Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Individual Privacy Accounting with Gaussian Differential Privacy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.15596 v2 pith:BDFPPIAL submitted 2022-09-30 cs.CR cs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.CRcs.LGstat.ML
keywords privacyindividualanalysisdifferentiallossboundsgaussianlosses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Individual privacy accounting enables bounding differential privacy (DP) loss individually for each participant involved in the analysis. This can be informative as often the individual privacy losses are considerably smaller than those indicated by the DP bounds that are based on considering worst-case bounds at each data access. In order to account for the individual privacy losses in a principled manner, we need a privacy accountant for adaptive compositions of randomised mechanisms, where the loss incurred at a given data access is allowed to be smaller than the worst-case loss. This kind of analysis has been carried out for the R\'enyi differential privacy (RDP) by Feldman and Zrnic (2021), however not yet for the so-called optimal privacy accountants. We make first steps in this direction by providing a careful analysis using the Gaussian differential privacy which gives optimal bounds for the Gaussian mechanism, one of the most versatile DP mechanisms. This approach is based on determining a certain supermartingale for the hockey-stick divergence and on extending the R\'enyi divergence-based fully adaptive composition results by Feldman and Zrnic. We also consider measuring the individual $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-privacy losses using the so-called privacy loss distributions. With the help of the Blackwell theorem, we can then make use of the RDP analysis to construct an approximative individual $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-accountant.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adaptive Diffusion Denoised Smoothing : Certified Robustness via Randomized Smoothing with Differentially Private Guided Denoising Diffusion

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ADDS certifies adversarial robustness of guided denoising diffusion models by composing per-step Gaussian differential privacy budgets with a privacy filter.

Pith tools