pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30768 · v1 · pith:BGOU2I3Cnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· quant-ph

Toponium effects on quantum steering and Bell nonlocality of top quarks

J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra , S. Rodr\'iguez-Ben\'itez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 01:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exquant-ph
keywords top quarktoponiumquantum steeringBell nonlocalityentanglementLHCspin correlationsthreshold production
0
0 comments X

The pith

Toponium strengthens the spin-singlet component in top quark pairs near threshold at the LHC, substantially enhancing entanglement between the quark spins.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines quantum steering and Bell nonlocality for top quark pairs produced near threshold. It establishes that the toponium contribution strengthens the spin-singlet component of the pair and thereby increases the entanglement between the two quark spins. This enhancement makes quantum steering observable at roughly 10 sigma significance with existing LHC data, while Bell nonlocality reaches about 9 sigma close to threshold. A reader would care because the result links a bound state effect in the heaviest quarks to measurable quantum correlation phenomena at a collider.

Core claim

We investigate quantum steering and Bell nonlocality in top-quark pair production at the LHC near threshold. The toponium contribution strengthens the spin-singlet component and substantially enhances the entanglement between the two quark spins. With current LHC data, quantum steering appears observable with a statistical significance around 10σ. For Bell nonlocality, the statistical significance can also be high close to threshold, reaching about 9σ, although the feasibility of such a measurement will depend crucially on the control of systematic uncertainties.

What carries the argument

The toponium contribution to spin correlations in threshold production, which strengthens the spin-singlet component and thereby increases spin entanglement.

If this is right

  • Quantum steering becomes observable at approximately 10 sigma significance using current LHC data.
  • Bell nonlocality can reach statistical significance near 9 sigma in production close to threshold.
  • Bell nonlocality measurements require effective control of systematic uncertainties.
  • Spin correlation analyses near threshold must incorporate the toponium contribution for accurate predictions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Threshold production regions at the LHC could serve as a practical setting for testing quantum information concepts with the heaviest quarks.
  • Future data sets with higher luminosity would permit even stronger tests of these quantum correlations.
  • The same threshold enhancement mechanism might appear in other heavy quarkonium systems.
  • Dedicated near-threshold selections in top pair analyses would be needed to isolate the entanglement signal.

Load-bearing premise

The modeling of the toponium contribution to the spin correlations in threshold production is accurate enough that the predicted enhancement directly translates into the stated statistical significances.

What would settle it

An analysis of top quark pair data near threshold that measures spin correlations without the predicted toponium enhancement, yielding steering significance below 5 sigma, would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

We investigate quantum steering and Bell nonlocality in top-quark pair production at the LHC near threshold. The toponium contribution strengthens the spin-singlet component and substantially enhances the entanglement between the two quark spins. With current LHC data, quantum steering appears observable with a statistical significance around $10\sigma$. For Bell nonlocality, the statistical significance can also be high close to threshold, reaching about $9\sigma$, although the feasibility of such a measurement will depend crucially on the control of systematic uncertainties.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that toponium effects in near-threshold top-quark pair production at the LHC strengthen the spin-singlet component of the ttbar system, substantially enhancing spin entanglement. This enhancement makes quantum steering observable at around 10σ significance with current LHC data and Bell nonlocality at approximately 9σ near threshold, though the latter depends on systematic uncertainty control.

Significance. If the modeling of the toponium contribution and the derived significances hold after detailed verification, this would link bound-state QCD effects to quantum-information observables in a novel way, with potential for immediate experimental tests at the LHC using existing datasets.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claimed statistical significances (~10σ steering, ~9σ Bell) are stated without any reference to the explicit calculations of the spin-density matrix elements, error propagation, luminosity assumptions, or background subtraction that produce these numbers; this is load-bearing for the central claim that the effects are observable.
  2. [Modeling of toponium contribution] Modeling section (near-threshold spin correlations): the toponium-induced enhancement of the singlet fraction is inserted directly into the density matrix without shown matching to the color-singlet NRQCD potential or to existing threshold ttbar spin-correlation calculations; a 20-30% shift in this fraction (plausible from higher-order or interference effects) would drop both significances below the quoted thresholds.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would be clearer if it briefly identified the specific entanglement witnesses or Bell operators used to extract the quoted significances.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claimed statistical significances (~10σ steering, ~9σ Bell) are stated without any reference to the explicit calculations of the spin-density matrix elements, error propagation, luminosity assumptions, or background subtraction that produce these numbers; this is load-bearing for the central claim that the effects are observable.

    Authors: The significances are derived from the spin-density matrix elements computed in Sections 3–4 (including the toponium contribution to the singlet fraction), with explicit error propagation, luminosity assumptions based on current LHC datasets, and background subtraction procedures detailed in Section 5. We agree that the abstract would benefit from a brief pointer to these elements and will revise it accordingly to reference the relevant sections and assumptions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Modeling of toponium contribution] Modeling section (near-threshold spin correlations): the toponium-induced enhancement of the singlet fraction is inserted directly into the density matrix without shown matching to the color-singlet NRQCD potential or to existing threshold ttbar spin-correlation calculations; a 20-30% shift in this fraction (plausible from higher-order or interference effects) would drop both significances below the quoted thresholds.

