Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Automated assessment of non-native learner essays: Investigating the role of linguistic features

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1612.00729 v1 pith:BHYBDKFV submitted 2016-12-02 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords featuresdatasetslinguisticpredictiveessaysscoringautomaticessay
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatic essay scoring (AES) refers to the process of scoring free text responses to given prompts, considering human grader scores as the gold standard. Writing such essays is an essential component of many language and aptitude exams. Hence, AES became an active and established area of research, and there are many proprietary systems used in real life applications today. However, not much is known about which specific linguistic features are useful for prediction and how much of this is consistent across datasets. This article addresses that by exploring the role of various linguistic features in automatic essay scoring using two publicly available datasets of non-native English essays written in test taking scenarios. The linguistic properties are modeled by encoding lexical, syntactic, discourse and error types of learner language in the feature set. Predictive models are then developed using these features on both datasets and the most predictive features are compared. While the results show that the feature set used results in good predictive models with both datasets, the question "what are the most predictive features?" has a different answer for each dataset.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Anatomy of Speech Persuasion: Linguistic Shifts in LLM-Modified Speeches

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GPT-4o increases emotional lexicon and uses more questions and exclamations when asked to strengthen speeches, but follows a surface style rather than human-like persuasive argumentation.

Pith tools