Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 47 references

Tailoring the Frequency-Dependent Optical Response of Hematite through Mono- and Co-Doping: A First-Principles Study

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Y co-doping with boron restores dynamical stability to hematite and pairs low-energy light absorption with a smoother optical response.

desk verdict Clean phonon story on B/Y hematite with a real stability result, but the optics half is RPA-on-DFT+U and the “Y heals B” claim rests on thin configuration evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.23409 v1 pith:B3OMEYJ2 submitted 2026-07-26 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.chem-ph

Abdul Ahad Mamun , Muhammad Anisuzzaman Talukder This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph
keywords hematiteα-Fe2O3dopingco-dopingphonondispersiondynamicalstabilitydielectricfunctionopticalproperties
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that doping hematite with boron, yttrium, or both changes both how stable its crystal lattice is and how it absorbs and redirects light across frequencies. First-principles phonon calculations show that boron alone softens the lattice enough to produce imaginary vibration modes, while yttrium alone keeps the structure stable and yttrium-plus-boron suppresses those soft modes through lattice relaxation. On the optical side, boron pulls absorption to lower energies by adding valence states, yttrium reshapes orbital hybridization, and the co-doped material inherits the low-energy absorption while keeping a more balanced dielectric and refractive response. The authors present this co-doping route as a practical way to make hematite more useful for photoelectrodes, optoelectronics, and photonic devices that need both structural durability and stronger visible-light interaction.

What carries the argument

Simultaneous phonon-dispersion analysis (finite-displacement Phonopy on DFT+U supercells) and independent-particle RPA dielectric function, from which refractive index, extinction coefficient, optical conductivity, reflectivity, and penetration depth are derived. The machinery links dopant-driven changes in interatomic force constants to the presence or absence of soft modes and to the shape of the optical spectra.

What would settle it

Measure phonon spectra or inelastic scattering on well-characterized B-doped versus (B, Y)-co-doped hematite: if B-doped samples show no soft modes, or if co-doping fails to eliminate them, the stability claim fails; likewise, if measured absorption onsets and low-energy tails disagree with the calculated 1.58–1.65 eV gaps and dielectric peaks, the optical ranking collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Pristine and Y-doped α-Fe₂O₃ are dynamically stable with entirely positive phonon modes, whereas B-doped α-Fe₂O₃ develops imaginary modes from Fe–O framework distortions; adding Y together with B suppresses those soft modes and restores stability. At the same time, B lowers the optical gap to about 1.65 eV (1.58 eV when co-doped) and opens low-energy absorption, while Y and especially (B, Y) co-doping improve static dielectric constant and smooth the frequency-dependent optical functions relative to the mono-doped and pristine cases.

