Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Solving the Hubble tension at intermediate redshifts with dynamical dark energy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.16862 v1 pith:BGVGOAYN submitted 2023-11-28 astro-ph.CO

Solving the Hubble tension at intermediate redshifts with dynamical dark energy

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords distancehubbletensionintermediateladderredshiftredshiftssolve
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The current expansion rate of the Universe, the Hubble constant $H_0$, is an important cosmological quantity. However, two different ways to measure its value do not agree -- building a low-redshift distance ladder leads to a higher value of $H_0$ than inferring it from high-redshift observations in a $\Lambda$CDM cosmology. Most approaches to solve this tension either act at very low redshift by modifying the local distance ladder, or at high redshift by introducing new physics that changes the normalization of the inverse distance ladder. Here we discuss a way to address the Hubble tension at intermediate redshifts instead. By keeping the low- and high-redshift normalizations unchanged, we find a violation of the distance duality in the redshift range where luminosity and angular diameter distances overlap. We 'solve' this problem by introducing a redshift-dependent systematic effect that brings the luminosity distance into agreement with the angular diameter distance. The resulting expansion history is no longer compatible with $\Lambda$CDM, but this can be fixed with a dynamical dark energy component. In this way, we are able to solve the Hubble tension at intermediate redshifts.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Growth, geometry, and early-universe split of the matter density parameter $\Omega_{\rm m}$

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    Splitting Ω_m into geometry, growth, and early-universe regimes yields mutually compatible values, yet ΔΩ_m^{geo,early} is 2σ from zero under combined DES, Planck (scale-cut), DESI, Pantheon+, and RSD data.

  2. New constraints on cosmic anisotropy from galaxy clusters using an improved dipole fitting method

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Galaxy cluster observations yield two preferred directions with cosmic anisotropy amplitude of about 5.3 times 10 to the minus 4 at roughly 1 sigma overall significance, though higher in the XMM-Newton subsample.

  3. Alleviating the Hubble tension with the $\Lambda_{\omega_s}$CDM model

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Λ_{ω_s}CDM adds a subdominant early barotropic fluid with fitted ω_s ≈ 0.294 and Ω_s ≈ 1.62×10^{-5}, producing H0 = 71.51 km/s/Mpc from MCMC fits to Planck 2018, DESI DR2, and Pantheon+SH0ES data.