Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 50 references

High-Field EPR/ENDOR of N/Be Centers for Defect Engineering in 6H-SiC

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read High-field EPR/ENDOR separates and assigns nitrogen donors and beryllium acceptors in one 6H-SiC crystal, yielding site-specific spin parameters for quantum-memory and strain-sensing applications.

desk verdict Useful W-band ENDOR data on N and Be in 6H-SiC, but the Be hyperfine numbers are internally inconsistent and the site assignment rests on them. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27862 v1 pith:BJ52G7ZL submitted 2026-07-30 cond-mat.mtrl-sci quant-ph

Yuliya Ermakova , Ekaterina Dmitrieva , Margarita Sadovnikova , Fadis Murzakhanov , George Mamin , Sergey Nagalyuk , Evgeny Mokhov , Marat Gafurov This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciquant-ph PACS 76.30.-v76.70.-r
keywords 6H-SiCEPRENDORTRIPLEresonancenitrogendonorberylliumacceptorhyperfineinteractionnuclearquadrupole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Working in a single 6H-SiC crystal co-doped with nitrogen and beryllium, the paper sets out to show that high-field (94 GHz) pulsed EPR and ENDOR can resolve the two impurities by lattice site and extract quantitative spin-Hamiltonian parameters for each. It assigns two nitrogen donor configurations (k1 and k2) with hyperfine constants near 33 MHz, two beryllium acceptor configurations (hexagonal h-site and quasi-cubic k1/k2) with hyperfine 5.5–5.7 MHz and quadrupole 220 kHz, and reports coherence times of 13.5 µs for N and 8.5 µs for Be at 30 K. If correct, this establishes dual-doped 6H-SiC as a material where a stable donor spin memory and a Jahn-Teller-sensitive acceptor strain probe can coexist, and it supplies the quantitative inputs needed to engineer such centers.

What carries the argument

The central tool is W-band (94 GHz) pulsed EPR with Mims ENDOR and TRIPLE resonance, interpreted through an axial spin Hamiltonian containing g, hyperfine A, and nuclear quadrupole Cq terms. The high magnetic field separates sites whose g-factors differ only slightly, while ENDOR's narrow nuclear transitions resolve hyperfine differences of a few hundred kilohertz. TRIPLE resonance then distinguishes true multiple sites from quadrupole splittings by showing controlled population transfer between nuclear spin sublevels of different coordination shells.

What would settle it

Rotate the 6H-SiC crystal at W-band and record the angular dependence of the two Be quartets: an h-site axial acceptor should show one smoothly varying pattern, while quasi-cubic k1/k2 centers should split into distinct orientation-dependent patterns. If the low-field quartet shows non-axial behavior or the high-field quartet lacks the predicted Jahn-Teller averaging, the site assignment collapses. Alternatively, resolve the 29Si ENDOR shell structure for each quartet and compare with calculated hyperfine patterns for BeSi at h versus k1/k2.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that high-frequency ENDOR, aided by the Zeeman resolution of the W-band at 3.4 T, can fingerprint two complementary functional impurities in one 6H-SiC sample and tie each spectral feature to a specific crystallographic site. For beryllium, the low-field quartet is assigned to the shallow axial acceptor at the hexagonal h-site, while the high-field quartet is assigned to the quasi-cubic k1/k2 sites, where a dynamic Jahn-Teller hop partially averages the spin density and lowers the observed hyperfine splitting. ENDOR yields A(Be)=5.5–5.7 MHz with a quadrupole splitting of about 220 kHz, indicating that the hole density sits mostly on neighboring carbons rather than on the

