Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 97 references

The CHIMERAS Project: Design Framework for the Collisionless HIgh-beta Magnetized Experiment Researching Astrophysical Systems

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a 7.25 m by 14.5 m source-target chamber can create the first laboratory plasma that is simultaneously magnetized, collisionless, and at ion beta above one, opening controlled studies of kinetic instabilities and…

desk verdict A useful and honest design-framework paper whose central 'will work' sentence outruns its own evidence; the expansion physics is the gap that matters. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.06426 v1 pith:AVMOOVHY submitted 2025-05-09 physics.plasm-ph astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IMastro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph

S. Dorfman , S. Bose , E. Lichko , M. Abler , J. Juno , J.M. TenBarge , Y. Zhang , S. Chakraborty Thakur
show 6 more authors
C. A. Cartagena-Sanchez P. Tatum E. Scime G. Joshi S. Greess C. Kuchta
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-phastro-ph.GAastro-ph.IMastro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph
keywords collisionlessplasmashighionbetaplasmadevicedesignAlfvénicturbulencekineticinstabilitiessource-targetexpansionspacephysicslaboratoryastrophysics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The CHIMERAS working group is trying to establish that a particular device design can create, for the first time in a laboratory, a plasma that is simultaneously magnetized, collisionless, and at high ion $\beta$ ($\beta_i\gtrsim 1$). The paper converts this physics goal into machine requirements: an ion $\beta$ above one, an electron-ion collision frequency below the Alfvén wave frequency, and a chamber large enough to hold about 50 ion skin depths or gyroradii across and 100 along the background magnetic field. The resulting preliminary design is a source chamber feeding a target chamber about 7.25 m in diameter and 14.5 m long, with the natural expansion of the plasma doing the work of reaching the desired regime. If this expansion works as assumed, the device would give researchers controlled, multi-point access to kinetic instabilities and Alfvénic turbulence that are currently studied mainly by spacecraft and numerical simulations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the source-target expansion geometry: a dense magnetized plasma is produced in a source chamber by electron cyclotron resonant heating and neutral beam injection, and it expands into a larger target chamber whose walls are lined with permanent magnets in a line-cusp configuration to reduce plasma loss. The dimensionless requirements in Table 1 carry the argument: $\beta_i\gtrsim 1$, $\nu_{ei}/\omega_{ci}<1$, $L_\perp\sim 50\,\max(d_i,\rho_i)$, and $L_\parallel\sim 100\,\max(d_i,\rho_i)$. The factor of 50 ensures the largest perpendicular scale satisfies $k_\perp\rho_i\gtrsim 0.13$, so instability and turbulence physics near $k_\perp\rho_i\sim 1$ can be resolved, while the factor of 100 follows from writing the low-frequency Alfvén wave dispersion relation as $k_\parallel d_i=\omega/\omega_{ci}$, which requires the chamber to be long enough to hold the wave.

What would settle it

A kinetic or two-fluid simulation of the proposed source-target expansion, initialized with the Table 2 source parameters and tracking density, temperature, and magnetic-field profiles through the interface into the target chamber, would falsify the design claim if it shows that by the time $\beta_i\gtrsim 1$ is reached the collision frequency ratio $\nu_{ei}/\omega_{ci}$ is no longer below one or that the ion gyroradius exceeds the chamber radius. A smaller proof-of-principle experiment in an existing device could test the same expansion trajectory at reduced scale before the full 7.25 m chamber is built.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At its core, the paper claims that a hydrogen plasma with density $n=10^{13}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$, electron temperature $T_e=400$ eV, and ion temperature $T_i=100$ eV can be made simultaneously magnetized, collisionless, and high-$\beta$ if it is created in a small source chamber and allowed to expand into a large target chamber. At a background field of 100 G the ion $\beta$ reaches $\beta_i\simeq 4.03$ with $\nu_{ei}/\omega_{ci}\simeq 0.057$ (Setup A, for instabilities); at 400 G, $\beta_i\simeq 0.25$ with $\nu_{ei}/\omega_{ci}\simeq 0.014$ (Setup B, for turbulence). The paper derives a required chamber diameter $L_\perp\sim 50\,\max(d_i,\rho_i)=7.25$ m and length $L_\parallel\sim 100\,\max(d_i,\rho_i)=14.5$ m so that MHD Alfvén waves fit in the device and perpendicular scales down to $k_\perp\rho_i\sim 1$ can be resolved. It argues that no existing facility meets the three conditions simultaneously: high-$\beta$ experiments tend to have gyroradii comparable to the system size, and a single-chamber plasma whose pressure exceeds the magnetic pressure would expel the field. The source-target expansion geometry is therefore the proposed way to enter the new regime.

Load-bearing premise

That the expanding plasma will naturally evolve into the target state with $\beta_i\gtrsim 1$ and $\nu_{ei}/\omega_{ci}<1$ while remaining magnetized, instead of expelling the background magnetic field or staying collisional; the paper itself identifies the density and temperature evolution during source ionization and expansion into the target chamber as an open question.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A working CHIMERAS device would give the first controlled laboratory measurements of firehose- and mirror-instability dynamics at $\beta_i\gtrsim 1$ in a collisionless, magnetized plasma.
  • The turbulence configuration would resolve roughly two decades of perpendicular scales, from multi-meter driving scales down to sub-$\rho_i$ scales, with the density, magnetic-field, and ion-velocity fluctuation measurements needed to test cascade and damping theories.
  • Because the source-target expansion resembles solar-wind expansion, the facility could study how expansion drives temperature anisotropy and how self-generated instabilities regulate heat and momentum transport.
  • The proposed optical diagnostic suite, including Thomson scattering and laser-induced fluorescence, would provide spatially resolved distribution-function measurements at the required sampling rates without relying on short-lived in-situ probes.
  • Meeting the collisionless requirement would keep Alfvén wave damping weak enough that measured wave physics can be compared quantitatively with kinetic theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural near-term test is to simulate the source-to-target expansion and map the region in the target chamber where $\beta_i\gtrsim 1$, $\nu_{ei}/\omega_{ci}<1$, and magnetized ion scales all hold; the paper explicitly leaves this open, so such a study could confirm or reject the size estimate before construction starts.
  • If the expansion itself produces temperature anisotropy, the same device could serve not only as a target-state experiment but as a controlled platform for studying how firehose and mirror fluctuations scatter particles and regulate the distribution function.
  • The size estimate assumes hydrogen; choosing helium for diagnostic access would increase the required vessel dimensions, so the 7.25 m and 14.5 m numbers should be read as lower bounds for the hydrogen-only design.
  • A scaled-down test in an existing device could check whether the source-target mechanism actually produces the predicted parameter trajectory, independent of the full $50\,\max(d_i,\rho_i)$ size requirement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents the design framework of the CHIMERAS project, a proposed next-generation laboratory device intended to create a magnetized, collisionless, high-ion-beta (βi ≳ 1) plasma for studies of astrophysical turbulence and kinetic instabilities. The authors compile dimensionless machine requirements (Table 1), give a preliminary set of dimensional parameters for hydrogen plasmas in two operating setups (Tables 2 and 3), argue for a source-target geometry, list diagnostic requirements and candidate diagnostics, and identify outstanding challenges for plasma evolution, diagnostics, and vessel sizing. The central quantitative claim is that a chamber with L_perp ~ 50 max(d_i, ρ_i) = 7.25 m and L_parallel ~ 100 max(d_i, ρ_i) = 14.5 m will satisfy the stated physics requirements for both instability and turbulence studies.

