Black hole thermodynamics at null infinity. Part 2: Open systems, Markovian dynamics and work extraction from non-rotating black holes

Antoine Rignon-Bret; Matthieu Vilatte

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 127 references

Black hole thermodynamics at null infinity. Part 2: Open systems, Markovian dynamics and work extraction from non-rotating black holes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Black hole radiation at null infinity obeys a grand-canonical second law, and non-thermal Hawking radiation can yield work.

desk verdict The Unruh-vacuum payoff rests on an explicitly unproven modular Hamiltonian; the rest of the framework is a credible and useful contribution. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.03356 v2 pith:B5LAZZZZ submitted 2026-01-06 hep-th gr-qc

Antoine Rignon-Bret , Matthieu Vilatte This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thgr-qc MSC 83C5781T20 PACS 04.70.Dy

keywords generalizedsecondlawnullinfinityUnruhvacuummodularHamiltonianopenquantumsystemsgreybodyfactorsgrandpotentialworkextraction

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the thermodynamics of quantum fields on future null infinity is the same physics as an open quantum system coupled to equilibrium reservoirs: choosing a vacuum is choosing a reservoir, and the modular Hamiltonian is a thermodynamic potential. The authors show that the 'extra' terms in the dual generalized second law—chemical-potential and angular-momentum terms—are work contributions, so that non-thermal vacua at null infinity are non-passive states. For the physically relevant Unruh vacuum around Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes, they derive a grand-potential law, ΔM − Ω_H ΔJ − Σ μ Δn − T_H ΔS ≤ 0, where the chemical potentials are fixed by greybody transmission factors. If correct, Hawking radiation is an open, work-extractable resource, and black hole thermodynamics becomes a fully grand-canonical theory. The authors are explicit that a direct algebraic proof of the Unruh modular Hamiltonian is still missing, so the Unruh-vacuum law rests on a stated assumption.

What carries the argument

The central object is the one-sided modular Hamiltonian of a vacuum state restricted to the algebra of observables above a cut at future null infinity. It plays the role of a grand-canonical Hamiltonian: a geometric piece tied to Bondi mass plus chemical-potential terms. In the Unruh vacuum those chemical potentials are fixed by the greybody transmission coefficients t_{ωl} (and by Ω_H in Kerr); in the κ_l vacua they are fixed by the effective temperatures κ_l/2π. Monotonicity of relative entropy under algebra restriction turns this Hamiltonian into a decreasing thermodynamic potential, which is what produces the inequality.

What would settle it

Compute the modular Hamiltonian of the Unruh vacuum restricted to the algebra of observables above a cut at future null infinity directly from the asymptotic Weyl algebra; if the resulting chemical potentials differ from μ_{ωl} = T_H ln( |t|^2 / (1 − (1 − |t|^2) e^{−βω}) ), then Eq. (5.58) fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the spontaneous evolution of a quantum field at future null infinity is governed by a grand potential rather than a free energy. In the Unruh vacuum—the state produced by gravitational collapse—the one-sided modular Hamiltonian decomposes into a geometric energy term plus chemical-potential terms determined by greybody transmission coefficients; for Kerr an additional angular-momentum term Ω_H ΔJ appears. Monotonicity of relative entropy then yields ΔM − Ω_H ΔJ − Σ μ Δn − T_H ΔS ≤ 0. The same structure shows that the κ_l vacua, being non-thermal, are not passive states: an autonomous engine can lift a load, and the maximum work equals the chemical potential.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Unruh vacuum, restricted to observables at future null infinity, is thermal with respect to the one-sided modular Hamiltonian written in Eqs. (5.15)/(5.49); the paper states that a direct algebraic proof of this is still missing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The Unruh-vacuum dual second law takes the explicit grand-potential form ΔM − Ω_H ΔJ − Σ μ Δn − T_H ΔS ≤ 0, with μ fixed by greybody factors.
Hawking radiation is not a passive thermal bath: in κ_l vacua, and in the Unruh state, autonomous engines can extract work; the maximum extractable work per mode equals the chemical potential.
For Kerr, angular momentum flux appears as a work term, so rotation contributes to the extractable work in the quantum thermodynamic description.
The dictionary aligns generalized-second-law proofs at null infinity with Markovian open-system thermodynamics: vacuum equals reservoir, modular Hamiltonian equals thermodynamic potential.
This reframes black hole thermodynamics as grand-canonical, with particle and angular-momentum exchange rather than pure heat exchange.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the greybody chemical potentials vary with frequency and angular momentum, the Unruh state at null infinity is effectively a continuum of reservoirs at different temperatures; this suggests Hawking radiation could be harvested by multi-reservoir machines beyond a simple two-qubit engine.
The grand-potential form implies that the primary observable for asymptotic observers is a Bondi-mass-based free energy rather than horizon area; a direct test would be to see whether the predicted work bound matches energy extraction from simulated Hawking spectra.
If the missing algebraic derivation is completed, the same machinery should extend to charged black holes, where electric work −Φ dQ should appear alongside the angular momentum term.
For near-extremal Kerr, the Ω_H m term can dominate and the effective temperature can become negative before backscattering is included; checking the grand-potential inequality against superradiant amplification would be a sharp test.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear colleague,

The thing to know about this paper: its main new claim—the dual GSL for the Unruh vacuum in Schwarzschild and Kerr—is conditionally derived. The paper explicitly states that a direct algebraic proof is missing, and the modular Hamiltonian used is formal, with chemical potentials imported from the authors' earlier work. The stress-test note is on target: the KMS property on the subalgebras at future null infinity is not established; the mode calculation shows spectral concentration but not thermality with respect to the modular flow. So if you expect a proof of the Unruh-vacuum second law, you will not find it. But if you read it as a physical proposal with a concrete, if unproven, structure, it is instructive.