Load-bearing premise

The assignment of the two beryllium EPR quartets to the hexagonal h-site versus the quasi-cubic k1/k2 sites rests on comparing g-factors and hyperfine magnitudes with earlier data and on a dynamic Jahn-Teller averaging argument, not on a direct structural measurement or angular-dependent ENDOR.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Co-doped 6H-SiC can host a stable N-donor spin state and a Be-acceptor state in the same crystal, with distinct microscopic identities instead of one overlapped spectrum.
  • The nearly equal Nk1/Nk2 hyperfine constants and the 10 kHz quadrupole upper bound place a quantitative limit on the host electric field gradient at carbon substitution sites.
  • The small Be Fermi contact (5.5–5.7 MHz) and large 9Be quadrupole (220 kHz) support the off-center BeSi acceptor model and explain why the Be center is sensitive to local strain.
  • The measured 30 K coherence times, 13.5 µs for nitrogen and 8.5 µs for beryllium, give concrete design targets for quantum memory and sensing sequences in this material.
  • The two-orders-of-magnitude difference in quadrupole coupling between the N donor and the NV center traces the EFG at nitrogen to the adjacent silicon vacancy, providing a quantitative handle on vacancy-induced charge redistribution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the Be site model would be angular-dependent W-band ENDOR on a rotating crystal; the paper reports spectra at fixed orientation, so the full hyperfine and quadrupole tensors for the two Be configurations remain to be mapped.
  • The measured T2 values come from ensemble measurements and do not by themselves prove single-defect addressability; a natural next step is optically detected magnetic resonance on individual N or Be centers in co-doped 6H-SiC.
  • Because the 14N quadrupole coupling is two orders of magnitude larger for NV than for isolated N donors, ENDOR-resolved quadrupole data could serve as a local fingerprint of nearby silicon vacancies in co-doped material.
  • The 9Be nuclear spin (I=3/2) coupled to a short-T1 electron could act as a long-lived nuclear memory; one testable extension is a nuclear spin echo or coherence measurement at 30 K extending beyond the electronic T2.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a multi-frequency (X- and W-band) EPR/ENDOR/TRIPLE study of a 6H-SiC crystal co-doped with nitrogen and beryllium. It claims to identify two nitrogen donor configurations (Nk1, Nk2) and two beryllium acceptor configurations (hexagonal h and quasi-cubic k1/k2), to extract site-specific hyperfine and quadrupole parameters (A(Nk1)=33.23(3) MHz, A(Nk2)=33.55(3) MHz, A(Be)=5.5–5.7 MHz, Q(Be)=220 kHz), and to determine coherence times (T2(N)=13.5 µs, T2(Be)=8.5 µs, T1(N)=20 ms, T1(Be)=143 µs at 30 K). It further interprets TRIPLE data as evidence of coupled nuclear spin subspaces and argues that the N/Be pair provides complementary functionality for defect engineering and quantum sensing in SiC.

Significance. If the site assignments and interaction parameters hold, this work provides a useful quantitative reference for N and Be spin defects in 6H-SiC and demonstrates the resolving power of W-band ENDOR/TRIPLE on a dual-doped sample. The main strengths are the direct measurement of multiple interaction parameters in one crystal and the explicit N-donor/Be-acceptor comparison of hyperfine and quadrupole interactions. However, the load-bearing inconsistency between the reported Be EPR hyperfine splittings and the ENDOR A(Be) values must be resolved before the site-specific conclusions can be accepted. The paper does not provide raw spectra or simulation files, but the reported precision of the nitrogen parameters is a strong point.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, W-band EPR assignment paragraph (Fig. 4a)] The text states that the low-field 9Be quartet has a hyperfine splitting constant of 2.45 mT (686 kHz) and the high-field quartet 2.2 mT (616 kHz). For S=1/2, g≈2, ΔB(mT) and A(MHz) are related by A ≈ 28.0 MHz/mT × ΔB, so 2.45 mT corresponds to ≈68.6 MHz, not 686 kHz, and 2.2 mT to ≈61.6 MHz. Conversely, the ENDOR section reports A(Be)=5.5–5.7 MHz, which would give an EPR quartet spacing of ≈0.20 mT. If 686 kHz were the intended A, the spacing would be ≈0.0245 mT, not 2.45 mT. As written, the EPR and ENDOR data cannot refer to the same 9Be centers, and the h-site vs k1/k2 assignment anchored to these magnitudes and to comparison with ref. [10] is not internally consistent. Please supply corrected values and the conversion used, or revise the site-specific interpretation.
  2. [§3, Fig. 4b relaxation data] The main plot of Fig. 4b reports T2(Be)=8.5 ms and T2(N)=13.5 ms, and the inset reports T1(Be)=143 ms and T1(N)=20 ms, while the text states T2(Be)=8.5 µs, T2(N)=13.5 µs, T1(Be)=143 µs, T1(N)=20 ms. This factor-of-1000 unit discrepancy must be resolved, since the coherence times are a central quantitative claim of the paper. Please also report uncertainties for the fitted relaxation times.
  3. [§3, Be site assignment; Abstract and Conclusions] The separation of the two Be quartets into a 'shallow axial' h-site and 'quasi-cubic' k1/k2 acceptors is inferred from the magnitude of g-factors and hyperfine constants relative to ref. [10] and from a dynamic Jahn–Teller averaging argument, not from angular-dependent ENDOR or a direct structural determination. Given the inconsistency identified above, the word 'unambiguous' used for this assignment is too strong. Either provide supporting angular data or present the site labels as tentative. The abstract and conclusions also state that TRIPLE spectra 'verify coupled nuclear spin subspaces,' while the body text says the population-transfer mechanisms 'require further study'; please make the wording consistent.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.1, Sample] The acceptor Be concentration is given as '10 cm−3'; this lacks an exponent (presumably 10^17 or 10^18 cm−3) and conflicts with the abstract's '1018 cm−3'. Please correct.
  2. [Eq. (1)] The spin Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) omits the nuclear Zeeman and nuclear quadrupole terms that are used later in the ENDOR analysis. Either include them explicitly or state that they are added for the ENDOR simulations.
  3. [§3, quadrupole comparison text after Table 1] The text says the separation of NMR lines corresponds to 2Q = 3.795 MHz and 'translates to' Cq = 2.53 MHz, while Table 1 gives Cq = 2.426(3) MHz for the NV center. For I=1, the formula Q = 3/(4I(2I−1))Cq gives Cq ≈ 5.06 MHz from Q = 1.8975 MHz. The formula, the line separation, or the table entry must be reconciled.
  4. [§3, 29Si ENDOR description] The text mentions 'ten distinct spectral features' but labels them A(1) through A(9). The numbering should match the stated number of features.
  5. [References] Reference [37] combines two separate citations (Holiatkina et al. and Goldfarb/Stoll) into a single numbered entry. These should be split.
  6. [Figure captions and data availability] Fig. 3b caption says 'dashed lines' while the text says 'dashed-dotted lines'; Fig. 4a lacks units on the y-axis. The data availability statement is too generic; please identify where raw EPR/ENDOR spectra or simulation input files can be obtained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Experimental EPR/ENDOR parameter extraction; no predicted quantity reduces to its own inputs by construction.