Load-bearing premise

The optical spectra and reported band gaps rest on independent-particle random-phase approximation built on DFT+U eigenvalues, without quasiparticle or excitonic corrections that are known to matter for hematite.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • B-only doping is a poor practical route because lattice instability accompanies the desired low-energy absorption.
  • (B, Y) co-doping offers a single composition that is both dynamically stable and optically red-shifted into the visible/near-IR.
  • Static dielectric constant and polarization response improve under Y and co-doping, aiding light confinement and screening.
  • Penetration depth and optical conductivity become dopant-tunable knobs for photoelectrode thickness and photon-to-charge design.
  • The same mono-/co-doping logic can be used to screen other hematite dopant pairs for joint vibrational–optical performance.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If soft-mode suppression is mainly ionic-radius and bond-strength driven, other large trivalent cations paired with small p-block dopants may stabilize similarly without needing yttrium specifically.
  • Device-level tests of co-doped films should check whether the calculated smoother dielectric loss actually reduces recombination or trapping under operating bias and illumination.
  • Temperature-dependent Raman or neutron data on the co-doped phase would test whether the harmonic free-energy advantage survives anharmonic effects near device temperatures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports spin-polarized DFT+U (PBE, U_eff = 4.3 eV, D3) calculations of pristine, B-doped, Y-doped, and (B,Y)-co-doped α-Fe₂O₃ at one substitutional concentration per dopant. Phonon dispersions from Phonopy finite displacements (0.01 Å) show imaginary branches for B-doped hematite but entirely positive spectra for pristine, Y-doped, and co-doped cells; the authors conclude that Y co-doping suppresses B-induced soft modes via lattice relaxation, and they support this with temperature-dependent Fvib and Svib. The optical half computes the complex dielectric function in the independent-particle RPA and derives n, k, χE, σop, Rop, and δop via Eqs. (1a)–(1f). Reported optical gaps are 2.30 eV (pristine), 1.65 eV (B), 2.25 eV (Y), and 1.58 eV (B,Y); B introduces a sub-2 eV absorption tail, and the co-doped system is presented as combining low-energy absorption with a smoother dielectric response and restored stability. The central claim is thus two-part: (i) Y heals B's dynamical instability, and (ii) co-doping yields an improved, broadened optical response suitable for photoactive applications.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper usefully couples two properties usually treated separately — dynamical stability and frequency-dependent optics — for the same set of doped hematite systems, and the finding that co-doping can stabilize a lattice destabilized by one dopant while retaining its sub-bandgap absorption is a design-relevant result for hematite photoanodes. Strengths that deserve explicit credit: a standard, largely reproducible workflow (QE/PAW, literature-derived U = 4.3 eV, Phonopy finite displacements, a complete suite of optical functions derived consistently from ε(ω)); honest reporting of the B-doped instability rather than hiding it; and concrete, falsifiable numerical predictions (Eg values, εre,0, Epeak in Table 1; stability dichotomy). The significance is tempered by the IPA-level optics and by the fragility of the stability evidence, which limit how much of the device-oriented framing can be taken at face value.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2 (Computational Methodology) and §3.1, Figs. 1–2] The paper's self-described 'noteworthy finding' — that Y suppresses B's soft modes and restores dynamical stability — rests on an asymmetric comparison. For B-doped α-Fe₂O₃ the text states soft modes persist 'across various doping arrangements,' but no analogous statement exists for the co-doped system, whose stability may depend on B–Y relative placement. Furthermore, §2 never states the phonon supercell size, and no supercell-size convergence is reported; imaginary modes can appear or vanish with cell commensuration. Please report phonons for at least two inequivalent B–Y arrangements and demonstrate convergence with supercell size. The mechanism ('lattice relaxation and improved interatomic forces') is currently asserted without evidence; bond-length/strain distributions or mode-resolved force-constant analysis would substantiate it.
