Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 85 references

Modeling Optical Polarization Evolution in Myelinated Axon Waveguides with Realistic Imperfections

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Polarization-encoded light signals may remain recoverable in realistic myelinated axons, despite strong dips caused by bending and other structural imperfections.

desk verdict Incremental but genuine step: first polarization-fidelity study combining three realistic axon imperfections, yet the fidelity metric is a full-field overlap, so the 'recoverable' claim needs a polarization-specific metric and ensemble statistics. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.15211 v2 pith:AXMGWEF6 submitted 2026-05-07 physics.bio-ph

Ethan Davies , Rishabh , Christoph Simon This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-ph
keywords biophotonicsignalingmyelinsheathwaveguidepolarizationfidelitynodesofRanvieraxonalbendingg-ratiovariationfinite-differencetime-domainneuralcommunication
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that polarization-encoded light signals could still be recoverable after traveling through myelinated axons that carry the structural imperfections found in real nerve tissue: varying myelin thickness, non-circular cross-sections, and bending. Using finite-difference time-domain simulations of a 500-micrometer axon model with four nodes of Ranvier, it finds bending is the main enemy of polarization fidelity, while myelin-thickness variation alone barely matters. In the fully combined model, fidelity drops sharply, but certain guided modes keep coming back to values around 0.8, better than the revivals seen with bending alone. If this holds, polarization-based biophotonic communication in the brain remains plausible, and mode selection would be essential.

What carries the argument

The operational quantity is F(z), a normalized full-vector field overlap between the injected mode and the field at each monitor (Eq. 1); it is what 'polarization fidelity' means here. The simulations use FDTD to solve Maxwell's equations on a 500-micrometer domain with four 2-micrometer nodes of Ranvier, with three separately introduced imperfections: a smooth bell-shaped g-ratio variation (myelin thickness), a Fourier-perturbed polygonal cross-section with ellipticity, and a tortuosity-1.01 bent centerline. The modes are chosen to illustrate mode dependence, and F(z) is plotted at 21 monitor planes to show dips and revivals.

What would settle it

Repeat the combined-imperfection simulation for, say, 20 random draws of the thickness profile and cross-section perturbation, and compute F(z) for all guided modes; if no mode shows revivals reliably above, say, 0.5 across realizations, or if revivals disappear when fidelity is measured only within a localized spatial window, the recoverability claim would not stand.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that combining realistic anatomical imperfections in one axon waveguide does not destroy polarization fidelity outright; rather, it produces strong mode dependence, with some modes showing repeated revivals to fidelity around 0.8 that exceed the revivals seen for bending in isolation. The authors quantify this through F(z), the normalized overlap of the full vector field with the input, sampled at 21 cross-sections along the axon. Variation in myelin thickness alone leaves fidelity close to the control, non-circular cross-sections introduce mode-dependent loss, and bending causes large fluctuations and deep dips. The combined model suggests polarization-based biophotonic

Load-bearing premise

The paper equates the full-field overlap F(z) with polarization preservation, and its recoverability conclusion rests on one composite geometry with hand-picked modes and one random realization of the imperfections.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, a polarization-encoded bit may survive propagation through a geometrically realistic myelinated axon, not just idealized cylindrical ones.
  • Mode choice is decisive: some guided modes retain fidelity far better than others, so a working polarization channel would need to select or excite the robust modes.
  • Axonal bending, not myelin-thickness variation, is the dominant source of polarization degradation; efforts to preserve or measure polarization should focus on curvature.
  • The repeated revivals near 0.8 in the combined model imply that energy can cycle back into the original modal component even after strong dips, making signal recovery at nodes along the axon plausible.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • F(z) measures overlap of the whole vector field, not just the local polarization state; some of the revivals could be spatial mode recoherence rather than polarization preservation, a distinction the paper's metric cannot separate.
  • The results rest on a single random draw of the thickness profile and cross-section perturbation; averaging over many realizations could reveal whether revivals near 0.8 are typical or a lucky outcome.
  • Real detectors inside tissue would be localized, not cross-section-wide; for a specific detection region, fidelity would likely be lower than F(z), so a testable extension is to compute localized-detector fidelity along the same models.
  • The quantum-communication speculation requires superposition preservation, not just fidelity of a fixed input; a direct extension is to simulate two orthogonal inputs and check whether their relative phase survives propagation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports finite-difference time-domain simulations of light propagation in myelinated axon myelin-sheath waveguides containing four nodes of Ranvier, with three structural imperfections added separately and then combined: longitudinal variation of myelin thickness through a g-ratio profile, a non-circular (slightly elliptical with Fourier-perturbed) cross-section, and axonal bending with tortuosity 1.01. Polarization evolution is quantified for two injected guided modes by a normalized full-vector-field overlap F(z) at 21 cross-sectional monitors along a 500 µm domain. The central finding is that myelin-thickness variation alone barely changes fidelity, non-circularity induces strong mode dependence, bending produces large dips and fluctuations, and the combined model shows large fidelity drops but repeated revivals to values around 0.8 for one of the two modes. The authors conclude that polarization-encoded biophotonic signals might remain partially recoverable under realistic imperfections. The data and code are publicly available (Ref. [85]).

Significance. If the central claim were established, the paper would be a useful step beyond idealized-geometry studies of polarization in axonal waveguides, and the public data/code would support follow-up work. The manuscript is careful in anchoring refractive indices, g-ratio bounds, node lengths, and tortuosity to cited measurements, and the control simulation and per-imperfection decompositions are a sensible structure. However, the main quantitative evidence is currently a single fidelity curve per mode per geometry, computed with a metric that does not isolate polarization, and the recoverability claim rests on one random realization and two hand-selected modes. These are addressable with additional analysis of the deposited data, but as written the claim is not yet supported at the level the abstract suggests. The paper's significance therefore lies in its framework and preliminary evidence rather than in a demonstrated recoverability result.

major comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (1); Secs. III and IV] F(z) is the normalized overlap of the full input and output vector fields, not a polarization-only fidelity. Spatial mode distortion and coupling into other transverse modes lower F even if the local polarization state is unchanged; conversely, modal interference can raise F without polarization preservation. The recoverability conclusion is therefore not justified by F alone. The authors should decompose the field into the guided-mode basis and show either a polarization Stokes-vector comparison per mode or a projection onto the injected mode's polarization component. Without this, the revivals in Fig. 10 cannot be attributed to polarization preservation.
  2. [Secs. II.C–E and III; Figs. 7–10] Each imperfection and the combined model are simulated for a single randomly generated geometry (one g-ratio draw, one non-circular contour, one bend realization), and only two input modes are shown. The frequency and height of the revivals, and the comparison between the combined model and bending alone, therefore have no statistical support. The authors should run several random realizations per imperfection (or at least for the combined model) and report ranges/error bars, and examine more than the two selected modes, including modes with intermediate coupling behavior. One random draw is not representative of in-vivo axonal variation.
  3. [Sec. II.A; no convergence or mesh-refinement study] The simulations rely on a nanometer-scale FDTD mesh, but the paper does not report any mesh-convergence test or validation of the 500 µm/21-monitor setup. Since the central quantities are phase-sensitive overlaps and small fidelity differences, the authors should provide at least one convergence check (e.g., a shorter domain at two mesh resolutions) to rule out numerical artifacts, especially near the nodes of Ranvier where monitors are snapped to mesh cells.
  4. [Sec. IV; Fig. 10] The Discussion acknowledges that biological detectors would be localized and therefore a full-aperture overlap is an optimistic matched-filter receiver. This is a direct caveat to the abstract's recoverability statement. The paper should either compute a localized-detector fidelity (e.g., overlap over a smaller sub-aperture or a focused detection region) or explicitly state that the recoverability claim applies only to full-aperture coherent detection. As written, the mismatch between the metric and the biological scenario is load-bearing.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II.C] The g-ratio profile is generated from 'a random subrange' with the first internode anchored at 0.70, but the exact realization is not described in the text. Please state the seed or how reproducibility is ensured (the code is deposited, but a description of the chosen profile would help).
  2. [Fig. 4] The centerline x-offset plot is visually dominated by the macro-bend because of axis scaling. Add an inset or annotate the local fluctuations so the tortuosity-1.01 structure is readable.
  3. [Sec. II.E] The bend generation procedure is described only qualitatively ('smoothed random fluctuations', 'macro-bend', 'overall bend strength tuned'). Provide equations or pseudocode for the centerline; otherwise the geometry cannot be independently reconstructed from the text.
  4. [Sec. III; Figs. 6–10] The fidelity plots show curves but not the monitor positions relative to nodes of Ranvier. Marking the node locations (z=100,200,300,400 µm) on the x-axis would make the node-induced dips and revivals much easier to interpret.
  5. [Sec. IV] The paragraph discussing quantum information and consciousness goes beyond the evidence presented; it is speculative. It could be trimmed or explicitly separated from the modeling conclusions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the simulation results are self-contained and the fidelity metric is a defined observable, not a fitted input.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a direct FDTD simulation. F(z) in Eq. (1) is defined as a normalized full-vector-field overlap between the input field and the field at a downstream monitor; no parameter in this metric is fitted to produce the reported revivals or dips. The simulation inputs—refractive indices, g-ratio bounds, node geometry, tortuosity, and the injected modes—are either taken from cited measurements or hand-set before the runs, and the comparison across control, single-imperfection, and combined-imperfection models is presented as raw simulation output. The self-citations to Frede et al. and Kumar et al. provide background and prior idealized results but are not load-bearing for the present target claim: the new conclusion about revivals under combined imperfections does not reduce to those citations. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or renamed empirical pattern is imported from the authors' prior work. The Discussion explicitly flags limitations (full-cross-section planar monitors, single guided mode, localized detection in vivo), which are validity concerns about the proxy used for polarization preservation, not circular steps. Accordingly, the analysis finds no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central claim depends on hand-set simulation parameters (radius, wavelength, ellipticity, g-ratio bounds) and on modeling assumptions that are partially acknowledged in the Discussion. The most important load-bearing assumption is that F(z) measures polarization fidelity and that one random realization is representative; those are not backed by error bars or ensemble statistics.