What is new and good: the dictionary between null-infinity QFT and open quantum systems is a genuine contribution. The parallel between coarse-graining in Lindblad dynamics and restriction of algebras to late-time cuts has explanatory power. The BLPS engine applied to the κ_l-vacua is a concrete, novel argument for work extraction from non-thermal vacuum states, and it correctly identifies the chemical potentials as the maximum extractable work. The extension to Kerr, with the angular momentum term and the superradiance connection, is a natural and interesting step, even though it inherits the same unproven modular Hamiltonian.

The soft spot is the Unruh section. Both the reader and the stress-test note converge on this. The paper concedes: 'deriving the dual generalized second law directly from the asymptotic algebra I_i in the Unruh vacuum remains an open problem.' That is a load-bearing gap. If the assumed modular Hamiltonian fails, Eqs. (5.58) and the Kerr version do not follow. This is significant, but the paper is honest about it—it is not a hidden flaw. I do not call the paper unsound; I call the strongest result incomplete. The reliance on companion [1] and [73] is a reproducibility problem: the companion is not available, so a referee cannot check the summarized proofs.

I think the paper deserves serious peer review. The framework is new, the κ_l-vacua work extraction is solid enough to stand alone, and the Unruh-vacuum problem is clearly posed as a challenge. A good referee could push the authors to prove the modular Hamiltonian or help them sharpen the claim. I would bring this to a reading group—not because it is wrong, but because it maps open problems well.

Recommendation: engage with it. Send it to peer review. If the companion appears and the κ_l part is citable, I would cite the dictionary myself.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This is the second part of a two-part series (with [1]) on black hole thermodynamics at null infinity. The paper develops a dictionary between, on one side, open quantum systems with Markovian (Lindblad) dynamics and, on the other, quantum fields on asymptotically null hypersurfaces whose reference state is a vacuum selected by late-time boundary conditions. Sections 2 and 3 recapitulate and interpret the companion paper’s dual generalized second law (GSL), identifying the extra chemical-potential terms with thermodynamic work. Section 4 proposes that the non-thermal κ_l-vacua can drive an autonomous BLPS engine and extract work, with a maximum set by the chemical potential. Section 5 extends the formalism to the Unruh vacuum in Schwarzschild and Kerr backgrounds, obtaining grand-potential-type inequalities, Eq. (5.26) and (5.58), with greybody-factor chemical potentials (5.6) and (5.38), plus an angular-momentum work term in Kerr. The paper explicitly states that the algebraic derivation of the Unruh modular Hamiltonian remains an open problem and that the expression used is formal.

Significance. If the companion paper’s κ_l-vacuum results are taken as established, the dictionary with open quantum thermodynamics is instructive, and the BLPS-engine construction is a concrete, operational illustration of how non-thermal vacuum states at null infinity can yield work. The Unruh-vacuum grand-potential laws would, if proven, be a substantial extension of the dual GSL to physically realistic Hawking radiation, incorporating greybody factors and, in Kerr, angular momentum extraction. The paper is also commendably explicit about what is and is not proven: the summary in Section 2 is clear, the chemical potentials are presented as imported from [73], and the end of Section 5.2 states that a direct derivation from the asymptotic algebra is lacking. However, as it stands the Unruh-vacuum section is a formal extension that inherits its central thermodynamic structure from an assumed KMS property rather than establishing it, and the companion reference [1] is not available to the reader in a verifiable form.

major comments (3)

[§5.1–5.2, Eq. (5.15)/(5.16), (5.19), (5.26)] The central claim — the dual GSL in the Unruh vacuum — is not derived. The monotonicity inequality (5.19) is a statement about relative entropy in the GNS Hilbert space of the Unruh vacuum; it becomes the charge-flux inequality (5.26) only if the reference state restricted to AI_i is KMS with respect to the one-sided modular Hamiltonian (5.16). The mode computation (5.10)–(5.14) shows that the adapted modes b^ε are normalized and spectrally concentrated near the Killing frequency; it does not show that the restricted state is thermal under the flow generated by (5.16). The manuscript itself states at the end of §5.2 that deriving the dual GSL directly from the asymptotic algebra AI_i remains an open problem and that the modular Hamiltonian is formal. Without the KMS property, (5.19) and (5.58) are conjectural. A direct check of the KMS condition on the restricted two-point function at I^
[§5.1–5.2, Eq. (5.6)/(5.38), (5.16)/(5.50), (5.24)/(5.56)] There is a circularity in the Unruh-vacuum construction: the chemical potentials μ_ωl (and μ_ωlm) are taken from the earlier effective computation in [73] and inserted by hand into the formal modular operator (5.7)/(5.49) and modular Hamiltonian (5.16)/(5.50). The balance relation (5.24)/(5.56) — ΔM − Ω_H ΔJ − Σ μ Δn = T_H ΔS — is then exactly the relation that defines those chemical potentials. The resulting grand-potential inequality therefore largely reproduces the input assumption. To claim a derivation, the chemical potentials should follow from the modular Hamiltonian computed from the asymptotic algebra, or at least from a self-contained KMS analysis. As it stands, the section is best described as a consistency check of the framework of [73] in the present algebraic language.
[References, [1]; also §2] The paper depends heavily on the companion paper [1] for the proofs of the dual GSL in the Hartle–Hawking, L-vacuum, and κ_l-vacuum cases, and for the central modular-Hamiltonian formulas used in Sections 2–4. Reference [1] is cited as “arXiv2601:????”, i.e. with an incomplete arXiv number, so the referee and readers cannot verify these foundations. Since the κ_l-vacuum results are load-bearing for the dictionary and for the work-extraction claims, the manuscript should either include the necessary derivations in an appendix or provide a complete, accessible reference to the companion paper.

