pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.00377 · v1 · pith:B3MSYYNUnew · submitted 2025-02-01 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI· cs.MM· cs.SD· eess.AS

When End-to-End is Overkill: Rethinking Cascaded Speech-to-Text Translation

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AIcs.MMcs.SDeess.AS
keywords translationspeechspeech-to-textcandidatescascadeddomainend-to-enderror
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Though end-to-end speech-to-text translation has been a great success, we argue that the cascaded speech-to-text translation model still has its place, which is usually criticized for the error propagation between automatic speech recognition (ASR) and machine translation (MT) models. In this paper, we explore the benefits of incorporating multiple candidates from ASR and self-supervised speech features into MT. Our analysis reveals that the primary cause of cascading errors stems from the increased divergence between similar samples in the speech domain when mapped to the text domain. By including multiple candidates and self-supervised speech features, our approach allows the machine translation model to choose the right words and ensure precise translation using various speech samples. This strategy minimizes error spread and takes advantage of large ASR and MT datasets, along with pre-trained ASR/MT models, while addressing associated issues.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Hearing to Translate: The Effectiveness of Speech Modality Integration into LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Cascaded systems remain the most reliable for speech translation overall, but recent SpeechLLMs match or outperform them in many conditions while standalone speech models lag.