed-coincidence counts at 90% CL, which translates into a $^{77}$Ge production rate of $<0.216$ nuc/(kg·yr) and, assuming equal production of the ground and isomeric states and a ground-state population probability of $(59.5\pm8.1)\%$, a combined $^{77}$Ge and $^{77\mathrm{m}}$Ge production rate of $<0.38$ nuc/(kg·yr). The paper reads this as corroboration of the earlier Monte Carlo estimate of $(0.21\pm0.07)$ nuc/(kg·yr), and a Bayesian update centers the rate at $0.18$ nuc/(kg·yr) with a 1$\sigma$ credibility interval of $[0.106, 0.251]$ nuc/(kg·yr). It further claims that tagging the $^{77\mathrm{m}}$As isomer can reject about 62% of the $^{77}$Ge background events that survive other cuts, and that this keeps the in-situ cosmogenic background in LEGEND-1000 below $10^{-6}$ cts/(keV·kg·yr), at most 10% of the experiment's background budget.

Load-bearing premise

The limit assumes the Monte Carlo simulation of the germanium detectors correctly predicts how often a real $^{77}$Ge decay chain would survive the selection, because the quoted $<0.5\%$ efficiency uncertainty covers only the statistical spread of the generated samples and not the full systematic accuracy of the detector simulation; if the simulated efficiency is too high, the production-rate limit is too strong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The combined $^{77}$Ge and $^{77\mathrm{m}}$Ge in-situ production rate at the GERDA site is bounded below $0.38$ nuc/(kg·yr) at 90% CL, about a factor of two above the Monte Carlo prediction and roughly an order of magnitude tighter than the earlier GERDA-based bound of $<4.1$ nuc/(kg·yr).
  • A Bayesian update of the simulation prior by the new likelihood centers the production rate at $0.18$ nuc/(kg·yr) with a 1$\sigma$ credibility interval of $[0.106, 0.251]$ nuc/(kg·yr), a scaling factor of $0.85^{+0.35}_{-0.34}$ relative to the original estimate.
  • Tagging the $^{77\mathrm{m}}$As delayed de-excitation rejects about 62% of the $^{77}$Ge background events that survive the other analysis cuts, lowering the $^{77}$Ge/$^{77\mathrm{m}}$Ge background-index contribution to $(1.50\pm0.07\pm0.67)\times10^{-6}$ cts/(keV·kg·yr).
  • For LEGEND-1000, the in-situ cosmogenic background contribution is estimated below $10^{-6}$ cts/(keV·kg·yr), no more than 10% of the target background index of $<10^{-5}$ cts/(keV·kg·yr).
  • After one year of LEGEND-200 running at its final detector mass, the sensitivity of this delayed-coincidence search doubles, so the limit would tighten by a factor of two or a signal could appear.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An editorial inference: because the expected random-coincidence rate is only 0.04 counts, applying the $^{77\mathrm{m}}$As tag as an active veto in LEGEND-200 costs almost no signal efficiency, so the same delayed-coincidence logic could be run online as a live background tag rather than offline.
  • An editorial inference: the factor-of-two headroom between the simulation and the limit is small next to the simulation's 35% systematic uncertainty, so the agreement is weaker than it might appear; a larger exposure is needed to say whether the true rate sits near the prior or near the limit.
  • An editorial inference: the eight observed continuum candidates with delayed energies between 200 and 500 keV do not follow the 114 µs lifetime, but a future analysis that includes the continuum rather than only the three gamma peaks could gain additional sensitivity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a search for in-situ production of 77Ge in the full GERDA Phase II data set (103.7 kg·yr) using a delayed coincidence method that exploits the 114 µs isomeric state of 77As. No candidate events are found (N_obs = 0), with an expected random-coincidence background of N_rc = 0.04, leading to a Feldman-Cousins upper limit of <2.4 counts and a 77Ge production rate of <0.216 nuc/(kg·yr) at 90% CL. Using a neutron-capture model with a ground-state population fraction ε_g = (59.5±8.1)%, the total 77(m)Ge production rate is derived as <0.38 nuc/(kg·yr). A Bayesian update of a previous Monte Carlo prediction gives a posterior central value of 0.18 nuc/(kg·yr). The paper further estimates that the 77(m)Ge background contribution in LEGEND-1000 would be sub-dominant, below 10^-6 cts/(keV·kg·yr).