minor comments (5)

[Title] The title reads “... from non-rotating black holes”, but Section 5.3 is devoted to Kerr (rotating) black holes and the angular-momentum term is one of the paper’s advertised results. The title should be adjusted to reflect the rotating case.
[Eq. (5.54)] In the display for δE_ωlm, the exponential appears as e^{β(ω−Ω_H ω)}; this should be e^{β(ω−Ω_H m)} to agree with Eq. (5.53).
[Eq. (4.13)] The identification of Q_2 with the frequency ω and the use of the Carnot bound should be made more explicit; as written, the equality |W_max| = (1 − T_l/T_H)ω = (T_H/T_l − 1)ω′ is correct only after using (4.12), but the reader must infer which reservoir is hot and which heat exchange corresponds to which frequency.
[Throughout] Several typos and duplicated words appear, e.g. “satisﬁesthe”, “Bolse-Einstein”, “toﬁnite cuts”, and “Weterms”. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
[§3, Table 1] The table is useful, but the entry “Evolution” could be clarified: in the null-infinity column “evolution” is kinematical restriction to a subalgebra rather than a genuine time evolution generated by a Lindbladian. The text explains this, but the table may mislead.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Unruh/Kerr dual GSL is a consequence of an assumed KMS modular Hamiltonian whose chemical potentials are imported from the authors' [73]; the derived grand-potential inequality reproduces that input by construction.

self definitional [§5.1 (Eqs. 5.5–5.7, 5.15–5.16) and §5.2/§5.3.2 (Eqs. 5.26, 5.58)]
"we deduce that the restriction of the Unruh vacuum at I+_R satisfies the following KMS conditions ... μ_{ωl}=T_H ln |t_{ωl}|^2/(1-(1-|t_{ωl}|^2)e^{-β_H ω}) and μ_{ωl} is the chemical potential introduced in [73]. ... The expression (5.15) allows us to define the one-sided Hamiltonian of the Unruh as K ... we find that ΔM−Ω_H ΔJ−Σ_{lm}∫_0^∞ μ_{ωlm}⟨Δn_{ωlm}⟩_Ψ dω−T_H ΔS_Ψ≤0."

The KMS state (5.15)/(5.49) is assumed to be a grand-canonical ensemble whose chemical potentials μ are taken from the authors' earlier work [73], Eq. (5.6)/(5.38). The one-sided modular Hamiltonian (5.16)/(5.50) is then defined from this assumed state, and the relative-entropy inequality is applied to it. The resulting dual GSL (5.26)/(5.58) contains exactly the same μ terms that were put into the assumed state; the only additional ingredient is the generic monotonicity of relative entropy. The paper itself concedes that the modular Hamiltonian is formal and that deriving the dual GSL directly from the asymptotic algebra remains an open problem, so the μ-dependent potential is not independently derived from the algebra.

full rationale

Most of Sections 2–4 are a recap of the companion paper [1] and a dictionary with open quantum thermodynamics; reliance on a companion in a two-part series is normal and not circular. The κ_l-vacuum work-extraction result is a consistency check (Carnot efficiency on a state defined by mode-dependent temperatures) rather than a hidden prediction. The genuinely circular element is in Section 5: the Unruh-vacuum grand-potential law is not obtained from a computed modular Hamiltonian at null infinity, but from an assumed KMS state whose chemical potentials are imported verbatim from [73]; the final inequality then returns those same chemical potentials in the thermodynamic potential. This is a partial construction-reduction: the greybody factors and transmission coefficients are independent physical inputs, and the paper is transparent about the missing algebraic derivation, so the result is not fully forced by definition (score 8) or fully equivalent to its input (score 10). The explicit admission that the direct derivation remains an open problem is a correctness/rigor gap that compounds, but does not by itself create, the circularity. Score 6 reflects the one load-bearing step where the 'predicted' grand potential is built into the assumed modular Hamiltonian.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claims depend on a choice of vacuum state (κ_l sequence or cutoff), an assumed slow-variation condition, and for the Unruh section a formally assumed KMS modular Hamiltonian with chemical potentials imported from the authors' earlier work. No new physical entities are required beyond the toy κ_l-vacua.

free parameters (2)

κ_l sequence (effective surface gravities) = arbitrary decreasing sequence κ ≥ κ_l ≥ 0; candidate κ_l = e^{-α l(l+1)}
Defines the kappa_l-vacua and the chemical potentials μ_ωl = ω(1 - κ/κ_l) in (2.62). The sequence is chosen by hand and is central to the work-extraction argument.
Cutoff L in L-vacuum = L < ∞ arbitrary
Hard regularization of the Hartle-Hawking state; modes with l ≥ L are in the Minkowski vacuum. Results are expected to be cutoff-independent at large L, but L is a free choice.