full rationale

This paper is an experimental EPR/ENDOR characterization. The spin-Hamiltonian parameters (e.g., A(Nk1)=33.23(3) MHz, A(Nk2)=33.55(3) MHz, A(Be)=5.5–5.7 MHz, Q(Be)=220 kHz, T2 values) are obtained by fitting the standard axial spin Hamiltonian, Eq. (1), to measured EPR/ENDOR line positions; this is parameter extraction from data, not a derivation that later announces the same quantity as a prediction. The assignment of the beryllium quartets to h-site versus quasi-cubic k1/k2 sites is an interpretive comparison with the earlier external single-crystal EPR study [10] plus a Jahn–Teller averaging argument; even if that assignment were insecure, no fitted constant is being read back as an independent prediction. The self-citations [32,33,40] provide comparison values for NV centers and prior measurement context; they are not load-bearing supports for the central N/Be claims, and [10] is independently falsifiable prior work. The apparent unit inconsistency between the quoted EPR Be splitting "2.45 mT (686 kHz)" and the ENDOR value 5.5–5.7 MHz is a correctness/consistency concern, not a circularity: it does not show that any claimed result is equivalent by construction to the paper's inputs. Thus no circular steps are identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its load-bearing assumptions are the spin-Hamiltonian model, the site assignments inferred from prior literature [10], and the interpretation of ENDOR/TRIPLE line patterns as single-defect delocalized spin density. The free parameters are standard EPR spin-Hamiltonian constants and relaxation times obtained by spectral fitting; they are outputs of the measurement, but the central interpretive claims depend on these fits being unique and correctly assigned.