  2. [§3.1, Fig. 3(a)] The value Fvib = 126.4 kJ/mol at 300 K is quoted for B-doped α-Fe₂O₃, a structure with imaginary phonon branches. Harmonic vibrational free energy is ill-defined in the presence of imaginary modes (how were they treated in the sum?), so this number — and the four-way Fvib ranking built partly on it ('the (B, Y)-co-doped structure consistently exhibits the lowest Fvib') — is not meaningful as written. Either remove the B-doped entry, compute it with a justified treatment (e.g., excluding or renormalizing unstable modes, with the procedure stated), or restrict the thermodynamic ranking to the three dynamically stable systems.
  3. [§2, Eqs. (1a)–(1f); §3.2.1, Fig. 4, Table 1] All optical quantities derive from an independent-particle RPA dielectric function on DFT+U eigenvalues, with no quasiparticle (GW) or excitonic (BSE) corrections — despite the manuscript citing Piccinin's GW-BSE study [10], which shows both effects are substantial in hematite. The load-bearing optical claims are quantitative: Eg = 2.30/1.65/2.25/1.58 eV, the sub-2 eV absorption tails, and the 'improved/optimal' ranking of the co-doped system. As a concrete test: benchmark the pristine RPA ε(ω) against ref. [10] and/or experimental ellipsometry, state the expected error (e.g., a rigid shift), and carry that uncertainty into the doped results. Relatedly, the B-doped optical spectrum is computed on a dynamically unstable structure; its relevance should be stated as conditional on kinetic stabilization, since the practical absorption claim rests on the co-doped (stable) cell.
  4. [§3.2.3, Fig. 7] The text reports |σop| maxima 'near 0.8 × 10¹⁵ Hz and 4.5 × 10¹⁵ Hz.' Since 1 eV corresponds to 2.42 × 10¹⁴ Hz, 4.5 × 10¹⁵ Hz is ~18.6 eV — far outside the 0–8 eV window in which ε(ω) (Figs. 4–6) was computed, and from which σop follows via Eq. (1d). The Fig. 7 axis extending to 7.5 (presumably ×10¹⁵ Hz, ~31 eV) compounds the inconsistency. Either the axis units are mislabeled or σop was generated beyond the computed ε data; in both cases the reported σop spectra — and the conclusion that co-doping gives 'enhanced conductivity over a wider frequency range' — cannot be verified. Please reconcile the units and replot within the actual energy window.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§3.1] §3.1, paragraph on Fig. 2: 'there is no photonic band gap' should read 'phononic band gap' (a photonic band gap would be a very different claim).
  2. [§3.2.1, Table 1] The method for extracting the optical Eg values in Table 1 is never stated (onset of εim? Tauc analysis? KS gap?). Please specify, especially since the values (e.g., 1.58 eV) are quoted to three significant figures.
  3. [§2] §2: 'We examined all possible substitutional positions in the host lattice' is too vague to be reproducible — state how many configurations were tested for each system and how the reported one was selected. Also state the magnetic ordering used (α-Fe₂O₃ is antiferromagnetic; this is never mentioned).
  4. [§3.2.3–3.2.4] Caption of Fig. 7: 'pristine pristine α-Fe₂O₃' (duplicated word). §3.2.4: 'Beyond λ < 600 nm' should presumably be 'Beyond λ = 600 nm' or 'λ > 600 nm.'
  5. [§3.2.4, Fig. 8(b)] The Y-doped δop ≈ 28 µm at λ = 2500 nm (0.5 eV) implies an exponentially small k in the IPA spectrum, where absorption below the gap is numerical noise rather than physics (no phonon-assisted or free-carrier terms are included). The long-wavelength δop discussion should be truncated to energies within the computed interband window or explicitly caveated.
  6. [Figs. 1–8] Figures 1, 2, 4–7 appear to lack axis labels/units in places (e.g., Fig. 1 axes show only numbers; the PDOS and THz labels are illegible), and several panels are low-resolution. Please regenerate with labeled axes and units throughout.
  7. [§3.2.2] §3.2.2 refers to 'the material's indirect band gap' for pristine α-Fe₂O₃; the direct/indirect character of hematite's gap is debated (cf. ref. [10]) — either justify with the computed band structure or soften the statement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: phonon stability and RPA optical spectra are independent DFT/Phonopy outputs, not restatements of fitted targets or self-cited definitions.