assumptions (5)

standard math Monotonicity of Araki relative entropy under restriction to subalgebras (2.12)
The core inequality behind all dual GSL proofs in this paper and in [1].
domain assumption Condition (2.30): κ^{-1} ∂_u <T_uu> ≪ <T_uu> (slowly varying flux)
Needed to relate Bondi mass to boost energy. It is assumed throughout Sections 2 and 5 and is not generally proven for arbitrary states.
ad hoc to paper Unruh vacuum restricted to subalgebras at I+ is KMS with modular Hamiltonian (5.15)/(5.49) and chemical potentials from [73]
This formal assumption underpins the Unruh-vacuum second law; the paper explicitly states that an algebraic proof is still lacking.
domain assumption Semiclassical Einstein equations encoded in Bondi and Raychaudhuri flux-balance laws (2.25), (2.28)
Links stress-tensor expectation values to Bondi mass and area variations; standard semiclassical gravity input.
domain assumption Massless scalar field on a non-expanding null hypersurface with Weyl algebra and symplectic structure
The QFT setup on null infinity and the basis for defining vacua and modular Hamiltonians.

invented entities (1)

κ_l-vacua |Ω_{κ_l}>
purpose: Toy vacuum states with mode-dependent effective temperatures T_l = κ_l/2π; they interpolate between Hartle-Hawking and Minkowski and enable work extraction.
The family is chosen by hand and not tied to a concrete physical process or falsifiable prediction outside the paper's own construction.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Black hole thermodynamics at null infinity. Part 2: Open systems, Markovian dynamics and work extraction from non-rotating black holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B5LAZZZZ

@misc{pith2026260103356,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Black hole thermodynamics at null infinity. Part 2: Open systems, Markovian dynamics and work extraction from non-rotating black holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B5LAZZZZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.03356}
}

read the original abstract

Black hole thermodynamics provides a unique setting in which general relativity, quantum field theory, and statistical mechanics converge. In semiclassical gravity, this interplay culminates in the generalized second law (GSL), whose modern proofs rely on information theoretic techniques applied to algebras of observables defined on null hypersurfaces. These proofs exhibit close structural parallels with the thermodynamics of open quantum systems governed by Markovian dynamics. In this work, we draw parallels between the dynamics of quantum fields in regions bounded by non expanding causal horizons and the thermodynamics of quantum systems weakly coupled to equilibrium reservoirs. We introduce a dictionary relating late time boundary conditions to the choice of reservoir, vacuum states to fixed points of the dynamics, and modular Hamiltonians to thermodynamic potentials. Building on results from a companion paper on dual generalized second laws at future null infinity, we show that additional terms appearing in the associated thermodynamic potentials admit a natural interpretation as work contributions. We demonstrate that certain non thermal vacuum states at null infinity allow for the operation of autonomous thermal engines and enable work extraction from the radiation. Extending the analysis to the Unruh vacuum in Schwarzschild and Kerr backgrounds, we obtain generalized grand potential type laws incorporating grey body effects and angular momentum fluxes. Altogether, our results clarify the thermodynamic description of black hole dynamics and place it within the broader framework of open quantum thermodynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.03356 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Setup in which the hypersurfaces Σ1 and Σ2 both starts at the horizon bifurcation surface B and end at different cuts 𝑈 = 𝑈1 and 𝑈 = 𝑈2 respectively at I+ 𝑅 . Are also depicted the regions DH and DI 𝑖 . Figure taken from [1]. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** A picture depicting the BLPS engine. Because of the population inversion, we are able to extract [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Here we represented the eigenbasis of the tensor space spanned by our two qubits. We depicted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: One region of the Penrose diagram of the maximal extension of the Kerr solution. The (anti)- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 79 linked inside Pith

[1]

A.Rignon-BretandM.Vilatte,Black hole thermodynamics at null inﬁnity Part 1: Dual Generalized Second Law,arXiv2601:???? (2026)

2026
[73]

A.Rignon-Bret,Black hole thermodynamic potentials for asymptotic observers,Phys.Rev.D110 (2024),no.12,124002,2406.15843

arXiv 2024
[2]

R.PenroseandR.M.Floyd,Extraction of rotational energy from a black hole,NaturePhysical Science229(1971),no.6,177–179

1971
[3]

S.W.Hawking,Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes,Phys.Rev.Lett.26(1971) 1344–1346 46

1971
[4]

S.W.HawkingandJ.Hartle,Energy and angular momentum ﬂow into a black hole, Communicationsinmathematicalphysics27(1972),no.4,283–290

1972
[5]

J.M.Bardeen,B.CarterandS.W.Hawking,The four laws of black hole mechanics, Communicationsinmathematicalphysics31(1973),no.2,161–170

1973
[6]

J.D.Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,PhysicalReviewD7(1973),no.8,2333

1973
[7]

J.D.Bekenstein,Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black-hole physics,PhysicalReview D9(1974),no.12,3292

1974

Show all 127 references

[8]

S.W.Hawking,Black hole explosions,Nature248(1974)30–31

1974
[9]

World Scientiﬁc,1975

S.W.Hawking,Particle creation by black holes,inEuclidean quantum gravity,pp.167–188. World Scientiﬁc,1975

1975
[10]

R.M.Wald,On Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun.Math.Phys.45(1975)9–34

1975
[11]

W.Israel,Thermo-ﬁeld dynamics of black holes,PhysicsLettersA57(1976),no.2,107–110

1976
[12]

J.B.HartleandS.W.Hawking,Path-integral derivation of black-hole radiance,PhysicalReviewD 13(1976),no.8,2188

1976
[13]