Significance. If the concept is realized, CHIMERAS would enable controlled laboratory studies of high-beta collisionless instabilities and Alfvénic turbulence in a regime not simultaneously accessible in existing facilities. The paper is a white-paper-style design framework rather than a completed device design. Its strengths include a transparent derivation of scale requirements from standard Alfvén wave physics, an internally consistent set of dimensionless parameters (apart from the ν_ei typo discussed below), a useful parameter-space map, and a thoughtful survey of diagnostic capabilities. The principal scientific significance is as a community planning document that identifies a target regime and the open problems that must be solved to reach it.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.1] The statement that a large chamber with L_perp ≈ 7.25 m and L_parallel ≈ 14.5 m 'will work for studying both turbulence as well as kinetic instabilities' is the central feasibility claim of the paper, but it is not supported by any calculation or simulation of the source-target expansion. Section 3.1.1 explicitly states that 'how the density and temperature evolves following ionization in the source chamber and plasma expansion into the target chamber is an open question,' and Section 3.1.3 defers precise sizing to future simulation studies. The concept requires that the expanding plasma naturally evolve into a β_i ≥ 1, collisionless, magnetized state without expelling the background field, yet Section 2.2 itself notes that a high-beta plasma in a single chamber will 'rapidly expel the magnetic field.' I recommend either adding a quantitative proof-of-concept calculation (for example, an axisymmetric MHD or hybrid simulation of the source-target expansion using Setup A parameters, tracking n, T_i, T_e, β_i, and B in the target volume for at least one Alfvén crossing time) or explicitly softening the 'will work' claim to a requirements-compatibility statement pending such validation.
  2. [§2.2] The proposed use of permanent-magnet line-cusp walls to reduce plasma loss and improve confinement in the target chamber is not accompanied by any estimate of confinement time, nor is there an analysis of whether such low-beta confinement techniques can contain a core with total beta β_e + β_i ≈ 20 (Setup A has β_e = 16.1, β_i = 4.03). This is load-bearing because the target plasma must remain magnetized and quasi-steady for the planned Alfvén wave and instability studies. The paper should either provide a quantitative estimate or citation demonstrating that a line-cusp-walled target can confine a β ~ 20 plasma for the required duration without significant magnetic field expulsion, or explicitly list this as a critical assumption to be tested in future work.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 2 and Table 3] There is a numerical inconsistency between the electron-ion collision frequency in Table 2 (ν_ei = 54.7 rad/s) and the dimensionless ratio ν_ei/ω_ci = 0.057 in Table 3: with ω_ci = 2π × 152 kHz ≈ 9.55 × 10^5 rad/s, the ratio is 5.7 × 10^-5. The Table 3 value is consistent with ν_ei ≈ 5.47 × 10^4 rad/s, so Table 2 appears to have a missing factor of 10^3; please correct the table and verify all derived parameters.
  2. [Fig. 1 caption and §2.1] The red/blue shading is described inconsistently: the text in §2.1 says 'red and blue shadings indicate different levels of βi and νei/ωci respectively,' while the Fig. 1 caption states that blue indicates βi and red indicates νei/ωci. Please make the descriptions consistent.
  3. [§1.1] Several typos appear in the text, including 'T urbulence' at the start of a paragraph, 'T o enhance,' 'Thompson scattering' (should be 'Thomson scattering') in §2.3, and 'excitement of anisotropy-driven instabilities' (§3.1.1, should likely be 'excitation').
  4. [Table 4 / §3.1.2] The reference 'Scime 2024' is cited as a private communication for Zeeman Quantum Beat Spectroscopy; since ZQBS is presented as a potentially key diagnostic, please provide a citable public reference or indicate that the technique is still unpublished.
  5. [§2.3] In the sentence describing spatial resolution, the text says 'multiple decades of resolved scales for the turbulence studies (from ~3.6 m driving scales down to ≲ 3.6 cm sub-ρ_i scales)'; for Setup A, ρ_i = 14.5 cm, so 3.6 cm is indeed sub-ρ_i, but for Setup B, ρ_i = 3.61 cm, making the stated 3.6 cm lower bound only marginally sub-ρ_i. Please clarify which setup this statement refers to.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the device parameters are chosen to meet stated requirements, and the load-bearing source-target expansion assumption is explicitly flagged as an open question.

full rationale

The paper makes no fitted predictions and derives no empirical result from its inputs. The target parameters in Tables 2 and 3 are selected to satisfy the dimensionless requirements in Table 1 (beta_i >= 1, nu_ei/omega_ci < 1, L ~ 50 max(d_i,rho_i), L ~ 100 max(d_i,rho_i)); this is design constraint satisfaction, not circular reasoning, because the requirements are not themselves outputs of the calculation. The statement that a 7.25 m by 14.5 m chamber 'will work' is an extrapolation, not a derivation, and the paper explicitly identifies the decisive assumption as unresolved: 'how the density and temperature evolves following ionization in the source chamber and plasma expansion into the target chamber is an open question' (Sec. 3.1.1) and calls for simulations to 'determine what specific device configurations ... are needed to achieve and diagnose our target physics' (Sec. 3.1.3). Self-citations (Dorfman et al. 2023; Lichko et al. 2020, 2023) motivate the science but are not load-bearing for quantitative sizing; the dispersion-relation use of Mallet et al. (2023) is standard external physics and does not import a conclusion from the authors' own prior work. A consistency error between Table 2 (nu_ei = 54.7 rad/s) and Table 3 (nu_ei/omega_ci = 0.057) is a bookkeeping defect and a correctness risk, but not circularity. No step reduces to its own input, so no circular steps are recorded.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The design rests on standard plasma physics definitions (beta, skin depth, gyroradius, Alfven dispersion) plus three domain assumptions: achievable source density and temperature, the unvalidated source-target expansion dynamics, and line-cusp wall confinement at scale. There are no invented physical entities. The density limit and the factor-50 scale separation are hand-chosen design targets, not fitted parameters; they directly set the device size.