free parameters (9)
  • A(Nk1) isotropic hyperfine constant = 33.23(3) MHz
    Extracted by fitting ENDOR spectra with the spin Hamiltonian (Eq. 1); used to assign the N donor to the k1 site.
  • A(Nk2) isotropic hyperfine constant = 33.55(3) MHz
    Extracted by fitting ENDOR spectra; used to assign the N donor to the k2 site.
  • A(Be) hyperfine interaction = 5.5–5.7 MHz
    Determined from W-band ENDOR of Be acceptors; central to the claim of off-center BeSi character.
  • Q(Be) quadrupole splitting = 220 kHz
    Interpreted as 9Be nuclear quadrupole interaction; supports the local EFG/distortion model.
  • T2(N) phase coherence time = 13.5 µs (labeled 13.5 ms in Fig. 4b)
    Fitted from ESE decay at 30 K; used to claim quantum-memory relevance.
  • T2(Be) phase coherence time = 8.5 µs (labeled 8.5 ms in Fig. 4b)
    Fitted from ESE decay at 30 K; used to claim acceptor spin robustness.
  • T1(N) spin-lattice relaxation time = 20 ms
    Fitted from recovery curve at 30 K.
  • T1(Be) spin-lattice relaxation time = 143 µs
    Fitted from recovery curve at 30 K.
  • Cq(NV) quadrupole coupling constant = 2.426(3) MHz in Table 1; 2.53 MHz in text
    Used for the N-donor vs NV comparison; the discrepancy and its provenance are unresolved.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The paramagnetic centers are described by the axial spin Hamiltonian H = g_|| μ_B B·S + A_|| S_z I_z + A_⊥(S_x I_x + S_y I_y) with S=1/2.
    Introduced in Eq. (1); standard for shallow donors/acceptors but assumes axial symmetry and omits explicit quadrupole terms in the EPR simulation.
  • domain assumption The two Be EPR quartets arise from isolated 9Be (I=3/2) acceptors at h-site and quasi-cubic k1/k2 sites.
    Used to assign spectra in the W-band EPR paragraph of §3; based on comparison with [10], not direct structure determination.
  • domain assumption ENDOR features near 29Si and 13C Larmor frequencies are produced by the spin density of the nitrogen donor, not by overlapping unrelated paramagnetic centers.
    This underpins the 'highly delocalized spin density' claim; no angular-dependent ENDOR or DFT modeling is provided to exclude overlap.
  • domain assumption TRIPLE resonance intensity redistributions indicate internuclear dipole–dipole coupling mediated by defect spin density.
    The text itself states 'The mechanisms underlying this population transfer between nuclear spin sublevels require further study,' making this an unproven interpretive step.
  • standard math Standard strong/weak coupling ENDOR line-position formulas (e.g., line pairs centered at A/2 with 2ν_L splitting) apply.
    Used to interpret the 14N and 9Be ENDOR spectra; standard spin physics but assumed without derivation.
  • domain assumption Beryllium vapor diffusion at 2000 °C produced the intended dopant distribution at ~10^18 cm^-3.
    Section 2.1 states the acceptor Be concentration as '10 cm−3', which is likely a typo for 10^18 cm−3; this creates uncertainty about actual doping levels.
  • standard math The quadrupole relation Q = 3/(4I(2I−1)) C_q and the Townes–Dailey interpretation of EFG are valid for 14N and 9Be.
    Used to convert NV line separations to Cq and to argue about local EFG; standard nuclear quadrupole physics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-Field EPR/ENDOR of N/Be Centers for Defect Engineering in 6H-SiC." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BJ52G7ZL

@misc{pith2026260727862,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-Field EPR/ENDOR of N/Be Centers for Defect Engineering in 6H-SiC},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BJ52G7ZL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27862}
}
read the original abstract

Silicon carbide (SiC) in its various structural modifications is widely used in power semiconductor electronics, operating under extreme conditions of high temperature, high voltage, and intense radiation. The discovery of spin defects (S>0) with unique optical and coherent properties has further positioned SiC as a promising platform for quantum technologies. Here, we investigate a 6H-SiC single crystal co-doped with nitrogen and beryllium at concentrations of 1018 cm-3, using continuous-wave and pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and electron-nuclear double resonance (ENDOR). To enhance spectral resolution, experiments were conducted in the W-band (94 GHz; B = 3.4 T). Pulsed EPR identified nitrogen donors and beryllium acceptors in various lattice positions, allowing for the determination of their phase coherence and spin-lattice relaxation times. ENDOR measurements elucidated the electron-nuclear interactions with the local silicon and carbon environment, including distant coordination spheres. The observed hyperfine structures indicated highly delocalized spin density within the supercell. The TRIPLE resonance spectra verify coupled nuclear spin subspaces from different coordination spheres due to defect spin density. These results demonstrate the feasibility of incorporating dual impurities with distinct functional roles while preserving the crystal lattice`s structural features.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27862 by the authors.

Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Continuous-wave X-band EPR spectrum of beryllium centers at room temperature of the 6H-SiC sample. (b) Pulsed X-band EPR (integrated ESE intensity as a function of the magnetic field) for nitrogen donors at 50 K, with the inset showing the pulsed EPR spectrum at 10 K and the dashed lines indicating simulations based on the spin Hamiltonian values. To describe the experimental results for point defects with elect… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. (a) Pulsed W-band EPR spectra for beryllium and nitrogen spin centers in 6H-SiC as a function of crystal temperature. The green (low-field) region highlights the beryllium acceptors. (b) Relaxation curves for nitrogen and beryllium centers. Main plot: decay of transverse magnetization due to spin–spin interaction. Inset: recovery of longitudinal spin magnetization characterized by the spin–lattice relaxation time. T… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. (a) X-band ENDOR spectrum at 50 K for the 14N isotope. The dashed line shows the simu￾lation. (b) The results of selective spin excitation by an additional radiofrequency pulse (triple res￾onance) for specific NMR transitions are shown. The TRIPLE resonance spectra as a function of the fixed pump pulse are presented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a,b display the ENDOR spectra acquired at a fixed EPR transition of the ni￾trogen center, specifically targeting the Larmor frequency regions of 13C (νL = 35.8 MHz) and 29Si (νL = 28.3 MHz). Remarkably, despite the low natural isotopic abundances of 13C (1.1%, I = 1/2)…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [10]

    Electronic structure of the Be acceptor centers in 6H-SiC

    van Duijn-Arnold, A.; Schmidt, J.; Poluektov, O.G.; Baranov, P.G.; Mokhov, E.N. Electronic structure of the Be acceptor centers in 6H-SiC. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60, 15799

    1999

  2. [1]

    Electrically active defects in 3C, 4H, and 6H silicon carbide polytypes: A review

    Capan, I. Electrically active defects in 3C, 4H, and 6H silicon carbide polytypes: A review. Crystals 2025, 15, 255

    2025

  3. [2]

    A survey of wide bandgap power semiconductor devices

    Millan, J.; Godignon, P.; Perpina, X.; Perez-Tomas, A.; Rebollo, J. A survey of wide bandgap power semiconductor devices. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2014, 29, 2155–2163

    2014

  4. [3]

    A review on single photon sources in silicon carbide

    Lohrmann, A.; Johnson, B.C.; McCallum, A.J.; Castelletto, S. A review on single photon sources in silicon carbide. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2017, 80, 034502

    2017

  5. [4]

    Electronic structure of the nitrogen donors in 6H SiC as studied by pulsed ENDOR and TRIPLE ENDOR spectroscopy

    Savchenko, D.V.; Kalabukhova, E.N.; Pöppl, A.; Shanina, B.D. Electronic structure of the nitrogen donors in 6H SiC as studied by pulsed ENDOR and TRIPLE ENDOR spectroscopy. Phys. Status Solidi B 2012, 249, 2167–2178

    2012

  6. [5]

    Spin-coupling and hyperfine interaction of the nitro- gen donors in 6H-SiC

    Savchenko, D.V.; Kalabukhova, E.N.; Kiselev, V.S.; Hoentsch, J.; Pöppl, A. Spin-coupling and hyperfine interaction of the nitro- gen donors in 6H-SiC. Phys. Status Solidi B 2009, 246, 1908–1914

    2009

  7. [6]

    The electron spin resonance study of heavily nitrogen doped 6H SiC crystals

    Savchenko, D.V. The electron spin resonance study of heavily nitrogen doped 6H SiC crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 4

    2015

  8. [8]

    Sensitivity optimization for NV -dia- mond magnetometry

    Barry, J.F.; Schloss, J.M.; Bauch, E.; Turner, M.J.; Hart, C.A.; Pham, L.M.; Walsworth, R.L. Sensitivity optimization for NV -dia- mond magnetometry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2020, 92, 015004

    2020

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Beryllium implantation induced deep level defects in p-type 6H–silicon carbide

    Chen, X.D.; Ling, C.C.; Fung, S.; Beling, C.D.; Gong, M.; Henkel, T.; Tanoue, H.; Kobayashi, N. Beryllium implantation induced deep level defects in p-type 6H–silicon carbide. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 93, 3117–3119

    2003

  2. [11]