full rationale

The paper’s load-bearing claims—that B-doped α-Fe₂O₃ has imaginary phonon modes while Y-doped and (B,Y)-co-doped systems do not, and that doping reshapes ε(ω), Eg, n, k, σop, etc.—are direct numerical outputs of finite-displacement Phonopy force constants and independent-particle RPA dielectric functions on DFT+U eigenvalues (Methodology; Eqs. 1a–1f). Optical constants are standard algebraic transforms of εre/εim, not quantities fitted to the same data they are said to predict. Self-citations [12, 31] supply prior defect energetics and electronic-structure context for the same dopant set and motivate the open questions this work addresses; they are not used to define dynamical stability, soft-mode suppression, or the reported optical spectra. Literature U = 4.3 eV (Mosey et al.) and GGA-PBE+U/D3 are ordinary domain inputs, not circular closures. Robustness concerns (single co-dopant geometry, supercell-size sensitivity of imaginary modes, harmonic Fvib quoted for an unstable B-doped cell, RPA without GW/BSE) affect correctness confidence, not circularity of the derivation chain. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, uniqueness import, or renamed empirical pattern is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central stability+optics claims rest on standard DFT+U and harmonic-phonon machinery plus the independent-particle RPA optical formulas. Load-bearing choices are the Hubbard U, the RPA (no BSE), harmonic finite-displacement phonons, and the decision to analyze optics on a B-doped lattice that the same calculations flag as unstable. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • Hubbard U_eff on Fe 3d = 4.30 eV
    Set to 4.30 eV following Mosey et al.; controls gap, hybridization, and thus all optical onset energies and dielectric peaks.
  • Plane-wave kinetic cutoff = 60 Ry
    Chosen as 60 Ry (charge density ~8×); affects force accuracy for phonons and dielectric convergence.
  • Doping concentration / supercell substitution = 4.719e20 / 9.439e20 cm^-3
    Single-atom substitution giving 4.719e20 cm^-3 (mono) and 9.439e20 cm^-3 (co-doped); fixes defect–defect interaction and reported property shifts.
  • Finite-displacement amplitude = 0.01 Å
    0.01 Å in Phonopy for IFCs; standard but hand-chosen harmonic probe of stability.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption DFT+U (Dudarev) with PBE and fixed U adequately describes Fe 3d localization and the optical joint density of states of doped hematite.
    Invoked throughout Methodology and Results for gaps and dielectric peaks; known to be approximate for hematite.
  • domain assumption Independent-particle random-phase approximation from DFT eigenvalues yields reliable frequency-dependent ε(ω) and derived optical constants.
    Stated in §2; Eqs. (1a–1f) build n, k, χ, σop, Rop, δop solely from RPA ε_re, ε_im.
  • domain assumption Harmonic finite-displacement phonons (Phonopy) diagnose dynamical stability and give F_vib, S_vib via the harmonic approximation.
    §2–3.1; imaginary modes interpreted as lattice instability without anharmonic follow-up.
  • ad hoc to paper Optical properties computed on the relaxed B-doped cell remain physically informative despite imaginary phonon branches.
    B-doped optics are reported in Figs. 4–8 and Table 1 even after §3.1 establishes dynamical instability.
  • standard math Standard PAW, DFT-D3, and Monkhorst–Pack sampling suffice for forces and dielectric response at the stated meshes.
    Methodology defaults; no novel formal claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tailoring the Frequency-Dependent Optical Response of Hematite through Mono- and Co-Doping: A First-Principles Study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B3OMEYJ2

@misc{pith2026260723409,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tailoring the Frequency-Dependent Optical Response of Hematite through Mono- and Co-Doping: A First-Principles Study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B3OMEYJ2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.23409}
}
abstract

Understanding the effects of doping on the crystal structure and optical properties of semiconductor materials is crucial for advancing next-generation semiconductor and photonic technologies. Although various studies have focused on doped hematite ($\alpha$-Fe$_2$O$_3$), the relationship between dynamical stability and optical properties remains insufficiently explored. This study presents a comprehensive first-principles investigation that simultaneously evaluates the phonon dispersion characteristics and frequency-dependent optical response of B-doped, Y-doped, and (B, Y)-co-doped $\alpha$-Fe$_2$O$_3$, providing deeper insights into the underlying mechanisms. We examined the finite-temperature vibrational properties, dielectric function, and optical characteristics to comprehend the lattice dynamics and light-matter interactions under electromagnetic radiation. Vibrational thermodynamics reveal that pristine and Y-doped hematite maintain dynamic stability, while B-doped hematite exhibits imaginary phonon modes indicating lattice instability due to distortions in the Fe--O framework. Notably, Y co-doping with B helps suppress these soft modes, restoring structural stability through lattice relaxation and improved interatomic forces. B doping enhances low-energy absorption by introducing additional states in the valence band, while Y doping alters orbital hybridization, leading to a broader dispersion. In the optical regime, doped hematite displays dominant interband transitions below $2$ eV and strong absorption between 1.80 eV and 4 eV. The (B, Y) co-doping combines the low-energy benefits with an improved optical response profile. In summary, doping significantly enhances lattice vibrations, light-matter interactions, and optical responses, providing an effective strategy for tailoring hematite for diverse applications in photoactive, optoelectronic, and photonic technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23409 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Phonon band structure and (b) phonon density of states (PDOS) of pristine [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Phonon band structure and (b) phonon density of states (PDOS) of Y-doped [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Vibrational free energy, Fvib, and (b) vibrational entropy, Svib, of pristine and doped α-Fe2O3. The temperature-dependent Fvib and Svib provide valuable insights into the lattice dynam￾ics and thermal stability of crystalline materials. These properties are directly derived from the phonon spectrum and reflect the total free energy of systems due to lattice vibrations. Specifically, Fvib describes the phononic … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Real (εre), and imaginary parts (εim) of complex permittivity (ε) as a function of photon energy (E) for (a) pristine α-Fe2O3, (b) B-doped α-Fe2O3, (c) Y-doped α-Fe2O3, and (d) (B, Y)-co-doped α-Fe2O3. sitions characteristic of the electronic structure. In pristine α-F…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Refractive Index (n) and extinction Coefficient (k) as a function of energy (E) for (a) pristine α-Fe2O3, (b) B-doped α-Fe2O3, (c) Y-doped α-Fe2O3, and (d) (B, Y)-co-doped α-Fe2O3. main absorption range. In contrast, k increases sharply around E = 2 eV, reaching a peak…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Real (χE,re) and imaginary parts (χE,im) of electric susceptibility (χE) as a function of energy (E) for (a) pristine α-Fe2O3, (b) B-doped α-Fe2O3, (c) Y-doped α-Fe2O3, and (d) (B, Y)-co-doped α-Fe2O3. The parameter χE represents a key material property that describes …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Absolute value, |σop|, and polar angle, ∠σop, in degree of optical complex con￾ductivity, σop, as a function of frequency, f , for (a) pristine pristine α-Fe2O3, (b) B-doped α-Fe2O3, (c) Y-doped α-Fe2O3, and (d) (B, Y)-co-doped α-Fe2O3. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/ful…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Optical reflectivity, Rop, and (b) penetration depth, δop, of pristine and doped α-Fe2O3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references