free parameters (2)
  • Plasma density upper limit n = 10^13 cm^-3 = 10^13 cm^-3
    Chosen as the maximum density the source is assumed to deliver in a large chamber; this sets the lower limit on device size (Section 2.1). It is a design constraint, not a measured quantity, and the paper acknowledges generating high density in a large chamber is challenging.
  • Scale-separation factor L_perp ~ 50 max(d_i, rho_i) = 50
    Introduced to require k_perp rho_i >= 0.13 while keeping MHD Alfven waves in the device (Section 1.2). The factor 50 is a round number derived from 2 pi / 0.13 ~ 48; it is a design threshold, not a physical constant, and the paper itself says a more precise quantitative analysis is needed (Section 3.1.3).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Alfven wave damping is negligible when nu_ei/omega_ci < 1; two-fluid dispersion governs the dispersive regime.
    Used in Table 1 and Section 1.2 to define the collisionless requirement and the need to resolve k_perp rho_i ~ 1; standard in plasma physics but an assumption about the validity of two-fluid theory in this regime.
  • domain assumption A source can produce a hydrogen plasma with n ~ 10^13 cm^-3, Te ~ 400 eV, Ti ~ 100 eV that remains confined while crossing the source-target interface.
    Section 2.1 assumes this density as the upper limit; Section 3.1.1 states the actual evolution of density and temperature through the expansion is an open question. The feasibility is not demonstrated.
  • ad hoc to paper The plasma expansion into the target chamber naturally yields beta_i >= 1 while staying magnetized, without the plasma expelling the magnetic field.
    Section 2.2 introduces the source-target geometry specifically because a single-chamber high-beta plasma would expel its magnetic field. The success of this configuration is a new proposal, unvalidated.
  • domain assumption Permanent-magnet line-cusp boundary confinement will limit wall losses enough to maintain a quasi-steady magnetized target plasma.
    Section 2.2 proposes line-cusp or broken line-cusp wall liners, citing Limpaecher 1973, Leung 1975, Gekelman 1975, and Forest 2015. Effective at smaller scales, but its performance at the large CHIMERAS scale is assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The CHIMERAS Project: Design Framework for the Collisionless HIgh-beta Magnetized Experiment Researching Astrophysical Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AVMOOVHY

@misc{pith2026250506426,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The CHIMERAS Project: Design Framework for the Collisionless HIgh-beta Magnetized Experiment Researching Astrophysical Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AVMOOVHY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.06426}
}
abstract

From the near-Earth solar wind to the intracluster medium of galaxy clusters, collisionless, high-beta, magnetized plasmas pervade our universe. Energy and momentum transport from large-scale fields and flows to small scale motions of plasma particles is ubiquitous in these systems, but a full picture of the underlying physical mechanisms remains elusive. The transfer is often mediated by a turbulent cascade of Alfv{\'e}nic fluctuations as well as a variety of kinetic instabilities; these processes tend to be multi-scale and/or multi-dimensional, which makes them difficult to study using spacecraft missions and numerical simulations alone (Dorfman et al. 2023; Lichko et al. 2020, 2023). Meanwhile, existing laboratory devices struggle to produce the collisionless, high ion beta ($\beta_i \gtrsim 1$), magnetized plasmas across the range of scales necessary to address these problems. As envisioned in recent community planning documents (Carter et al. 2020; Milchberg and Scime 2020; Baalrud et al. 2020; Dorfman et al. 2023; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2024, it is therefore important to build a next generation laboratory facility to create a $\beta_i \gtrsim 1$, collisionless, magnetized plasma in the laboratory for the first time. A Working Group has been formed and is actively defining the necessary technical requirements to move the facility towards a construction-ready state. Recent progress includes the development of target parameters and diagnostic requirements as well as the identification of a need for source-target device geometry. As the working group is already leading to new synergies across the community, we anticipate a broad community of users funded by a variety of federal agencies (including NASA, DOE, and NSF) to make copious use of the future facility.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.06426 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The red and blue shadings indicate different levels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Location of Setups A and B in parameter space. Blue shading indicates different levels of βi while red shading indicates different levels of νei/ωci. Black lines show the value of L⊥ = 50 max(di, ρi) for Setup A and B. (a) Location of Setup A in n-T parameter space. (b) Location of Setup B in n-T parameter space. (c) Location of both setups in B-T parameter space. Note that L⊥ = 3.62m everywhere to the right of the … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Amato and P

    E. Amato and P. Blasi. A kinetic approach to cosmic-ray-induced streaming instability at supernova shocks. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 392: 0 1591--1600, 2009. ISSN 13652966. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14200.x

    arXiv 2009

  2. [2]

    A community plan for fusion energy and discovery plasma sciences

    Scott Baalrud, Nathaniel Ferraro, Lauren Garrison, Nathan Howard, Carolyn Kuranz, John Sarff, and Wayne Solomon. A community plan for fusion energy and discovery plasma sciences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.04806, 2020. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.04806

    arXiv 2011

  3. [3]

    A Powerful Local Shear Instability in Weakly Magnetized Disks

    Steven A Balbus and John F Hawley. A Powerful Local Shear Instability in Weakly Magnetized Disks. I. Linear Analysis . ApJ, 376 0 (Ii): 0 214--222, 1991. URL http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1991ApJ...376..214B&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf

    1991

  4. [4]

    S. D. Bale, J. C. Kasper, G. G. Howes, E. Quataert, C. Salem, and D. Sundkvist. Magnetic Fluctuation Power Near Proton Temperature Anisotropy Instability Thresholds in the Solar Wind . Physical Review Letters, 2009. ISSN 00319007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.211101

