REVIEW 1 cited by
Evaluating the Disentanglement of Deep Generative Models through Manifold Topology
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Learning disentangled representations is regarded as a fundamental task for improving the generalization, robustness, and interpretability of generative models. However, measuring disentanglement has been challenging and inconsistent, often dependent on an ad-hoc external model or specific to a certain dataset. To address this, we present a method for quantifying disentanglement that only uses the generative model, by measuring the topological similarity of conditional submanifolds in the learned representation. This method showcases both unsupervised and supervised variants. To illustrate the effectiveness and applicability of our method, we empirically evaluate several state-of-the-art models across multiple datasets. We find that our method ranks models similarly to existing methods. We make ourcode publicly available at https://github.com/stanfordmlgroup/disentanglement.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Disentanglement in Difference: Directly Learning Semantically Disentangled Representations by Maximizing Inter-Factor Differences
DiD uses a GAN with a difference encoder that maximizes distances between image-change vectors from different latent axes, reporting improved disentanglement metrics on dSprites and 3DShapes.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.