  1. [10]

    The band structure and optical absorption of hematite ( α-Fe2O3): a first- principles gw-bse study,

    S. Piccinin, “The band structure and optical absorption of hematite ( α-Fe2O3): a first- principles gw-bse study,”Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 2957–2967, 2019

    2019

  2. [1]

    Advanced hematite nanomaterials for newly emerging applications,

    H. Wan, L. Hu, X. Liu, Y. Zhang, G. Chen, N. Zhang, and R. Ma, “Advanced hematite nanomaterials for newly emerging applications,”Chemical Science, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 2776– 2798, 2023

    2023

  3. [2]

    Advancingtransitionmetaloxidephotoelectrodesforefficientsolar-drivenhydrogen generation: Strategies and insights,

    A. A. Mamun, A. H. Chowdhury, A. Billah, J. Karim, A. O. Hussain, F. Rahman, and M. A. Talukder, “Advancingtransitionmetaloxidephotoelectrodesforefficientsolar-drivenhydrogen generation: Strategies and insights,”AdvancedEnergy Materials, p. 2501766, 2025

    2025

  4. [3]

    Hematite Fe2O3 effects on the structural, morphological, and optical characteristics of PVP polymer for optoelectronic uses,

    M. O. Alziyadi and A. Alkabsh, “Hematite Fe2O3 effects on the structural, morphological, and optical characteristics of PVP polymer for optoelectronic uses,”Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 230, p. 112577, 2025

    2025

  5. [4]

    Solar water splitting: progress using hematite (α-Fe2O3) photoelectrodes,

    K. Sivula, F. Le Formal, and M. Grätzel, “Solar water splitting: progress using hematite (α-Fe2O3) photoelectrodes,”ChemSusChem, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 432–449, 2011

    2011

  6. [5]

    α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles aided-dual con- version for self-powered bio-based photodetector,

    I. Chakraborty, S.-N. Lai, J.-M. Wu, and C.-S. Lai, “α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles aided-dual con- version for self-powered bio-based photodetector,”Nanomaterials, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 1147, 2022

    2022

  7. [6]

    MoS2 decorated α-Fe2O3 nanostructures for efficient NO2 gas sensor,

    M. Das, A. K. Shringi, and M. Kumar, “MoS2 decorated α-Fe2O3 nanostructures for efficient NO2 gas sensor,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 22, no. 20, pp. 19183–19190, 2022

    2022

  8. [7]

    Large-amplitude spin dynamics driven by a THz pulse in resonance with an electromagnon,