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.211101 2009

  5. [5]

    A. R. Bell. Turbulent amplification of magnetic field and diffusive shock acceleration of cosmic rays . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 353 0 (2): 0 550--558, 2004. ISSN 00358711. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08097.x

    arXiv 2004

  6. [6]

    Laser induced fluorescence in ar and he plasmas with a tunable diode laser

    RF Boivin and EE Scime. Laser induced fluorescence in ar and he plasmas with a tunable diode laser. Review of scientific instruments, 74 0 (10): 0 4352--4360, 2003

    2003

  7. [7]

    Two-dimensional plasma density evolution local to the inversion layer during sawtooth crash events using beam emission spectroscopy

    Sayak Bose, William Fox, Dingyun Liu, Zheng Yan, George McKee, Aaron Goodman, and Hantao Ji. Two-dimensional plasma density evolution local to the inversion layer during sawtooth crash events using beam emission spectroscopy. Review of Scientific Instruments, 93 0 (9), 2022

    2022

  8. [8]

    Experimental study of alfv \'e n wave reflection from an alfv \'e n-speed gradient relevant to the solar coronal holes

    Sayak Bose, Jason M TenBarge, Troy Carter, Michael Hahn, Hantao Ji, James Juno, Daniel Wolf Savin, Shreekrishna Tripathi, and Stephen Vincena. Experimental study of alfv \'e n wave reflection from an alfv \'e n-speed gradient relevant to the solar coronal holes. The Astrophysical Journal, 971 0 (1): 0 72, 2024

    2024

Show all 97 references
  1. [9]

    Archie F. A. Bott, Petros Tzeferacos, Laura Chen, Charlotte A. J. Palmer, Alexandra Rigby, Anthony R. Bell, Robert Bingham, Andrew Birkel, Carlo Graziani, Dustin H. Froula, Joseph Katz, Michel Koenig, Matthew W. Kunz, Chikang Li, Jena Meinecke, Francesco Miniati, Richard Petra...

    2021

  2. [10]

    Breech, W

    B. Breech, W. H. Matthaeus, S. R. Cranmer, J. C. Kasper, and S. Oughton. Electron and proton heating by solar wind turbulence. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 114 0 (A9), 2009. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014354. URL https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.co...

    2009 doi

  3. [11]

    Laboratory sources of turbulent plasma: a unique MHD plasma wind tunnel

    M R Brown and D A Schaffner. Laboratory sources of turbulent plasma: a unique MHD plasma wind tunnel. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 23 0 (6): 0 063001, September 2014. ISSN 0963-0252, 1361-6595. doi:10.1088/0963-0252/23/6/063001. URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article...

    2014 doi

  4. [12]

    Gianfranco Brunetti and Thomas W. Jones. Cosmic rays in galaxy clusters and their nonthermal emission . International Journal of Modern Physics D, 23 0 (4): 0 1--76, 2014. ISSN 02182718. doi:10.1142/S0218271814300079

    2014 doi

  5. [13]

    Caprioli and A

    D. Caprioli and A. Spitkovsky. Cosmic-ray-induced filamentation instability in collisionless shocks . Astrophysical Journal Letters, 765 0 (1), 2013. ISSN 20418205. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/765/1/L20

    2013 doi

  6. [14]

    Powering the future: Fusion & plasmas

    Troy Carter, Scott Baalrud, Riccardo Betti, Tyler Ellis, John Foster, Cameron Geddes, Arianna Gleason, Chistopher Holland, Paul Humrickhouse, Charles Kessel, et al. Powering the future: Fusion & plasmas. Technical report, US Department of Energy (USDOE), Washington, DC (United...

    2020

  7. [15]

    The role of electron heating physics in images and variability of the Galactic Centre black hole Sagittarius A*

    Andrew Chael, Michael Rowan, Ramesh Narayan, Michael Johnson, and Lorenzo Sironi. The role of electron heating physics in images and variability of the Galactic Centre black hole Sagittarius A* . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 478 0 (4): 0 5209--5229, 06 20...

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    Two-temperature, Magnetically Arrested Disc simulations of the jet from the supermassive black hole in M87

    Andrew Chael, Ramesh Narayan, and Michael D Johnson. Two-temperature, Magnetically Arrested Disc simulations of the jet from the supermassive black hole in M87 . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 486 0 (2): 0 2873--2895, 04 2019. ISSN 0035-8711. doi:10.1093/mn...

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    B. D. G. Chandran, D. Verscharen, E. Quataert, J. C. Kasper, P. A. Isenberg, and S. Bourouaine. Stochastic heating, differential flow, and the alpha-to-proton temperature ratio in the solar wind. The Astrophysical Journal, 776 0 (1): 0 45, sep 2013. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/776/1...

    2013 doi

  10. [18]

    Dorfman and T

    S. Dorfman and T. A. Carter. Observation of an Alfv \' e n Wave Parametric Instability in a Laboratory Plasma . Physical Review Letters, 116 0 (19): 0 1--5, 2016. ISSN 10797114. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.195002

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    Seth Dorfman, Emily Lichko, Joseph Olson, James Juno, Evdokiya Kostadinova, David Schaffner, Mel Abler, Saikat Chakraborty Thakur, Peter Heuer, Alfred Mallet, Feiyu Li, Gregory G. Howes, Jonathan Squire, Douglass Endrizzi, Rachel Young, Derek Schaeffer, Kristopher Klein, Racha...

    2023

  12. [20]

    Egedal, M

    Douglass Endrizzi, J. Egedal, M. Clark, K. Flanagan, S. Greess, J. Milhone, A. Millet-Ayala, J. Olson, E. E. Peterson, J. Wallace, and C. B. Forest. Laboratory resolved structure of supercritical perpendicular shocks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 126: 0 145001, Apr 2021. doi:10.1103/Phys...

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    C. B. Forest, K. Flanagan, M. Brookhart, M. Clark, C. M. Cooper, V. D \'e sangles, J. Egedal, D. Endrizzi, I. V. Khalzov, H. Li, and et al. The wisconsin plasma astrophysics laboratory. Journal of Plasma Physics, 81 0 (5): 0 345810501, 2015. doi:10.1017/S0022377815000975

    2015 doi

  14. [22]

    Peter Gary, Ruth M

    S. Peter Gary, Ruth M. Skoug, John T. Steinberg, and Charles W. Smith. Proton temperature anisotropy constraint in the solar wind: Ace observations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 28 0 (14): 0 2759--2762, 2001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013165. URL https://agupubs.onlinelibrary....

