Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 29 references

A large-tension braneworld with mildly negative Weyl coupling fits NICER and GW170817 neutron-star data while lifting maximum mass and radius above pure GR+SLy values.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 15:10 UTC pith:B5OIMIZW

load-bearing objection Solid Bayesian map of a viable large-tension + mildly negative α_U window for SLy; the shift is real under their closure, but that closure is the whole game. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.09836 v1 pith:B5OIMIZW submitted 2026-07-10 gr-qc astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR

Compact stars in a large-tension braneworld: mildly negative Weyl coupling consistent with NICER and gravitational-wave data

Samuel Isidoro dos Santos J\'unior , Rafael Camargo Rodrigues de Lima , Pedro Henrique Ribeiro da Silva Moraes This is my paper
classification gr-qc astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords braneworld gravitycompact starsneutron starsmodified TOV equationsWeyl sectorBayesian inferenceNICERGW170817
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether a simple effective braneworld model of gravity can still describe real neutron stars once modern multi-messenger data are taken seriously. It freezes the nuclear equation of state at the standard SLy relation and lets only three braneworld parameters vary: the brane tension and two phenomenological numbers that close the nonlocal Weyl sector. Bayesian sampling against GW170817 and two NICER mass–radius posteriors prefers a large brane tension (so local high-energy corrections stay small) together with a slightly negative Weyl coupling. That negative coupling reduces the effective gravitational density inside the star, pushing both the maximum mass and the 1.4-solar-mass radius upward relative to ordinary general relativity. The resulting sequences remain inside current observational bounds and do not demand large departures from Einstein gravity. A sympathetic reader cares because the result shows that extra-dimensional corrections need not be extreme or incompatible with data; a mild, data-driven screening effect is enough to keep braneworld compact stars viable.

Core claim

For the fixed SLy equation of state, multi-messenger Bayesian inference places compact stars in a large-tension braneworld regime with a mildly negative Weyl coupling. The posterior medians are log10(λ/km−²)≈3.98 and α_U≈−0.15; the corresponding stellar sequences give M_max≈2.30 M_⊙ and R_1.4≈13.31 km, both larger than the pure GR+SLy values, while remaining consistent with GW170817 and the two NICER mass–radius posteriors used in the fit.

What carries the argument

Modified Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff equations closed by the phenomenological Weyl ansatz ρ_U=α_U ρ and p_U=w_U ρ_U. Negative α_U lowers the effective density that sources both the mass and hydrostatic-equilibrium equations, producing the rightward shift of the mass–radius sequence that the data accommodate.

Load-bearing premise

The nonlocal Weyl piece of the effective equations is replaced by a simple isotropic ansatz that is not derived from any bulk geometry or matching condition; if that closure is wrong, the preferred negative coupling and the claimed screening are artifacts of the parametrization rather than predictions of braneworld gravity.

What would settle it

A self-consistent five-dimensional bulk solution whose projected Weyl tensor cannot be approximated by ρ_U=α_U ρ with α_U near −0.15 would eliminate the screening mechanism that currently reconciles the model with the NICER and GW170817 radii; alternatively, a future tighter radius measurement that forces R_1.4 back below ~12 km for SLy-like stars would exclude the posterior.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper performs Bayesian MCMC inference of a phenomenological braneworld stellar model (local quadratic brane corrections plus an isotropic Weyl closure ρ_U=α_U ρ, p_U=w_U ρ_U) with fixed SLy EoS against GW170817 and NICER (PSR J0740+6620, PSR J1231−1411) mass–radius posteriors. The posterior prefers large brane tension, log10(λ/km^{-2})=3.98^{+1.52}_{-1.44} (68%), and mildly negative Weyl coupling α_U=−0.15^{+0.30}_{-0.08} (68%), yielding M_max≈2.30 M_⊙ and R_1.4≈13.31 km, larger than GR+SLy and consistent with the adopted multi-messenger constraints. The authors interpret this as a large-tension regime in which the Weyl sector, not the local quadratic term, drives a mild gravitational screening.