free parameters (5)
  • Axon radius r_a = 0.6 µm
    Hand-selected to balance computational cost while staying in the cortical white-matter range; sets the waveguide core size and affects guided modes.
  • Optical wavelength λ = 0.4 µm
    Chosen for computational cost and strong confinement, not as an optimal biological wavelength; results may be wavelength-dependent.
  • Ellipticity ratio = a_in = 0.6/1.15 µm, b_in = 0.6×1.15 µm
    Imposed 15% ellipticity to represent non-circular axons; no in-vivo distribution of ellipticity is sampled.
  • g-ratio bounds and anchor = g ∈ [0.60, 0.80], edge g = 0.70
    Bounds motivated by literature, edge anchored for mode launch; the thickness profile is otherwise a random smooth bell shape.
  • Random imperfection realization = Not specified (no seeds or distributions)
    The central claims about mode dependence and combined-model revivals are demonstrated on one random draw; no ensemble statistics are provided.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Maxwell's equations solved by FDTD with Yee cells
    Basis of all field simulations; no numerical convergence study is reported.
  • domain assumption Myelin, axon, and interstitial fluid are homogeneous, lossless, constant-index dielectrics; absorption is negligible
    Introduced in Sec. II.B; if myelin absorption or index heterogeneity is significant, the fidelity numbers change.
  • ad hoc to paper The normalized field overlap F(z) of Eq. (1) is a valid measure of polarization fidelity
    F is a full-vector spatial overlap; spatial mode coupling and distortion lower it independently of polarization-state changes.
  • ad hoc to paper The single random geometry realizations are representative of in-vivo axonal variation
    One arbitrary realization per imperfection and one combined model are used; the Discussion acknowledges the need for more realism but not for ensemble statistics.
  • domain assumption Launching a single guided mode approximates biophoton emission and detection
    The Discussion explicitly lists this as a limitation: point-like emission and localized detection are not modeled.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modeling Optical Polarization Evolution in Myelinated Axon Waveguides with Realistic Imperfections." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AXMGWEF6

@misc{pith2026260515211,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modeling Optical Polarization Evolution in Myelinated Axon Waveguides with Realistic Imperfections},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AXMGWEF6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.15211}
}
read the original abstract

Biophotonic signaling via axons has been proposed as a potential mode of neural communication, where information might be encoded not only in photon number and wavelength but also in polarization. Although earlier computational studies have examined how structural imperfections influence optical transmission, their effects on polarization fidelity remain unexplored; previous modeling of polarization fidelity in myelinated axons has largely focused on idealized geometries. This study incorporates three structural imperfections characteristic of axons in vivo: variation in myelin thickness, non-circular cross-sectional geometry, and axonal bending, within a model that includes four nodes of Ranvier. We find that variation in myelin thickness alone has minimal impact on fidelity, while non-circular cross-sections show strong mode dependence. Axonal bending has the most significant influence, generating large fluctuations and deep fidelity dips. When all imperfections are combined in a single axon model, the simulations show substantial drops in fidelity, yet certain modes exhibit recovery, with repeated revivals reaching values of around 0.8, which exceeds the revivals observed in the single imperfection cases. Overall, the results indicate that although structural imperfections affect polarization, polarization-based biophotonic signals might remain recoverable even in realistic axons, lending support to the plausibility of polarization-based biophotonic signaling in the brain.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15211 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Artistic diagram of axon incorporating three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. To limit the computational cost, the models do not [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Myelin thickness variation used in simulations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Polarization fidelity for control axon for the two in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Injected modes used for the circular and non-circular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Polarization fidelity for the axon with a non-circular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Polarization fidelity for the bent axon with tortuosity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [85]

    modeling optical polarization evolution in Myelinated Axon Waveguides with Realistic Imperfec- tions

