REVIEW
Comparing high-dimensional neural recordings by aligning their low-dimensional latent representations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Comparing high-dimensional neural recordings by aligning their low-dimensional latent representations
read the original abstract
Many questions in neuroscience involve understanding of the responses of large populations of neurons. However, when dealing with large-scale neural activity, interpretation becomes difficult, and comparisons between two animals, or across different time points becomes challenging. One major challenge that we face in modern neuroscience is that of correspondence, e.g. we do not record the exact same neurons at the exact same times. Without some way to link two or more datasets, comparing different collections of neural activity patterns becomes impossible. Here, we describe approaches for leveraging shared latent structure across neural recordings to tackle this correspondence challenge. We review algorithms that map two datasets into a shared space where they can be directly compared, and argue that alignment is key for comparing high-dimensional neural activities across times, subsets of neurons, and individuals.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.