Significance. If the effective closure is accepted as a controlled phenomenological probe, the work is a useful multi-messenger constraint on braneworld-inspired TOV modifications: it reports full MCMC diagnostics (ensemble size, burn-in, Gelman–Rubin), a transparent likelihood construction, and a carefully limited claim of consistency under fixed SLy rather than model selection against GR. Section 6’s comparison with prior braneworld compact-star literature is particularly valuable in showing that larger maximum masses are not generic. The result is of moderate significance for modified-gravity neutron-star phenomenology, but its reach as a braneworld prediction is limited by the ad hoc Weyl closure and the single-EoS setup.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2 / Appendix A] Section 2, Eqs. (2.4)–(2.5) and Appendix A (A.20)–(A.21): the entire observational preference for α_U≈−0.15 and the claimed screening-driven shift of M_max and R_1.4 rest on the isotropic phenomenological closure ρ_U=α_U ρ, p_U=w_U ρ_U. Appendix A itself notes that E_μν cannot be reconstructed from brane quantities and that the anisotropic TOV (A.19) is more general; the analysis sets Δ_U=0 and uses ordinary-matter conservation. Because at the posterior median ρ/λ∼10^{-7}, the local quadratic term is negligible and the central claim is almost entirely an artifact of this free closure. Either (i) a sensitivity study with alternative closures (anisotropic stresses, different ρ_U–ρ relations, or bulk-motivated forms) or (ii) a substantially more cautious abstract/conclusions framing that this is a four-dimensional effective ansatz, not a bulk-derived braneworld prediction, is required for t
  2. [Section 4.4 / Table 1] Section 4.4 and Table 1: the reported large-tension preference log10(λ/km^{-2})=3.98^{+1.52}_{-1.44} largely tracks the Gaussian prior N(4,1.5^2)×U(−1,9). The text acknowledges this (§5.1, §5.3), yet the abstract and conclusions still present it as data-driven evidence for a large-tension regime. A prior-sensitivity test (flat prior on log10 λ, or a prior centered at lower tension) and explicit quantification of how much the λ posterior is prior-dominated are needed before that statement can stand as an observational constraint.
  3. [Section 4.3] Section 4.3, Eq. (4.3): the total posterior includes soft Gaussian penalties for M_max<2.12 M_⊙ (σ=0.06 M_⊙) and C_max>0.34 (σ=0.05), plus dataset weights w_GW=0.3, w_J0740=1.5, w_J1231=1.25 and a support-coverage penalty κ=8. These choices are load-bearing for the shape of the M_max and R_1.4 posteriors and for the relative weight of the subdominant positive-α_U branch. The manuscript should either justify these hyperparameters from external calibration or show that the median α_U and the consistency claim are stable under reasonable variations (e.g., no M_max/C_max penalties; equal dataset weights).
  4. [Section 3 / Abstract] Sections 3 and 7: all quantitative results are for fixed SLy. The paper correctly frames this as isolating the gravitational sector, but the abstract’s claim that the model is “consistent with current NICER and gravitational-wave constraints without requiring large deviations from GR” is then EoS-dependent. Soft SLy underpredicts R_1.4 and M_max in GR; the Weyl screening mainly compensates that baseline. At least a brief check with one stiffer hadronic EoS (or an explicit statement that the preferred α_U would shift under a different baseline) is needed so the multi-messenger consistency claim is not overstated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: notation is inconsistent (α{U}, α_U, αU; missing subscript braces in places). Align with the body notation α_U, w_U throughout.
  2. [Section 5.2] Figure 1 / Figure 2: the mass–radius band is built from only 1000 random samples and is described as “not a high-precision posterior-predictive emulator.” Consider stating the sampling fraction more prominently in the caption and, if feasible, overlay the observational 68%/95% contours used in the likelihood for direct visual comparison.
  3. [Section 4.2] Section 4.2: acceptance rate 49% and R̂≈1.02 for α_U, w_U are reported; a brief note on effective sample size (ESS) for the degenerate (α_U, w_U) direction would strengthen the convergence claim.
  4. [Section 6] Section 6, Eq. (6.1): ρ_loc is written as ρ+ρ²/(2λ), which is the effective density contribution, not solely the local correction; a short clarifying phrase would avoid confusion with ρ_eff in Eqs. (2.2)–(2.3).
  5. [References] References: several 2025–2026 citations (e.g., Romani et al. 2025, Brandes & Weise 2025, Murshid et al. 2025) should be checked for final bibliographic details at production time.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Genuine multi-messenger Bayesian inference of a free phenomenological Weyl closure; mild prior-centering and soft M_max/C_max penalties shape the reported large-tension preference but do not make the posterior a tautology of the inputs.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 4.4 Priors (Eqs. 4.4–4.6) and Sec. 4.3 likelihood (ln P_constr)]
    "We adopt the large-tension prior set, consisting of a Gaussian prior centered at large brane tension for log10 λ and Gaussian priors centered on the General Relativity values of the Weyl parameters... ln P_constr encodes soft physical constraints: a Gaussian penalty for M_max < 2.12 M_⊙ (width σ=0.06 M_⊙) and a penalty for C_max > 0.34 (width σ=0.05)."