    Ethan Davies, Rishabh, and Christoph Simon, Data and code for “modeling optical polarization evolution in Myelinated Axon Waveguides with Realistic Imperfec- tions” (2026), doi: 10.5281/zenodo.20057606

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.20057606 2026

  2. [1]

    McKilliam, Explanation, understanding, and the methodological problem in consciousness science, Syn- these205, 142 (2025)

    A. McKilliam, Explanation, understanding, and the methodological problem in consciousness science, Syn- these205, 142 (2025)

    2025

  3. [2]

    C. Koch, M. Massimini, M. Boly, and G. Tononi, Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems, Nat. Rev. Neurosci.17, 307 (2016)

    2016

  4. [3]

    N. P. Franks, General anaesthesia: from molecular tar- gets to neuronal pathways of sleep and arousal, Nat. Rev. Neurosci.9, 370 (2008). 8

    2008

  5. [4]

    G. A. Mashour, Integrating the science of consciousness and anesthesia, Anesth. Analg.103, 975 (2006)

    2006

  6. [5]

    Humeau and D

    Y. Humeau and D. Choquet, The next generation of ap- proaches to investigate the link between synaptic plastic- ity and learning, Nat. Neurosci.22, 1536 (2019)

    2019

  7. [6]

    Machado, C

    S. Machado, C. E. Portella, J. G. Silva, B. Velasques, V. H. Bastos, M. Cunha, L. Basile, M. Cagy, R. A. Piedade, and P. Ribeiro, Learning and implicit mem- ory: mechanisms and neuroplasticity, Rev. Neurol.46, 543 (2008)

    2008

  8. [7]

    J. J. Day and J. D. Sweatt, DNA methylation and mem- ory formation, Nat. Neurosci.13, 1319 (2010)

    2010

Show all 85 references
  1. [8]

    Nadel, A

    L. Nadel, A. Hupbach, R. Gomez, and K. Newman- Smith, Memory formation, consolidation and transfor- mation, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.36, 1640 (2012)

    2012

  2. [9]

    Tang and J

    R. Tang and J. Dai, Biophoton signal transmission and processing in the brain, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B139, 71 (2014)

    2014

  3. [10]

    N. Liu, Z. Wang, and J. Dai, Intracellular simulated bio- photon stimulation and transsynaptic signal transmis- sion, Appl. Phys. Lett.121, 203701 (2022)

    2022

  4. [11]

    Y. Sun, C. Wang, and J. Dai, Biophotons as neural com- munication signals demonstrated by in situ biophoton autography, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci.9, 315 (2010)

    2010

  5. [12]

    Kumar, K

    S. Kumar, K. Boone, J. A. Tuszy´ nski, P. E. Barclay, and C. Simon, Possible existence of optical communication channels in the brain, Sci. Rep.6, 36508 (2016)

    2016

  6. [13]

    Zarkeshian, S

    P. Zarkeshian, S. Kumar, J. Tuszynski, P. Barclay, and C. Simon, Are there optical communication channels in the brain?, Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed.)23, 1407 (2018)

    2018

  7. [14]

    H. Zeng, Y. Zhang, Y. Ma, and S. Li, Electromagnetic modeling and simulation of the biophoton propagation in myelinated axon waveguide, Appl. Opt.61, 4013 (2022)

    2022

  8. [15]

    Frede, H

    E. Frede, H. Zadeh-Haghighi, and C. Simon, Optical po- larization evolution and transmission in multi-Ranvier- node axonal myelin-sheath waveguides, IEEE Trans. Mol. Biol. Multi-Scale Commun.10, 613 (2024)

    2024

  9. [16]

    I. P. Antonov, A. V. Goroshkov, V. N. Kalyunov, I. V. Markhvida, A. S. Rubanov, and L. V. Tanin, Measure- ment of the radial distribution of the refractive index of the Schwann’s sheath and the axon of a myelinated nerve fiber in vivo, J. Appl. Spectrosc.39, 822 (1983)

    1983

  10. [17]

