Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparing high-dimensional neural recordings by aligning their low-dimensional latent representations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.08413 v1 pith:B47XLPWO submitted 2022-05-17 q-bio.NC

Comparing high-dimensional neural recordings by aligning their low-dimensional latent representations

classification q-bio.NC
keywords neuralacrossbecomescomparingneuronsactivitychallengecorrespondence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many questions in neuroscience involve understanding of the responses of large populations of neurons. However, when dealing with large-scale neural activity, interpretation becomes difficult, and comparisons between two animals, or across different time points becomes challenging. One major challenge that we face in modern neuroscience is that of correspondence, e.g. we do not record the exact same neurons at the exact same times. Without some way to link two or more datasets, comparing different collections of neural activity patterns becomes impossible. Here, we describe approaches for leveraging shared latent structure across neural recordings to tackle this correspondence challenge. We review algorithms that map two datasets into a shared space where they can be directly compared, and argue that alignment is key for comparing high-dimensional neural activities across times, subsets of neurons, and individuals.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.