    The reported preference for large λ and the high-mass, moderate-compactness sequences are partially shaped by the deliberately centered Gaussian priors and by soft penalties that push M_max upward and C_max downward. These are not pure data-driven constraints; the prior mean log10 λ=4 and the M_max penalty already favor the regime later advertised as the posterior result. The effect is mild (the likelihood still uses external NICER/GW samples and the Weyl parameters remain free), so it does not collapse the inference into a tautology, but it does make the “large-tension braneworld consistent with data” headline partly prior-assisted.

full rationale

The paper does not claim a first-principles derivation of stellar structure from a bulk geometry. It explicitly presents a four-dimensional phenomenological closure of the Shiromizu–Maeda–Sasaki equations (ρ_U=α_U ρ, p_U=w_U ρ_U) and then performs affine-invariant ensemble MCMC against external GW170817 and NICER mass–radius posteriors for a fixed SLy EoS. The modified TOV system is solved independently for each walker; the likelihood is a KDE comparison to published observational samples plus soft Gaussian penalties. The resulting posterior medians (log10 λ≈3.98, α_U≈−0.15, M_max≈2.30 M_⊙, R_1.4≈13.31 km) are therefore statistical constraints on free parameters, not quantities forced by definition or by self-citation. The only mild circularity burden is that the Gaussian priors are deliberately centered on large tension and on the GR Weyl values, and that soft penalties discourage M_max<2.12 M_⊙ and C_max>0.34; these choices bias the reported “large-tension, mildly negative Weyl” regime toward the observationally favored region without rendering the fit tautological. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, no fitted quantity is re-labeled a prediction of an independent observable, and the Weyl ansatz is openly labeled phenomenological rather than derived. Score 2 reflects that prior/penalty influence, not a reduction of the central claim to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central consistency claim rests on the Shiromizu–Maeda–Sasaki effective equations plus an ad hoc isotropic Weyl closure, a fixed SLy microphysics table, and three free braneworld parameters inferred under informative priors and hand-tuned likelihood weights. The Weyl sector is not reconstructed from a bulk solution; λ is effectively prior-regularized into the large-tension regime; and soft physical penalties further shape M_max. Invented content is the phenomenological (α_U, w_U) closure used as a four-dimensional stand-in for nonlocal bulk effects.