    Maghoul, A

    A. Maghoul, A. Khaleghi, and I. Balasingham, Engineer- ing photonic transmission inside brain nerve fibers, IEEE Access9, 35399 (2021)

    2021

  11. [18]

    Cifra and P

    M. Cifra and P. Posp ´ ıˇ sil, Ultra-weak photon emission from biological samples: definition, mechanisms, prop- erties, detection and applications, J. Photochem. Photo- biol. B139, 2 (2014)

    2014

  12. [19]

    Salari, V

    V. Salari, V. Seshan, L. Frankle, D. England, C. Simon, and D. Oblak, Imaging ultraweak photon emission from living and dead mice and from plants under stress, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.16, 4354 (2025)

    2025

  13. [20]

    J. Du, T. Deng, B. Cao, Z. Wang, M. Yang, and J. Han, The application and trend of ultra-weak photon emis- sion in biology and medicine, Front. Chem.11, 1140128 (2023)

    2023

  14. [21]

    Isojima, T

    Y. Isojima, T. Isoshima, K. Nagai, K. Kikuchi, and H. Nakagawa, Ultraweak biochemiluminescence detected from rat hippocampal slices, Neuroreport6, 658 (1995)

    1995

  15. [22]

    Kobayashi, M

    M. Kobayashi, M. Takeda, T. Sato, Y. Yamazaki, K. Kaneko, K. Ito, H. Kato, and H. Inaba, In vivo imag- ing of spontaneous ultraweak photon emission from a rat’s brain correlated with cerebral energy metabolism and oxidative stress, Neurosci. Res.34, 103 (1999)

    1999

  16. [23]

    Kataoka, Y

    Y. Kataoka, Y. Cui, A. Yamagata, M. Niigaki, T. Hi- rohata, N. Oishi, and Y. Watanabe, Activity-dependent neural tissue oxidation emits intrinsic ultraweak photons, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.285, 1007 (2001)

    2001

  17. [24]

    Tang and J

    R. Tang and J. Dai, Spatiotemporal imaging of glutamate-induced biophotonic activities and transmis- sion in neural circuits, PLoS One9, e85643 (2014)

    2014

  18. [25]

    Simon, Can quantum physics help solve the hard prob- lem of consciousness?, J

    C. Simon, Can quantum physics help solve the hard prob- lem of consciousness?, J. Consciousness Stud.26, 204 (2019)

    2019

  19. [26]

    K. X. Zhanget al., Violet-light suppression of thermoge- nesis by opsin 5 hypothalamic neurons, Nature585, 420 (2020)

    2020

  20. [27]

    I. S. Buyanova and M. Arsalidou, Cerebral white mat- ter myelination and relations to age, gender, and cog- nition: a selective review, Front. Hum. Neurosci.15, 662031 (2021)

    2021

  21. [28]

    J. Li, L. Zhang, Y. Chu, M. Namaka, B. Deng, J. Kong, and X. Bi, Astrocytes in oligodendrocyte lineage develop- ment and white matter pathology, Front. Cell. Neurosci. 10, 119 (2016)

    2016

  22. [29]

    Sampaio-Baptista and H

    C. Sampaio-Baptista and H. Johansen-Berg, White mat- ter plasticity in the adult brain, Neuron96, 1239 (2017)

    2017

  23. [30]

    H. Wang, J. Wang, G. Cai, Y. Liu, Y. Qu, and T. Wu, A physical perspective to the inductive function of myelin—a missing piece of neuroscience, Front. Neural Circuits14, 562005 (2021)

    2021

  24. [31]

    Poitelon, A

    Y. Poitelon, A. M. Kopec, and S. Belin, Myelin fat facts: an overview of lipids and fatty acid metabolism, Cells9, 812 (2020)

    2020

  25. [32]

    Q. Yu, T. Guan, Y. Guo, and J. Kong, The initial myeli- nation in the central nervous system, ASN Neuro15, 17590914231163039 (2023)

    2023

  26. [33]

    Franze, J

    K. Franze, J. Grosche, S. N. Skatchkov, S. Schinkinger, C. Foja, D. Schild, O. Uckermann, K. Travis, A. Reichen- bach, and J. Guck, M¨ uller cells are living optical fibers in the vertebrate retina, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.104, 8287 (2007)

    2007

  27. [34]

    A. M. Labin, S. K. Safuri, E. N. Ribak, and I. Perlman, M¨ uller cells separate between wavelengths to improve day vision with minimal effect upon night vision, Nat. Com- mun.5, 4319 (2014)

    2014

  28. [35]

