Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

"Well, Keep Thinking": Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Adaptive Injection Decoding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.10167 v2 pith:AZW3A26S submitted 2025-03-13 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningllmspromptingcapabilitiesdecodingexplicitstrategywithout
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning abilities, often attributed to few-shot or zero-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. While effective, these methods require labor-intensive prompt engineering, raising the question of whether reasoning can be induced without reliance on explicit prompts. In this work, we unlock the reasoning capabilities of LLMs without explicit prompting. Inspired by zero-shot CoT and CoT-decoding, we propose a novel decoding strategy that systematically nudges LLMs to continue reasoning, thereby preventing immature reasoning processes. Specifically, we monitor the model's generation and inject a designated phrase whenever it is likely to conclude its response prematurely, before completing the reasoning process. Our experimental evaluations on diverse reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our proposed strategy substantially improves LLM reasoning capabilities, highlighting the potential of decoding-based interventions as an alternative to traditional prompting techniques.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Answer First, Reason Later: Commitment Order in Diffusion LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Answer-first token commitment and answer-only collapse explain why unconstrained diffusion LLM decoding fails on reasoning tasks, and a frontier-window gate recovers the gap.

  2. Why Do MLLMs Struggle with Spatial Understanding? A Systematic Analysis from Data to Architecture

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Spatial understanding in multimodal LLMs plateaus quickly as training data grows, and position encoding in the visual encoder is the more influential factor.

  3. Structured Thoughts For Improved Reasoning And Context Pruning

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    Structured try/outcome SFT improves math reasoning by up to 8% over standard SFT and enables pruning ~85% of context with ~9% accuracy drop.

Pith tools