    T. Kubacka, J. A. Johnson, M. C. Hoffmann, C. Vicario, S. De Jong, P. Beaud, S. Grübel, S.-W. Huang, L. Huber, L. Patthey,et al., “Large-amplitude spin dynamics driven by a THz pulse in resonance with an electromagnon,”Science, vol. 343, no. 6177, pp. 1333–1336, 2014. 20

    2014

Show all 47 references
  1. [8]

    Doped, porous iron oxide films and their optical functions and anodic photocurrents for solar water splitting,

    C. X. Kronawitter, S. S. Mao, and B. R. Antoun, “Doped, porous iron oxide films and their optical functions and anodic photocurrents for solar water splitting,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 98, no. 9, 2011

    2011

  2. [9]

    Tuning of opto- electrical properties of hematite thin films using Co2+ doping,

    H. Yousaf, S. M. Muzaffar, S. Riaz, N. Ahmad, S. Shahzadi, and S. Naseem, “Tuning of opto- electrical properties of hematite thin films using Co2+ doping,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 4203–4218, 2019

    2019

  3. [11]

    A review of theα-Fe2O3 (hematite) nanotube structure: recent ad- vances in synthesis, characterization, and applications,

    Y. Xue and Y. Wang, “A review of theα-Fe2O3 (hematite) nanotube structure: recent ad- vances in synthesis, characterization, and applications,”Nanoscale, vol. 12, no. 20, pp. 10912– 10932, 2020

    2020

  4. [12]

    Improved photocatalytic activity ofα-Fe2O3 by introduc- ing B, Y, and Nb dopants for solar-driven water splitting: a first-principles study,

    A. A. Mamun and M. A. Talukder, “Improved photocatalytic activity ofα-Fe2O3 by introduc- ing B, Y, and Nb dopants for solar-driven water splitting: a first-principles study,”Materials Advances, vol. 6, no. 14, pp. 4755–4767, 2025

    2025

  5. [13]

    Experimental and computational investiga- tion of the optical, electronic, and electrochemical properties of hydrogenatedα-Fe2O3,

    Y. Yin, X. Zhang, L. Li, L. Spiccia, and C. Sun, “Experimental and computational investiga- tion of the optical, electronic, and electrochemical properties of hydrogenatedα-Fe2O3,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 121, no. 30, pp. 16059–16065, 2017

    2017

  6. [14]

    Dielectric response of Fe2O3 crystals and thin films,

    R. A. Lunt, A. J. Jackson, and A. Walsh, “Dielectric response of Fe2O3 crystals and thin films,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 586, pp. 67–69, 2013

    2013

  7. [15]

    Field-enhanced polarization in polytype ferric oxides: confronting anisotropy in dielectric ellipsoid dispersion,

    S. Bhattacharjee, A. Banerjee, and K. K. Chattopadhyay, “Field-enhanced polarization in polytype ferric oxides: confronting anisotropy in dielectric ellipsoid dispersion,”Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 54, no. 29, p. 295301, 2021

    2021

  8. [16]

    Controlling band gap and refractive index in dopant-free α-Fe2O3 films,

    P. Kumar, N. Rawat, D.-R. Hang, H.-N. Lee, and R. Kumar, “Controlling band gap and refractive index in dopant-free α-Fe2O3 films,” Electronic Materials Letters, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 13–23, 2015

    2015

  9. [17]

    Hematite photoanodes: synergetic enhancement of light harvesting and charge management by sandwiched with Fe2TiO5/Fe2O3/Pt structures,

    L. Wang, N. T. Nguyen, X. Huang, P. Schmuki, and Y. Bi, “Hematite photoanodes: synergetic enhancement of light harvesting and charge management by sandwiched with Fe2TiO5/Fe2O3/Pt structures,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 27, no. 46, p. 1703527, 2017

    2017

  10. [18]

    Influence of plasmonic Au nanopar- ticles on the photoactivity ofα-Fe2O3 electrodes for water splitting,

    E. Thimsen, F. Le Formal, M. Gratzel, and S. C. Warren, “Influence of plasmonic Au nanopar- ticles on the photoactivity ofα-Fe2O3 electrodes for water splitting,”Nano letters, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2011. 21

    2011

  11. [19]

    Steering electron–hole migration pathways from plasmon-induced resonance energy transfer in hematite to enhance their photoelectrochemical water splitting,

    Y. Su, H. Xiong, L. Liao, H. Lei, Z. Wang, H. Chen, H. Xu, Y. Pan, W. Yu, X. Xiong,et al., “Steering electron–hole migration pathways from plasmon-induced resonance energy transfer in hematite to enhance their photoelectrochemical water splitting,”Nano Energy, vol. 127, p. 109...