    2001 doi

  15. [23]

    Large, quiescent, magnetized plasma for wave studies

    W Gekelman and RL Stenzel. Large, quiescent, magnetized plasma for wave studies. Review of Scientific Instruments, 46 0 (10): 0 1386--1393, 1975

    1975

  16. [24]

    The upgraded large plasma device, a machine for studying frontier basic plasma physics

    W Gekelman, P Pribyl, Z Lucky, M Drandell, D Leneman, J Maggs, S Vincena, B Van Compernolle, SKP Tripathi, G Morales, et al. The upgraded large plasma device, a machine for studying frontier basic plasma physics. Review of Scientific Instruments, 87 0 (2): 0 025105, 2016. doi:...

    2016 doi

  17. [25]

    Thomson scattering on the large plasma device

    Sofiya Ghazaryan, Marietta Kaloyan, Walter Gekelman, Zoltan Lucky, Stephen Vincena, SKP Tripathi, P Pribyl, and C Niemann. Thomson scattering on the large plasma device. Review of Scientific Instruments, 93 0 (8), 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Generation of polarized shear alfv \'e n waves by a rotating magnetic field source

    Alex Gigliotti, Walter Gekelman, Patrick Pribyl, Stephen Vincena, Alex Karavaev, Xi Shao, A Surjalal Sharma, and D Papadopoulos. Generation of polarized shear alfv \'e n waves by a rotating magnetic field source. Physics of Plasmas, 16 0 (9), 2009

    2009

  19. [27]

    T. J. Gilbert, T. E. Steinberger, and E. E. Scime. Improving pulsed laser induced fluorescence distribution function analysis through matched filter signal processing . Review of Scientific Instruments, 95 0 (8): 0 083521, 08 2024. ISSN 0034-6748. doi:10.1063/5.0215510. URL ht...

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    Non-intrusive measurement of magnetic field strengths in a low-pressure argon plasma using quantum beat spectroscopy

    Tyler James Gilbert, Thomas Steinberger, and Earl E Scime. Non-intrusive measurement of magnetic field strengths in a low-pressure argon plasma using quantum beat spectroscopy. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 2025

    2025

  21. [29]

    Laser-induced fluorescence for iter divertor plasma

    AV Gorbunov, EE Mukhin, EB Berik, K Yu Vukolov, VS Lisitsa, AS Kukushkin, MG Levashova, R Barnsley, G Vayakis, and MJ Walsh. Laser-induced fluorescence for iter divertor plasma. Fusion Engineering and Design, 123: 0 695--698, 2017

    2017

  22. [30]

    Hellinger , P

    P. Hellinger , P. Tr \'a vn \' c ek , J. C. Kasper , and A. J. Lazarus . Solar wind proton temperature anisotropy: Linear theory and WIND/SWE observations . Geophys. Res. Lett., 33: 0 9101--+, May 2006. doi:10.1029/2006GL025925

    2006 doi

  23. [31]

    G. G. Howes. A prescription for the turbulent heating of astrophysical plasmas . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 409 0 (1): 0 L104--L108, 11 2010. ISSN 1745-3925. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00958.x. URL https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00958.x

    2010

  24. [32]

    Gregory G. Howes. Laboratory space physics: Investigating the physics of space plasmas in the laboratory. Physics of Plasmas, 25, 5 2018. ISSN 10897674. doi:10.1063/1.5025421

    2018 doi

  25. [33]

    Howes, Kristopher G

    Gregory G. Howes, Kristopher G. Klein, and Tak Chu Li. Diagnosing collisionless energy transfer using field–particle correlations: Vlasov–poisson plasmas. J. Plasma Phys., 83 0 (1): 0 705830102, 2017. doi:10.1017/S0022377816001197. URL https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/di...

    2017 doi

  26. [34]

    H. Ji, J. Yoo, W. Fox, M. Yamada, M. Argall, J. Egedal, Y. H. Liu, R. Wilder, S. Eriksson, W. Daughton, K. Bergstedt, S. Bose, J. Burch, R. Torbert, J. Ng, and L. J. Chen. Laboratory study of collisionless magnetic reconnection, 12 2023. ISSN 15729672

    2023

  27. [35]

    Properties of the circumgalactic medium in cosmic ray-dominated galaxy haloes

    Suoqing Ji, T K Chan, Cameron B Hummels, Philip F Hopkins, Jonathan Stern, Dušan Kereš, Eliot Quataert, Claude-André Faucher-Giguère, and Norman Murray. Properties of the circumgalactic medium in cosmic ray-dominated galaxy haloes. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 496 0 (4): 0 422...

    2020 doi

  28. [36]

    Multi-chord ir--visible two-color interferometer on kstar

    June-Woo Juhn, KC Lee, TG Lee, HM Wi, YS Kim, SH Hahn, and YU Nam. Multi-chord ir--visible two-color interferometer on kstar. Review of Scientific Instruments, 92 0 (4), 2021

    2021

  29. [37]

    J. C. Kasper , A. J. Lazarus , and S. P. Gary . Wind/SWE observations of firehose constraint on solar wind proton temperature anisotropy . Geophys. Res. Lett., 29: 0 20--1, September 2002

    2002

  30. [38]

    Kasper, Bennett A

    Justin C. Kasper, Bennett A. Maruca, Michael L. Stevens, and Arnaud Zaslavsky. Sensitive test for ion-cyclotron resonant heating in the solar wind. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110: 0 091102, Feb 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.091102. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.1...

    2013 doi

  31. [39]

    Design of a thomson scattering diagnostic for the small aspect ratio tokamak (smart)

    M Kaur, A Diallo, B LeBlanc, J Segado-Fernandez, E Viezzer, RB Huxford, A Mancini, DJ Cruz-Zabala, M Podesta, JW Berkery, et al. Design of a thomson scattering diagnostic for the small aspect ratio tokamak (smart). Review of Scientific Instruments, 95 0 (9), 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    Keiter, Earl E

    Paul A. Keiter, Earl E. Scime, Matthew M. Balkey, Robert Boivin, John L. Kline, and S. Peter Gary. Beta-dependent upper bound on ion temperature anisotropy in a laboratory plasma. Physics of Plasmas, 7 0 (3): 0 779--783, 03 2000. ISSN 1070-664X. doi:10.1063/1.873872. URL https...

    doi

  33. [41]

    Kiyani, Kareem T

    Khurom H. Kiyani, Kareem T. Osman, and Sandra C. Chapman. Dissipation and heating in solar wind turbulence: from the macro to the micro and back again. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 373 0 (2041): 0 20140155,...

