Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Effect of Intrinsic Dataset Properties on Generalization: Unraveling Learning Differences Between Natural and Medical Images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.08865 v3 pith:AYNUOBA4 submitted 2024-01-16 cs.CV cs.LGeess.IVstat.ML

classification cs.CVcs.LGeess.IVstat.ML
keywords medicalgeneralizationintrinsicdatadomainsimagesimagingnatural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

This paper investigates discrepancies in how neural networks learn from different imaging domains, which are commonly overlooked when adopting computer vision techniques from the domain of natural images to other specialized domains such as medical images. Recent works have found that the generalization error of a trained network typically increases with the intrinsic dimension ($d_{data}$) of its training set. Yet, the steepness of this relationship varies significantly between medical (radiological) and natural imaging domains, with no existing theoretical explanation. We address this gap in knowledge by establishing and empirically validating a generalization scaling law with respect to $d_{data}$, and propose that the substantial scaling discrepancy between the two considered domains may be at least partially attributed to the higher intrinsic ``label sharpness'' ($K_\mathcal{F}$) of medical imaging datasets, a metric which we propose. Next, we demonstrate an additional benefit of measuring the label sharpness of a training set: it is negatively correlated with the trained model's adversarial robustness, which notably leads to models for medical images having a substantially higher vulnerability to adversarial attack. Finally, we extend our $d_{data}$ formalism to the related metric of learned representation intrinsic dimension ($d_{repr}$), derive a generalization scaling law with respect to $d_{repr}$, and show that $d_{data}$ serves as an upper bound for $d_{repr}$. Our theoretical results are supported by thorough experiments with six models and eleven natural and medical imaging datasets over a range of training set sizes. Our findings offer insights into the influence of intrinsic dataset properties on generalization, representation learning, and robustness in deep neural networks. Code link: https://github.com/mazurowski-lab/intrinsic-properties

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Geometry of Saturation: Effective Rank Predicts When Labels Stop Helping in Few-Shot Classification

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The saturation index S(K)=erank(pooled within-class covariance)/K tracks when few-shot labels become redundant for fixed linear probes, with within-task median Spearman ρ≈0.81 on 17 binary tasks.

  2. Towards Affordable Tumor Segmentation and Visualization for 3D Breast MRI Using SAM2

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    SAM2 can segment breast tumors in 3D MRI with a single bounding-box prompt, and center-outward propagation yields the best volumetric Dice.

Pith tools