free parameters (5)
  • brane tension λ (via log10(λ/km^{-2})) = 3.98^{+1.52}_{-1.44} (68%)
    Primary model parameter; posterior median ~3.98 largely follows the N(4,1.5²) large-tension prior, controlling the local quadratic term.
  • Weyl coupling α_U = −0.15^{+0.30}_{-0.08} (68%)
    Dominant lever for the mass–radius shift via ρ_eff=ρ(1+α_U); fitted to multi-messenger data.
  • Weyl EoS parameter w_U = 0.24 with 95% CI [−1.25, 1.02]
    Closes p_U=w_U ρ_U; remains prior-dominated and degenerate with α_U.
  • likelihood weights w_GW, w_J0740, w_J1231 and KDE bandwidths = w=(0.3,1.5,1.25); h=(1.2,0.85,0.85) km
    Hand-chosen (0.3, 1.5, 1.25; h=1.2 and 0.85 km) and enter the total log-posterior; not marginalized.
  • support-coverage penalty κ and soft M_max/C_max constraints = κ=8; σ_M=0.06 M_⊙; σ_C=0.05
    κ=8 and Gaussian penalties (M_max<2.12 M_⊙ width 0.06; C_max>0.34 width 0.05) shape the posterior toward observationally favored sequences.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Effective brane Einstein equations G_μν=8πT_μν+κ_5^4 S_μν−E_μν with local quadratic S_μν (Shiromizu–Maeda–Sasaki).
    Section 2 and Appendix A take the projected bulk equations as the starting point for stellar structure.
  • ad hoc to paper Phenomenological isotropic Weyl closure ρ_U=α_U ρ, p_U=w_U ρ_U (and isotropic use in the hydrostatic equation).
    Eqs. (2.4)–(2.5) and (A.20)–(A.21); not derived from a bulk metric; the paper itself notes the Weyl sector is underdetermined.
  • ad hoc to paper Ordinary-matter conservation ∇_μ T^μν=0 rather than full effective-source conservation, yielding the isotropic modified TOV used in the MCMC.
    Appendix A contrasts this choice with the anisotropic effective TOV; the main analysis uses the ordinary-matter form (A.16)/(A.26).
  • domain assumption Fixed SLy hadronic equation of state as the sole microphysics input.
    Section 3; isolates gravity parameters but makes all mass–radius shifts conditional on a soft EoS known to underpredict radii/masses in GR.
  • standard math Static spherical perfect-fluid metric and standard TOV integration up to the maximum-mass turning point as the stable branch.
    Section 4.1 and Appendix A; standard stellar-structure assumptions.
  • domain assumption Empirical mass–radius likelihoods from published GW170817 and NICER posterior samples adequately represent the multi-messenger constraints.
    Section 4.3; KDE comparison to external samples rather than a full hierarchical reanalysis of raw data.
invented entities (1)
  • Phenomenological Weyl fluid (α_U, w_U) as a four-dimensional closure of the projected bulk Weyl tensor no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide a finite-parameter nonlocal sector so modified TOV equations can be integrated and fit to data without solving the five-dimensional bulk.
    The paper explicitly frames this as a phenomenological closure inspired by Sahni–Shtanov, not a bulk solution; no independent bulk observable is predicted.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 16901 in / 4302 out tokens · 40234 ms · 2026-07-14T15:10:16.942392+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We use Bayesian inference on multi-messenger observations to constrain the parameter space of compact stars in a phenomenological braneworld model inspired by the effective Sahni--Shtanov scenario. Stellar structure is described by modified Tolman--Oppenheimer--Volkoff equations including local quadratic brane corrections and a phenomenological closure for the nonlocal Weyl sector, parametrized by the brane tension $\lambda$, the Weyl coupling $\alpha_{\mathcal{U}}$, and the Weyl equation-of-state parameter $w_{\mathcal{U}}$. Using the SLy equation of state, we perform an affine-invariant ensemble Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis combining mass--radius posteriors from GW170817 (LIGO/Virgo) and NICER observations of PSR~J0740$+$6620 and PSR~J1231$-$1411. The posterior yields $\log_{10}(\lambda/\mathrm{km}^{-2})=3.98^{+1.52}{-1.44}$ (68%), indicating a large-brane-tension regime where local high-energy corrections are subdominant. The Weyl coupling is constrained to $\alpha{\mathcal{U}}=-0.15^{+0.30}{-0.08}$ (68%), while $w{\mathcal{U}}$ remains weakly constrained, with a 95% credible interval of $[-1.25,,1.02]$. The inferred stellar properties are $M_{\max}=2.30^{+0.14}{-0.08},M\odot$ and $R_{1.4}=13.31^{+0.54}_{-0.57},\mathrm{km}$ (68%), exceeding the corresponding General Relativity predictions for the SLy equation of state. The 95% posterior interval extends into the GW190814 secondary-mass range, although the median and best-fit values remain below it. These results show that a large-tension braneworld with a mildly negative Weyl coupling is consistent with current NICER and gravitational-wave constraints without requiring large deviations from General Relativity.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 26 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Demorest, T

    P.B. Demorest, T. Pennucci, S.M. Ransom, M.S.E. Roberts and J.W.T. Hessels,A two-solar-mass neutron star measured using Shapiro delay,Nature467(2010) 1081 [1010.5788]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  2. [2]

    Antoniadis, P.C.C

    J. Antoniadis, P.C.C. Freire, N. Wex, T.M. Tauris, R.S. Lynch, M.H. van Kerkwijk et al.,A massive pulsar in a compact relativistic binary,Science340(2013) 448 [1304.6875]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  3. [3]

    Cromartie et al.,Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar,Nature Astronomy4(2020) 72 [1904.06759]

    H.T. Cromartie et al.,Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar,Nature Astronomy4(2020) 72 [1904.06759]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    Romani, M

    R.W. Romani, M. Beleznay, A.V. Filippenko, T.G. Brink and W. Zheng,PSR J0952-0607: Tightening a record-high neutron star mass,Astrophys. J.(2025) [2512.05099]

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Brandes and W

    L. Brandes and W. Weise,Implications of latest NICER data for the neutron star equation of state,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 034005 [2412.05923]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Abbott et al.,GW190814: Gravitational waves from the coalescence of a 23 solar mass black hole with a 2.6 solar mass compact object,Astrophys