    2015

  34. [42]

    K. G. Klein and G. G. Howes. Measuring collisionless damping in heliospheric plasmas using field--particle correlations. Astrophys. J. Lett., 826 0 (2): 0 L30, jul 2016. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/826/2/l30. URL https://doi.org/10.3847

    2016 doi

  35. [43]

    Komarov, A

    S. Komarov, A. A. Schekochihin, E. Churazov, and A. Spitkovsky. Self-inhibiting thermal conduction in a high- , whistler-unstable plasma. J. Plasma Phys., 84 0 (3): 0 905840305, 2018. doi:10.1017/S0022377818000399

    2018 doi

  36. [44]

    S. V. Komarov, E. M. Churazov, M. W. Kunz, and A. A. Schekochihin. Thermal conduction in a mirror-unstable plasma . Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 460 0 (1): 0 467--477, 04 2016. ISSN 0035-8711. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw963. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw963

    2016 doi

  37. [45]

    Extracting the turbulent flow-field from beam emission spectroscopy images using velocimetry

    DM Kriete, GR McKee, RJ Fonck, DR Smith, GG Whelan, and Z Yan. Extracting the turbulent flow-field from beam emission spectroscopy images using velocimetry. Review of Scientific Instruments, 89 0 (10), 2018

    2018

  38. [46]

    Russell Kulsrud and William P. Pearce. The Effect of Wave-Particle Interactions on the Propagation of Cosmic Rays . The Astrophysical Journal, 156 0 (5): 0 445--469, 1969

    1969

  39. [47]

    M. W. Kunz, J. Squire, S. A. Balbus, S. D. Bale, C. H. K. Chen, E. Churazov, S. C. Cowley, C. B. Forest, C. F. Gammie, E. Quataert, C. S. Reynolds, A. A. Schekochihin, L. Sironi, A. Spitkovsky, J. M. Stone, I. Zhuravleva, and E. G. Zweibel. [Plasma 2020 Decadal] The Material P...

    2020 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Kunz, Alexander A

    Matthew W. Kunz, Alexander A. Schekochihin, and James M. Stone. Firehose and mirror instabilities in a collisionless shearing plasma . Physical Review Letters, 112 0 (20): 0 1--6, 2014. ISSN 10797114. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.205003

    2014 doi

  41. [49]

    Kunz, Thomas W

    Matthew W. Kunz, Thomas W. Jones, and Irina Zhuravleva. Plasma Physics of the Intracluster Medium, pages 1--42. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2022. ISBN 978-981-16-4544-0. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_125-1. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_125-1

    2022 doi

  42. [50]

    Optimization of permanent magnet plasma confinement

    KN Leung, TK Samec, and A Lamm. Optimization of permanent magnet plasma confinement. Physics Letters A, 51 0 (8): 0 490--492, 1975

    1975

  43. [51]

    The motional stark effect: Overview and future development

    FM Levinton. The motional stark effect: Overview and future development. Review of scientific instruments, 70 0 (1): 0 810--814, 1999

    1999

  44. [52]

    Lichko, D

    E. Lichko, D. Endrizzi, J. Juno, J. Olson, S. Dorfman, and R. Young. Enabling Discoveries in Heliospheric Science through Laboratory Plasma Experiments [White paper for the Heliophysics 2050 workshop] , September 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4025092

    2020 doi

  45. [53]

    Emily Lichko, Douglass Endrizzi, James Juno, Joseph Olson, Seth Dorfman, Rachel Young, Saikat Chakraborty Thakur, Evdokiya Kostadinova, Mel Abler, Feiyu Li, Derek Schaeffer, Kristopher Klein, Rachael Filwett, Yeimy Rivera, Silvina Guidoni, Arian Timm, Peter Heuer, Jason TenBar...

    2023

  46. [54]

    Magnetic multipole containment of large uniform collisionless quiescent plasmas

    Rudolf Limpaecher and KR MacKenzie. Magnetic multipole containment of large uniform collisionless quiescent plasmas. Review of Scientific Instruments, 44 0 (6): 0 726--731, 1973

    1973

  47. [55]

    Peeples, Brian W

    Cassandra Lochhaas, Jason Tumlinson, Molly S. Peeples, Brian W. O’Shea, Jessica K. Werk, Raymond C. Simons, James Juno, Claire Kopenhafer, Ramona Augustin, Anna C. Wright, Ayan Acharyya, and Britton D. Smith. Figuring out gas & galaxies in enzo (foggie). vi. the circumgalactic...

    2023 doi

  48. [56]

    Anisotropic ion heating and tail generation during tearing mode magnetic reconnection in a high-temperature plasma

    RM Magee, DJ Den Hartog, STA Kumar, AF Almagri, BE Chapman, G Fiksel, VV Mirnov, ED Mezonlin, and JB Titus. Anisotropic ion heating and tail generation during tearing mode magnetic reconnection in a high-temperature plasma. Physical Review Letters, 107 0 (6): 0 065005, 2011

    2011

  49. [57]

    Pedestal fluctuation measurements with charge exchange imaging at the diii-d tokamak

    MR Major, GR McKee, B Geiger, DJ Den Hartog, K Jaehnig, C Seyfert, DR Smith, SD Stewart, and Z Yan. Pedestal fluctuation measurements with charge exchange imaging at the diii-d tokamak. Review of Scientific Instruments, 93 0 (11), 2022

    2022

  50. [58]

    Bowen, and Christopher H

    Alfred Mallet, Seth Dorfman, Mel Abler, Trevor A. Bowen, and Christopher H. K. Chen. Nonlinear dynamics of small-scale Alfv \'e n waves. Physics of Plasmas, 30 0 (11): 0 112102, November 2023. ISSN 1070-664X. doi:10.1063/5.0151035

    2023 doi

  51. [59]

    The beam emission spectroscopy diagnostic on the diii-d tokamak

    G McKee, R Ashley, R Durst, R Fonck, Marcin Jakubowski, K Tritz, K Burrell, Charles Greenfield, and John Robinson. The beam emission spectroscopy diagnostic on the diii-d tokamak. Review of scientific instruments, 70 0 (1): 0 913--916, 1999

    1999

  52. [60]

    Ross, Archie F

    Jena Meinecke, Petros Tzeferacos, James S. Ross, Archie F. A. Bott, Scott Feister, Hye-Sook Park, Anthony R. Bell, Roger Blandford, Richard L. Berger, Robert Bingham, Alexis Casner, Laura E. Chen, John Foster, Dustin H. Froula, Clement Goyon, Daniel Kalantar, Michel Koenig, Br...

