Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Revisiting ResNets: Improved Training and Scaling Strategies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.07579 v1 pith:BFJVFVSL submitted 2021-03-13 cs.CV

Revisiting ResNets: Improved Training and Scaling Strategies

classification cs.CV
keywords scalingtrainingstrategiesresnetsarchitectureschangesfasterimagenet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Novel computer vision architectures monopolize the spotlight, but the impact of the model architecture is often conflated with simultaneous changes to training methodology and scaling strategies. Our work revisits the canonical ResNet (He et al., 2015) and studies these three aspects in an effort to disentangle them. Perhaps surprisingly, we find that training and scaling strategies may matter more than architectural changes, and further, that the resulting ResNets match recent state-of-the-art models. We show that the best performing scaling strategy depends on the training regime and offer two new scaling strategies: (1) scale model depth in regimes where overfitting can occur (width scaling is preferable otherwise); (2) increase image resolution more slowly than previously recommended (Tan & Le, 2019). Using improved training and scaling strategies, we design a family of ResNet architectures, ResNet-RS, which are 1.7x - 2.7x faster than EfficientNets on TPUs, while achieving similar accuracies on ImageNet. In a large-scale semi-supervised learning setup, ResNet-RS achieves 86.2% top-1 ImageNet accuracy, while being 4.7x faster than EfficientNet NoisyStudent. The training techniques improve transfer performance on a suite of downstream tasks (rivaling state-of-the-art self-supervised algorithms) and extend to video classification on Kinetics-400. We recommend practitioners use these simple revised ResNets as baselines for future research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SketchMamba: A Lightweight State-Space Model for Joint Progressive Sketch Classification and Stroke Auto-Completion

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Dense per-step class loss on a 1.55M-parameter causal Mamba unifies progressive sketch recognition (94.93% final Top-1, 0.706 progressive AUC) and stroke auto-completion on 58-class Quick, Draw!.

  2. Exploring Budgeted Image Classification with Content-Sensitive Resource Allocation

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    A content-sensitive strategy that routes easy images to cheap decision points and hard images to expensive ones outperforms random allocation under a computational budget.