    E. Pini, D. Di Meo, I. Costantini, M. Sorelli, S. Bradley, D. S. Wiersma, F. S. Pavone, and L. Pattelli, Anisotropic light propagation in human brain white matter, Neu- rophotonics12, 045003 (2025)

    2025

  29. [36]

    DePaoli, A

    D. DePaoli, A. Gasecka, M. Bahdine, J. M. Deschenes, L. Goetz, J. Perez-Sanchez, R. P. Bonin, Y. De Koninck, M. Parent, and D. C. Cˆ ot´ e, Anisotropic light scattering from myelinated axons in the spinal cord, Neurophotonics 7, 015011 (2020)

    2020

  30. [37]

    Zarkeshian, T

    P. Zarkeshian, T. Kergan, R. Ghobadi, W. Nicola, and C. Simon, Photons guided by axons may enable backpropagation-based learning in the brain, Sci. Rep. 12, 20720 (2022)

    2022

  31. [38]

    Liu, Y.-C

    Z. Liu, Y.-C. Chen, and P. Ao, Entangled biphoton gen- eration in the myelin sheath, Phys. Rev. E110, 024402 (2024)

    2024

  32. [39]

    Omidi, M

    M. Omidi, M. I. Zibaii, and N. Granpayeh, Simulation of nerve fiber based on anti-resonant reflecting optical waveguide, Sci. Rep.12, 19356 (2022). 9

    2022

  33. [40]

    O. M. Ostafiychuk, V. A. Es’kin, A. V. Kudrin, and A. A. Popova, Electromagnetic waves guided by a myelinated axon in the optical and infrared ranges, in2019 Pho- tonIcs & Electromagnetics Research Symposium – Spring (PIERS-Spring)(2019) p. 1180

    2019

  34. [41]

    Zangari, D

    A. Zangari, D. Micheli, R. Galeazzi, and A. Tozzi, Node of Ranvier as an array of bio-nanoantennas for infrared communication in nerve tissue, Sci. Rep.8, 539 (2018)

    2018

  35. [42]

    G. Liu, C. Chang, Z. Qiao, K. Wu, Z. Zhu, G. Cui, W. Peng, Y. Tang, J. Li, and C. Fan, Myelin sheath as a dielectric waveguide for signal propagation in the mid- infrared to terahertz spectral range, Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1807862 (2019)

    2019

  36. [43]

    L. Guo, D. Xu, K. Wang, Y. Sun, Q. Zhang, H. Ning, C. Lu, S. Wang, and Y. Gong, Electromagnetic character- istics of in vivo nerve fibers at the terahertz–far-infrared band, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.10, 1055232 (2022)

    2022

  37. [44]

    Nilsson, J

    M. Nilsson, J. L¨ att, F. St ˚ ahlberg, D. van Westen, and H. Hagsl¨ att, The importance of axonal undulation in diffusion MR measurements: a Monte Carlo simulation study, NMR Biomed.25, 795 (2012)

    2012

  38. [45]

    H. H. Lee, K. Yaros, J. Veraart, J. L. Pathan, F. X. Liang, S. G. Kim, D. S. Novikov, and E. Fieremans, Along- axon diameter variation and axonal orientation disper- sion revealed with 3D electron microscopy: implications for quantifying brain white matter microstructure with ...

    2019

  39. [46]

    Abdollahzadeh, I

    A. Abdollahzadeh, I. Belevich, E. Jokitalo, A. Sierra, and J. Tohka, DeepACSON automated segmentation of white matter in 3D electron microscopy, Commun. Biol.4, 179 (2021)

    2021

  40. [47]

    J. P. Fraher, Quantitative studies on the maturation of central and peripheral parts of individual ventral mo- toneuron axons. I. Myelin sheath and axon calibre, J. Anat.126, 509 (1978)

    1978

  41. [48]

    P. M. Bartmeyer, N. P. Biscola, and L. A. Havton, A shape-adjusted ellipse approach corrects for varied axonal dispersion angles and myelination in primate nerve roots, Sci. Rep.11, 3150 (2021)

    2021

  42. [49]

    P. Chen, L. Zhou, Z. Liu, and S. Liu, Measurement and analysis of optical transmission characteristics of the hu- man skull, J. Biophotonics18, e202400414 (2025)

    2025

  43. [50]

    Z. Wang, I. S. Chun, X. Li, Z. Y. Ong, E. Pop, L. Mil- let, M. Gillette, and G. Popescu, Topography and refrac- tometry of nanostructures using spatial light interference microscopy, Opt. Lett.35, 208 (2010)