    2022

  53. [61]

    Workshop on opportunities, challenges, and best practices for basic plasma science user facilities

    Howard Milchberg and Earl Scime. Workshop on opportunities, challenges, and best practices for basic plasma science user facilities. final report--conference proposal. Technical report, US Department of Energy (USDOE), Washington, DC (United States). Office of Science and Tech...

    2020

  54. [62]

    The Next Decade of Discovery in Solar and Space Physics: Exploring and Safeguarding Humanity's Home in Space

    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine . The Next Decade of Discovery in Solar and Space Physics: Exploring and Safeguarding Humanity's Home in Space. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2024. ISBN 978-0-309-73250-5. doi:10.17226/27938. URL https:/...

    2024 doi

  55. [63]

    Owen, Kinwah Wu, Yoshiyuki Inoue, H

    Ellis R. Owen, Kinwah Wu, Yoshiyuki Inoue, H. Y.Karen Yang, and Alison M.W. Mitchell. Cosmic Ray Processes in Galactic Ecosystems . Galaxies, 11 0 (4): 0 1--78, 2023. ISSN 20754434. doi:10.3390/galaxies11040086

    2023 doi

  56. [64]

    Measurement of ion motion in a shear Alfvén wave

    Nathan Palmer, Walter Gekelman, and Stephen Vincena. Measurement of ion motion in a shear Alfvén wave . Physics of Plasmas, 12 0 (7): 0 072102, 06 2005. ISSN 1070-664X. doi:10.1063/1.1930796. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1930796

    2005 doi

  57. [65]

    Peterson , Douglass A

    Ethan E. Peterson , Douglass A. Endrizzi , Michael Clark , Jan Egedal , Kenneth Flanagan , Nuno F. Loureiro , Jason Milhone , Joseph Olson , Carl R. Sovinec , John Wallace , and Cary B. Forest . Laminar and turbulent plasmoid ejection in a laboratory Parker Spiral current shee...

    2021 doi

  58. [66]

    Buoyancy Instabilities in Weakly Magnetized Low‐Collisionality Plasmas

    Eliot Quataert. Buoyancy Instabilities in Weakly Magnetized Low‐Collisionality Plasmas . The Astrophysical Journal, 673 0 (2): 0 758--762, 2008. ISSN 0004-637X. doi:10.1086/525248

    2008 doi

  59. [67]

    Eliot Quataert, William Dorland, and Gregory W. Hammett. The Magnetorotational Instability in a Collisionless Plasma . The Astrophysical Journal, 577 0 (1): 0 524--533, 2002. ISSN 0004-637X. doi:10.1086/342174

    2002 doi

  60. [68]

    Effect of plasma radial electric field on motional stark effect measurements and equilibrium reconstruction

    BW Rice, KH Burrell, and LL Lao. Effect of plasma radial electric field on motional stark effect measurements and equilibrium reconstruction. Nuclear fusion, 37 0 (4): 0 517, 1997

    1997

  61. [69]

    J. D. Richardson , L. F. Burlaga , H. Elliott , W. S. Kurth , Y. D. Liu , and R. von Steiger . Observations of the Outer Heliosphere, Heliosheath, and Interstellar Medium . Space Sci. Rev., 218 0 (4): 0 35, June 2022. doi:10.1007/s11214-022-00899-y

    2022 doi

  62. [70]

    Riquelme, Eliot Quataert, and Daniel Verscharen

    Mario A. Riquelme, Eliot Quataert, and Daniel Verscharen. Pic simulations of the effect of velocity space instabilities on electron viscosity and thermal conduction. Astrophys. J., 824 0 (2): 0 123, jun 2016. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/824/2/123. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0004...

    2016 doi

  63. [71]

    G. T. Roberg-Clark, J. F. Drake, C. S. Reynolds, and M. Swisdak. Suppression of electron thermal conduction in the high intracluster medium of galaxy clusters. Astrophys. J. Lett., 830 0 (1): 0 L9, oct 2016. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/830/1/L9. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8...

    2016 doi

  64. [72]

    G. T. Roberg-Clark, J. F. Drake, C. S. Reynolds, and M. Swisdak. Suppression of electron thermal conduction by whistler turbulence in a sustained thermal gradient. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120: 0 035101, Jan 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.035101. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.11...

    2018 doi

  65. [73]

    M. S. Rosin, A. A. Schekochihin, F. Rincon, and S. C. Cowley. A non-linear theory of the parallel firehose and gyrothermal instabilities in a weakly collisional plasma . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 413 0 (1): 0 7--38, 04 2011. ISSN 0035-8711. doi:10.1111...

    2011

  66. [74]

    D. A. Schaffner, A. Wan, and M. R. Brown. Observation of turbulent intermittency scaling with magnetic helicity in an mhd plasma wind tunnel. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112: 0 165001, Apr 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.165001. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.165001

    2014 doi

  67. [75]

    A. A. Schekochihin, S. C. Cowley, R. M. Kulsrud, M. S. Rosin, and T. Heinemann. Nonlinear growth of firehose and mirror fluctuations in astrophysical plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100: 0 081301, Feb 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.081301. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Ph...

    2008 doi

  68. [76]

    J. W.R. Schroeder, G. G. Howes, C. A. Kletzing, F. Skiff, T. A. Carter, S. Vincena, and S. Dorfman. Laboratory measurements of the physics of auroral electron acceleration by alfvén waves. Nature Communications, 12: 0 1--9, 2021. ISSN 20411723. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23377-5. ...