    2024

  12. [20]

    Strategies to improve the photo- electrochemical performance of hematite nanorod-based photoanodes,

    A. Tofanello, S. Shen, F. L. de Souza, and L. Vayssieres, “Strategies to improve the photo- electrochemical performance of hematite nanorod-based photoanodes,”APL Materials, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 040905, 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    Recent progress and perspectives on heteroatom dopingofhematitephotoanodesforphotoelectrochemicalwatersplitting,

    J. Park, J. Kang, S. Chaule, and J.-H. Jang, “Recent progress and perspectives on heteroatom dopingofhematitephotoanodesforphotoelectrochemicalwatersplitting,” JournalofMaterials Chemistry A, vol. 11, no. 45, pp. 24551–24565, 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Revisiting strategies to improve the performance of hematite photoanodes for water photoelectrolysis,

    F. L. Souza, I. Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, J. B. Souza, and E. R. Leite, “Revisiting strategies to improve the performance of hematite photoanodes for water photoelectrolysis,”Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 642–654, 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    Structural, optical and electrical properties of undoped polycrystalline hematite thin films produced using filtered arc deposition,

    J. Glasscock, P. Barnes, I. Plumb, A. Bendavid, and P. Martin, “Structural, optical and electrical properties of undoped polycrystalline hematite thin films produced using filtered arc deposition,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 516, no. 8, pp. 1716–1724, 2008

    2008

  16. [24]

    Structure, optical, magnetic, morphology and dielectric studies of pristine and green synthesized hematite nanoparticles,

    T. Sarkar, S. Kundu, G. Ghorai, P. K. Sahoo, V. R. Reddy, and A. Bhattacharjee, “Structure, optical, magnetic, morphology and dielectric studies of pristine and green synthesized hematite nanoparticles,” Applied Physics A, vol. 130, no. 2, p. 123, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Role of morphology, composition, and structure on the optical response of nanostructured hematite thin films,

    D. Mazón-Montijo, D. Cabrera-German, A. Sánchez-Ovando, O. Ramírez-Esquivel, and Z. Montiel-González, “Role of morphology, composition, and structure on the optical response of nanostructured hematite thin films,”Optical Materials, vol. 110, p. 110496, 2020

    2020

  18. [26]

    Effects of Ru doping and of oxygen vacancies on the optical properties inα-Fe2O3 powders.,

    A. Elouafi, R. Moubah, A. Tizliouine, S. Derkaoui, L. Omari, and H. Lassri, “Effects of Ru doping and of oxygen vacancies on the optical properties inα-Fe2O3 powders.,” Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, vol. 126, no. 3, p. 1, 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    Zn dopedα-Fe2O3: an efficient material for UV driven photocatalysis and electrical conductivity,

    Suman, S. Chahal, A. Kumar, and P. Kumar, “Zn dopedα-Fe2O3: an efficient material for UV driven photocatalysis and electrical conductivity,”Crystals, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 273, 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    Exploring the magnetic, optical and dielectric proper- ties of Cr-doped hematite (α-Fe(2−x)CrxO3): A comprehensive study,

    I. Irshad, A. G. Lone, and B. Want, “Exploring the magnetic, optical and dielectric proper- ties of Cr-doped hematite (α-Fe(2−x)CrxO3): A comprehensive study,”Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 971, p. 172696, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Polaronic optical transitions in hematite (α-Fe2O3) revealed by first-principles electron–phonon coupling,

    J. L. Shelton and K. E. Knowles, “Polaronic optical transitions in hematite (α-Fe2O3) revealed by first-principles electron–phonon coupling,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 157, no. 17, p. 174703, 2022. 22