W.G.Unruh,Notes on black hole evaporation,Phys.Rev.D14(1976)870

1976
[14]

R.M.Wald,The Thermodynamics of Black Holes,NATOSci.Ser.II60(2002)477–522

2002
[15]

A.C.Wall,A Survey of Black Hole Thermodynamics,1804.10610

arXiv
[16]

A.Perez,Black Hole Entropy and Planckian Discreteness,2310.19389

arXiv
[17]

D.SudarskyandR.M.Wald,Extrema of mass, stationarity, and staticity, and solutions to the Einstein-Yang-Mills equations,PhysicalReviewD46(1992),no.4,1453

1992
[18]

R.M.Wald,Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,PhysicalReviewD48(1993),no.8,R3427, gr-qc/9307038

1993 arXiv
[19]

V.IyerandR.M.Wald,Some properties of the Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,PhysicalreviewD50(1994),no.2,846,gr-qc/9403028

1994 arXiv
[20]

T.Jacobson,G.KangandR.C.Myers,On black hole entropy,PhysicalReviewD49(1994),no.12, 6587,gr-qc/9312023

1994 arXiv
[21]

Physical process version

S.GaoandR.M.Wald,“Physical process version” of the ﬁrst law and the generalized second law for charged and rotating black holes,PhysicalReviewD64(2001),no.8,084020,gr-qc/0106071 47

2001 arXiv
[22]

K.Prabhu,The ﬁrst law of black hole mechanics for ﬁelds with internal gauge freedom,Classicaland QuantumGravity34(2017),no.3,035011,1511.00388

2017 arXiv
[23]

A.Rignon-Bret,Note on the physical process ﬁrst law of black hole mechanics,Phys.Rev.D108 (2023),no.2,024005,2303.06731

2023 arXiv
[24]

T.Jacobson,Thermodynamics of spacetime: the Einstein equation of state,PhysicalReviewLetters 75(1995),no.7,1260,gr-qc/9504004

1995 arXiv
[25]

T.Jacobson,Entanglement equilibrium and the Einstein equation,Physicalreviewletters116(2016), no.20,201101,1505.04753

2016 arXiv
[26]

T.JacobsonandM.R.Visser,Gravitational thermodynamics of causal diamonds in (A) dS,SciPost Physics7(2019),no.6,079,1812.01596

2019 arXiv
[27]

Geom.Meth.Mod.Phys.19(2022),no.Supp01,2230002,2112.06301

A.Alonso-SerranoandM.Liška,Thermodynamics of spacetime and unimodular gravity,Int.J. Geom.Meth.Mod.Phys.19(2022),no.Supp01,2230002,2112.06301

2022 arXiv
[28]

A.Alonso-Serrano,M.LiškaandM.Piotrak,Semi-classical spacetime thermodynamics, 2509.05052

arXiv
[29]

S.W.Hawking,Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse,PhysicalReviewD14(1976), no.10,2460

1976
[30]

S.W.Hawking,The unpredictability of quantum gravity,CommunicationsinMathematical Physics87(1982),no.3,395–415

1982
[31]

D.N.Page,Information in black hole radiation,Physicalreviewletters71(1993),no.23,3743

1993
[32]

S.D.Mathur,The Fuzzball proposal for black holes: An Elementary review,FortschrittederPhysik: ProgressofPhysics53(2005),no.7-8,793–827,hep-th/0502050

2005 arXiv
[33]

S.W.Hawking,The Information Paradox for Black Holes, 9,2015.1509.01147

2015
[34]

S.W.Hawking,M.J.PerryandA.Strominger,Soft Hair on Black Holes,Phys.Rev.Lett.116(2016), no.23,231301,1601.00921

2016 arXiv
[35]

W.G.UnruhandR.M.Wald,Information loss,ReportsonProgressinPhysics80(2017),no.9, 092002,1703.02140

2017 arXiv
[36]

G.Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,JHEP09(2020) 002,1905.08255

2020 arXiv
[37]

G.Penington,S.H.Shenker,D.StanfordandZ.Yang,Replicawormholesandtheblackholeinterior, JHEP03(2022)205,1911.11977 48

2022 arXiv
[38]

A.Almheiri,N.Engelhardt,D.MarolfandH.Maxﬁeld,The entropy of bulk quantum ﬁelds and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,JHEP12(2019)063,1905.08762

2019 arXiv
[39]

A.Almheiri,R.Mahajan,J.MaldacenaandY.Zhao,The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,JHEP03(2020)149,1908.10996

2020 arXiv
[40]

A.Almheiri,T.Hartman,J.Maldacena,E.ShaghoulianandA.Tajdini,Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,JHEP05(2020)013,1911.12333

2020 arXiv
[41]

A.PerezandS.Viollet,Discreteness Unravels the Black Hole Information Puzzle: Insights from a Quantum Gravity Toy Model,Entropy25(2023),no.11,1479,2307.10254

2023 arXiv
[42]

V.Chandrasekaran,É.É.FlanaganandK.Prabhu,Symmetries and charges of general relativity at null boundaries,JHEP11(2018)125,1807.11499,[Erratum: JHEP07,224(2023)]

2018 arXiv
[43]

A.Rignon-Bret,Second law from the Noether current on null hypersurfaces,Phys.Rev.D108(2023), no.4,044069,2303.07262

2023 arXiv
[44]

G.Odak,A.Rignon-BretandS.Speziale,General gravitational charges on null hypersurfaces,JHEP 12(2023)038,2309.03854