    2021 doi

  69. [77]

    Private communication, 2024

    Earl Scime. Private communication, 2024

    2024

  70. [78]

    A heavy ion beam probe for the madison symmetric torus

    U Shah, KA Connor, J Lei, PM Schoch, TP Crowley, JG Schatz, and Y Dong. A heavy ion beam probe for the madison symmetric torus. Review of scientific instruments, 70 0 (1): 0 963--966, 1999

    1999

  71. [79]

    Multi-dimensional incoherent thomson scattering system in phase space mapping (phasma) facility

    Peiyun Shi and Earl E Scime. Multi-dimensional incoherent thomson scattering system in phase space mapping (phasma) facility. Review of Scientific Instruments, 94 0 (2), 2023

    2023

  72. [80]

    Hasan Barbhuiya, Paul A

    Peiyun Shi, Prabhakar Srivastav, M. Hasan Barbhuiya, Paul A. Cassak, Earl E. Scime, and M. Swisdak. Laboratory observations of electron heating and non-maxwellian distributions at the kinetic scale during electron-only magnetic reconnection. Phys. Rev. Lett., 128: 0 025002, Ja...

    2022 doi

  73. [81]

    Particle Acceleration in Relativistic Collisionless Shocks: Fermi Process at Last? The Astrophysical Journal, 2008

    Anatoly Spitkovsky. Particle Acceleration in Relativistic Collisionless Shocks: Fermi Process at Last? The Astrophysical Journal, 2008. ISSN 0004-637X. doi:10.1086/590248

    2008 doi

  74. [82]

    Talbot, Rüdiger Pakmor, Christoph Pfrommer, Volker Springel, Maria Werhahn, Rebekka Bieri, and Freeke van de Voort

    Rosie Y. Talbot, Rüdiger Pakmor, Christoph Pfrommer, Volker Springel, Maria Werhahn, Rebekka Bieri, and Freeke van de Voort. Anisotropic thermal conduction on a moving mesh for cosmological simulations, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07316

    2024 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Multi-instability plasma dynamics during the route to fully developed turbulence in a helicon plasma

    S Chakraborty Thakur, C Brandt, L Cui, JJ Gosselin, AD Light, and GR Tynan. Multi-instability plasma dynamics during the route to fully developed turbulence in a helicon plasma. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 23 0 (4): 0 044006, 2014 a

    2014

  76. [84]

    Simultaneous use of camera and probe diagnostics to unambiguously identify and study the dynamics of multiple underlying instabilities during the route to plasma turbulence

    SC Thakur, C Brandt, A Light, L Cui, JJ Gosselin, and GR Tynan. Simultaneous use of camera and probe diagnostics to unambiguously identify and study the dynamics of multiple underlying instabilities during the route to plasma turbulence. Review of Scientific Instruments, 85 0 ...

    2014

  77. [85]

    First m87 event horizon telescope results

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. First m87 event horizon telescope results. i. the shadow of the supermassive black hole. Astrophys. J. Lett., 875 0 (1): 0 L1, apr 2019 a . doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

    2019 doi

  78. [86]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole . Astrophys. J. Lett., 875 0 (1): 0 L6, apr 2019 b . doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141

    2019 doi

  79. [87]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Magnetic Field Structure near The Event Horizon . Astrophys. J. Lett., 910 0 (L13): 0 43, 2021. URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/abe4de

    2021 doi

  80. [88]

    Comparing different closure relations for cosmic ray hydrodynamics

    T Thomas and C Pfrommer. Comparing different closure relations for cosmic ray hydrodynamics . Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 4816: 0 4803--4816, 2022

    2022

  81. [89]

    Tests of collision operators using laboratory measurements of shear alfv \'e n wave dispersion and damping

    DJ Thuecks, CA Kletzing, F Skiff, SR Bounds, and S Vincena. Tests of collision operators using laboratory measurements of shear alfv \'e n wave dispersion and damping. Physics of plasmas, 16 0 (5), 2009

    2009

  82. [90]

    Tu and E

    C.-Y. Tu and E. Marsch . MHD structures, waves and turbulence in the solar wind: Observations and theories . Space Sci. Rev., 73: 0 1--2, July 1995. 10.1007/BF00748891

    1995 doi

  83. [91]

    Peeples, and Jessica K

    Jason Tumlinson, Molly S. Peeples, and Jessica K. Werk. The circumgalactic medium. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 55 0 (1): 0 389--432, 2017. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055240

    2017 doi

  84. [92]

    Sokolov, Darren L

    Gábor Tóth, Bart van der Holst , Igor V. Sokolov, Darren L. De Zeeuw , Tamas I. Gombosi, Fang Fang, Ward B. Manchester, Xing Meng, Dalal Najib, Kenneth G. Powell, Quentin F. Stout, Alex Glocer, Ying-Juan Ma, and Merav Opher. Adaptive numerical algorithms in space weather model...

    2012 doi

  85. [93]

    Phase error correction method for a vibration compensated interferometer

    MA Van Zeeland and TN Carlstrom. Phase error correction method for a vibration compensated interferometer. Review of scientific instruments, 75 0 (10): 0 3423--3425, 2004

    2004

  86. [94]

    Klein, and Bennett A

    Daniel Verscharen, Kristopher G. Klein, and Bennett A. Maruca. The multi-scale nature of the solar wind. Living Rev. Solar Phys., 16 0 (1): 0 5, 2019. doi:10.1007/s41116-019-0021-0. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-019-0021-0

    2019 doi

  87. [95]

    L. B. Wilson, D. G. Sibeck, A. W. Breneman, O. Le Contel, C. Cully, D. L. Turner, V. Angelopoulos, and D. M. Malaspina. Quantified energy dissipation rates in the terrestrial bow shock: 2. Waves and dissipation . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 119 0 (8): 0 647...

    2014 doi

  88. [96]

    L. B. Wilson, D. G. Sibeck, D. L. Turner, A. Osmane, D. Caprioli, and V. Angelopoulos. Relativistic electrons produced by foreshock disturbances observed upstream of earth's bow shock . Physical Review Letters, 2016. ISSN 10797114. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.215101

    2016 doi

  89. [97]

    Spectral gap of shear alfv \'e n waves in a periodic array of magnetic mirrors

    Yang Zhang, WW Heidbrink, H Boehmer, R McWilliams, Guangye Chen, BN Breizman, S Vincena, T Carter, D Leneman, W Gekelman, et al. Spectral gap of shear alfv \'e n waves in a periodic array of magnetic mirrors. Physics of Plasmas, 15 0 (1), 2008

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.