REVIEW 15 cited by
R-Bench: Graduate-level Multi-disciplinary Benchmarks for LLM & MLLM Complex Reasoning Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Reasoning stands as a cornerstone of intelligence, enabling the synthesis of existing knowledge to solve complex problems. Despite remarkable progress, existing reasoning benchmarks often fail to rigorously evaluate the nuanced reasoning capabilities required for complex, real-world problemsolving, particularly in multi-disciplinary and multimodal contexts. In this paper, we introduce a graduate-level, multi-disciplinary, EnglishChinese benchmark, dubbed as Reasoning Bench (R-Bench), for assessing the reasoning capability of both language and multimodal models. RBench spans 1,094 questions across 108 subjects for language model evaluation and 665 questions across 83 subjects for multimodal model testing in both English and Chinese. These questions are meticulously curated to ensure rigorous difficulty calibration, subject balance, and crosslinguistic alignment, enabling the assessment to be an Olympiad-level multi-disciplinary benchmark. We evaluate widely used models, including OpenAI o1, GPT-4o, DeepSeek-R1, etc. Experimental results indicate that advanced models perform poorly on complex reasoning, especially multimodal reasoning. Even the top-performing model OpenAI o1 achieves only 53.2% accuracy on our multimodal evaluation. Data and code are made publicly available at here.
Forward citations
Cited by 15 Pith papers
-
Toward Skill-Native LLMs: Skill Entropy for Benchmarking and Training Long-Horizon Reasoning
Skill entropy, a reference-model-based measure of skill-switching difficulty, calibrates a new cross-skill benchmark and serves as an RL reward, more than doubling small models' scores.
-
SFBench: The SciFy Scientific Feasibility Benchmark
SFBench provides 197 expert-created materials science claims with feasibility scores and explanations to evaluate AI systems on scientific feasibility assessment.
-
ChronoPhyBench: Do MLLMs Truly Understand the World or Merely Exploit Language Priors?
ChronoPhyBench is a new benchmark and dataset for chronological physical dynamics reasoning that combines video-conditioned next-state prediction with VQA to reduce language bias in MLLM evaluation.
-
Enjoy Your Talk: A Human-Centered Benchmark for Multi-Turn Dialogue with Decoupled User Simulation, Target Modeling, and Judging
A 17-model benchmark with a decoupled simulator/judge design finds frontier chatbots indistinguishable on subjective warmth but sharply separated on long-horizon intent tracking, with a reasoning-mode gain that appear...
-
Enjoy Your Talk: A Human-Centered Benchmark for Multi-Turn Dialogue with Decoupled User Simulation, Target Modeling, and Judging
A three-party-decoupled multi-turn chat benchmark finds closed and open models nearly tied on subjective empathy/persona scores but separated by up to 9× on objective intent tracking, with reasoning and persona format...
-
OPT-BENCH: Evaluating the Iterative Self-Optimization of LLM Agents in Large-Scale Search Spaces
OPT-BENCH and OPT-Agent evaluate LLM self-optimization in large search spaces, showing stronger models improve via feedback but stay constrained by base capacity and below human performance.
-
ExoActor: Exocentric Video Generation as Generalizable Interactive Humanoid Control
ExoActor uses exocentric video generation to implicitly model robot-environment-object interactions and converts the resulting videos into task-conditioned humanoid control sequences.
-
IRIS: A Real-World Benchmark for Inverse Recovery and Identification of Physical Dynamic Systems from Monocular Video
IRIS releases 220 real 4K videos of eight dynamical systems with ground-truth parameters plus a protocol that measures parameter recovery, equation selection, and multi-body failure modes of unsupervised video-to-phys...
-
MapTab: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Long-Horizon Multi-Criteria Multimodal Reasoning on Heterogeneous Topological Graphs
MapTab is a new multimodal benchmark with 328 images and nearly 200k queries that shows current MLLMs have substantial difficulty with multi-criteria route planning when visual and tabular information must be combined.
-
MapTab: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Long-Horizon Multi-Criteria Multimodal Reasoning on Heterogeneous Topological Graphs
MapTab introduces a 328-map, 196,800-query benchmark showing that current multimodal LLMs fall far short on multi-criteria route planning from maps-plus-tables.
-
MapTab: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Long-Horizon Multi-Criteria Multimodal Reasoning on Heterogeneous Topological Graphs
MapTab benchmark shows current MLLMs struggle with multi-criteria multimodal route planning and that combining vision and language frequently underperforms single-modality approaches.
-
SciAgentGym: Benchmarking Multi-Step Scientific Tool-use in LLM Agents
SciAgent-8B, fine-tuned on trajectories synthesized from a tool dependency graph, outperforms Qwen3-VL-235B-Instruct on SciAgentBench, a new 259-task benchmark for multi-step scientific tool-use.
-
MME-SCI: A Comprehensive and Challenging Science Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models
A manually curated, multilingual, multimodal science benchmark shows that even top MLLMs struggle, with fine-grained knowledge-point labels revealing specific weaknesses.
-
Blind-Spots-Bench: Evaluating Blind Spots in Multimodal Models
A 235-item multimodal stress-test shows frontier closed models outpace open-weight peers by ~10% and leaves shared failures on counting, spatial, and character-level tasks.
-
Boogu-Image-0.1: Boosting Open Agentic Multimodal Generation via Understanding under a Minimal Budget
An open-source image-generation family shows that agentic prompt rewriting and a stronger text encoder can lift quality to near closed-source levels with only 208.62M images and about $400K of training compute.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.