    2010

  44. [51]

    V. V. Tuchin, I. L. Maksimova, D. A. Zimnyakov, I. L. Kon, A. H. Mavlyutov, and A. A. Mishin, Light prop- agation in tissues with controlled optical properties, J. Biomed. Opt.2, 401 (1997)

    1997

  45. [52]

    R. L. van Veen, H. J. Sterenborg, A. Pifferi, A. Torri- celli, E. Chikoidze, and R. Cubeddu, Determination of visible near-ir absorption coefficients of mammalian fat using time- and spatially resolved diffuse reflectance and transmission spectroscopy, J. Biomed. Opt.10, 054004 (2005)

    2005

  46. [53]

    Facci, P

    P. Facci, P. Cavatorta, L. Cristofolini, M. P. Fontana, A. Fasano, and P. Riccio, Kinetic and structural study of the interaction of myelin basic protein with dipalmi- toylphosphatidylglycerol layers, Biophys. J.78, 1413 (2000)

    2000

  47. [54]

    A. N. Yaroslavsky, P. C. Schulze, I. V. Yaroslavsky, R. Schober, F. Ulrich, and H. J. Schwarzmaier, Optical properties of selected native and coagulated human brain tissues in vitro in the visible and near infrared spectral range, Phys. Med. Biol.47, 2059 (2002)

  48. [55]

    W. F. Cheong, S. A. Prahl, and A. J. Welch, A review of the optical properties of biological tissues, IEEE J. Quantum Electron.26, 2166 (1990)

    1990

  49. [56]

    I. L. Arancibia-C´ arcamo, M. C. Ford, L. Cossell, K. Ishida, K. Tohyama, and D. Attwell, Node of Ran- vier length as a potential regulator of myelinated axon conduction speed, eLife6, e23329 (2017)

    2017

  50. [57]

    E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, and T. M. Jessell,Prin- ciples of Neural Science, 4th ed. (McGraw-Hill Health Professions Division, New York, 2000)

    2000

  51. [58]

    Berman, K

    S. Berman, K. L. West, M. D. Does, J. D. Yeatman, and A. A. Mezer, Evaluating g-ratio weighted changes in the corpus callosum as a function of age and sex, NeuroImage 182, 304 (2018)

    2018

  52. [59]

    Abdollahzadeh, I

    A. Abdollahzadeh, I. Belevich, E. Jokitalo, J. Tohka, and A. Sierra, Automated 3D axonal morphometry of white matter, Sci. Rep.9, 6084 (2019)

    2019

  53. [60]

    Liewald, R

    D. Liewald, R. Miller, N. Logothetis, H. J. Wagner, and A. Sch¨ uz, Distribution of axon diameters in cortical white matter: an electron-microscopic study on three human brains and a macaque, Biol. Cybern.108, 541 (2014)

    2014

  54. [61]

    H. M. Kjer, M. Andersson, Y. He, A. Pacureanu, A. Da- ducci, M. Pizzolato, T. Salditt, A.-L. Robisch, M. Ecker- mann, M. T¨ opperwien, A. B. Dahl, M. L. Elkjær, Z. Illes, M. Ptito, V. A. Dahl, and T. B. Dyrby, Bridging the 3D geometrical organisation of white matter pathways a...

    2025

  55. [62]

    Albrecht-Buehler, Cellular infrared detector appears to be contained in the centrosome, Cell Motil

    G. Albrecht-Buehler, Cellular infrared detector appears to be contained in the centrosome, Cell Motil. Cytoskele- ton27, 262 (1994)

    1994

  56. [63]

    M. Kato, K. Shinzawa, and S. Yoshikawa, Cytochrome oxidase is a possible photoreceptor in mitochondria, Pho- tobiochem. Photobiophys.2, 263 (1981)

    1981

  57. [64]

    A. I. Zhuravlev, O. P. Tsvylev, and S. M. Zubkova, Spontaneous endogenous ultraweak luminescence of rat liver mitochondria under normal metabolic conditions, Biofizika18, 1037 (1973)

    1973

  58. [65]

    J. A. Tuszy´ nski and J. M. Dixon, Quantitative analysis of the frequency spectrum of the radiation emitted by cytochrome oxidase enzymes, Phys. Rev. E64, 051915 (2001)

    2001

  59. [66]

    Rahnama, J

    M. Rahnama, J. A. Tuszynski, I. B´ okkon, M. Cifra, P. Sardar, and V. Salari, Emission of mitochondrial bio- photons and their effect on electrical activity of mem- brane via microtubules, J. Integr. Neurosci.10, 65 (2011)