    Electron spin relaxation and coherence of nitrogen donors in silicon carbide

    Greulich-Weber, S.; Feege, M.; Kalinowski, J.; Gerstmann, U.; Rauls, E.; Overhof, H.; Spaeth, J.-M. Electron spin relaxation and coherence of nitrogen donors in silicon carbide. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 67, 195207

    2003

  3. [12]

    Current -controlled negative resistance (CCNR) in SiC PiN rectifiers

    Ramungul, N.; Chow, T.P. Current -controlled negative resistance (CCNR) in SiC PiN rectifiers. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1999, 46, 493–496

    1999

  4. [13]

    Nitrogen ion implantation into 6H-SiC and application to high-tempera- ture, radiation-hard diodes

    Yaguchi, S.; Kimoto, T.; Ohyama, N.; Matsunami, H. Nitrogen ion implantation into 6H-SiC and application to high-tempera- ture, radiation-hard diodes. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1995, 34, 3036

    1995

  5. [14]

    Materials for quantum technologies: A roadmap for spin and topology

    Banerjee, N.; Bell, C.; Ciccarelli, C.; Hesjedal, T.; Johnson, F.; Kurebayashi, H.; Moore, T.A.; Moutafis, C.; Stern, H.L.; Vera- Marun, I.J.; et al. Materials for quantum technologies: A roadmap for spin and topology. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2025, 12, 041328

    2025

  6. [15]

    Quantum technologies with optically interfaced solid-state spins

    Awschalom, D.D.; Hanson, R.; Wrachtrup, J.; Zhou, B.B. Quantum technologies with optically interfaced solid-state spins. Nat. Photonics 2018, 12, 516–527

    2018

  7. [16]

    Quantum network technologies based on diamond NV centers

    Sekiguchi, Y. Quantum network technologies based on diamond NV centers. JSAP Rev. 2025, 25, 250420

    2025

  8. [17]

    Quantum communication networks with defects in silicon carbide

    Sohr, P.; Koller, P.; Ecker, S.; Fink, M.; Scheidl, T.; Ursin, R.; Arshad, M.J.; Bonato, C.; Cilibrizzi, P.; Gali, A .; et al. Quantum communication networks with defects in silicon carbide. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2403.03284

    2024 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Single-electron spin qubits in silicon for quantum computing

    Hu, G.; Huang, W.W.; Cai, R.; Wang, L.; Yang, C.H.; Cao, G.; Xue, X.; Huang, P.; He, Y. Single-electron spin qubits in silicon for quantum computing. Intell. Comput. 2025, 4, 0115

    2025

  10. [19]

    Compact and fully integrated LED quantum sensor based on NV centers in diamond

    Pogorzelski, J.; Horsthemke, L.; Homrighausen, J.; Stiegekötter, D.; Gregor, M.; Glösekötter, P. Compact and fully integrated LED quantum sensor based on NV centers in diamond. Sensors 2024, 24, 743

    2024

  11. [20]

    Quantum sensing of radio-frequency signal with NV centers in SiC

    Jiang, Z.; Cai, H.; Cernansky, R.; Liu, X.; Gao, W. Quantum sensing of radio-frequency signal with NV centers in SiC. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadg2080

    2023

  12. [21]

    Quantum guidelines for solid-state spin defects

    Wolfowicz, G.; Heremans, F.J.; Anderson, C.P.; Kanai, S.; Seo, H.; Gali, A.; Galli, G.; Awschalom, D.D. Quantum guidelines for solid-state spin defects. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6, 906–925

    2021

  13. [22]

    Hybrid solid-state qubits: The powerful role of electron spins

    Morton, J.J.; Lovett, B.W. Hybrid solid-state qubits: The powerful role of electron spins. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2011, 2, 189–212

    2011

  14. [23]

    Colloquium: Decoherence of solid-state spin qubits: A computational perspective

    Onizhuk, M.; Galli, G. Colloquium: Decoherence of solid-state spin qubits: A computational perspective. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2025, 97, 021001

    2025

  15. [24]

    A review of the study of diamond NV color cente rs: Fabrication, application and challenge

    Li, Y.; Li, H.; Yi, T.; Li, C.; Wei, J. A review of the study of diamond NV color cente rs: Fabrication, application and challenge. Funct. Diamond 2025, 5, 2567286

    2025

  16. [25]

    Spin qubits: Useful defects in silicon carbide

    Pacchioni, G. Spin qubits: Useful defects in silicon carbide. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17052