2023 arXiv
[45]

V.ChandrasekaranandE.E.Flanagan,Horizon phase spaces in general relativity,JHEP07(2024) 017,2309.03871

2024 arXiv
[46]

L.Ciambelli,L.FreidelandR.G.Leigh,Null Raychaudhuri: canonical structure and the dressing time,JHEP01(2024)166,2309.03932

2024 arXiv
[47]

S.Hollands,R.M.WaldandV.G.Zhang,Entropy of dynamical black holes,Phys.Rev.D110(2024), no.2,024070,2402.00818

2024 arXiv
[48]

M.R.VisserandZ.Yan,Properties of dynamical black hole entropy,JHEP10(2024)029, 2403.07140

2024 arXiv
[49]

D.Kong,Y.Tian,H.ZhangandJ.Zhao,Dynamicalblackholeentropybeyondgeneralrelativityfrom the Einstein frame,Phys.Rev.D111(2025),no.8,084005,2412.00647

2025 arXiv
[50]

J.Zhao,The entropy of dynamical de Sitter horizons,Eur.Phys.J.C85(2025),no.7,750, 2503.16138

2025 arXiv
[51]

W.Jia,Q.QiandC.Gao,Entanglement Entropy and Thermodynamics of Dynamical Black Holes, 2509.05700

arXiv
[52]

M.R.VisserandZ.Yan,Dynamical entropy of charged black objects,2510.20747
[53]

S.LeutheusserandH.Liu,Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality,PhysicalReviewD108(2023),no.8,086019,2110.05497 49

2023 arXiv
[54]

E.Witten,Gravity and the crossed product,JHEP10(2022)008,2112.12828

2022 arXiv
[55]

V.Chandrasekaran,R.Longo,G.PeningtonandE.Witten,An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,JHEP02(2023)082,2206.10780

2023 arXiv
[56]

V.Chandrasekaran,G.PeningtonandE.Witten,Large N algebras and generalized entropy,JHEP 04(2023)009,2209.10454

2023 arXiv
[57]

K.Jensen,J.SorceandA.J.Speranza,Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity,JHEP12(2023)020,2306.01837

2023 arXiv
[58]

J.Kudler-Flam,S.LeutheusserandG.Satishchandran,Generalized Black Hole Entropy is von Neumann Entropy,2309.15897

arXiv
[59]

S.AliAhmadandR.Jeﬀerson,Crossed product algebras and generalized entropy for subregions, SciPostPhysicsCore7(2024),no.2,020,2306.07323

2024 arXiv
[60]

T.FaulknerandA.J.Speranza,Gravitational algebras and the generalized second law,JHEP11 (2024)099,2405.00847

2024 arXiv
[61]

J.DeVuyst,S.Eccles,P.A.HoehnandJ.Kirklin,Gravitational entropy is observer-dependent,JHEP 07(2025)146,2405.00114

2025 arXiv
[62]

J.DeVuyst,S.Eccles,P.A.HoehnandJ.Kirklin,Crossed products and quantum reference frames: on the observer-dependence of gravitational entropy,JHEP07(2025)063,2412.15502,[Erratum: JHEP10,234(2025)]

2025 arXiv
[63]

R.D.Sorkin,The statistical mechanics of black hole thermodynamics,Blackholesandrelativistic stars(1998)177–194,gr-qc/9705006

1998 arXiv
[64]

H.Casini,Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound,ClassicalandQuantumGravity25(2008), no.20,205021,0804.2182

2008 arXiv
[65]

A.C.Wall,Proving the Achronal Averaged Null Energy Condition from the Generalized Second Law, Phys.Rev.D81(2010)024038,0910.5751

2010 arXiv
[66]

Grav.30(2013)165003,1010.5513,[Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav.30,199501(2013)]

A.C.Wall,The Generalized Second Law implies a Quantum Singularity Theorem,Class.Quant. Grav.30(2013)165003,1010.5513,[Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav.30,199501(2013)]

2013 arXiv
[67]

A.C.Wall,A Proof of the generalized second law for rapidly-evolving Rindler horizons,Phys.Rev.D 82(2010)124019,1007.1493

2010 arXiv
[68]

A.C.Wall,A proof of the generalized second law for rapidly changing ﬁelds and arbitrary horizon slices,Phys.Rev.D85(2012)104049,1105.3445,[Erratum: Phys.Rev.D87,069904(2013)] 50

2012 arXiv
[69]

A.C.Wall,A Second Law for Higher Curvature Gravity,Int.J.Mod.Phys.D24(2015),no.12, 1544014,1504.08040

2015 arXiv
[70]

D.Kapec,A.-M.RaclariuandA.Strominger,Area, Entanglement Entropy and Supertranslations at Null Inﬁnity,Class.Quant.Grav.34(2017),no.16,165007,1603.07706

2017 arXiv
[71]

R.BoussoandN.Engelhardt,Generalized second law for cosmology,PhysicalReviewD93(2016), no.2,024025,1510.02099

2016 arXiv
[72]

S.Hollands,Á.D.KovácsandH.S.Reall,The second law of black hole mechanics in eﬀective ﬁeld theory,JHEP08(2022)258,2205.15341

2022 arXiv
[74]

J.Kirklin,Generalised second law beyond the semiclassical regime,JHEP07(2025)192,2412.01903

2025 arXiv
[75]

G.Lindblad,Completely positive maps and entropy inequalities,CommunicationsinMathematical Physics40(1975)147–151

1975
[76]