Significance. If the result holds, it is the strongest experimental constraint on in-situ 77(m)Ge production at LNGS and an important validation of cosmogenic background models for LEGEND-1000. The analysis uses the full GERDA Phase II exposure, a novel digital signal processing approach for pile-up reconstruction, and a carefully described delayed-coincidence selection with cross-checks against calibration data. The null observation, the internal consistency of the limit derivation, and the explicit treatment of nuisance parameters are strengths. The main concerns are a misleading statement in the abstract and the absence of a systematic uncertainty for the simulation-based efficiencies; both are addressable.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract vs. Section 3] The abstract states that the total 77(m)Ge production rate limit of <0.38 nuc/(kg·yr) is derived "assuming equal production rates". However, Section 3 derives this number by converting the 77Ge ground-state limit using ε_g = (ε_d + (1−ε_d)·ε_IT) = (59.5±8.1)%, with ε_d = (50±10)% and ε_IT = (19±2)%. A genuine equal-production assumption (ε_g = 0.5) would give a total limit of <0.216/0.5 = <0.43 nuc/(kg·yr), not <0.38. The quoted 0.38 follows from the neutron-capture model, not from equal production rates. This misstates the basis of the headline result and should be corrected in the abstract, for example by stating the adopted model assumption explicitly.
  2. [Section 2.3, Table 1] The uncertainty quoted for the selection efficiencies (<0.5%) is the statistical precision of the generated Monte Carlo samples, not a systematic uncertainty of the MaGe/GERDA detector simulation. The total efficiency directly enters the conversion from counts to production rate; an unquantified systematic bias in the simulated energy/multiplicity, time-difference, or pile-up acceptance would propagate directly into the quoted limit. The paper should either quantify systematic uncertainties of the simulation-based efficiencies (e.g., by varying simulation parameters or comparing with calibration data) or explicitly discuss the expected size of such effects and justify that they are negligible relative to the statistical precision of the null measurement.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence "an upper limit on the production rate of was set at <0.216 nuc/(kg·yr)" is missing the isotope; it should refer to 77Ge.
  2. [Figures 5 and 6] The axis label "dT [s]" appears in both figures, but the plotted values (0–20 and 0–800) are in microseconds, not seconds. Please correct the units to µs.
  3. [Section 2.3 and Figure 6 caption] The text states that the FWTM contains 96% of the peak area, while the caption of Figure 6 states 97%. These values should be reconciled.
  4. [Figure 7] The x-axis label contains a typo: "produdction" should be "production".
  5. [Introduction] The unit "nuc" (nuclei) is not defined at first use; please define it explicitly.
  6. [Section 3] The statement that the previous prediction is "further corroborated" should be qualified, since the 90% CL upper limit of 0.38 nuc/(kg·yr) is about a factor of two above the predicted central value of 0.21 nuc/(kg·yr); the result is consistent with but does not strongly confirm the prediction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the primary 77Ge upper limit comes directly from GERDA data and is independent of the previous MC prediction; only the secondary total-rate conversion relies on a same-collaboration epsilon_g parameter, and the abstract's 'equal production rates' wording is internally inconsistent rather than circular.