    2017

  17. [26]

    The effects of defects on the defect formation energy, electronic band structure, and electron mobility in 4H–SiC

    Jiang, S.; Li, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, W.; Wu, Q.; He, H.; Wang, X. The effects of defects on the defect formation energy, electronic band structure, and electron mobility in 4H–SiC. AIP Adv. 2022, 12, 065328

    2022

  18. [27]

    Fabrication and quantum sensing of spin defects in silicon carbide—A review

    Frontiers in Physics Editorial Office. Fabrication and quantum sensing of spin defects in silicon carbide—A review. Front. Phys. 2023, 11, 1270602

    2023

  19. [28]

    Formation of carbon vacancy in 4H silicon carbide during high - temperature processing

    Ayedh, H.M.; Bobal, V.; Nipoti, R.; Hallén, A.; Svensson, B.G. Formation of carbon vacancy in 4H silicon carbide during high - temperature processing. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 013506

    2014

  20. [29]

    Charge s tate control of the silicon vacancy and divacancy in silicon carbide

    Son, N.T.; Ivanov, I.G. Charge s tate control of the silicon vacancy and divacancy in silicon carbide. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 129, 210903

    2021

  21. [30]

    Identification of Si-vacancy related room-temperature qubits in 4H silicon carbide

    Ivády, V.; Davidsson, J.; Son, N.T.; Ohshima, T.; Abrikosov, I.A.; Gali, A. Identification of Si-vacancy related room-temperature qubits in 4H silicon carbide. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 161114

    2017

  22. [31]

    Nanotesla Magnetometry with the Silicon Vacancy in Silicon Carbide

    Singam, M.R.; Nesladek, M. Nanotesla Magnetometry with the Silicon Vacancy in Silicon Carbide. Phys. Rev. Applied 2021, 15, 064022

    2021

  23. [32]

    J.; Schmidt, W.G.; Biktagirov, T.; Gerstmann, U.; Soltamov, V.A

    Murzakhanov, F.F.; Sadovnikova, M.A.; Mamin, G.V.; Nagalyuk, S.S.; von Bardeleben, H. J.; Schmidt, W.G.; Biktagirov, T.; Gerstmann, U.; Soltamov, V.A. 14N hyperfine and nuclear interactions of axial and basal NV centers in 4H -SiC: A high fre- quency (94 GHz) ENDOR study. J. A...

    2023

  24. [33]

    Elec- tron–nuclear interactions of NV defects in an isotopically purified 6H-28SiC crystal

    Latypova, L.R.; Gracheva, I.N.; Shurtakova, D.V.; Murzakhanov, F.F.; Sadovnikova, M.A.; Mamin, G.V.; Gafurov, M.R. Elec- tron–nuclear interactions of NV defects in an isotopically purified 6H-28SiC crystal. J. Phys. Chem. C 2024, 128, 18559–18565. Nanomaterials 2026, 16, x FOR...

    2024 doi

  25. [34]

    Point defects in silicon carbide for quantum technolo- gies

    Son, N.T.; Anderson, C.P.; Bourassa, A.; A wschalom, D.D.; Ivanov, I.G. Point defects in silicon carbide for quantum technolo- gies. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 116, 190501

    2020

  26. [35]

    Silicon carbide: Synthesis and properties

    Abderrazak, H.; Hmida, E.S.B.H. Silicon carbide: Synthesis and properties. In Properties and Applications of Silicon Carbide; Ger- lach, R., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2011; pp. 361–388

    2011

  27. [36]

    Characterization of defects in n -type 6H-SiC single crystals by optical admittance spectroscopy

    Evwaraye, A.O.; Smith, S.R.; Mitchel, W.C. Characterization of defects in n -type 6H-SiC single crystals by optical admittance spectroscopy. MRS Online Proc. Libr. 1994, 339, 711

    1994

  28. [37]

    Nature of electrically detected magnetic resonance in highly nitrogen -doped 6 H-SiC single crystals

    Holiatkina, M.; Solodovnyk, A.; Laguta, O.; Neugebauer, P.; Kalabukhova, E.; Savchenko, D. Nature of electrically detected magnetic resonance in highly nitrogen -doped 6 H-SiC single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 110(12), 125205. Goldfarb, D.; Stoll, S. (Eds.) EPR Spectroscopy:...