A.Uhlmann,Relative entropy and the Wigner-Yanase-Dyson-Lieb concavity in an interpolation theory,CommunicationsinMathematicalPhysics54(1977),no.1,21–32

1977
[77]

H.Araki,Relative entropy of states of von Neumann algebras,PublicationsoftheResearchInstitute forMathematicalSciences11(1975),no.3,809–833

1975
[78]

D.Petz,Monotonicity of quantum relative entropy revisited,ReviewsinMathematicalPhysics15 (2003),no.01,79–91,quant-ph/0209053

2003 arXiv
[79]

SpringerScience&BusinessMedia,2004

M.OhyaandD.Petz,Quantum entropy and its use. SpringerScience&BusinessMedia,2004

2004
[80]

H.Spohn,Entropy production for quantum dynamical semigroups,JournalofMathematicalPhysics 19(1978),no.5,1227–1230

1978
[81]

B.SchumacherandM.D.Westmoreland,Relative entropy in quantum information theory, quant-ph/0004045

arXiv
[82]

OUPOxford,2002

H.-P.BreuerandF.Petruccione,The theory of open quantum systems. OUPOxford,2002

2002
[83]

V.Vedral,The role of relative entropy in quantum information theory,ReviewsofModernPhysics 74(2002),no.1,197,quant-ph/0102094

2002 arXiv
[84]

J.Goold,M.Huber,A.Riera,L.DelRioandP.Skrzypczyk,The role of quantum information in thermodynamics—a topical review,JournalofPhysicsA:MathematicalandTheoretical49(2016), no.14,143001,1505.07835 51

2016 arXiv
[85]

Springer,2019.1801.08314

R.AlickiandR.Kosloﬀ,Introduction to quantum thermodynamics: History and prospects,in Thermodynamics in the Quantum Regime: Fundamental Aspects and New Directions,pp.1–33. Springer,2019.1801.08314

2019
[86]

G.T.LandiandM.Paternostro,Irreversibleentropyproduction: Fromclassicaltoquantum,Reviews ofModernPhysics93(2021),no.3,035008,2009.07668

2021 arXiv
[87]

E.B.Davies,Markovian master equations,CommunicationsinmathematicalPhysics39(1974), no.2,91–110

1974
[88]

G.Lindblad,On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups,Communicationsin mathematicalphysics48(1976),no.2,119–130

1976
[89]

H.SpohnandJ.L.Lebowitz,Irreversible thermodynamics for quantum systems weakly coupled to thermal reservoirs,AdvancesinChemicalPhysics: ForIlyaPrigogine(1978)109–142

1978
[90]

D.ChruścińskiandS.Pascazio,A brief history of the GKLS equation,OpenSystems&Information Dynamics24(2017),no.03,1740001,1710.05993

2017 arXiv
[91]

R.Kosloﬀ,Quantum thermodynamics and open-systems modeling,TheJournalofchemicalphysics 150(2019),no.20,

2019
[92]

R.Alicki,Thermodynamics of Markovian Open Quantum Systems with Application to Lasers,Open Systems&InformationDynamics30(2023),no.03,2350012,2309.13580

2023 arXiv
[93]

R.Kubo,Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. I. General theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problems,JournalofthephysicalsocietyofJapan12(1957), no.6,570–586

1957
[94]

I,PhysicalReview115(1959),no.6, 1342

P.C.MartinandJ.Schwinger,Theory of many-particle systems. I,PhysicalReview115(1959),no.6, 1342

1959
[95]

D.Manzano,A short introduction to the Lindblad master equation,Aipadvances10(2020),no.2, 1906.04478

2020 arXiv
[96]

N.Brunner,N.Linden,S.PopescuandP.Skrzypczyk,Virtual qubits, virtual temperatures, and the foundations of thermodynamics,PhysicalReviewE—Statistical,Nonlinear,andSoftMatter Physics85(2012),no.5,051117,1106.2138

2012 arXiv
[97]

R.Kosloﬀ,Quantum thermodynamics: A dynamical viewpoint,Entropy15(2013),no.6,2100–2128, 1305.2268

2013 arXiv
[98]

R.KosloﬀandA.Levy,Quantum heat engines and refrigerators: Continuous devices,Annualreview ofphysicalchemistry65(2014),no.1,365–393,1310.0683 52

2014 arXiv
[99]

K.BrandnerandU.Seifert,Periodic thermodynamics of open quantum systems,PhysicalReviewE 93(2016),no.6,062134,1604.03411v1

2016 arXiv
[100]

Phys.19(2017),no.12,123037,1707.09211

P.P.Hofer,M.Perarnau-Llobet,L.D.M.Miranda,G.Haack,R.Silva,J.B.BraskandN.Brunner, Markovian master equations for quantum thermal machines: local versus global approach,NewJ. Phys.19(2017),no.12,123037,1707.09211

2017 arXiv
[101]

J.CresserandC.Facer,Coarse-graining in the derivation of Markovian master equations and its signiﬁcance in quantum thermodynamics,1710.09939

arXiv
[102]

F.Liu,Heat and work in Markovian quantum master equations: concepts, ﬂuctuation theorems, and computations,1710.02311

arXiv
[103]

T.VanVuandK.Saito,Thermodynamics of precision in Markovian open quantum dynamics, Physicalreviewletters128(2022),no.14,140602,2111.04599

2022 arXiv
[104]

W.PuszandS.L.Woronowicz,Passive states and KMS states for general quantum systems, CommunicationsinMathematicalPhysics58(1978),no.3,273–290