full rationale

The primary upper limit is not circular. The paper records N_obs = 0 candidate delayed coincidences with N_rc = 0.04 expected random coincidences, applies Feldman-Cousins to obtain <2.4 counts, and converts to a 77Ge production rate using independently documented decay-scheme branching (33±1)% from ENSDF, exposure, and simulation-based selection efficiencies (total 32.4%) that are checked against calibration data. No parameter of the previous Monte Carlo prediction is fitted into this limit. The total 77(m)Ge rate is a secondary conversion: it divides the ground-state limit by epsilon_g = (epsilon_d + (1 - epsilon_d) * epsilon_IT) = (59.5±8.1)%, where epsilon_d is taken from the collaboration's earlier work [4] and from statistical-model calculations [15]. This is a same-group citation, but it is not a circular reduction because the measured 77Ge limit is not derived from epsilon_g and the paper does not define epsilon_g in terms of the total rate it is used to produce. The Bayesian update is transparently a prior (the earlier simulation) updated by the new likelihood, so it is disclosed model combination rather than hidden reuse. The abstract's phrase 'assuming equal production rates' conflicts with the body's epsilon_g = 59.5% ground-state fraction; a literal 50% equal-rate assumption would give about <0.43 nuc/(kg·yr) rather than <0.38. That is an internal inconsistency to be corrected, not a circularity. The LEGEND-1000 projection is explicitly a scaled estimate from Refs. [4,17] and is not presented as an independent measurement.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central limit depends on three classes of inputs: measured nuclear data (branching ratios and half-lives), simulation-derived efficiencies, and a model-dependent ground-state population fraction. The only parameter chosen from prior model work rather than measured directly is epsilon_d=(50±10)% from refs [4,15], which controls the conversion from the 77Ge limit to the total 77(m)Ge rate. Simulations enter through the selection efficiencies and energy windows. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • epsilon_d, direct ground-state population fraction after neutron capture on 76Ge = (50 ± 10)%
    Taken from previous GERDA Monte Carlo work [4] and statistical model [15]; not fitted to data in this paper, but it is the key model-dependent parameter used to convert the measured 77Ge limit into the total 77(m)Ge production rate of <0.38 nuc/(kg·yr).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption MaGe/Geant4 simulation accurately models the GERDA detector response, including energy deposition, multiplicity, trigger thresholds, and pile-up reconstruction.
    Selection efficiencies and delayed-energy acceptance windows in Section 2.3 and Table 1 come from MaGe simulations; if the simulation is biased, the upper limit is biased.
  • domain assumption Cosmogenic neutron capture on 76Ge is the only significant in-situ source of 77Ge; radiogenic neutrons from outside are absorbed by the water shield.
    Section 3 states radiogenic neutrons cannot reach the detectors; this justifies converting the observed 77Ge count directly into a cosmogenic production rate and scaling to LEGEND-1000.
  • standard math Nuclear decay data (77Ge half-life, 77mAs half-life and energies, branching ratios) from ENSDF are accurate.
    Used throughout for the coincidence signature, efficiencies, and branching ratio (33±1)% of 77Ge decays populating the 114 microsecond isomer.
  • standard math Feldman-Cousins and Cousins-Highland prescriptions correctly handle the Poisson upper limit with nuisance parameters.
    Used in Section 3 to set N<2.4 cts and to integrate over branching-ratio uncertainties.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Search for the in-situ production of $^{77}$Ge in the GERDA neutrinoless double-beta decay experiment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AU6KZDBW

@misc{pith2026250616955,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Search for the in-situ production of $^77$Ge in the GERDA neutrinoless double-beta decay experiment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AU6KZDBW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.16955}
}
abstract

The beta decay of $^{77}$Ge and $^{77\mathrm{m}}$Ge, both produced by neutron capture on $^{76}$Ge, is a potential background for Germanium based neutrinoless double-beta decay search experiments such as GERDA or the LEGEND experiment. In this work we present a search for $^{77}$Ge decays in the full GERDA Phase II data set. A delayed coincidence method was employed to identify the decay of $^{77}$Ge via the isomeric state of $^{77}$As (9/2$^+$, 475 keV, ${T_{1/2} = 114}\,\mu $s, $^{77\mathrm{m}}$As). New digital signal processing methods were employed to select and analyze pile-up signals. No signal was observed, and an upper limit on the production rate of was set at $<0.216$ nuc/(kg$\cdot$yr) (90% CL). This corresponds to a total production rate of $^{77}$Ge and $^{77\mathrm{m}}$Ge of $<0.38$ nuc/(kg$\cdot$ yr) (90% CL), assuming equal production rates. A previous Monte Carlo study predicted a value for in-situ $^{77}$Ge and $^{77\mathrm{m}}$Ge production of (0.21$\pm$0.07) nuc/(kg$\cdot$yr), a prediction that is now further corroborated by our experimental limit. Moreover, tagging the isomeric state of $^{77\mathrm{m}}$As can be utilised to further suppress the $^{77}$Ge background. Considering the similar experimental configurations of LEGEND-1000 and GERDA, the cosmogenic background in LEGEND-1000 at LNGS is estimated to remain at a sub-dominant level.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