    2024

  29. [38]

    Hyperfine interaction of the nitrogen donor in 4H-SiC

    Son, N.T.; Janzén, E.; Isoya, J.; Yamasaki, S. Hyperfine interaction of the nitrogen donor in 4H-SiC. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 193207

    2004

  30. [39]

    Electronic structure of the N donor center in 4H-SiC and 6H-SiC

    van Duijn-Arnold, A.; Zondervan, R.; Schmidt, J.; Baranov, P.G.; Mokhov, E.N. Electronic structure of the N donor center in 4H-SiC and 6H-SiC. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64, 085206

    2001

  31. [40]

    Opti- cal spin initialization of nitrogen vacancy centers in a 28Si-enriched 6H-SiC crystal for quantum technologies

    Murzakhanov, F.F.; Sadovnikova, M.A.; Mamin, G.V.; Shurtakova, D.Y.V.; Mokhov, E.N.; Kazarova, O.P.; Gafurov, M.R. Opti- cal spin initialization of nitrogen vacancy centers in a 28Si-enriched 6H-SiC crystal for quantum technologies. JETP Lett. 2024, 119, 593–598

    2024

  32. [41]

    Electric field gradient models based on the geometry of the coordination sphere

    Brill, T.B. Electric field gradient models based on the geometry of the coordination sphere. J. Mol. Struct. 1983, 111, 269–280

    1983

  33. [42]

    Beyond the Dailey–Townes model: Chemical information from the electric field gradient

    Fabbro, G.; Pototschnig, J.; Saue, T. Beyond the Dailey–Townes model: Chemical information from the electric field gradient. J. Phys. Chem. A 2025, 129, 1006–1025

    2025

  34. [43]

    EPR interactions-nuclear quadrupole couplings

    Stoll, S.; Goldfarb, D. EPR interactions-nuclear quadrupole couplings. In EPR Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Methods; Goldfarb, D., Stoll, S., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2018; p. 95

    2018

  35. [44]

    First-principles investigation of 6H-SiC dominated by strong covalent bonding: Electronic structure, mechanical properties and optical properties

    Xia, J.Y.; Liu, Z.T.; Liu, Q.J. First-principles investigation of 6H-SiC dominated by strong covalent bonding: Electronic structure, mechanical properties and optical properties. J. Mol. Model. 2025, 31, 292

    2025

  36. [45]

    High-frequency (95 GHz) EPR spectroscopy to characterize spin adducts

    Smirnova, T.I.; Smirnov, A.I.; Clarkson, R.B.; Belford, R.L.; Kotake, Y.; Janzen, E.G. High-frequency (95 GHz) EPR spectroscopy to characterize spin adducts. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 3877–3885

    1997

  37. [46]

    Nitrogen-related point defect in 4H and 6H SiC

    Zvanut, M.E.; Van Tol, J. Nitrogen-related point defect in 4H and 6H SiC. Physica B 2007, 401, 73–76

    2007

  38. [47]

    Beryllium implantation induced deep levels in 6H-silicon carbide

    Chen, X.D.; Fung, S.; Beling, C.D.; Gong, M.; Henkel, T.; Tanoue, H.; Kobayashi, N. Beryllium implantation induced deep levels in 6H-silicon carbide. Physica B 2001, 308, 718–721

    2001

  39. [48]

    Diffusion of implanted beryllium in silicon carbide studied by secondary ion mass spectrometry

    Henkel, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Kobayashi, N.; Tanoue, H.; Hishita, S. Diffusion of implanted beryllium in silicon carbide studied by secondary ion mass spectrometry. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 231–233

    2001

  40. [49]

    Silicon carbide defects and luminescence centers in current heated 6H-SiC

    Lee, S.W.; Vlaskina, S.I.; Vlaskin, V.I.; Zaharchenko, I.V.; Gubanov, V.A.; Mishinova, G.N.; Podlasov, S.A. Silicon carbide defects and luminescence centers in current heated 6H-SiC. Semicond. Phys. Quantum Electron. Optoelectron. 2010, 13, 24–29

    2010

  41. [50]

    The crystal chemistry of beryllium

    Hawthorne, F.C.; Huminicki, D.M. The crystal chemistry of beryllium. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2002, 50, 333–403

    2002

  42. [51]

    Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides

    Shannon, R.D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. A 1976, 32, 751–767. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the...

    1976

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.