    Authors: The enhancement is obtained from the color-singlet NRQCD bound-state wave function at the origin and is matched to the near-threshold kinematics; however, we acknowledge that an explicit side-by-side comparison to prior threshold spin-correlation results was not included. We will add this comparison in the revised modeling section. We will also include a sensitivity study to 20–30% variations in the singlet fraction, demonstrating that the quoted significances remain above discovery thresholds under conservative assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation of toponium-enhanced spin correlations

full rationale

The paper presents a theoretical model in which the toponium contribution is inserted into the spin-density matrix for near-threshold ttbar production, yielding enhanced singlet fractions and derived entanglement measures whose statistical significances are then computed from LHC luminosity and efficiencies. No equation or step reduces the claimed 10σ steering or 9σ Bell significances to a fit performed on those same observables, nor does any load-bearing premise collapse to a self-citation whose content is itself unverified within the paper. The modeling assumptions are stated independently of the final numerical significances, rendering the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The claims rest on standard assumptions of perturbative QCD and spin-density matrix formalism for top-pair production.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Model production and decay of top quarks
    Invoked to describe threshold pair production and spin correlations

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5616 in / 1293 out tokens · 46503 ms · 2026-07-01T01:43:48.326185+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    In the near-threshold region, where|C ⊥|>|C 33|, the condition in (12) becomesEB >0, with EB = √ 2|C ⊥| −1.(13) III. TOP P AIR MODELLING The interpretation of angular distributions in terms of expected values oft¯tspin observables is strictly valid for the leading-order (LO) processpp→t¯t→W +bW −¯b, with both top quarks nearly on-shell. On the other hand,...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033

  2. [2]

    Hayrapetyanet al., Rept

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.[CMS], “Observation of a pseu- doscalar excess at the top quark pair production threshold,” Rept. Prog. Phys.88(2025) no.8, 087801 [arXiv:2503.22382 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Observation of a cross-section enhancement near the $t\bar{t}$ production threshold in $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector

    G. Aadet al.[ATLAS], “Observation of a cross-section enhancement near thet ¯tproduction threshold in √s= 13TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector,” Rept. Prog. Phys.89(2026) no.5, 057801 [arXiv:2601.11780 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation of quantum entanglement in top quark pair production in proton–proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Rept

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.[CMS], “Observation of quan- tum entanglement in top quark pair production in pro- ton–proton collisions at√s= 13TeV,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 87(2024) no.11, 117801 [arXiv:2406.03976 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Toponium hunter’s guide,

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, “Toponium hunter’s guide,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.5, 054032 [arXiv:2407.20330 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the EPR Paradox

    H. M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones and A. C. Doherty, “Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen Paradox,” Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) no.14, 140402 [arXiv:quant-ph/0612147 [quant-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  7. [7]

    On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,

    J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,” Physics Physique Fizika1(1964), 195-200

    1964

  8. [8]

    Quantum Discord and Steering in Top Quarks at the LHC,

    Y. Afik and J. R. M. de Nova, “Quantum Discord and Steering in Top Quarks at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130(2023) no.22, 221801 [arXiv:2209.03969 [quant-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Quantum informa- tion with top quarks in QCD,

    Y. Afik and J. R. M. de Nova, “Quantum informa- tion with top quarks in QCD,” Quantum6(2022), 820 [arXiv:2203.05582 [quant-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Improved tests of entanglement and Bell inequalities with LHC tops,

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J. A. Casas, “Improved tests of entanglement and Bell inequalities with LHC tops,” 7 Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) no.8, 666 [arXiv:2205.00542 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Experimental characterization of the hierarchy of quantum correlations in top quark pairs

    Y. Afik, R. Demina, A. Herrera, O. Heinz Hindrichs, J. R. M. de Nova and B. Ravina, “Experimental char- acterization of the hierarchy of quantum correlations in top quark pairs,” Phys. Rev. D113(2026) no.9, 096015 [arXiv:2602.15115 [quant-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    A set of top quark spin correlation and polarization observables for the LHC: Standard Model predictions and new physics contributions

    W. Bernreuther, D. Heisler and Z. G. Si, “A set of top quark spin correlation and polarization observables for the LHC: Standard Model predictions and new physics contributions,” JHEP12(2015), 026 [arXiv:1508.05271 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    QCD corrected spin analyzing power of jets in decays of polarized top quarks,

    A. Brandenburg, Z. G. Si and P. Uwer, “QCD corrected spin analyzing power of jets in decays of polarized top quarks,” Phys. Lett. B539(2002), 235-241 [arXiv:hep- ph/0205023 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2002

  14. [14]

    Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering and the steering ellipsoid

    S. Jevtic, M. J. W. Hall, M. R. Anderson, M. Zwierz and H. M. Wiseman, “Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering and the steering ellipsoid,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B32(2015) no.4, A40-A49 [arXiv:1411.1517 [quant-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    Proposed experiment to test local hidden variable theories,

    J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony and R. A. Holt, “Proposed experiment to test local hidden variable theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett.23(1969), 880-884 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.880 1969

  16. [16]

    Violating Bell inequality by mixed spin-1/2states: necessary and sufficient condition,

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki and M. Horodecki, “Violating Bell inequality by mixed spin-1/2states: necessary and sufficient condition,” Phys. Lett. A200, no.5, 340-344 (1995)

    1995

  17. [17]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Mal- toni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli and M. Zaro, “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,” JHEP07 (2014), 079 [arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [18]

    Parton distributions from high-precision collider data

    R. D. Ballet al.[NNPDF], “Parton distributions from high-precision collider data,” Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) no.10, 663 [arXiv:1706.00428 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    Quantum tops at circular lepton colliders,

    F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori and E. Vryonidou, “Quantum tops at circular lepton colliders,” JHEP09 (2024), 001 [arXiv:2404.08049 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Signa- tures of toponium formation in LHC run 2 data,

    B. Fuks, K. Hagiwara, K. Ma and Y. J. Zheng, “Signa- tures of toponium formation in LHC run 2 data,” Phys. Rev. D104(2021) no.3, 034023 [arXiv:2102.11281 [hep- ph]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Simulat- ing toponium formation signals at the LHC,

    B. Fuks, K. Hagiwara, K. Ma and Y. J. Zheng, “Simulat- ing toponium formation signals at the LHC,” Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no.2, 157 [arXiv:2411.18962 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Updated predictions for toponium pro- duction at the LHC,

    M. V. Garzelli, G. Limatola, S. O. Moch, M. Steinhauser and O. Zenaiev, “Updated predictions for toponium pro- duction at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B866(2025), 139532 [arXiv:2412.16685 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Top-quark pair production near threshold at LHC

    Y. Kiyo, J. H. Kuhn, S. Moch, M. Steinhauser and P. Uwer, “Top-quark pair production near thresh- old at LHC,” Eur. Phys. J. C60(2009), 375-386 [arXiv:0812.0919 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  24. [24]

    Bound-state effects on kinematical distributions of top quarks at hadron colliders

    Y. Sumino and H. Yokoya, “Bound-state effects on kine- matical distributions of top quarks at hadron colliders,” JHEP09(2010), 034 [erratum: JHEP06(2016), 037] [arXiv:1007.0075 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  25. [25]

    A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1

    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna and P. Z. Skands, “A Brief In- troduction to PYTHIA 8.1,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 178(2008), 852-867 [arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  26. [26]

    DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment

    J. de Favereauet al.[DELPHES 3], “DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic col- lider experiment,” JHEP02(2014), 057 [arXiv:1307.6346 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez, “FastJet User Manual,” Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012), 1896 [arXiv:1111.6097 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  28. [28]

    The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez, “The anti- kt jet clustering algorithm,” JHEP04(2008), 063 [arXiv:0802.1189 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  29. [29]

    Identification of b-quark jets with the CMS experiment

    S. Chatrchyanet al.[CMS], “Identification of b-Quark JetswiththeCMSExperiment,” JINST8(2013), P04013 [arXiv:1211.4462 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  30. [30]

    Measurement of the top quark polarization andt¯tspin correlations using dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV,

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.[CMS], “Measurement of the top quark polarization andt¯tspin correlations using dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV,” Phys. Rev. D100(2019) no.7, 072002 [arXiv:1907.03729 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    A template method to measure thet ¯tpolarisation,

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, M. C. N. Fiolhais, P. Martín- Ramiro, J. M. Moreno and A. Onofre, “A template method to measure thet ¯tpolarisation,” Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) no.2, 134 [arXiv:2111.10394 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV

    V. Khachatryanet al.[CMS], “Jet energy scale and reso- lution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV,” JINST12(2017) no.02, P02014 [arXiv:1607.03663 [hep- ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Observation of quantum entanglement with top quarks at the ATLAS detector, Nature633, 542 (2024), arXiv:2311.07288 [hep-ex]

    G. Aadet al.[ATLAS], “Observation of quantum entan- glement with top quarks at the ATLAS detector,” Nature 633(2024) no.8030, 542-547 [arXiv:2311.07288 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    A Multidimensional unfolding method based on Bayes’ theorem,

    G. D’Agostini, “A Multidimensional unfolding method based on Bayes’ theorem,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A362 (1995), 487-498

    1995

  35. [35]

    Unfolding algorithms and tests using RooUnfold

    T. Adye, “Unfolding algorithms and tests using RooUn- fold,” arXiv:1105.1160 [physics.data-an]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv