Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Clustered Policy Decision Ranking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.12970 v2 pith:BEGFIHKC submitted 2023-11-21 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords decisionspolicyrankingstatesstatisticaltrainedaccordingachieving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Policies trained via reinforcement learning (RL) are often very complex even for simple tasks. In an episode with n time steps, a policy will make n decisions on actions to take, many of which may appear non-intuitive to the observer. Moreover, it is not clear which of these decisions directly contribute towards achieving the reward and how significant their contribution is. Given a trained policy, we propose a black-box method based on statistical covariance estimation that clusters the states of the environment and ranks each cluster according to the importance of decisions made in its states. We compare our measure against a previous statistical fault localization based ranking procedure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Perspectives for Direct Interpretability in Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A perspective paper that advocates direct, post hoc interpretability for multi-agent deep reinforcement learning and offers a taxonomy of where those methods might apply.

Pith tools