    2022

  22. [30]

    Beyond single dopants: The chemistry of multi-atom doping in hematite photoanodes for water splitting,

    B. K. Jha and J.-H. Jang, “Beyond single dopants: The chemistry of multi-atom doping in hematite photoanodes for water splitting,”ACSAppliedMaterials&Interfaces, vol. 17, no. 35, pp. 49079–49091, 2025

    2025

  23. [31]

    Re-engineering hematite: Synergistic codoping routes to efficient solar water splitting,

    A. A. Mamun and M. A. Talukder, “Re-engineering hematite: Synergistic codoping routes to efficient solar water splitting,”The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 736– 746, 2026

    2026

  24. [32]

    Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials,

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, et al., “Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials,”JournalofPhysics: CondensedMatter, vol. 21, ...

    2009

  25. [33]

    Advancedcapabilitiesformaterialsmodelling with quantum espresso,

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C.Cavazzoni, D.Ceresoli, M.Cococcioni, etal., “Advancedcapabilitiesformaterialsmodelling with quantum espresso,”Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 29, no. 46, p. 465901, 2017

    2017

  26. [34]

    From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method,

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, “From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method,” Physical Review B, vol. 59, no. 3, p. 1758, 1999

    1999

  27. [35]

    Electron- energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study,

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, “Electron- energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study,”Physical Review B, vol. 57, no. 3, p. 1505, 1998

    1998

  28. [36]

    Rotationally invariant ab initio evaluation of Coulomb and exchange parameters for DFT+U calculations,

    N. J. Mosey, P. Liao, and E. A. Carter, “Rotationally invariant ab initio evaluation of Coulomb and exchange parameters for DFT+U calculations,”TheJournalofChemicalPhysics, vol. 129, no. 1, p. 014103, 2008

    2008

  29. [37]

    A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H- Pu,

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, “A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H- Pu,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 132, no. 15, 2010

    2010

  30. [38]

    Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations,

    H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, “Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations,”Physical Review B, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 5188, 1976

    1976

  31. [39]

    Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py,

    A. Togo, L. Chaput, T. Tadano, and I. Tanaka, “Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py,”Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 35, no. 35, p. 353001, 2023

    2023

  32. [40]

    First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py,

    A. Togo, “First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py,”Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 92, no. 1, p. 012001, 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Fox,Optical properties of solids, vol

    M. Fox,Optical properties of solids, vol. 3. Oxford university press, 2010. 23

    2010

  34. [42]

    Peter and M

    Y. Peter and M. Cardona,Fundamentalsof semiconductors: physics and materials properties. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010

    2010

  35. [43]

    Born and E

    M. Born and E. Wolf,Principles of optics: electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light. Elsevier, 2013

    2013

  36. [44]

    Basic moments of phonon density of states spectra and characteristic phonon temperatures of group IV, III–V, and II–VI materials,

    R. Pässler, “Basic moments of phonon density of states spectra and characteristic phonon temperatures of group IV, III–V, and II–VI materials,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 101, no. 9, 2007

    2007

  37. [45]

    Phonon dispersions as indicators of dynamic symmetry reduction in superconductors,

    J. A. Alarco and I. D. Mackinnon, “Phonon dispersions as indicators of dynamic symmetry reduction in superconductors,”Phonons in Low Dimensional Structures, pp. 75–101, 2018

    2018

  38. [46]

    Theoretical and experimental investigation of 2D hematite,

    A. Padilha, M. Soares, E. Leite, and A. Fazzio, “Theoretical and experimental investigation of 2D hematite,”The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 123, no. 26, pp. 16359–16365, 2019

    2019

  39. [47]

    Temperature-dependent lattice dynamics study on phase stability, martensitic transformation mechanism, and vibrational entropy properties of B2-type Ni–Mn–Ti heusler alloy,

    L. Zhao, C. Tan, J. Yang, X. Wang, J. Wang, W. Zhao, J. Li, Z. Luan, and X. Tian, “Temperature-dependent lattice dynamics study on phase stability, martensitic transformation mechanism, and vibrational entropy properties of B2-type Ni–Mn–Ti heusler alloy,”Journal of Materials ...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.