    2011

  60. [67]

    V. M. Mazhul’ and D. G. Shcherbin, Phosphorescence analysis of lipid peroxidation products in liposomes, Bio- physics44, 656 (1999)

    1999

  61. [68]

    Stoler, A

    O. Stoler, A. Stavsky, Y. Khrapunsky, I. Melamed, G. Stutzmann, D. Gitler, I. Sekler, and I. Fleidervish, Frequency- and spike-timing-dependent mitochondrial Ca2+ signaling regulates the metabolic rate and synaptic efficacy in cortical neurons, eLife11, e74606 (2022)

    2022

  62. [69]

    Caminiti, F

    R. Caminiti, F. Carducci, C. Piervincenzi, A. Battaglia- Mayer, G. Confalone, F. Visco-Comandini, P. Pantano, and G. M. Innocenti, Diameter, length, speed, and con- duction delay of callosal axons in macaque monkeys and humans: Comparing data from histology and magnetic resona...

    2013

  63. [70]

    F. O. Schmitt and R. S. Bear, The ultrastructure of the nerve axon sheath, Biol. Rev.14, 27 (1939)

    1939

  64. [71]

    F. O. Schmitt and R. S. Bear, The optical properties of vertebrate nerve axons as related to fiber size, J. Cell. Comp. Physiol.9, 261 (1937)

    1937

  65. [72]

    Watson, N

    D. Watson, N. Hagen, J. Diver, P. Marchand, and M. Chachisvilis, Elastic light scattering from single cells: orientational dynamics in optical trap, Biophys. J.87, 1298 (2004)

    2004

  66. [73]

    J. Kwon, M. Kim, H. Park, B. M. Kang, Y. Jo, J. H. Kim, O. James, S. H. Yun, S. G. Kim, M. Suh, and M. Choi, Label-free nanoscale optical metrology on myelinated ax- ons in vivo, Nat. Commun.8, 1832 (2017)

    2017

  67. [74]

    P. D. Wade, J. Taylor, and P. Siekevitz, Mammalian cere- bral cortical tissue responds to low-intensity visible light, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.85, 9322 (1988)

    1988

  68. [75]

    D. N. Leszkiewicz, K. Kandler, and E. Aizenman, En- hancement of NMDA receptor-mediated currents by light in rat neurones in vitro, J. Physiol.524, 365 (2000)

    2000

  69. [76]

    Vandewalle, P

    G. Vandewalle, P. Maquet, and D.-J. Dijk, Light as a modulator of cognitive brain function, Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 429 (2009)

    2009

  70. [77]

    Starck, J

    T. Starck, J. Nissil¨ a, A. Aunio, A. Abou-Elseoud, J. Remes, J. Nikkinen, M. Timonen, T. Takala, O. Ter- vonen, and V. Kiviniemi, Stimulating brain tissue with bright light alters functional connectivity in brain at the resting state, World J. Neurosci.2, 81 (2012)

    2012

  71. [78]

    Adams and F

    B. Adams and F. Petruccione, Quantum effects in the brain: A review, A VS Quantum Sci.2, 022901 (2020)

    2020

  72. [79]

    M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum cognition: The possibility of processing with nuclear spins in the brain, Ann. Phys. 362, 593 (2015)

    2015

  73. [80]

    A. K. Fedorov, N. Gisin, S. M. Beloussov, and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv:2203.17181

    arXiv

  74. [81]

    I. N. Marshall, Consciousness and Bose-Einstein conden- sates, New Ideas in Psychology7, 73 (1989)

    1989

  75. [82]

    Schubert, M

    N. Schubert, M. Axer, U. Pietrzyk, and K. Amunts, 3D polarized light imaging portrayed: Visualization of fiber architecture derived from 3D-PLI, inHigh-Resolution Neuroimaging: Basic Physical Principles and Clinical Applications, edited by A. M. Halefo˘ glu (InTech, Lon- don, 2018)

    2018

  76. [83]

    Menzel, K

    M. Menzel, K. Michielsen, H. De Raedt, J. Reckfort, K. Amunts, and M. Axer, A Jones matrix formalism for simulating three-dimensional polarized light imaging of brain tissue, J. R. Soc. Interface12, 20150734 (2015)

    2015

  77. [84]

    Nakahara, M

    J. Nakahara, M. Maeda, S. Aiso, and N. Suzuki, Cur- rent concepts in multiple sclerosis: autoimmunity versus oligodendrogliopathy, Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol.42, 26 (2012)

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.