    R. Abbott et al.,GW190814: Gravitational waves from the coalescence of a 23 solar mass black hole with a 2.6 solar mass compact object,Astrophys. J. Lett.896(2020) L44 [2006.12611]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Lattimer and M

    J.M. Lattimer and M. Prakash,Neutron star observations: Prognosis for equation of state constraints,Phys. Rept.442(2007) 109 [astro-ph/0612440]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    Oertel, M

    M. Oertel, M. Hempel, T. Klahn and S. Typel,Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars,Rev. Mod. Phys.89(2017) 015007 [1610.03361]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Berti et al.,Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations, Class

    E. Berti et al.,Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations, Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015) 243001 [1501.07274]. – 14 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    Riess, A.V

    A.G. Riess, A.V. Filippenko, P. Challis, A. Clocchiatti, A. Diercks, P.M. Garnavich et al., Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant,Astron. J.116(1998) 1009 [astro-ph/9805201]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  11. [11]

    Rubin and B

    D. Rubin and B. Hayden,Is the expansion of the universe accelerating? all signs point to yes, Astrophys. J. Lett.833(2016) L30 [1610.08972]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    Weinberg, M.J

    D.H. Weinberg, M.J. Mortonson, D.J. Eisenstein, C. Hirata, A.G. Riess and E. Rozo, Observational probes of cosmic acceleration,Phys. Rept.530(2013) 87 [1201.2434]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  13. [13]

    Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem,Rev

    S. Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem,Rev. Mod. Phys.61(1989) 1

    1989

  14. [14]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 3370 [hep-ph/9905221]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  15. [15]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,An alternative to compactification,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 4690 [hep-th/9906064]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  16. [16]

    Shiromizu, K

    T. Shiromizu, K. Maeda and M. Sasaki,The Einstein equations on the 3-brane world,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 024012 [gr-qc/9910076]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  17. [17]

    Germani and R

    C. Germani and R. Maartens,Stars in the braneworld,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 124010 [hep-th/0107011]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  18. [18]

    Ovalle,Nonuniform braneworld stars: An exact solution,Int

    J. Ovalle,Nonuniform braneworld stars: An exact solution,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D18(2009) 837 [0809.3547]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  19. [19]

    Ovalle and F

    J. Ovalle and F. Linares,Tolman IV solution in the Randall-Sundrum braneworld,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 104026 [1311.1844]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  20. [20]

    Castro, M.D

    L.B. Castro, M.D. Alloy and D.P. Menezes,Mass radius relation of compact stars in the braneworld,JCAP08(2014) 047 [1403.1099]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    García-Aspeitia and L.A

    M.A. García-Aspeitia and L.A. Ureña-López,Stellar stability in brane-worlds revisited,Class. Quantum Grav.32(2015) 025014 [1405.3932]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    Murshid, N

    M. Murshid, N. Rahman and M. Kalam,Braneworld neutron stars: Constraining brane tension with observational data,arXiv e-prints(2025) [2501.10730]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Sahni and Y

    V. Sahni and Y. Shtanov,Braneworld models of dark energy,JCAP11(2003) 014 [astro-ph/0202346]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  24. [24]

    Mishra, W.L

    S.S. Mishra, W.L. Matthewson, V. Sahni, A. Shafieloo and Y. Shtanov,Braneworld dark energy in light of DESI DR2,JCAP(2025) [2507.07193]

    arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Douchin and P

    F. Douchin and P. Haensel,A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure,Astron. Astrophys.380(2001) 151 [astro-ph/0111092]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  26. [26]

    Foreman-Mackey, D.W

    D. Foreman-Mackey, D.W. Hogg, D. Lang and J. Goodman,emcee: The MCMC hammer, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.125(2013) 306 [1202.3665]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [27]

    Abbott et al.,GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state, Phys

    B.P. Abbott et al.,GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 161101 [1805.11581]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    Dittmann, M.C

    A.J. Dittmann, M.C. Miller, F.K. Lamb, I. Holt, C. Chirenti, M.T. Wolff et al.,A more precise measurement of the radius of PSR J0740+6620 using updated NICER data,Astrophys. J.974 (2024) 295 [2406.14467]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Salmi, J.S

    T. Salmi, J.S. Deneva, P.S. Ray, A.L. Watts, D. Choudhury, Y. Kini et al.,A NICER view of PSR J1231-1411: A complex case,Astrophys. J.976(2024) 58 [2409.14923]. – 15 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024