17 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Agostiniet al.(GerdaCollab.), Upgrade for Phase II of theGerdaexperiment , Eur

    M. Agostiniet al.(GerdaCollab.), Upgrade for Phase II of theGerdaexperiment , Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 388 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5812-2

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5812-2 2018

  2. [2]

    Agostiniet al.(GerdaCollab.), Final Results ofGerda on the Search for Neutrinoless Double-βDecay, Phys

    M. Agostiniet al.(GerdaCollab.), Final Results ofGerda on the Search for Neutrinoless Double-βDecay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 252502 (2020)https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.125.252502

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Pandolaet al., Monte Carlo evaluation of the muon- induced background in theGerdadouble beta decay ex- periment, Nucl

    L. Pandolaet al., Monte Carlo evaluation of the muon- induced background in theGerdadouble beta decay ex- periment, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 570, 149–158 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2006.10.103

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2006.10.103 2007

  4. [4]

    Wiesinger, L

    C. Wiesinger, L. Pandola and S. Sch¨ onert, Virtual depth by active background suppression: Revisiting the cos- mic muon induced background ofGerdaPhase II, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 597 (2018)https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/ s10052-018-6079-3

    doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2018

  5. [5]

    N. Abgrallet al.(LEGEND Collab.), The Large En- riched Germanium Experiment for NeutrinolessββDecay: LEGEND-1000 Preconceptual Design Report, arXiv (2021) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.11462

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.11462 2021

  6. [6]

    I. J. Arnquistet al., (MajoranaCollab.), Signatures of muonic activation in theMajoranaDemonstrator, Phys. Rev. C 105, 014617 (2022)https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.105.014617

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Ver- sion available athttp://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensarchivals/ Full Evaluation Balraj Singh ENSDF 30-Sep-2020

    From ENSDF database as of February 21st, 2024. Ver- sion available athttp://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensarchivals/ Full Evaluation Balraj Singh ENSDF 30-Sep-2020

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Boswellet al., MaGe – a Geant4-based Monte Carlo application framework for low-background germanium ex- periments

    M. Boswellet al., MaGe – a Geant4-based Monte Carlo application framework for low-background germanium ex- periments. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 58, 1212 (2011)https: //doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2011.2144619

    arXiv 2011

Show all 17 references
  1. [9]

    A. Lazzaro, Signal processing and event classification for a background free neutrinoless double beta decay search with theGerdaexperiment, PhD Thesis, Technische Universit¨ at M¨ unchen (2019)https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/1507626

    2019

  2. [10]

    Agostiniet al., The MGDO software library for data analysis in Ge neutrinoless double-beta decay experiments, J

    M. Agostiniet al., The MGDO software library for data analysis in Ge neutrinoless double-beta decay experiments, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 375 042027 (2012)https://doi.org/10. 1088/1742-6596/375/1/042027

    2012

  3. [11]

    Agostiniet al.(GerdaCollab.), Calibration of the Gerdaexperiment, Eur

    M. Agostiniet al.(GerdaCollab.), Calibration of the Gerdaexperiment, Eur. J. Phys. C 81 (2021) 682https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09403-2

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins, A Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 3873-3889https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 57.3873 11

    1998 doi

  5. [13]

    R. D. Cousins and V. Highland, Incorporating systematic uncertainties into an upper limit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 320 (1992) 331-33https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(92) 90794-5

    1992 doi

  6. [14]

    R. L. Workmanet al.(Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Grabmayr, Cross sections and gamma cascades in 77Ge needed for background reduction in 0νββexperi- ments on 76Ge, Eur

    P. Grabmayr, Cross sections and gamma cascades in 77Ge needed for background reduction in 0νββexperi- ments on 76Ge, Eur. Phys. J. A (2024) 60, 115,https: //doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01336-0

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    L. Vanhoefer, Limitations of Rare Event HPGe Exper- iments due to Muon-Induced Neutron Background, PhD Thesis, Technische Universit¨ at M¨ unchen (2018)https:// mediatum.ub.tum.de/1446626

    2018

  9. [17]

    Neuberger, M

    M. Neuberger, M. Morellaet al., Strategies for cosmo- genic 77(m)Ge reduction for LEGEND-1000 Experiment, Poster, Neutrino 2022https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 6804443

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.