1978
[105]

D.N.Page,Hawking radiation and black hole thermodynamics,NewJ.Phys.7(2005)203, hep-th/0409024

2005 arXiv
[106]

B.S.KayandR.M.Wald,Theorems on the uniqueness and thermal properties of stationary, nonsingular, quasifree states on spacetimes with a bifurcate Killing horizon,PhysicsReports207 (1991),no.2,49–136

1991
[107]

C.Dappiaggi,V.MorettiandN.Pinamonti,Rigorous construction and Hadamard property of the Unruh state in Schwarzschild spacetime,Adv.Theor.Math.Phys.15(2011),no.2,355–447, 0907.1034

2011 arXiv
[108]

Springer,2017

C.Dappiaggi,V.MorettiandN.Pinamonti,Hadamard States from Light-like Hypersurfaces,vol.25 ofSpringerBriefs in Mathematical Physics. Springer,2017

2017
[109]

I.GelfandandM.Neumark,On the imbedding of normed rings into the ring of operators in Hilbert space,Rec.Math.12(1943),no.2,197–217

1943
[110]

I.E.Segal,Irreducible representations of operator algebras,Bull.Amer.Math.Soc.53(February, 1947)73–88

1947
[111]

E.Witten,APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum ﬁeld theory,ReviewsofModernPhysics90(2018),no.4,045003

2018
[112]

J.Sorce,Notes on the type classiﬁcation of von Neumann algebras,Rev.Math.Phys.36(2024), no.02,2430002,2302.01958 53

2024
[113]

M.Takesaki,Conditional expectations in von Neumann algebras,JournalofFunctionalAnalysis9 (1972),no.3,306–321

1972
[114]

Springer,2003

M.Takesakiet al.,Theory of operator algebras II,vol.125. Springer,2003

2003
[115]

I,Phys.Rev.98(May,1955)1123–1126

A.Raychaudhuri,Relativistic Cosmology. I,Phys.Rev.98(May,1955)1123–1126

1955
[116]

H.Bondi,Gravitational Waves in General Relativity,Nature186(1960),no.4724,535–535

1960
[117]

R.K.Sachs,Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory,PhysicalReview128(1962),no.6,2851

1962
[118]

A.Rignon-Bret,G.Guarnieri,J.GooldandM.T.Mitchison,Thermodynamics of precision in quantum nanomachines,Phys.Rev.E103(2021),no.1,012133,2009.11303

2021 arXiv
[119]

WorldScientiﬁc,2005

J.Navarro-salasandA.Fabbri,Modeling black hole evaporation. WorldScientiﬁc,2005

2005
[120]

R.Penrose,Quasi-local mass and angular momentum in general relativity,ProceedingsoftheRoyal SocietyofLondon.A.MathematicalandPhysicalSciences381(1982),no.1780,53–63

1982
[121]

Rel.7(2004)10,gr-qc/0407042

A.AshtekarandB.Krishnan,Isolated and dynamical horizons and their applications,LivingRev. Rel.7(2004)10,gr-qc/0407042

2004 arXiv
[122]

R.H.PriceandK.S.Thorne,Membrane viewpoint on black holes: properties and evolution of the stretched horizon,PhysicalReviewD33(1986),no.4,915

1986
[123]

L.FreidelandP.Jai-akson,GeometryofCarrollianstretchedhorizons,Class.Quant.Grav.42(2025), no.6,065010,2406.06709

2025 arXiv
[124]

M.Esposito,K.LindenbergandC.VandenBroeck,Entropy production as correlation between system and reservoir,NewJournalofPhysics12(2010),no.1,013013,0908.1125

2010 arXiv
[125]

I.DeVegaandD.Alonso,Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum systems,ReviewsofModern Physics89(2017),no.1,015001,1511.06994

2017 arXiv
[126]

S.Marcantoni,S.Alipour,F.Benatti,R.FloreaniniandA.Rezakhani,Entropy production and non-Markovian dynamical maps,Scientiﬁcreports7(2017),no.1,12447,1709.02174

2017 arXiv
[127]

M.Popovic,B.VacchiniandS.Campbell,Entropy production and correlations in a controlled non-Markovian setting,PhysicalReviewA98(2018),no.1,1804.03861 54

2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

A.Rignon-BretandM.Vilatte,Black hole thermodynamics at null inﬁnity Part 1: Dual Generalized Second Law,arXiv2601:???? (2026)

2026

[2] [73]

A.Rignon-Bret,Black hole thermodynamic potentials for asymptotic observers,Phys.Rev.D110 (2024),no.12,124002,2406.15843

arXiv 2024

[3] [2]

R.PenroseandR.M.Floyd,Extraction of rotational energy from a black hole,NaturePhysical Science229(1971),no.6,177–179

1971

[4] [3]

S.W.Hawking,Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes,Phys.Rev.Lett.26(1971) 1344–1346 46

1971

[5] [4]

S.W.HawkingandJ.Hartle,Energy and angular momentum ﬂow into a black hole, Communicationsinmathematicalphysics27(1972),no.4,283–290

1972

[6] [5]

J.M.Bardeen,B.CarterandS.W.Hawking,The four laws of black hole mechanics, Communicationsinmathematicalphysics31(1973),no.2,161–170

1973

[7] [6]

J.D.Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,PhysicalReviewD7(1973),no.8,2333

1973

[8] [7]

J.D.Bekenstein,Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black-hole physics,PhysicalReview D9(1974),no.12,3292

1974