Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adaptive Preference Aggregation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.10215 v1 pith:AZ5FVVBC submitted 2025-03-13 cs.AI cs.GT

classification cs.AIcs.GT
keywords humansystemsaggregationpreferencepreferencesaccordanceadaptiveadapts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

AI alignment, the challenge of ensuring AI systems act in accordance with human values, has emerged as a critical problem in the development of systems such as foundation models and recommender systems. Still, the current dominant approach, reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) faces known theoretical limitations in aggregating diverse human preferences. Social choice theory provides a framework to aggregate preferences, but was not developed for the multidimensional applications typical of AI. Leveraging insights from a recently published urn process, this work introduces a preference aggregation strategy that adapts to the user's context and that inherits the good properties of the maximal lottery, a Condorcet-consistent solution concept.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Shapley-based Data Valuation for LLM Alignment via Sequential Preference Optimization

    cs.LG 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sequential DPO-style training makes coalition policies reconstructable by arithmetic on singleton models, enabling linear-cost approximation of Shapley data values.

Pith tools